M
muttchad323
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
- Posts
- 93
- Reputation
- 108
Think about it. If looks were truly as objective as people on here made it out to be then there would be a definitive hierarchy on who is placed where.
In my time as I browse through the forum, I see multiple people criticise the same person and multiple people say the same person is the best looking ever. If looks are truly objective then why cant you guys reach a conclusion for everyone.
For example, many people say this British model is overrated:
And many people say he is the Best looking man ever. I have seen the same sentiment on other websites too with multiple people including famous models and actors. My personal opinion is that he looks very good but he is far too overrated.
Some weird looking people according to some who people on here say are the most incredible looking people:
Not saying they can't get girls. Many people can get girls, doesn't mean they are the best looking people ever.
Looks are basically not subjective at all and this forum which tries to rank looks is proof of it. Everyone argues about who's good looking and who isn't but if it is so objective then it shouldn't be that hard. For example, height is objective. Nobody is going to argue that Tyson Fury is taller than Shaquille O Neal. But you'll always have people arguing about who's eyes are better looking or things like that.
Learn to admit there's a very broad and general hierarchy of looks as in deformed, very ugly, ugly, below average, average, above average, good looking and very good looking. But don't be surprised if girls would pick someone in a category below from someone in the category above the to some other factor like personality. You literally can't place people on a number scale because it makes no sense for girls for then majorly prefer someone less goos looking over someone who is good looking.
Here is an example hierarchy for black people in my opinion.
Deformed
Very ugly
Ugly
Below Average
Average
Above Average
Good looking
Very Good Looking
Maybe Best looking?
I do not claim this is definitive, I.e., someone one category below the other could be considered better looking by some but I doubt someone two categories below someone would be argued as better looking by anyone.
That's my take on things.
Tldr; looks aren't as objective as objective as made out to be there's a broad category of who's better looking than who but it's very general and can be argued.
In my time as I browse through the forum, I see multiple people criticise the same person and multiple people say the same person is the best looking ever. If looks are truly objective then why cant you guys reach a conclusion for everyone.
For example, many people say this British model is overrated:
And many people say he is the Best looking man ever. I have seen the same sentiment on other websites too with multiple people including famous models and actors. My personal opinion is that he looks very good but he is far too overrated.
Some weird looking people according to some who people on here say are the most incredible looking people:
Not saying they can't get girls. Many people can get girls, doesn't mean they are the best looking people ever.
Looks are basically not subjective at all and this forum which tries to rank looks is proof of it. Everyone argues about who's good looking and who isn't but if it is so objective then it shouldn't be that hard. For example, height is objective. Nobody is going to argue that Tyson Fury is taller than Shaquille O Neal. But you'll always have people arguing about who's eyes are better looking or things like that.
Learn to admit there's a very broad and general hierarchy of looks as in deformed, very ugly, ugly, below average, average, above average, good looking and very good looking. But don't be surprised if girls would pick someone in a category below from someone in the category above the to some other factor like personality. You literally can't place people on a number scale because it makes no sense for girls for then majorly prefer someone less goos looking over someone who is good looking.
Here is an example hierarchy for black people in my opinion.
Deformed
Very ugly
Ugly
Below Average
Average
Above Average
Good looking
Very Good Looking
Maybe Best looking?
I do not claim this is definitive, I.e., someone one category below the other could be considered better looking by some but I doubt someone two categories below someone would be argued as better looking by anyone.
That's my take on things.
Tldr; looks aren't as objective as objective as made out to be there's a broad category of who's better looking than who but it's very general and can be argued.
