JesusChristisLord
Iron
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2025
- Posts
- 96
- Reputation
- 42
Let's compile a list of all peptides that affect bones in any way, including lesser-known ones and briefly explain how they work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Neer et al., NEJM (2001)
Miller et al., NEJM (2016) (ACTIVE trial)
Chesnut et al., NEJM (1995)
Wozney, Science (1992)
Amizuka et al., NEJM-linked skeletal biology studies
Cornish et al., Bone & Mineral Research literaturenone of these would probably give what the user wants. At least most of them. Over activation of osteoblasts are in fact not beneficial.Peptides that affect bones (Clinically Proven)
1. Teriparatide (PTH 1–34)
Neer et al., NEJM (2001)
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200111013451801
“stimulates new bone formation and increases bone mineral density”
Effect:
- Strong osteoblast activation (bone formation)
- Increases bone mineral density
- Reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fractures
2. Abaloparatide (PTHrP analog)
Miller et al., NEJM (2016) (ACTIVE trial)
“increased bone mineral density and reduced the risk of vertebral fractures”
Effect:
- Stimulates PTH1 receptor signaling
- Increases bone formation more selectively than resorption
- Reduces fracture risk in osteoporosis
3. Calcitonin
Chesnut et al., NEJM (1995)
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199506013322202
“calcitonin inhibits bone resorption”
Effect:
- Inhibits osteoclasts
- Reduces bone resorption
- Modest clinical effect compared to modern therapies
4. BMP-2 / BMP-7 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)
Wozney, Science (1992)
“induction of new bone formation”
Effect:
- Directly induces mesenchymal stem cells → osteoblasts
- Can trigger ectopic bone formation in vivo
- One of the strongest known osteogenic signals
5. PTH-related peptide (PTHrP)
Amizuka et al., NEJM-linked skeletal biology studies
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199609053351004
“activation of the receptor for parathyroid hormone–related peptide regulates skeletal development”
Effect:
- Regulates growth plate cartilage development
- Essential for normal skeletal growth
- Controls bone elongation and remodeling
6. CGRP (Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide)
Cornish et al., Bone & Mineral Research literature
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8726390/
“stimulates insulin-like growth factor I production by osteoblasts”
Effect:
- Neuro-osteogenic signaling molecule
- Supports osteoblast activity
- Indirect role in bone formation via IGF-1 pathways
Short form:
- Clinically proven bone-building peptides: Teriparatide, Abaloparatide
- Anti-resorptive peptide: Calcitonin (limited potency)
- Strong developmental/experimental regulators: BMPs, PTHrP
- Neuro-regulatory support role: CGRP
Then name some.none of these would probably give what the user wants. At least most of them. Over activation of osteoblasts are in fact not beneficial.
idk if jesus would approve of this tbhLet's compile a list of all peptides that affect bones in any way, including lesser-known ones and briefly explain how they work.
what is ideal to you?none of these would probably give what the user wants. At least most of them. Over activation of osteoblasts are in fact not beneficial.
There's no ,,peptides that give you bonemass"Let's compile a list of all peptides that affect bones in any way, including lesser-known ones and briefly explain how they work.
excess osteoblasts are what close the sutures in your skull, the sutures naturally have a niche microenvironment with pro osteigenic signals at the edges and anti at the center preserving its existence. These sututures a composed of various collagen fibres and skeletal stem cells specifically Gli1+ Axin2, Gli1 is more proliferative and abundant tho. We neeed to focus on increasing proliferation of these cells rather than maximizing their differentiation into osteoblasts. The response from Adyta69 is correct but we need to understand that we need to focus on optimizng the existing growth centers (synchondrose and sutures) in our skull.Then name some.
Why wouldn't Jesus approve with it?idk if jesus would approve of this tbh
btw the answer is none
what is ideal to you?
maximize suutres patency, preferable without sacrafrcing its growth. Synchondrose is similaire to growth plate but but grows in two directions, it grows via endochronal, sutures are intramembranous. FGFR-3 inhibition would probably be effective at least for the SOS (spheno occiptal synchondrose)idk if jesus would approve of this tbh
btw the answer is none
what is ideal to you?
isnt gh and an ai already proven to add to final adult height?There's no ,,peptides that give you bonemass"
There's no proof, no studies, no research, nothing (in healthy children)
If you're genetically normal and healthy, your body is already working at it's maximum capacity (oversimplified but you get it), anything more then that comes with severe sides (acromegaly->reduced life, organ failure, constant severe pain, ogre features etc.)
you're made in gods image, who are you to try to change it?Why wouldn't Jesus approve with it?![]()
pure bullshit.There's no ,,peptides that give you bonemass"
There's no proof, no studies, no research, nothing (in healthy children)
If you're genetically normal and healthy, your body is already working at it's maximum capacity (oversimplified but you get it), anything more then that comes with severe sides (acromegaly->reduced life, organ failure, constant severe pain, ogre features etc.)
