LOOKSMAXXER’S STUDY REVEALS shocking differences between what women, normie men, and PSL users find attractive in men

oh wait nvm i just saw the google forms imgur.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
needs bigger sample sizes and more robust surveying technique imo. good study though, the results are interesting but probably not reliable
 
  • +1
Reactions: LusterToLow and thecel
what was the sample size for normies, girls, and PSL autists, respectively?

Total Responses: 92 (87 used in the charts)
  • 14 women
  • 19 normie guys
  • 54 PSL autists
    • 10 unregistered
    • 44 registered
  • 5 respondents excluded from analysis for gender
    • 1 "non-binary"
    • 1 "agender"
    • 2 picked "prefer not to say"
    • 1 "raichu"
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17429, GorLee, Danish_Retard and 3 others
@thecel check DMs plz
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Good job
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Hollywood actors are the optimal slayers
 
  • +1
Reactions: sandcelmuttcel and thecel
1616342680540

Reminder that looksmax Zayn is always their preference
 
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel
HAHAHAHAHA best thread ever made. In internet history. A complete wreckage of over a decade of sheer autism and worship of eccentric bruxism creeper Mike Mew.
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: SoberAndRetarded, Richard_Hungwell and thecel
Jfl at asking normie guys whos opinions are based off of normie foids who dont exactly know what the fuck they want. They are so virtuesignal pilled that they will even lie on a test
Yeah but men here do know obv which is why normie men are not incel while almost everyone here is a struggling permavirgin.

Just lol crown this masterpiece. Autism owned yet again. When will they learn?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
Btw women "not knowing what they want" is the same thing used by PUAs to make people believe in their fairytale non-existent concept known as "game"... Yeah bro women are just lying they secretly want you to neg them.

NO IDIOT. THEY DO like nice men they just don't like YOU because you're UGLY. They like the asshole because he's NOT UGLY. Not because he's an asshole who negs them.

Two sides of the same autistic coin.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: zeshama, chawaje, TsarTsar444 and 10 others
Btw women "not knowing what they want" is the same thing used by PUAs to make people believe in their fairytale non-existent concept known as "game"... Yeah bro women are just lying they secretly want you to neg them.

NO IDIOT. THEY DO like nice men they just don't like YOU because you're UGLY. They like the asshole because he's NOT UGLY. Not because he's an asshole who negs them.

Two sides of the same autistic coin.
Bro this is looksm.ax not incels.is, even though there are some incels here (i mean there has to be some crossover). As far as i can see, people come here, take the info and stay here till they “ascend” (like 1-2y years) and then just disappear, but if they didn’t know how to talk to women, they still didn’t “get it”. So what was your point anyway? That looks theory and pua are true? Or both are false? Or both are true, but both teams don’t get laid? Either I’m still in a haze from just having woken up or you’re a foid, because you made that shit super complicated.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Bro this is looksm.ax not incels.is, even though there are some incels here (i mean there has to be some crossover). As far as i can see, people come here, take the info and stay here till they “ascend” (like 1-2y years) and then just disappear, but if they didn’t know how to talk to women, they still didn’t “get it”. So what was your point anyway? That looks theory and pua are true? Or both are false? Or both are true, but both teams don’t get laid? Either I’m still in a haze from just having woken up or you’re a foid, because you made that shit super complicated.
Only looks matter. Being weird turns women off but game doesn't cause attraction.

PUA is autistic bullshit.

And looks theory board posters have no idea what looks good to women at all due to autism.

...Basically whenever autism is involved, failure and incorrectness is guaranteed.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Danish_Retard, Richard_Hungwell, chigoha and 4 others
Btw women "not knowing what they want" is the same thing used by PUAs to make people believe in their fairytale non-existent concept known as "game"... Yeah bro women are just lying they secretly want you to neg them.

NO IDIOT. THEY DO like nice men they just don't like YOU because you're UGLY. They like the asshole because he's NOT UGLY. Not because he's an asshole who negs them.

Two sides of the same autistic coin.

