Londonville vs me

Who mogs and who is more asian

  • Londonville

  • Haven


Results are only viewable after voting.
Rigth you have brachycephaly which is as worse
Brachy is a chad trait Indir 1
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10615
brachy pride worldwide


being brachy is a blessing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9670 and Deleted member 14848
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10615
damn almost 4 pages in an hour
mirin
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Haven
  • +1
Reactions: StrangerDanger
that is a cope thread


being brachy is good and looks more masc


all the high t looking phenotypes are brachy
 
that is a cope thread


being brachy is good and looks more masc


all the high t looking phenotypes are brachy
You are probably judging brachy by the facial width frm the front and not the sagittal dimension. Having a short skull length sagitally = bad trait
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 9670, Deleted member 14848 and 1 other person
You are probably judging brachy by the facial width frm the front and not the sagittal dimension. Having a short skull length sagitally = bad trait
Even nordic looks better when brachy how you cope 20210829 150404 ?
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 10615 and StrangerDanger
Even nordic looks better when brachy how you copeView attachment 1292250?
You didnt even read thecels thread

I know some people will copefully claim brachycephy to be a Chad trait, and if that's you, you really should keep reading.

Brachycephaly is not just a wide head. Many uneducated looksmaxxers believe brachycephaly equals wide, and wide head means wider FWHR, therefore Chad.

Do you know what the prefix "brachy-" means? It actually means short. Brachycephalic skulls are wider, but their defining trait is short front-back (or sagittal) length.

Since brachycephalic people have short head length, their anterior craniums—where the maxilla is attached to the bottom of—are also shorter in sagittal length. So what's the consequence of this? The consequence is there's less room for forward growth of the maxilla and mandible. Think about it: if one's forehead isn't very far in front of their ears, how much forward maxillary growth can "fit" in the space under their anterior cranium? Not much.

If you still think, "cope, those brachy guys are recessed and just need forward growth," first of all you're kind of right. The brachycephalic guys in the pictures above do not have good forward growth. However, their lack of skull length makes it so their skulls cannot support the classic "forward-grown look." Normal maxillas are not supposed to project far in front of the forehead.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
You are probably judging brachy by the facial width frm the front and not the sagittal dimension. Having a short skull length sagitally = bad trait
bro enough ok just enough of the autism that doesn't make sense


thecel used the most one sided pictures of brachys to prove his point


look at op this guy is extreme brachy but look how good his forward growth is


stop coping mate, who cares if you can't have the ' classic forward grown look' that is just psl autism


the ideal is meso skull but brachy isn't bad like the autists here say
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
You didnt even read thecels thread

I know some people will copefully claim brachycephy to be a Chad trait, and if that's you, you really should keep reading.

Brachycephaly is not just a wide head. Many uneducated looksmaxxers believe brachycephaly equals wide, and wide head means wider FWHR, therefore Chad.

Do you know what the prefix "brachy-" means? It actually means short. Brachycephalic skulls are wider, but their defining trait is short front-back (or sagittal) length.

Since brachycephalic people have short head length, their anterior craniums—where the maxilla is attached to the bottom of—are also shorter in sagittal length. So what's the consequence of this? The consequence is there's less room for forward growth of the maxilla and mandible. Think about it: if one's forehead isn't very far in front of their ears, how much forward maxillary growth can "fit" in the space under their anterior cranium? Not much.

If you still think, "cope, those brachy guys are recessed and just need forward growth," first of all you're kind of right. The brachycephalic guys in the pictures above do not have good forward growth. However, their lack of skull length makes it so their skulls cannot support the classic "forward-grown look." Normal maxillas are not supposed to project far in front of the forehead.

The most high psl guy according to this site is a brachy Indir 12 hernan drago is brachy barret is brachy
 
bro enough ok just enough of the autism that doesn't make sense


thecel used the most one sided pictures of brachys to prove his point


look at op this guy is extreme brachy but look how good his forward growth is


stop coping mate, who cares if you can't have the ' classic forward grown look' that is just psl autism


the ideal is meso skull but brachy isn't bad like the autists here say
Hernan drago is brachy he is the best looking guy according to this site
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10615
You didnt even read thecels thread

I know some people will copefully claim brachycephy to be a Chad trait, and if that's you, you really should keep reading.

Brachycephaly is not just a wide head. Many uneducated looksmaxxers believe brachycephaly equals wide, and wide head means wider FWHR, therefore Chad.

Do you know what the prefix "brachy-" means? It actually means short. Brachycephalic skulls are wider, but their defining trait is short front-back (or sagittal) length.

Since brachycephalic people have short head length, their anterior craniums—where the maxilla is attached to the bottom of—are also shorter in sagittal length. So what's the consequence of this? The consequence is there's less room for forward growth of the maxilla and mandible. Think about it: if one's forehead isn't very far in front of their ears, how much forward maxillary growth can "fit" in the space under their anterior cranium? Not much.

If you still think, "cope, those brachy guys are recessed and just need forward growth," first of all you're kind of right. The brachycephalic guys in the pictures above do not have good forward growth. However, their lack of skull length makes it so their skulls cannot support the classic "forward-grown look." Normal maxillas are not supposed to project far in front of the forehead.
Forward grown is not about skull you rwtard its about pheno
 
Forward grown is not about skull you rwtard its about pheno
yeah you're fucking retarded and thats not even my post
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03
Hernan drago is brachy he is the best looking guy according to this site
he is extremley good looking but looks like a evil robot
 
  • +1
Reactions: Haven
yeah you're fucking retarded and thats not even my post
Forward grown is not about skull alpinids dont haves forward growns but turanids have very good forward growns mostly
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14848 and Haven
brachy gang just keeps on winning


we have the second tallest ethnic group under our belt, our men have the most robust frames, we are more adapt to combat and have bigger dicks


how will dolio gang cope?
Tallest group is dinarids and they are brachy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10615
Keep coping jhonny deep is brachy too leo is brachy too:lul::lul::lul::lul:
a potruding occupult is the most disgusting looking trait

it is even worse looking then a recessed jaw or being fat
 
  • +1
Reactions: Haven
its ovah haven
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5786
brachy gang just keeps on winning


we have the second tallest ethnic group under our belt, our men have the most robust frames, we are more adapt to combat and have bigger dicks


how will dolio gang cope?
Cephalic index has a huge environmental factor and is not really being used in modern anthropology for classification.
20210829 142400

If it's a chad trait why does it occur in degenarated individiuals?
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and StrangerDanger
Cephalic index has a huge environmental factor and is not really being used in modern anthropology for classification.
View attachment 1292265
If it's a chad trait why does it occur in degenarated individiuals?
Stop cherry picking :forcedsmile:most of the famous and handsome actors are brachy
 
Cephalic index has a huge environmental factor and is not really being used in modern anthropology for classification.
View attachment 1292265
If it's a chad trait why does it occur in degenarated individiuals?
Theres no point in arguing with him
he knows jack shit about looks
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 14848 and Haven
yeah bro spot on
Wrong tallest group are massai and they are dolicho.
Dinarids cephalic indexes changed with increased heigth and most are meso nowadays
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StrangerDanger and Haven

Similar threads

manletmogger
Replies
55
Views
802
manletmogger
manletmogger
albikuma
Replies
26
Views
878
albikuma
albikuma
RealFunkyFlamingo
Replies
8
Views
547
kyrre
kyrre
RealFunkyFlamingo
Replies
14
Views
484
Piratecel
Piratecel
E
Replies
85
Views
2K
luria
luria

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top