Male Attractiveness (Face) is NOT Normally Distributed

[greeneyes]

View attachment 1749122
Not unreasonable take at all jfl? even @Biiyo03 @Preston @volcelfatcel @AscendingHero rate him at 7
The rest I just copy and pasted old guides cba to make my own and it wasn't even the point of this post

Rate him here

 

[Deleted member 14160]

Rate him here

Ummm tbh I think Colton in arrow mogs him here

 

[Biiyo03]

Rate him here

mogger

 

[Deleted member 14160]

@SwedishMeatball just read this tbh. 6 psl is equal to 7.5 trm I’d say.

 

[Erik-Jón]

Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh.
First off, this is my rating scale for PSL. You can agree or disagree with the exactness, but allow me ± .25 in digression.

Sub 4 PSL (Normie-ish and Below)
View attachment 1475345

4-4.75 PSL (Normie to HTN)
View attachment 1475349

5-5.75 PSL (Weak Chadlite to Strong Chadlite)
View attachment 1475359
View attachment 1475371

6-7 PSL (Weak Chad to GigaChad)
View attachment 1475361

View attachment 1475373

With a normal distribution with 4 PSL being average, these are the percentiles corresponding:
PSL 4 is equivalent to 50% (50/100)
PSL 5 is equivalent to 84.15% (16/100)
PSL 6 is equivalent to 97.25% (3/100)
PSL 7 is equivalent to 99.87% (1/1000)

These percentiles fall off hard after around the 5.25 PSL mark. Ask yourself, in a university class with 30 males, would 5 of them really be at the level of looks of Timothee Chalamet or Ronaldo (5.5 PSL's) or even Chris Pratt/Harry Styles (5.25)? And PSL 6 is even more absurd, if you went to a highschool of around 2000 kids, of the 1k males, are you really telling me you know 30 students at the looks level of Kelly Oubre, Cillian Murphy, or Siva Kanesweran (all low tier 6 psl's)?
FInally, PSL 7 implies that there are 5 or 6 Atesh Salih/Prime Gandy/ Drago level moggers at every college. Yeah, nah.

Here is the true Distribution:
View attachment 1475424

2 psl is 10th percentile
3psl is 30th percentile
4 psl is 50th percentile
4.5 is 75th percentile
5 is 85-90th percentile
5.5 is 95th percentile
5.75 is 98th
6 is 99.5th
6.5 is 99.99th
7 is 99.9999th

In this distribution, weak chadlites are (15/100), mid level chadlites are 5-10/100 and strong chadlites (Chalamet/Ronaldo) are 2/100.
6 PSL (Zac Effron, Mike Thurston, Amnesia) are 5/1000, and 6.5 PSL (Tyler Maher, Ian Sommerhalder, Salludon) are 1/10 000. Gods like Barrett and Gandy are 1/1 000 000.

My Question to Looksmax: Based on your real life experiences and how many people you've seen, what distribution do Male FACES (not body or other halos) fall into?
I don't think I've ever met someone who is 6 PSL in my Life. Remember, 6 PSL is someone who could be in a mog battle with Zac Effron or Zayn Malik.
@germanlooks @thecel @AscendingHero @EverythingMattersCel @reptiles @forevergymcelling @Amnesia

6psl is definitely pretty rare, especially by psl standards. Also if you include that 50% of America is obese and that most people are aged out of there looks and that most of the world ethnic 6psl gets even more rare then 5/1000

 

[Deleted member 14160]

6psl is definitely pretty rare, especially by psl standards. Also if you include that 50% of America is obese and that most people are aged out of there looks and that most of the world ethnic 6psl gets even more rare then 5/1000

True. 6 psl in ethnic world is 1/1000 000

 

[Erik-Jón]

True. 6 psl in ethnic world is 1/1000 000

Ima be honest boyo I didn’t even know that people like you and Atesh could exist I thought al you guys were bloated normies at best

 

[Deleted member 14160]

Ima be honest boyo I didn’t even know that people like you and Atesh could exist I thought al you guys were bloated normies at best

Actually 1/million is conservative too. That would imply there’s 1000 6 psl’s in indias 1billion population which I highly doubt @Biggdink

 

[Erik-Jón]

Actually 1/million is conservative too. That would imply there’s 1000 6 psl’s in indias 1billion population which I highly doubt @Biggdink

One thing I have noticed almost all nordic users asides from me are moggers even just living in nordic territory like your arch enemy makes him a giga mogger, 6psl there is probably less rare

 

[Erik-Jón]

Tbh most of this doesn’t even matter average guy In dating/sexual market is 5psl

 

[Johanjohan]

Actually 1/million is conservative too. That would imply there’s 1000 6 psl’s in indias 1billion population which I highly doubt @Biggdink

Mumbai night stalker @RabidRosaries is top tier tho

 

[Deleted member 16371]

Tbh most of this doesn’t even matter average guy In dating/sexual market is 5psl

This is what I said average is really 5.5 psl. Indians cope. I know what’s up I live with nordics and Europeans. Curry coper made this thread

 

[Usum]

Water is wet.
Yet, let females give PSL ratings because you suck at it as a man.