Women not knowing what they’re attracted to is just like normies not knowing the importance of a forward-grown maxilla.

Before I learned PSL looks theory, I didn’t even know what a maxilla was. If you showed me a picture of an attractive person then, I wouldn’t know that their maxilla makes them good-looking. If you asked me to identify the feature that contributes to their facial aesthetics the most, I’d give a wrong answer.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deprived, Danish_Retard, Richard_Hungwell and 2 others
Women not knowing what they’re attracted to is just like normies not knowing the importance of a forward-grown maxilla.

Before I was educated on looks theory, I didn’t even know what a maxilla was. If you showed me a picture of an attractive person then, I wouldn’t know that their maxilla makes them good-looking. If you asked me to identify the feature that contributes to their facial aesthetics the most, I’d give a wrong answer.
You haven't been educated. The last person I know who got "educated" literally just got a box osteotomy and I am not kidding. His username was IncelExecutioner.

I don't want to give my opinion on what has happened.

There is a reason the list of people who were not desirable then became so is such a short one. And most of those people started with actual serious issues where for example a doctor would willingly perform LeFort and not have to be strong-armed into it against their advice.

I can walk into any bar and I can tell you immediately what type of girl will go with what guy there. I also know exactly what type will go for me on any given night. Your eyes are a much more valuable tool. This is why normal men align more with women, because they have natural instinct and also from years of real world interaction knowing what sort of men get attention.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and oldcelloser
Only looks matter. Being weird turns women off but game doesn't cause attraction.

PUA is autistic bullshit.

And looks theory board posters have no idea what looks good to women at all due to autism.

...Basically whenever autism is involved, failure and incorrectness is guaranteed.
Do you also think Daniel Kahneman is autistic? My point is everything matters and all autists (they’re not really autistic, just analytical people who maybe didn’t get laid because they were in their head too much but tbh I have onlh seen these same people get laid more than naturals regularly once they got out of their head and cracked the code so to speak) are doin g is using science and anthropology to decipher attraction. I never make anything my religion. There’s a time for redpill, pua, new age pua (purplepill) all wrapped in a nice blackpilled format with a sweet bluepill ribbon on top. Be like water my friend. And with all the real world experinece, you came to the conclusion that only looks matter? What do you think @Jamesothy? Does this boy know what he’s talking about? Nevertheless I respect your opinion because I don’t know what the fuck you’ve been through / seen even though i disagree with it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12002 and thecel
Do you also think Daniel Kahneman is autistic? My point is everything matters and all autists (they’re not really autistic, just analytical people who maybe didn’t get laid because they were in their head too much but tbh I have onlh seen these same people get laid more than naturals regularly once they got out of their head and cracked the code so to speak) are doin g is using science and anthropology to decipher attraction. I never make anything my religion. There’s a time for redpill, pua, new age pua (purplepill) all wrapped in a nice blackpilled format with a sweet bluepill ribbon on top. Be like water my friend. And with all the real world experinece, you came to the conclusion that only looks matter? What do you think @Jamesothy? Does this boy know what he’s talking about? Nevertheless I respect your opinion because I don’t know what the fuck you’ve been through / seen even though i disagree with it.
I certainly don't agree that only looks matter. But he's right that a lot of people on sites like this don't know what looks good to women.

The word "autism" is overused on this site as well.

To me, "game" just means knowing how to smoothly escalate without getting snagged, usually when trying to have a one night stand. He's right that it doesn't attract women itself, but it's not the same thing as "personality" or character. Game is just a prerequisite to having sex. Passing sh*t tests and knowing what to do in certain situations. Usually the more sl*tty a woman is the higher level your game needs to be. Well, a certain kind of slutty.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chawaje, Danish_Retard, Richard_Hungwell and 2 others
Do you also think Daniel Kahneman is autistic? My point is everything matters and all autists (they’re not really autistic, just analytical people who maybe didn’t get laid because they were in their head too much but tbh I have onlh seen these same people get laid more than naturals regularly once they got out of their head and cracked the code so to speak) are doin g is using science and anthropology to decipher attraction. I never make anything my religion. There’s a time for redpill, pua, new age pua (purplepill) all wrapped in a nice blackpilled format with a sweet bluepill ribbon on top. Be like water my friend. And with all the real world experinece, you came to the conclusion that only looks matter? What do you think @Jamesothy? Does this boy know what he’s talking about? Nevertheless I respect your opinion because I don’t know what the fuck you’ve been through / seen even though i disagree with it.
Yes that is my conclusion. Personality is not something which attracts, rather, repels.

