Nordic Chad With Severe Facial Recession
- Nov 26, 2021
There are people that rate guy an fucking ugly and yet he is thirsted by women. Make tons of sense.Handsome Truecel said:Jfl
Maybe when it comes to different-looking chads and gl guys, women may have different tastes.
ForeverRecession said:Fair enough if your experience matches that.
Imo, I see far more people around 2-2.5 psl than 5.5-6.
ForeverRecession said:Here is the true Distribution:
2 psl is 10th percentile
3psl is 30th percentile
4 psl is 50th percentile
4.5 is 75th percentile
5 is 85-90th percentile
5.5 is 95th percentile
5.75 is 98th
6 is 99.5th
6.5 is 99.99th
7 is 99.9999th
ForeverRecession said:Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh.
Salludon is such a mogger. I am sure if he was famous everyone would rate him at the same lookslevel as other famous gigachads.forevergymcelling said:Also lol at ranking Salludon in the same category as Maher and Sommerhalder
Status halo. I agree with you these guys are overrated. Timothee is recognised as a "medium ugly" but ronaldo is just considered good looking. Ronaldo is about the same level as the good looking guys you see on a night out. I often see people at the same looks level as chalamet. They aren't ugly but I guarantee that if you gave a 4.5PSL+ looksmax user the same level of fame as these guys they would get fawned over. This just proves the importance of being facially average or not subhuman.looksmaxxer234 said:timothee chalamet and Ronaldo aren’t that gl. Many guys on their looks level outside.
Lol if you think any looksmax user is gonna look the same in a candid vs their frauded photoshopped basement selfiesmulattomaxxer said:Status halo. I agree with you these guys are overrated. Timothee is recognised as a "medium ugly" but ronaldo is just considered good looking. Ronaldo is about the same level as the good looking guys you see on a night out. I often see people at the same looks level as chalamet. They aren't ugly but I guarantee that if you gave a 4.5PSL+ looksmax user the same level of fame as these guys they would get fawned over. This just proves the importance of being facially average or not subhuman.
If these niggas weren't famous and posted on looksmax:
"Nice eyes and good body but your a recessed dog and a brown eyed mutt. Frame is meh but your look good gymmaxxed. Your a HTN. Bimax and light eye colour contacts should ascend you."
View attachment 1483998 View attachment 1484006 View attachment 1484008 View attachment 1484015
"Bug eyed UEE NCT small chinned cuck. Shit frame and your a skinnyfatcel. Its fucking over for you bro. Your a LTN at best. Hollow cheekbones halo your face. Your NW0 and eboymaxxed so you should seamaxx and run JBW game."
View attachment 1484002 View attachment 1484009 View attachment 1484010 View attachment 1484012
Despite this these guys SMV mog the forum. JFL at looksmax users tbh.
Great stuff! A lot of people will consider this cope tho, as it goes somewhat against common Black Pill "wisdom"mulattomaxxer said:I DONT THINK LOOKS SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A DISTRIBUTION. ITS AN UNSUITABLE METHOD TO VIEW LOOKS. WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, LOOKS ARE SOMEWHAT SUBJECTIVE. VIEWING A NON NUMERICAL VARIABLE THROUGH A NUMERICAL DISTRIBUTION IS INCORRECT.
With looks all good looking people will share simillar traits, but ignoring the subjective elements to looks is incorrect. Somebodies 6/10 is somebody else's 8/10. Its like going to a gallery and rating all the paintings on a distribution scale. What makes a one painting an 8/10 and another one a 4/10. Its subjective. Sure if one looks like an OC deviant art and the other is done by a proffesional there will be a clear difference but eventually it will come down to personal preference. Viewing data as a distribution is suitable for things such as height or weight. Looks should be viewed as categorical data.
Lets say you go to mumbai and take 100,000 people. You can view their height and weight as a distribution but what about their looks? The average indian isn't aesthetic. Especially if you view them though a eurocentric lens.
In reality there should only be 3 ways to rate looks. Ugly, Average and Attractive. If I were to develop this further I would make 5 catergories.