 

[Deleted member 23399]

Gigachad IQ user tbh. Wonder if he had a face to match

 

[MatheusCqb]

your table is shit u put a subhumam br soccer player in HTN

jorge henrrique

 

[Deleted member 23391]

All polygenic biological traits (like attractiveness, intelligence, height, and so on) are more or less normally distributed because of something called the Central Limit Theorem, you not thinking they are is a fault with the autistic scale you use rather than the reality of statistical laws and the nature of genetic expression and biology.

 

[untouchable_coper]

All polygenic biological traits (like attractiveness, intelligence, height, and so on) are more or less normally distributed because of something called the Central Limit Theorem, you not thinking they are is a fault with the autistic scale you use rather than the reality of statistical laws and the nature of genetic expression and biology.

Correct, if everyone softmaxxed so that all non-heritable flaws (i.e. extreme obesity) were elimated, attractiveness would be normally distributed.

 

[GorLee]

All polygenic biological traits (like attractiveness, intelligence, height, and so on) are more or less normally distributed because of something called the Central Limit Theorem, you not thinking they are is a fault with the autistic scale you use rather than the reality of statistical laws and the nature of genetic b

I do agree I just think that it's still important to look at both the mean and the median, and the skewness. Cause the mean and median could have quite a large deviation, though it'll end up normal distributed in a larger enough sample size.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

All polygenic biological traits (like attractiveness, intelligence, height, and so on) are more or less normally distributed because of something called the Central Limit Theorem, you not thinking they are is a fault with the autistic scale you use rather than the reality of statistical laws and the nature of genetic expression and biology.

No proof just an hypothesis

 

[PunishedDollcel]

Where would I fall

 

[Broski]

Where would I fall

Youre a Sean opry (eyes) + @Birdcell (bones) morph

 

[medialcanthuscel]

4 years I was in an holiday in Slovakia, I was in an empty street and I saw a 2meters guy with a psl 6-6.5 face (he looked similar to young Tyler Maher, just slightly worse)and after 250 meters on a bench in the street I saw a guy with a psl 7.5 face (he was the best looking person I have ever seen).
All my muscles relaxed for the shocking double mog, my brain understood that my life was over.
@anactualdude

 

[DarkWanderer]

Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh.
First off, this is my rating scale for PSL. You can agree or disagree with the exactness, but allow me ± .25 in digression.

Sub 4 PSL (Normie-ish and Below)
View attachment 1475345

4-4.75 PSL (Normie to HTN)
View attachment 1475349

5-5.75 PSL (Weak Chadlite to Strong Chadlite)
View attachment 1475359
View attachment 1475371

6-7 PSL (Weak Chad to GigaChad)
View attachment 1475361

View attachment 1475373

With a normal distribution with 4 PSL being average, these are the percentiles corresponding:
PSL 4 is equivalent to 50% (50/100)
PSL 5 is equivalent to 84.15% (16/100)
PSL 6 is equivalent to 97.25% (3/100)
PSL 7 is equivalent to 99.87% (1/1000)

These percentiles fall off hard after around the 5.25 PSL mark. Ask yourself, in a university class with 30 males, would 5 of them really be at the level of looks of Timothee Chalamet or Ronaldo (5.5 PSL's) or even Chris Pratt/Harry Styles (5.25)? And PSL 6 is even more absurd, if you went to a highschool of around 2000 kids, of the 1k males, are you really telling me you know 30 students at the looks level of Kelly Oubre, Cillian Murphy, or Siva Kanesweran (all low tier 6 psl's)?
FInally, PSL 7 implies that there are 5 or 6 Atesh Salih/Prime Gandy/ Drago level moggers at every college. Yeah, nah.