Image which is also largely genetic is more important than beauty btw. E.g. a 6'5 ug dude who looks cool à la JMULV is better off than a guy who looks decent but like a Reddit poster or w.e.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
I certainly don't agree that only looks matter. But he's right that a lot of people on sites like this don't know what looks good to women.

The word "autism" is overused on this site as well.

To me, "game" just means knowing how to smoothly escalate without getting snagged, usually when trying to have a one night stand. He's right that it doesn't attract women itself, but it's not the same thing as "personality" or character. Game is just a prerequisite to having sex. Passing sh*t tests and knowing what to do in certain situations. Usually the more sl*tty a woman is the higher level your game needs to be. Well, a certain kind of slutty.
I don't believe there is such a thing as shit tests. It's literally just flirting most of the time or like uhhh... For example the girl is insecure and acting like she's too good blah, but PUAs have zero social experience so don't understand this.

You only need to be normal and show attraction/escalate. This requires no knowledge apart from basic stuff you will have learned naturally during your time at school. The only way you can go wrong is by being awkward or creepy.

This is the big thing. Nobody gets this. It is why handsome autists are convinced they need surgery and why ugly nice men think they need to neg and act like cunts. The uglies miss that it's looks, the handsome tists miss that it's personality. LOL.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
I certainly don't agree that only looks matter. But he's right that a lot of people on sites like this don't know what looks good to women.

The word "autism" is overused on this site as well.

To me, "game" just means knowing how to smoothly escalate without getting snagged, usually when trying to have a one night stand. He's right that it doesn't attract women itself, but it's not the same thing as "personality" or character. Game is just a prerequisite to having sex. Passing sh*t tests and knowing what to do in certain situations. Usually the more sl*tty a woman is the higher level your game needs to be. Well, a certain kind of slutty.
I agree and love the nuance you brought between game and character. To me at a certain point my character or personality became my game, because socialising became second nature and just part of me and sex at the end of the night was just the cherry on top. That was nice and fulfilling tbh. But I also realized that what I earlier used to do ie core game ie jmulv (@CeeJay im glad you know about him, but I’m confused why you still think game doesnt matter, anyway). Jn the end, formulaic pickup leads to more sex but then it just becomes your life (probably could do that in your early 20s) and towards my later 20s I’ve gravitated more towards the redpill as well as covering some lost blackpill ground.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, thecel and Deleted member 12002
I don't believe there is such a thing as shit tests. It's literally just flirting most of the time or like uhhh... For example the girl is insecure and acting like she's too good blah, but PUAs have zero social experience so don't understand this.

You only need to be normal and show attraction/escalate. This requires no knowledge apart from basic stuff you will have learned naturally during your time at school. The only way you can go wrong is by being awkward or creepy.

This is the big thing. Nobody gets this. It is why handsome autists are convinced they need surgery and why ugly nice men think they need to neg and act like cunts. The uglies miss that it's looks, the handsome tists miss that it's personality. LOL.
Yeah, you sound like a blind man who's only felt the trunk of an elephant and thinks he knows what the whole beast looks like. Wait till you get older and start dealing with more experienced women.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 7419 and AsGoodAsItGets
Yeah, you sound like a blind man who's only felt the trunk of an elephant and thinks he knows what the whole beast looks like. Wait till you get older and start dealing with more experienced women.
I'm 28. I've slept with shit tonnes of women I don't even remember most of them. I don't need fuck all pointers let me assure you of that.

