william.
Luminary
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2025
- Posts
- 5,220
- Reputation
- 6,233
s tier argument
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
In the eyes of the Lord yes, but among our fellow man? Fuh naw“muh we’re all equal!”
That it's just not an argument in any way shape or form.What would the counter argument be? I can’t think of one myself
Religion began when the first conman met the first fooli used to cope and make excuses thinking that maybe god had a plan. i didn’t realise how much i was deluding myself until i saw all the injustice and suffering around me
Not sure why some people say that copei used to cope and make excuses thinking that maybe god had a plan. i didn’t realise how much i was deluding myself until i saw all the injustice and suffering around me
what religion are uNot sure why some people say that copeGod wont help you on this earth, atleast not in the way you want him to
never seen any nutritious philosopher use lookism as a argument thoProblem of evil overall is the most powerful atheist argument
Christian but I dont pray or attend masswhat religion are u
going to hell so it doesnt matterBecause it’s not that powerful on its own. You can justify human suffering as a theist by some form of poetic evil which is somewhat understandable.never seen any nutritious philosopher use lookism as a argument tho
Evil against animals? Like testing shampoo on animals and random drugs?Because it’s not that powerful on its own. You can justify human suffering as a theist by some form of poetic evil which is somewhat understandable.
What isn’t justifiable under all but sceptical theist slop is evil against animals. They do not experience this poetic evil and suffer far too much and unnecessarily, much worse than lookism. It’s the natural mechanism of life itself
No. Like larvae eating animals from the inside out and using their corpse as a shield from predators, zebras having their windpipes seize with a lion’s jaws wrapped around it for nearly half an hour as they slowly die, and so on. All of which could be resolved by the simplest of means which any human can think of… yet God couldn’t, or worse, didn’t care forEvil against animals? Like testing shampoo on animals and random drugs?
Animals dont have souls like people do, they were given life but they werent made in the image of God. So if man can suffer why cant they?No. Like larvae eating animals from the inside out and using their corpse as a shield from predators, zebras having their windpipes seize over nearly half an hour as they slowly die, and so on. All of which could be resolved by the simplest of means which any humans can think of… yet God couldn’t, or worse, didn’t care for
Why need they is the question you must answer. Animals not having souls is the reason this is so strange. What is the reason for them suffering? Why must God make it the mechanism? Why must larvae eat the animals from the inside out?Animals dont have souls like people do, they were given life but they werent made in the image of God. So if man can suffer why cant they?
alex O'conner ahh, but i agree. Its just that so and say no one uses lookism as an argumentBecause it’s not that powerful on its own. You can justify human suffering as a theist by some form of poetic evil which is somewhat understandable.
What isn’t justifiable under all but sceptical theist slop is evil against animals. They do not experience this poetic evil and suffer far too much and unnecessarily, much worse than lookism. It’s the natural mechanism of life itself
Youre looking for a reason for something that just is, animals dont need to suffer they just doWhy need they is the question you must answer. Animals not having souls is the reason this is so strange. What is the reason for them suffering? Why must God make it the mechanism? Why must larvae eat the animals from the inside out?
Simply put, it’s what happens when a chemical accident creates biology and not an all-loving God making the world out of boredom.
I prefer determinismProblem of evil overall is the most powerful atheist argument
no its not lollol at the existence of evil argument already debunked
That “just is” is the reason God is so unlikely to exist. You’re backed into the corner of sceptical theism, “oh I don’t know, it’s just how it is and God just did it I don’t know, he knows not me”, it’s pathetic and shows a lack of sincerity.Youre looking for a reason for something that just is, animals dont need to suffer they just do
Humans are animals btwAnimals dont have souls like people do, they were given life but they werent made in the image of God. So if man can suffer why cant they?
No evil = no choice = no testno its not lol
Youre trying to find human reason from a being above us, there is none, or there might be one and we just werent told why this isThat “just is” is the reason God is so unlikely to exist. You’re backed into the corner of sceptical theism, “oh I don’t know, it’s just how it is and God just did it I don’t know, he knows not me”, it’s pathetic and shows a lack of sincerity.
Sure, but animals dont have moralsHumans are animals btw
Fellow Oxford Chad. This argument overall is very powerful, I’ve saw him list the problem of evil as one of his favourites, but I think it’s more damning than he doesalex O'conner ahh, but i agree. Its just that so and say no one uses lookism as an argument
there is tons of evil which is not chosen and lookism is by your belief only caused by godNo evil = no choice = no test
Morality is a useless tool made by genetic betasSure, but animals dont have morals
That’s called delusion. You believe in something with no evidence and then have the brass neck to claim “there is a reason I just wasn’t told it”, well no shit because some caveman thousands of years ago made it up and didn’t think you’d all still believe it this far in the futureYoure trying to find human reason from a being above us, there is none, or there might be one and we just werent told why this is
some animals literally do thoSure, but animals dont have morals
Morals are overratedsome animals literally do tho
Loyalty to man or other animals wouldn't be moralssome animals literally do tho
There is no free will so there is no choiceNo evil = no choice = no test
Theism is very broad, most of the range comes from Christianity because of how vague and polar the teachings can be book to bookI prefer determinism
Theists despise determinism
So you do whatever you want when you want?Morality is a useless tool made by genetic betas
well we can assume that its our fault as humans for judging other because of looksYeah pretty interesting argument I agree
I personally believe in God but I’ve seen some debates regarding this topic and it’s tough to have a counter argument for it
What would the counter argument be? I can’t think of one myself
Yes exactly?So you do whatever you want when you want?
Depends if God mogs or not. If he doesn't mog then he's saying it doesn't matter.s tier argument
That’s like blaming humans for seeing colours. It’s outside of the human will to choose how our brains evolved over millions of yearswell we can assume that its our fault as humans for judging other because of looks
yeah fair, im not into theology or these types of argumentsThat’s like blaming humans for seeing colours. It’s outside of the human will to choose how our brains evolved over millions of years
That we are all flawed and that brings us together, we need eachother.Yeah pretty interesting argument I agree
I personally believe in God but I’ve seen some debates regarding this topic and it’s tough to have a counter argument for it
What would the counter argument be? I can’t think of one myself
there was no reason for him to create a test he knew we would fail then another test he knew we would failNot sure why some people say that copeGod wont help you on this earth, atleast not in the way you want him to
It might be delusion, Im not saying that God is 100% real im just choosing to believe he isThat’s called delusion. You believe in something with no evidence and then have the brass neck to claim “there is a reason I just wasn’t told it”, well no shit because some caveman thousands of years ago made it up and didn’t think you’d all still believe it this far in the future
Eve wouldve never ate that apple if it wasnt for satan, we wouldve been fine if it werent for himthere was no reason for him to create a test he knew we would fail then another test he knew we would fail
which the so called free will is ingenuine anyway because if god is all-knowing no other alternative could have ever been possible
I would if there was no lawSo you do whatever you want when you want?