Here is the true Distribution:
View attachment 1475424

2 psl is 10th percentile
3psl is 30th percentile
4 psl is 50th percentile
4.5 is 75th percentile
5 is 85-90th percentile
5.5 is 95th percentile
5.75 is 98th
6 is 99.5th
6.5 is 99.99th
7 is 99.9999th

In this distribution, weak chadlites are (15/100), mid level chadlites are 5-10/100 and strong chadlites (Chalamet/Ronaldo) are 2/100.
6 PSL (Zac Effron, Mike Thurston, Amnesia) are 5/1000, and 6.5 PSL (Tyler Maher, Ian Sommerhalder, Salludon) are 1/10 000. Gods like Barrett and Gandy are 1/1 000 000.

My Question to Looksmax: Based on your real life experiences and how many people you've seen, what distribution do Male FACES (not body or other halos) fall into?
I don't think I've ever met someone who is 6 PSL in my Life. Remember, 6 PSL is someone who could be in a mog battle with Zac Effron or Zayn Malik.
@germanlooks @thecel @AscendingHero @EverythingMattersCel @reptiles @forevergymcelling @Amnesia

Friend, you made a slight mistake. There appears to be non-whites in the chad category.

 

[Magnum Opus]

Correct, if everyone softmaxxed so that all non-heritable flaws (i.e. extreme obesity) were elimated, attractiveness would be normally distributed.

Some non-heritable flaws need to be hardmaxxed tho. I got downward growth as the first person in my family, and none of the family members of at least the last three generations had that issue. I also developed it the older I got and that points towards epigenetic factors. This would presumably reverted by fixing the functional issues or getting jaw surgery. Latter counts as hardmaxx, and if I look at people in my school every third person looks like they need a bimax.

 

[Deleted member 21628]

retarded asf

 

[A23ghskung]

Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh.
First off, this is my rating scale for PSL. You can agree or disagree with the exactness, but allow me ± .25 in digression.

Sub 4 PSL (Normie-ish and Below)
View attachment 1475345

4-4.75 PSL (Normie to HTN)
View attachment 1475349

5-5.75 PSL (Weak Chadlite to Strong Chadlite)
View attachment 1475359
View attachment 1475371

6-7 PSL (Weak Chad to GigaChad)
View attachment 1475361

View attachment 1475373

With a normal distribution with 4 PSL being average, these are the percentiles corresponding:
PSL 4 is equivalent to 50% (50/100)
PSL 5 is equivalent to 84.15% (16/100)
PSL 6 is equivalent to 97.25% (3/100)
PSL 7 is equivalent to 99.87% (1/1000)

These percentiles fall off hard after around the 5.25 PSL mark. Ask yourself, in a university class with 30 males, would 5 of them really be at the level of looks of Timothee Chalamet or Ronaldo (5.5 PSL's) or even Chris Pratt/Harry Styles (5.25)? And PSL 6 is even more absurd, if you went to a highschool of around 2000 kids, of the 1k males, are you really telling me you know 30 students at the looks level of Kelly Oubre, Cillian Murphy, or Siva Kanesweran (all low tier 6 psl's)?
FInally, PSL 7 implies that there are 5 or 6 Atesh Salih/Prime Gandy/ Drago level moggers at every college. Yeah, nah.

Here is the true Distribution:
View attachment 1475424

2 psl is 10th percentile
3psl is 30th percentile
4 psl is 50th percentile
4.5 is 75th percentile
5 is 85-90th percentile
5.5 is 95th percentile
5.75 is 98th
6 is 99.5th
6.5 is 99.99th
7 is 99.9999th

In this distribution, weak chadlites are (15/100), mid level chadlites are 5-10/100 and strong chadlites (Chalamet/Ronaldo) are 2/100.
6 PSL (Zac Effron, Mike Thurston, Amnesia) are 5/1000, and 6.5 PSL (Tyler Maher, Ian Sommerhalder, Salludon) are 1/10 000. Gods like Barrett and Gandy are 1/1 000 000.

My Question to Looksmax: Based on your real life experiences and how many people you've seen, what distribution do Male FACES (not body or other halos) fall into?
I don't think I've ever met someone who is 6 PSL in my Life. Remember, 6 PSL is someone who could be in a mog battle with Zac Effron or Zayn Malik.
@germanlooks @thecel @AscendingHero @EverythingMattersCel @reptiles @forevergymcelling @Amnesia

Guaddafhi young was chad for sure ofc he's 1 psl at 79 years old

 

[Luxury]

this implies there are almost 10k people as attractive as jeremy meeks living in new york alone

 

[𝔻𝔸𝕎ℕ 𝕆𝔽 𝕂ℍ𝔸L]

GL

I'm Indian incel tell me what's GL? Is it bOoTyFul German Lady i can devour?