The very moment I walk into a bar I can tell you who is incel and who is not. JMULV is a facially ugly man. I would know instantaneously he is not incel because he looks physically like a popular douchebag. Like he'd own a strip club or some shit. Compare to the beta incel looking men in crowds at PUA seminars... In fact there's a guy at my gym similar. I've never spoken to him or heard him speak. I could bet any money based on looks alone that he is not incel.

This is very easy. Game isn't a real thing. If you want to have "elite game" drop some MDMA at a rave. There... You're the king for a night... Ironic since it's the opposite of typical PUA advice in that it makes you more friendly etc. What it does is make the women who are into you enough physically (AKA you don't put them off with your looks) become obsessive and more forward because the rapport is married couple tier strong.

I am of the opinion that no man of an attractiveness level physically (which includes image) of 6+ in real terms not spastic forum ratez is ever really getting rejected on looks. Barring racist chicks or like short men.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
Background: PSL Research Study
Earlier this week, I posted the following thread to get people to participate in my male aesthetics survey:


Here's the survey, which is now closed:




RESULTS

The survey accumulated 92 responses.





Analysis of Attractiveness Ratings

This section compares womens', normie males' and PSL males' answers. A normie male is defined as a man who is (1) not registered on a looksmaxxing site and (2) has not spent time on one. If a male respondent isn't classified as a normie, he's considered a PSL user.

Question 1: Which face is the most attractive? (6 options)

View attachment 1040743



Results:

View attachment 1040744

The normie guys' answers as a whole are almost identical to the females'. The PSL users are coping hard with their wide FWHR and wide skull ideals.

Question 2: Which man is the most attractive to women? (3 options)

View attachment 1040749



Results:

View attachment 1040750

The distribution of what the normie guys thought women found attractive is similar to what woman actually find attractive. On the other hand, PSL users are coping yet again, thinking women find a masculinized version of Nyle DiMarco to be the most attractive.

Question 3: Which side profile is the most attractive? (8 options)

View attachment 1040752



Results:

View attachment 1040753

This time, normies and PSL users find different kinds of side profiles attractive, and women prefer profiles in between the males' preferences. Normie men seem to think flat, recessed, and feminine morphs of Simon Nessman's profile are fairly attractive. PSL users tend to prefer more forward-grown side profiles.

Question 4: Which man has the most attractive EYES? (4 options)

View attachment 1040755




Results:

View attachment 1040758

When it comes to eye area, normie guys have it completely messed up. I was surprised to see that they thought the prey eyes were the most attractive. Although PSL users are similar to females in that they prefer hunter eyes, PSLers prefer the extremely hunter eyes to the moderately hunter eyes that women like the most.

Question 5: Which Ryan Gosling is the most attractive? (2 options)

View attachment 1040760




Results:

View attachment 1040761

Normie guys found the original Ryan Gosling the most attractive, and so did most women. About 40% of women preferred the compact midface morph, but only a few normie guys did. A little blackpill knowledge can get your taste in male aesthetics to be closer to womens'—but PSL users have gone too far and thought the compact morph was more attractive than women really found it to be.

Question 6: Which man is the most attractive? (2 options)

View attachment 1040765



Results:

View attachment 1040766


All 3 groups were very close on this question. It may be because Ryan Gosling has a long midface and this guy doesn't, and also might be because Ryan Gosling is a celebrity who women already find sexy.

I want to know which troll picked the last dude on question 3
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
the average person lives in delusion what a shocker
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7419 and thecel
Lol
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
I'm 28. I've slept with shit tonnes of women I don't even remember most of them. I don't need fuck all pointers let me assure you of that.

The very moment I walk into a bar I can tell you who is incel and who is not. JMULV is a facially ugly man. I would know instantaneously he is not incel because he looks physically like a popular douchebag. Like he'd own a strip club or some shit. Compare to the beta incel looking men in crowds at PUA seminars... In fact there's a guy at my gym similar. I've never spoken to him or heard him speak. I could bet any money based on looks alone that he is not incel.