This whole thread is str8 gptLet's compile a list of all peptides that affect bones in any way, including lesser-known ones and briefly explain how they work.
isnt gh and an ai already proven to add to final adult height?
ive heard they might even add vosoritide into that list
you're made in gods image, who are you to try to change it?
do what gets you what you wantWhy wouldn't Jesus approve with it?![]()
lol you will never ever ever be able to create a visible change from the suturesmaximize suutres patency, preferable without sacrafrcing its growth. Synchondrose is similaire to growth plate but but grows in two directions, it grows via endochronal, sutures are intramembranous. FGFR-3 inhibition would probably be effective at least for the SOS (spheno occiptal synchondrose)
Not in healthy children.isnt gh and an ai already proven to add to final adult height?
No argument in sight.pure bullshit.
explain your point furtherlol you will never ever ever be able to create a visible change from the sutures
the most you can ever do during puberty is increase periosteal apposition, and i still firmly believe that creating a visible result from that is close to impossible
it is. children with ISS (idiopathic short stature) whom have normal gh despite being short grow to higher final adult heights when given HGH, not even high doses. Gigantism, causes a masive overproduction of hgh, proving that supraphysiological levels cause signifcant height gain. It is also completley viable in theory when you learn the mechanisms.Not in healthy children.
No argument in sight.
this really isnt true, it isnt working at its maximum capacity its working at a capacity that is dictated by its environment and genetic code. You can increase the bodies endogenous production of GH, IGF-1 production is even more flexible. Or u can use exo HGH.There's no ,,peptides that give you bonemass"
There's no proof, no studies, no research, nothing (in healthy children)
If you're genetically normal and healthy, your body is already working at it's maximum capacity (oversimplified but you get it), anything more then that comes with severe sides (acromegaly->reduced life, organ failure, constant severe pain, ogre features etc.)
it works better in idiopathic short stature patients but i know those arent exactly clinically equivalentNot in healthy children.
No argument in sight.
what else is there to explainexplain your point further
th theory is quite simple. Estrogen is the No1 driver of senesence through dramatically accelerated cellular life, inhibitng it stops this making the chonrocytes proliferate for much longer than thwy ould otherwise.Not in healthy children.
No argument in sight.
a child with iss isnt exactly the same, they almost always have some underlying mild issueit is. children with ISS (idiopathic short stature) whom have normal gh despite being short grow to higher final adult heights when given HGH, not even high doses. Gigantism, causes a masive overproduction of hgh, proving that supraphysiological levels cause signifcant height gain. It is also completley viable in theory when you learn the mechanisms.
I don’t think that’s a particularly convincing argument. If you take it to its logical conclusion, you shouldn’t cut your hair, trim your nails, or wear glasses either. Besides, God has also given me the ability to make decisions about my body and make the most of what I’ve been given. I received that foundation from Him—that’s true. As long as I don’t cause my body any significant harm and inform myself about potential risks, I don’t see this as a major problem. The body changes anyway, especially during puberty. Many of these changes can be influenced. Why should it be wrong to shape this development in a conscious and positive way?isnt gh and an ai already proven to add to final adult height?
ive heard they might even add vosoritide into that list
you're made in gods image, who are you to try to change it?
yeah thats true. But the studies do seem to show 1-3 inch height gain on not a particaly high dose protocol. The variation may be caused by receptor sensitivity.the best equivalent is familial short stature, which it does work in but not as well as it does with idiopathic short stature, as expected
1. ISS are not normal childrenit is. children with ISS (idiopathic short stature) whom have normal gh despite being short grow to higher final adult heights when given HGH, not even high doses. Gigantism, causes a masive overproduction of hgh, proving that supraphysiological levels cause signifcant height gain. It is also completley viable in theory when you learn the mechanisms.