 

[Deleted member 23399]

@forevermirin it was this guy

 

[forevermirin]

@forevermirin it was this guy

Which guy lol

 

[Deleted member 24595]

All polygenic biological traits (like attractiveness, intelligence, height, and so on) are more or less normally distributed because of something called the Central Limit Theorem, you not thinking they are is a fault with the autistic scale you use rather than the reality of statistical laws and the nature of genetic expression and biology.

No lol, the central limit theorem doesn't say that. Read your theory and come back. The Central limit theorem doesn't dictate the distribution of the population ("everything is normally distributed") and this assumes independence among a population.

What the central limit theorem DOES say is that if you take a random sample of the population, the random sample will be distributed normally.

 

[forevermirin]

No lol, the central limit theorem doesn't say that. Read your theory and come back. The Central limit theorem doesn't dictate the distribution of the population ("everything is normally distributed") and this assumes independence among a population.

What the central limit theorem DOES say is that if you take a random sample of the population, the random sample will be distributed normally.

average curry stemcel

 

[Deleted member 24595]

average curry stemcel

you're the color of the shit that comes straight out of my asshole into your mom's mouth

 

[forevermirin]

you're the color of the shit that comes straight out of my asshole into your mom's mouth

jfl at your shit being lighter coloring than your skin

 

[Deleted member 25119]

There no way 8/10 is 1 in 100 that is just not believable. If 8/10 is 1 in 100 then there will be a lot more user with a 6 psl.

 

[Deleted member 25119]

8/10 people are extremely rare it not everyday you see one walking down then street. 7/10 are more common tho you see a lot of chadlite than 8/10.

 

[ripcordgod1]

cope HTNs are 1 in 40, chadlites are 1 in 200, chads are 1 in 1000

 

[Anchor_Ship]

dnrd everything but I know its a good thread

 

[User49]

idk if i agree niggas like meeks would’ve been unknown if he didn’t do what he did. there’s many unknown moggers

 

[kranerman23123]

Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh.
First off, this is my rating scale for PSL. You can agree or disagree with the exactness, but allow me ± .25 in digression.

Sub 4 PSL (Normie-ish and Below)
View attachment 1475345

4-4.75 PSL (Normie to HTN)
View attachment 1475349

5-5.75 PSL (Weak Chadlite to Strong Chadlite)
View attachment 1475359
View attachment 1475371

6-7 PSL (Weak Chad to GigaChad)
View attachment 1475361

View attachment 1475373

With a normal distribution with 4 PSL being average, these are the percentiles corresponding:
PSL 4 is equivalent to 50% (50/100)
PSL 5 is equivalent to 84.15% (16/100)
PSL 6 is equivalent to 97.25% (3/100)
PSL 7 is equivalent to 99.87% (1/1000)

These percentiles fall off hard after around the 5.25 PSL mark. Ask yourself, in a university class with 30 males, would 5 of them really be at the level of looks of Timothee Chalamet or Ronaldo (5.5 PSL's) or even Chris Pratt/Harry Styles (5.25)? And PSL 6 is even more absurd, if you went to a highschool of around 2000 kids, of the 1k males, are you really telling me you know 30 students at the looks level of Kelly Oubre, Cillian Murphy, or Siva Kanesweran (all low tier 6 psl's)?
FInally, PSL 7 implies that there are 5 or 6 Atesh Salih/Prime Gandy/ Drago level moggers at every college. Yeah, nah.

Here is the true Distribution:
View attachment 1475424

2 psl is 10th percentile
3psl is 30th percentile
4 psl is 50th percentile
4.5 is 75th percentile
5 is 85-90th percentile
5.5 is 95th percentile
5.75 is 98th
6 is 99.5th
6.5 is 99.99th
7 is 99.9999th

In this distribution, weak chadlites are (15/100), mid level chadlites are 5-10/100 and strong chadlites (Chalamet/Ronaldo) are 2/100.
6 PSL (Zac Effron, Mike Thurston, Amnesia) are 5/1000, and 6.5 PSL (Tyler Maher, Ian Sommerhalder, Salludon) are 1/10 000. Gods like Barrett and Gandy are 1/1 000 000.