This is very easy. Game isn't a real thing. If you want to have "elite game" drop some MDMA at a rave. There... You're the king for a night... Ironic since it's the opposite of typical PUA advice in that it makes you more friendly etc. What it does is make the women who are into you enough physically (AKA you don't put them off with your looks) become obsessive and more forward because the rapport is married couple tier strong.

I am of the opinion that no man of an attractiveness level physically (which includes image) of 6+ in real terms not spastic forum ratez is ever really getting rejected on looks. Barring racist chicks or like short men.
I got you. You're kind of all over the place, but I agree with some of the stuff you said.

I can't understand how you wouldn't recognize "sh*t testing" though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
I got you. You're kind of all over the place, but I agree with some of the stuff you said.

I can't understand how you wouldn't recognize "sh*t testing" though.
Because it's literally flirting. And people are mistaking it for some weird other trickery from her. It's legit flirting.

When a girl teases you in any way or acts in the way you are talking about, it's flirting. It's usually called "banter".

I get the nuance generally... I could list many. Like any objections I already am aware of and undersrandm Like the other example of insecure girl who acts like she's too good. Maybe even some female-PUA "technique" they're trying. That doesn't happen much.

Frankly I can tell easily genuine "fuck off" vibes from "banter". I don't enjoy banter much, I'll go along with it naturally but I'm really not on that wavelength... I want to just chat and connect. I don't find teasing very fun or humorous IMO.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
If this isn't in BOtB I'm ddosing the server
 
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel
well if its really like that why dont we all just go out and slay then?
oh wait bc it isnt like that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
What I got out of this is that it’s over.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell, thecel and Deleted member 7419
Btw women "not knowing what they want" is the same thing used by PUAs to make people believe in their fairytale non-existent concept known as "game"... Yeah bro women are just lying they secretly want you to neg them.

NO IDIOT. THEY DO like nice men they just don't like YOU because you're UGLY. They like the asshole because he's NOT UGLY. Not because he's an asshole who negs them.

Two sides of the same autistic coin.
Intelligent user detected. Would probably bet some money this user has sexual success and relatively high lay count.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
Intelligent user detected. Would probably bet some money this user has sexual success and relatively high lay count.
I have slept with over 50 women from irl. I don't count and I forget some of them.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
I'm 28. I've slept with shit tonnes of women I don't even remember most of them. I don't need fuck all pointers let me assure you of that.

The very moment I walk into a bar I can tell you who is incel and who is not. JMULV is a facially ugly man. I would know instantaneously he is not incel because he looks physically like a popular douchebag. Like he'd own a strip club or some shit. Compare to the beta incel looking men in crowds at PUA seminars... In fact there's a guy at my gym similar. I've never spoken to him or heard him speak. I could bet any money based on looks alone that he is not incel.

This is very easy. Game isn't a real thing. If you want to have "elite game" drop some MDMA at a rave. There... You're the king for a night... Ironic since it's the opposite of typical PUA advice in that it makes you more friendly etc. What it does is make the women who are into you enough physically (AKA you don't put them off with your looks) become obsessive and more forward because the rapport is married couple tier strong.

I am of the opinion that no man of an attractiveness level physically (which includes image) of 6+ in real terms not spastic forum ratez is ever really getting rejected on looks. Barring racist chicks or like short men.


I have slept with over 50 women from irl. I don't count and I forget some of them.I b
I have slept with over 50 women from irl. I don't count and I forget some of them.
I believe you. That’s not because of your game, that’s simply because they liked you physically. It is really not rocket science. I know you know this but saying out loud for the copers in the back
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
I believe you. That’s not because of your game, that’s simply because they liked you physically. It is really not rocket science. I know you know this but saying out loud for the copers in the back
Yeah that's why I know where I stand in physical appearance.

There is ofc also handsome autists with social anxiety etc and others where personality is problematic. Since I am a bit above average with noncel pheno (e.g don't look like I'm from Reddit), my personality helps: I am cocky and such so will just walk up to groups of girls. This is a helpful element ofc since some men are awkward and just stand around hoping to be approached.

