Measure Fwhr (Best way)

[Shodredux]

The conventional way to measure fwhr is pretty dumb tbh. It has too many varying factors that affect the values such as size of the lips , height of the brows etc.

A better way is to measure form top of the eyes to middle of the lips because it doesn't vary that much

1. Measure the Bizygomatic distance
2. Measure the distance from top of the eyes to middle of the lips
3. Divide the Bizygomatic distance by distance from eyes to lips

 

[Imjustthatguy]

1.85 using this method

 

[needsolution]

Lifefuel for my high set brows

 

[Pietrosiek]

No, becouse fullness of the lip DOES matter with face apearing shorter overall. You should count upper lip

 

[Shodredux]

No, becouse fullness of the lip DOES matter with face apearing shorter overall. You should count upper lip

The purpose of fwhr is to measure the width of the maxilla ( with height being the constant) , but if the height keeps varying due to lips and brows , it becomes harder to get an accurate value. The purpose is not to measure the "shortness" but the width.

 

[Almu]

Lifefuel for my high set brows

Thats why its cope

 

[Pietrosiek]

The purpose of fwhr is to measure the width of the maxilla ( with height being the constant) , but if the height keeps varying due to lips and brows , it becomes harder to get an accurate value. The purpose is not to measure the "shortness" but the width.

? Imo its about measuring how long your midface is in rrlation to bizygo and about how whole face apea Long or short.

 

[Shodredux]

? Imo its about measuring how long your midface is in rrlation to bizygo and about how whole face apea Long or short.

Yes , they are both interrelated but if height keeps varying due to unnecessary variables , then the result won't be accurate. That's my point

 

[Pietrosiek]

Yes , they are both interrelated but if height keeps varying due to unnecessary variables , then the result won't be accurate. That's my point

I agree with eyebrows but not with lips.

 

[Alexanderr]

Mine is still between 1.85-1.95 using this method so I’m good.

 

[Ethnicope]

1.85 using this method

same

 

[Deleted member 3962]

1.86

normally i get 2.04-2.1 range

 

[Shodredux]

1.86

normally i get 2.04-2.1 range

It changes depending on how far you are from the camera, did you use the same pics?

 

[Deleted member 3962]

It changes depending on how far you are from the camera, did you use the same pics?

always use at least 3 pics

 

[Shodredux]

always use at least 3 pics

Ohh

 

[Averagecel]

Bullshit! I will never use that method, because all these years we've been using the same method put forth by scientists. You're delusional if you think that you, an irrelevant greycel with 90 posts can change something that has been already established by real scientists and aspie PSL scientists.

This is the only true method:

The height measurement: distance from the bottom of the eyebrows to the top lip

We also use the top lip to measure the midface ratio, not the middle of the lips.

 

[Shodredux]

Bullshit! I will never use that method, because all these years we've been using the same method put forth by scientists. You're delusional if you think that you, an irrelevant greycel with 90 posts can change something that has been already established by real scientists and aspie PSL scientists.

This is the only true method:

View attachment 231120

The height measurement: distance from the bottom of the eyebrows to the top lip

We also use the top lip to measure the midface ratio, not the middle of the lips.

...ok

 

[Averagecel]

( with height being the constant) but if the height keeps varying due to lips and brows , it becomes harder to get an accurate value.

How can the height be a constant if not all human faces have the same height? A constant doesn't change. The distance between the top of the eyes and middle of the lips vary considerably from person to person. That means that it's not a constant.

It doesn't really matter if the height isn't a constant, because the aboslute dimensions aren't important, what matters is the ratio.

Lifefuel for my high set brows

There's no lifefuel, boyo.

High set eyebrows = major failo

I think OP is a heigh set eyebrows cel too, he made this thread to cope.

Lifefuel for my high set brows

That's probably why you worship Chico who has high set eyebrows. People tend to worship other people with similar physical appearance or people with the same feature(s)/flaws as them. People with long midfaces, for example, worship models with long midfaces.

They're coping hard, just like baldcel normies cope by saying that Jason Statham is very good looking and rocks the bald look. Just because Statham can pull off the bald look doesn't mean you can. Statham isn't even even good looking. It's all status.

At the end of the day, a flaw is a flaw, just because a model or an actor looks good despite their flaw, doesn't mean you can also look good if you have the same flaw.