Correct. Finally someone understands.it works better in idiopathic short stature patients but i know those arent exactly clinically equivalent
This is true, but we have studies in normal children dictating it (HGH) doesn't work, FSS have barely any studies, even in the studies they rarely conduct it isn't a ,,testing group" on it's own, it's grouped, which we can't use as definitive proof of HGH workingthe best equivalent is familial short stature, which it does work in but not as well as it does with idiopathic short stature, as expected
or he doesnt existI don’t think that’s a particularly convincing argument. If you take it to its logical conclusion, you shouldn’t cut your hair, trim your nails, or wear glasses either. Besides, God has also given me the ability to make decisions about my body and make the most of what I’ve been given. I received that foundation from Him—that’s true. As long as I don’t cause my body any significant harm and inform myself about potential risks, I don’t see this as a major problem. The body changes anyway, especially during puberty. Many of these changes can be influenced. Why should it be wrong to shape this development in a conscious and positive way?
maintenance isnt the same as enhancementI don’t think that’s a particularly convincing argument. If you take it to its logical conclusion, you shouldn’t cut your hair, trim your nails, or wear glasses either. Besides, God has also given me the ability to make decisions about my body and make the most of what I’ve been given. I received that foundation from Him—that’s true. As long as I don’t cause my body any significant harm and inform myself about potential risks, I don’t see this as a major problem. The body changes anyway, especially during puberty. Many of these changes can be influenced. Why should it be wrong to shape this development in a conscious and positive way?
yea fss barely has any studies1. ISS are not normal children
Do you even know what IDIOPATHIC means?
2. You can't use a tumor driven disease state to prove HGH works in a safe way, heck you can't even prove it works in high dose
Eating enough apples will kill you, is that proof apples are poisonous? See how stupid it sounds?
Correct. Finally someone understands.
This is true, but we have studies in normal children dictating it (HGH) doesn't work, FSS have barely any studies, even in the studies they rarely conduct it isn't a ,,testing group" on it's own, it's grouped, which we can't use as definitive proof of HGH working?
Sports, nutrition, skin care, braces, or glasses don't just help maintain the body—they actively improve it or its functions.maintenance isnt the same as enhancement
nigga used ai for this are we serious
conveniently leaving out trimming hair and cutting nails but alrSports, nutrition, skin care, braces, or glasses don't just help maintain the body—they actively improve it or its functions.![]()
Dude, how do you know that? Maybe I'm just using a translator, you smartass. Anyone who doesn't use ai is a caveman.maintenance isnt the same as enhancement
nigga used ai for this are we serious

translators dont use em dashes, and if you need to use ai to speak to niggaz on org its overDude, how do you know that? Maybe I'm just using a translator, you smartass. Anyone who doesn't use ai is a caveman.![]()
Dietary supplements are also exogenous substances.conveniently leaving out trimming hair and cutting nails but alr
all of these improve function within physiological limits, unlike exogenous compounds
which can only improve function within exogenous limitsDietary supplements are also exogenous substances.
Okay, you have a point.translators dont use em dashes, and if you need to use ai to speak to niggaz on org its over
its completely finished in that case
in fact im currently using it to aid me in my assignments
Brother, at the end of the day, you can interpret things however you want, but you won't find anything concrete on the subject. It's a matter of your beliefs.which can only improve function within exogenous limits
and you can also just get the same thing but eating wherever they come from naturally
deepl doestranslators dont use em dashes,
good response il make a thread evaulating whether hgh is nay or yay1. ISS are not normal children
Do you even know what IDIOPATHIC means?
2. You can't use a tumor driven disease state to prove HGH works in a safe way, heck you can't even prove it works in high dose
Eating enough apples will kill you, is that proof apples are poisonous? See how stupid it sounds?
Correct. Finally someone understands.
This is true, but we have studies in normal children dictating it (HGH) doesn't work, FSS have barely any studies, even in the studies they rarely conduct it isn't a ,,testing group" on it's own, it's grouped, which we can't use as definitive proof of HGH working
ghk cuLet's compile a list of all peptides that affect bones in any way, including lesser-known ones and briefly explain how they work.
leave the forum you idiot omfgThere's no ,,peptides that give you bonemass"
There's no proof, no studies, no research, nothing (in healthy children)
If you're genetically normal and healthy, your body is already working at it's maximum capacity (oversimplified but you get it), anything more then that comes with severe sides (acromegaly->reduced life, organ failure, constant severe pain, ogre features etc.)