My Question to Looksmax: Based on your real life experiences and how many people you've seen, what distribution do Male FACES (not body or other halos) fall into?
I don't think I've ever met someone who is 6 PSL in my Life. Remember, 6 PSL is someone who could be in a mog battle with Zac Effron or Zayn Malik.
@germanlooks @thecel @AscendingHero @EverythingMattersCel @reptiles @forevergymcelling @Amnesia

Thermonuclear cope

 

[forevermirin]

cope HTNs are 1 in 40, chadlites are 1 in 200, chads are 1 in 1000

u trippin bruh u mean for every 1000 foids there is only 1 chad, 5 chadlites, and 25 HTNs? so basically 6 dudes that the 1k women was to fuck, 25 others who they might fuck? 969 dudes are invisible??? gtfoh

 

[Deleted member 23558]

@St.TikTokcel thoughts?

 

[St.TikTokcel]

@St.TikTokcel thoughts?

4 psl examples suffer from syndromes. 4 psl my arse.

 

[NiKKKerhater]

THAT'S BECAUSE PSL IS ASPIE SHUTIN BS. THE ONLY LEGIT RATING IS GL, NOT GL, AND REPULSIVE
DON'T @ ME

Good lirls? You mean women?

 

[kanderior]

Makes sense. I think someone did a study where he plotted attractiveness vs number of matches on Tinder, and for women it scaled linearly (the more attractive the more matches), whereas for men it was exponential (very small increase from ugly to average and slightly above average, and then a huge jump for chads).

 

[colton myers]

Normal Distribution Implies You See Just as Many Ugly People as Good Looking Ones, which I don't agree with tbh.
First off, this is my rating scale for PSL. You can agree or disagree with the exactness, but allow me ± .25 in digression.

Sub 4 PSL (Normie-ish and Below)
View attachment 1475345

4-4.75 PSL (Normie to HTN)
View attachment 1475349

5-5.75 PSL (Weak Chadlite to Strong Chadlite)
View attachment 1475359
View attachment 1475371

6-7 PSL (Weak Chad to GigaChad)
View attachment 1475361

View attachment 1475373

With a normal distribution with 4 PSL being average, these are the percentiles corresponding:
PSL 4 is equivalent to 50% (50/100)
PSL 5 is equivalent to 84.15% (16/100)
PSL 6 is equivalent to 97.25% (3/100)
PSL 7 is equivalent to 99.87% (1/1000)

These percentiles fall off hard after around the 5.25 PSL mark. Ask yourself, in a university class with 30 males, would 5 of them really be at the level of looks of Timothee Chalamet or Ronaldo (5.5 PSL's) or even Chris Pratt/Harry Styles (5.25)? And PSL 6 is even more absurd, if you went to a highschool of around 2000 kids, of the 1k males, are you really telling me you know 30 students at the looks level of Kelly Oubre, Cillian Murphy, or Siva Kanesweran (all low tier 6 psl's)?
FInally, PSL 7 implies that there are 5 or 6 Atesh Salih/Prime Gandy/ Drago level moggers at every college. Yeah, nah.

Here is the true Distribution:
View attachment 1475424

2 psl is 10th percentile
3psl is 30th percentile
4 psl is 50th percentile
4.5 is 75th percentile
5 is 85-90th percentile
5.5 is 95th percentile
5.75 is 98th
6 is 99.5th
6.5 is 99.99th
7 is 99.9999th

In this distribution, weak chadlites are (15/100), mid level chadlites are 5-10/100 and strong chadlites (Chalamet/Ronaldo) are 2/100.
6 PSL (Zac Effron, Mike Thurston, Amnesia) are 5/1000, and 6.5 PSL (Tyler Maher, Ian Sommerhalder, Salludon) are 1/10 000. Gods like Barrett and Gandy are 1/1 000 000.

My Question to Looksmax: Based on your real life experiences and how many people you've seen, what distribution do Male FACES (not body or other halos) fall into?
I don't think I've ever met someone who is 6 PSL in my Life. Remember, 6 PSL is someone who could be in a mog battle with Zac Effron or Zayn Malik.
@germanlooks @thecel @AscendingHero @EverythingMattersCel @reptiles @forevergymcelling @Amnesia

What psl am I?

 

[Deleted member 32514]

THAT'S BECAUSE PSL IS ASPIE SHUTIN BS. THE ONLY LEGIT RATING IS GL, NOT GL, AND REPULSIVE
DON'T @ ME

The people in 4-4.75 PSL u put there will be rated MTN here . Autism scale strikes again

 

[Tryingtoascend]

@Rimaxtis this is facts

 

[GermanCel]

Source: Trust me bro

 

[Shkreliii]

The overlooked part, is that height does have a common distribution, crushing all skewed scenarios.