>Model - Attractive and Unique.
>Attractive - Attractive but not exceptional. Popular kids at school level of good looking.
>Average - Ordinary person. I would say this is the last catergory where you would be considered attractive. Being neutral is not bad, your just not going to be the "hot person" in your social circle. Your personality matters most here because your looks aren't going to halo you or fail you.
>Unattractive - These people aren't hideous but they usually look different. Maybe they don't take good care of themselves. Will have a few glaring flaws (fat, ance, balding, short, strange facial feature etc). You see people like this in relationships but they will struggle more in comparison to the average normie.
>Subhuman - Ugly as fuck. They may be hard to look at. Will get hard rejected by love interests. Most commonly deformed or morbidly obese (or both).
This is how I would rate people.
Blackpill is true but its so unbelievably overblown. I have seen far to many people that are LTN/Normie that get laid to believe all women are chadsexual. Combine this with the rarity of Chad and I begin to see an issue. Im still getting surgery for my lower third because I believe its worth it but its only over if your actually subhuman.TrestIsBest said:Great stuff! A lot of people will consider this cope tho, as it goes somewhat against common Black Pill "wisdom"
Agreed.. I'm seeing a pretty lil Latina rn and she worships me like chad tbhmulattomaxxer said:Blackpill is true but its so unbelievably overblown. I have seen far to many people that are LTN/Normie that get laid to believe all women are chadsexual. Combine this with the rarity of Chad and I begin to see an issue. Im still getting surgery for my lower third because I believe its worth it but its only over if your actually subhuman.
Fuark I am mirin. I literally could not imagine a woman giving me chad treatment. My last rejection was from a woman who wears size 24 clothing .TrestIsBest said:Agreed.. I'm seeing a pretty lil Latina rn and she worships me like chad tbh
Yeah it was a lucky incidence. She is not a native here (I'm in Germany) and I think I have my "arian" traits going for me (6"4 and blonde, although I have a jew nose ) and a bit of status halo because I'm studying law and dress like it too.mulattomaxxer said:Fuark I am mirin. I literally could not imagine a woman giving me chad treatment. My last rejection was from a woman who wears size 24 clothing .
fuark intergalactic iq bro, you should post more. No doubt. looks standards on this forum influenced me hard too.chadsmith said:I was thinking about this the other day, and I think the amount of positive skew must be a function of exposure to online dating, social media. As exposure increases the skew increases. I think this has foundations in how action potentials in neurons work, wherein there must be a threshold level of excitatory actions so higher exposure will increase this threshold. This leads to an all or nothing pareto type distribution of attractiveness. Without the confounding variable of increased online exposure I think it's just a slight positive skew, which can be attributed to balding, being overweight.
His frame is not "insane". It's complete dogshit. 190 lbs at 6'7". Basically DYEL.AscendingHero said:Oubre is a giga uber mogger, i've been blackpilled on him several times. Knows the importance of hairstyle and proportions, mirin his ascencion ngl. Quoves studio also have an excellent video on him.
Insane frame, 6'5+, light eyes, lightbrown skin mogger.
View attachment 1479994 View attachment 1479996 View attachment 1479997 View attachment 1480006 View attachment 1480007 View attachment 1480008 View attachment 1480010 View attachment 1480013 View attachment 1480014 View attachment 1480015 View attachment 1480016 View attachment 1480017
JFL at how hard this foid is simping over him @looksmaxxer234 @fogdart @Frank Jack Very nt pheno, excellent harmony, good nt hairstyle @Prettyboy , and good forward growth/coloring.
Oubrepilled so hard, i shake my head in astonishment at the amount of prime young stacies in his comments. SMV of a God looking like that in the NBA at that height.
no oneForeverRecession said:@Amnesia yo bro since you work a bar in Cali I’m curious, how many guys do you see who would be rated as good looking by our standards
antiantifa said:legit thread
attractiveness isn't governed by free market rules
ur either attractive or ur not, there's nothing more to it