When I look below average I just stay home since personality is useless then.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Yeah that's why I know where I stand in physical appearance.

There is ofc also handsome autists with social anxiety etc and others where personality is problematic. Since I am a bit above average with noncel pheno (e.g don't look like I'm from Reddit), my personality helps: I am cocky and such so will just walk up to groups of girls. This is a helpful element ofc since some men are awkward and just stand around hoping to be approached.

When I look below average I just stay home since personality is useless then.
I am not particularly low inhibition - hate approaching unless I have clear signs but my success comes from online dating. Has Worked for me super nicely with 76 lays on 2 years until I got banned on both bumble and tinder
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Yeah that's why I know where I stand in physical appearance.

There is ofc also handsome autists with social anxiety etc and others where personality is problematic. Since I am a bit above average with noncel pheno (e.g don't look like I'm from Reddit), my personality helps: I am cocky and such so will just walk up to groups of girls. This is a helpful element ofc since some men are awkward and just stand around hoping to be approached.

When I look below average I just stay home since personality is useless then.
By the way I have never met personally a handsome autist (clinical diagnosis) in my entire life.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
Yeah that's why I know where I stand in physical appearance.

There is ofc also handsome autists with social anxiety etc and others where personality is problematic. Since I am a bit above average with noncel pheno (e.g don't look like I'm from Reddit), my personality helps: I am cocky and such so will just walk up to groups of girls. This is a helpful element ofc since some men are awkward and just stand around hoping to be approached.

When I look below average I just stay home since personality is useless then.
And yes that is the only barometer of your attractiveness. If other women (multiple) find you handsome enough to want to hook up with you. Not men’s opinions in forums
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
I am not particularly low inhibition - hate approaching unless I have clear signs but my success comes from online dating. Has Worked for me super nicely with 76 lays on 2 years until I got banned on both bumble and tinder
I believe I have 1 from online dating that was worth a damn. I can only hook up irl I would say.

I just walk up to tables full of women it doesn't bother me. I am very awkward in certain situations, so not really sure why I have bizarre confidence levels in others.

One tale I repeatedly have told for years is that a girl I super'd who MUST have left swiped me, approached me at a bar. I recognized her WhatsApp pic when she gave me her number. A weird thing... I am above avg, not really big I'm 5'11 155 lbs when lean despite lifting.
 
Last edited:
You haven't been educated. The last person I know who got "educated" literally just got a box osteotomy and I am not kidding. His username was IncelExecutioner.

I don't want to give my opinion on what has happened.

There is a reason the list of people who were not desirable then became so is such a short one. And most of those people started with actual serious issues where for example a doctor would willingly perform LeFort and not have to be strong-armed into it against their advice.

I can walk into any bar and I can tell you immediately what type of girl will go with what guy there. I also know exactly what type will go for me on any given night. Your eyes are a much more valuable tool. This is why normal men align more with women, because they have natural instinct and also from years of real world interaction knowing what sort of men get attention.
we need to talk bro lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and CeeJay
Morphs are absolutely retarded
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
“Muh women don’t know what they want” aspies failing to look at the details and using myopic black and white thinking once again, this time to cope with their bdd.

Women know exactly what they want, they just lie about it. And they lie about it when it will BENEFIT them (being viewed as “pure“ by betabuxes)and/or being honest about it will DISADVANTAGE them (being viewed as “shallow”), Whether it be irl such aswithin a professional setting or on a date with a betabux, or virtually with a bunch of manlets on r/short.

On the other hand, where there is no risk of being viewed as “shallow” and no benefit to being viewed as “pure”, such as on Twitter, where being a bitch is actively rewarded (hence the constant manlet hate and deathnic hate threads) or where there is simply no disadvantage due to pure anonymity (such as this survey).

There is NO advantage to women lying about their preferences on an anonymous survey, if they won’t even do it on Twitter, where people can see their real names and faces, why would they do it when no one can identify them, not even by a username?