 

[Vidyacoper]

How can the height be a constant if not all human faces have the same height? A constant doesn't change. The distance between the top of the eyes and middle of the lips vary considerably from person to person. That means that it's not a constant.

It doesn't really matter if the height isn't a constant, because the aboslute dimensions aren't important, what matters is the ratio.

View attachment 231218View attachment 231219

There's no lifefuel, boyo.

High set eyebrows = major failo

I think OP is a heigh set eyebrows cel too, he made this thread to cope.

That's probably why you worship Chico who has high set eyebrows. People tend to worship other people with similar physical appearance or people with the same feature(s)/flaws as them. People with long midfaces, for example, worship models with long midfaces.

They're coping hard, just like baldcel normies cope by saying that Jason Statham is very good looking and rocks the bald look. Just because Statham can pull off the bald look doesn't mean you can. Statham isn't even even good looking. It's all status.

At the end of the day, a flaw is a flaw, just because a model or an actor looks good despite their flaw, doesn't mean you can also look good if you have the same flaw.

chico's eyebrows aren't even high set wtf?

 

[LordNorwood]

No, becouse fullness of the lip DOES matter with face apearing shorter overall. You should count upper lip

How can the height be a constant if not all human faces have the same height? A constant doesn't change. The distance between the top of the eyes and middle of the lips vary considerably from person to person. That means that it's not a constant.

It doesn't really matter if the height isn't a constant, because the aboslute dimensions aren't important, what matters is the ratio.

View attachment 231218View attachment 231219

There's no lifefuel, boyo.

High set eyebrows = major failo

I think OP is a heigh set eyebrows cel too, he made this thread to cope.

That's probably why you worship Chico who has high set eyebrows. People tend to worship other people with similar physical appearance or people with the same feature(s)/flaws as them. People with long midfaces, for example, worship models with long midfaces.

They're coping hard, just like baldcel normies cope by saying that Jason Statham is very good looking and rocks the bald look. Just because Statham can pull off the bald look doesn't mean you can. Statham isn't even even good looking. It's all status.

At the end of the day, a flaw is a flaw, just because a model or an actor looks good despite their flaw, doesn't mean you can also look good if you have the same flaw.

brutal truth pill

 

[Averagecel]

chico's eyebrows aren't even high set wtf?

He does have high set eyebrows. Not extremely high set, but high set nonetheless.

 

[Shodredux]

Bullshit! I will never use that method, because all these years we've been using the same method put forth by scientists. You're delusional if you think that you, an irrelevant greycel with 90 posts can change something that has been already established by real scientists and aspie PSL scientists.

This is the only true method:

View attachment 231120

The height measurement: distance from the bottom of the eyebrows to the top lip

We also use the top lip to measure the midface ratio, not the middle of the lips.

I used your method and my fwhr literally went from 1.71 to 1.92 due to my thick lips jfl

 

[Averagecel]

I used your method and my fwhr literally went from 1.71 to 1.92 due to my thick lips jfl

Good for you.

 

[Usum]

High set eyebrows = major failo

My eyebrows are like on my eyes ?
C'est grave docteur ?

 

[Deleted member 4209]

mine is subhuman either way (middle of brows to top lip or your way)

 

[Averagecel]

mine is subhuman either way (middle of brows to top lip or your way)

It's bottom of the eyebrows, not middle.

My eyebrows are like on my eyes ?

 

[Deleted member 4209]

It's bottom of the eyebrows, not middle.

oh that changes everything

Spoiler

still a subhuman

 

[Shodredux]

My eyebrows are like on my eyes ?
C'est grave docteur ?

Those are called eyelashes

 

[reptiles]

View attachment 232167

He does have high set eyebrows. Not extremely high set, but high set nonetheless.

View attachment 232180

It's 2020 and people are still bringing up this twink faggot from 2017 jesus fucking help me where is cavill

 

[Shodredux]

It's 2020 and people are still bringing up this twink faggot from 2017 jesus fucking help me where is cavill

Who are you referring to?

 

[dan]

1.7

 

[Deleted member 685]

All this talk and this guy doesn't even know how to properly measure it

 

[DutchPrettyBoy]

still 1.95

 

[BonesAndHarmony]

No, best method is from upper lip to bottom of eyebrows

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

This should be the standard

I get 2 with this meanwhile the eyebrows method gives me a retarded number cuz of my low set brows