Riddle me this, you autists if females never told The truth about their preferences online and only gave “bluepilled” responses, then why are their twitter posts upon twitter posts of foids completely dehumanizing manlets, curry foids dehumanizing curry men, chink foids dehumanizing chink men? Surely this must mean manlets, curries, and chinks are the men that women truly desire? Surely if tall white chads were desired then all of those twitter Posts would be shitting on them and not bragging about “tall kings” or “being a white mans whore”?

Riddle me one more thing you autists, if these foids were lying about their preferences and instead giving “bluepilled” Responses, then why wouldn’t they pick the most “bluepilled” choices? Surely they would have picked the “prey eyes” instead of the “hunter eyes” that they overwhelmingly chose as most attractive, right? Or does this mean that women really prefer “prey eyes” since they chose the “hunter eyes” instead? Why would they pick the decently forward grown face over the brutally recessed face? Does this mean that birdcels are now the most attractive? Why would they choose the decent fwhr face over the giga low fwhr ones? Surely having a horse face is the most attractive now?

You retards just have the complete inability to understand nuance. Women overwhelmingly picked faces with good features like “hunter eyes” and not too low of a fwhr, not brutally recessed, yet you retards still whinge about it because they chose the moderate features over the most extreme ones that are mostly not even humanly possible, hence the ridiculous looking morphs. You all think a feature literally has to be to the biggest extreme humanly possible and can not understand the concept of moderation.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell, Deleted member 14781, Landorus and 3 others
“Muh women don’t know what they want” aspies failing to look at the details and using myopic black and white thinking once again, this time to cope with their bdd.

Women know exactly what they want, they just lie about it. And they lie about it when it will BENEFIT them (being viewed as “pure“ by betabuxes)and/or being honest about it will DISADVANTAGE them (being viewed as “shallow”), Whether it be irl such aswithin a professional setting or on a date with a betabux, or virtually with a bunch of manlets on r/short.

On the other hand, where there is no risk of being viewed as “shallow” and no benefit to being viewed as “pure”, such as on Twitter, where being a bitch is actively rewarded (hence the constant manlet hate and deathnic hate threads) or where there is simply no disadvantage due to pure anonymity (such as this survey).

There is NO advantage to women lying about their preferences on an anonymous survey, if they won’t even do it on Twitter, where people can see their real names and faces, why would they do it when no one can identify them, not even by a username?

Riddle me this, you autists if females never told The truth about their preferences online and only gave “bluepilled” responses, then why are their twitter posts upon twitter posts of foids completely dehumanizing manlets, curry foids dehumanizing curry men, chink foids dehumanizing chink men? Surely this must mean manlets, curries, and chinks are the men that women truly desire? Surely if tall white chads were desired then all of those twitter Posts would be shitting on them and not bragging about “tall kings” or “being a white mans whore”?

Riddle me one more thing you autists, if these foids were lying about their preferences and instead giving “bluepilled” Responses, then why wouldn’t they pick the most “bluepilled” choices? Surely they would have picked the “prey eyes” instead of the “hunter eyes” that they overwhelmingly chose as most attractive, right? Or does this mean that women really prefer “prey eyes” since they chose the “hunter eyes” instead? Why would they pick the decently forward grown face over the brutally recessed face? Does this mean that birdcels are now the most attractive? Why would they choose the decent fwhr face over the giga low fwhr ones? Surely having a horse face is the most attractive now?

You retards just have the complete inability to understand nuance. Women overwhelmingly picked faces with good features like “hunter eyes” and not too low of a fwhr, not brutally recessed, yet you retards still whinge about it because they chose the moderate features over the most extreme ones that are mostly not even humanly possible, hence the ridiculous looking morphs. You all think a feature literally has to be to the biggest extreme humanly possible and can not understand the concept of moderation.
Women lie and give bluepilled responses even when it is safe to tell the truth. Many studies have confirmed this to be the case, as even in private women still try and ahdere to social terms and stay within the overton window. Many studies have confirmed this to be the case, so even in this survey we can't trust a women's response--or a man's for that matter--to be the exact truth.

Twitter is a poor example because as you said, that kind of bitching is rewarded there, so obviously a women would shit on short men and curries there. Doing such things are socially acceptable, and rewarded. It's the same reason why people here reply with 'dn rd' or 'kys' if there was no reward for leaving such useless and hateful comments, they wouldn't do it.

It isn't being autistic. It's never autism when the science speaks. We know women prefer masculine faces regardless of hormones because the science and many other studies confirm it. One looskmaxxing study surveying less than 100 women can't be taken as indicative of the general population.

The extreme hunter eyes were objectively speaking, the most attractive. It is not autism.
If you claim otherwise you aren't just saying some 'autistis' on looksmax.me are lying, you are saying hundereds of studies and researchers are lying.

You are denying the objective reality and going as far as to insult people here for being 'autistic' just because some women said so. Pathetic.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell, Deleted member 14781, thecel and 1 other person
Women lie and give bluepilled responses even when it is safe to tell the truth. Many studies have confirmed this to be the case, as even in private women still try and ahdere to social terms and stay within the overton window. Many studies have confirmed this to be the case, so even in this survey we can't trust a women's response--or a man's for that matter--to be the exact truth.

Twitter is a poor example because as you said, that kind of bitching is rewarded there, so obviously a women would shit on short men and curries there. Doing such things are socially acceptable, and rewarded. It's the same reason why people here reply with 'dn rd' or 'kys' if there was no reward for leaving such useless and hateful comments, they wouldn't do it.

It isn't being autistic. It's never autism when the science speaks. We know women prefer masculine faces regardless of hormones because the science and many other studies confirm it. One looskmaxxing study surveying less than 100 women can't be taken as indicative of the general population.

The extreme hunter eyes were objectively speaking, the most attractive. It is not autism.
If you claim otherwise you aren't just saying some 'autistis' on looksmax.me are lying, you are saying hundereds of studies and researchers are lying.

You are denying the objective reality and going as far as to insult people here for being 'autistic' just because some women said so. Pathetic.
Bro those extreme hunter eyes are not even differently shaped, he is just squinting hard as fuck and that’s why it was chosen less. When hernan drago makes a normal facial expression like the other guy with hunter eyes his eyes are virtually identically shaped. If women were choosing truly bluepilled responses they would NOT pick the hunter eyes, they would have picked the mediocre normie eyes on the far left or at least the Decent looking “prey eyes” which are far less attractive than the hunter eyes. Surely if women are picking the “bluepilled responses”, then them picking hunter eyes must mean that prey eyes are more attractive in reality? That makes no sense, and your studies literally prove my point because women picked the more masculine features in this survey. For example, in the fwhr one, they did not pick the narrow cuck skull, nor did they pick the disproportionately short skull causing infantile proportions , they picked the masculine one, tall skull but still decent fwhr. And I’m tired of you people Taking my statements out of context to insult me. I did not say their claims are autistic because “women said so”, I said their claims are autistic because they are claiming preferences for masculine features are “bluepilled” responses just because they aren’t the most extreme psl features humanly possible.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell, Deleted member 14781, thecel and 2 others
JFL at anyone who rated that DOm morphs as more attractive i refuse to believe its real

Also, incels, females have zero reason to cope at anonymous threads

REal 9 and 10 are acotrs u rated 5-6 here, with average faces and some good features

Fact
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell, Deleted member 14781, Deleted member 7419 and 1 other person
Marking with comment
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
The well known 15% of females here
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and thecel
1500662342328
D51xRa6XoAU X8Q
AA8F7B86 53D6 4882 9A4A6CCB29F68CB4 source
D51bBEwWwAcEL0K
ChadTypes
ELlPvH7XkAA6Jrm
 
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel
This legendary thread is hilarious.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel

Similar threads

Zenis
Replies
87
Views
10K
crushing sluts@100%
crushing sluts@100%
Xangsane
Replies
257
Views
11K
Xangsane
Xangsane
dreamcake1mo
Replies
106
Views
30K
illusivespirits
illusivespirits
AscendingHero
Replies
85
Views
14K
Deleted member 15854
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top