Medial Canthus

[Aesthetics_III]

Kennisgeving voor omleiding

Medial canthus doesn’t really seem that important tbh, O’pry has one of the best eye areas in the world and has a subhuman one, as does Barrett

 

[Deleted member 2846]

wtf are you talking about? barrett’s is very good jfl

 

[Aesthetics_III]

wtf are you talking about? barrett’s is very good jfl

Really? in the pic it points upwards and is rounded

 

[Deleted member 2846]

Really? in the pic it points upwards and is rounded

show me what ur talking about

 

[Aesthetics_III]

show me what ur talking about

see how his medial canthus is upwards and rounded

 

[Deleted member 2846]

see how his medial canthus is upwards and rounded

in that pic yeah

 

[needsolution]

Its important. Most of elite MMs (Chico, Gandy, Eriksen, Barrett) have above average medial canthus.

 

[Aesthetics_III]

Its important. Most of elite MMs (Chico, Gandy, Eriksen, Barrett) have above average medial canthus.

Definitely a great feature to have, but not needed for a top tier eye area. Look at O’Pry

 

[Deleted member 2661]

This or death

 

[Aesthetics_III]

This or death
View attachment 257507

mogged

 

[MoroccanGoku]

Kennisgeving voor omleiding

Medial canthus doesn’t really seem that important tbh, O’pry has one of the best eye areas in the world and has a subhuman one, as does Barrett

Can fillers give a downturned medial canthus

 

[Aesthetics_III]

Can fillers give a downturned medial canthus

don’t think so

 

[MoroccanGoku]

don’t think so

What about surgery

 

[DutchPrettyBoy]

if some models don't have it doesn't mean it doesn't look good bro

 

[Aesthetics_III]

if some models don't have it doesn't mean it doesn't look good bro

Not what I was saying, it’s an undeniably good trait; just not integral to having a good, or even godly eye area

 

[DutchPrettyBoy]

Not what I was saying, it’s an undeniably good trait; just not integral to having a good, or even godly eye area

if everything is on point and you dont have a good chantus then yes you can have god eyes but if you dont have everything on point then the chantus can make a big difference my friend. so it will make a big difference with god eyes or incel eyes.

 

[Aesthetics_III]

if everything is on point and you dont have a good chantus then yes you can have god eyes but if you dont have everything on point then the chantus can make a big difference my friend. so it will make a big difference with god eyes or incel eyes.

Doesn’t really make a big difference between these two

 

[Deleted member 2227]

David Gandy medial canthus is not that downward, he is just a pro squint

 

[Golden Glass]

I think OP is mistaking a god tier medial canthus for a good one.

All the men you mentioned have at least good ones. Ericksen and atesh have god tier ones.

 

[Aesthetics_III]

I think OP is mistaking a god tier medial canthus for a good one.

All the men you mentioned have at least good ones. Ericksen and atesh have god tier ones.

I posted atesh and compared erkisen with O’Pry

 

[Golden Glass]

I posted atesh and compared erkisen with O’Pry

Yes. Atesh and Ericksen are god tier.
O’Pry and Barret are very good medial canthi

 

[Aesthetics_III]

Yes. Atesh and Ericksen are god tier.
O’Pry and Barret are very good medial canthi

Atesh and Eriksen have the best medial canthus going, O’Pry and Barrett have shit tier ones

 

[Golden Glass]

Atesh and Eriksen have the best medial canthus going, O’Pry and Barrett have shit tier ones

The part I bolded is why you’re wrong. Laughably so.

 

[Aesthetics_III]

The part I bolded is why you’re wrong. Laughably so.

How so?

 

[DutchPrettyBoy]

Doesn’t really make a big difference between these two

opry's are still better but the chantus on the other guy makes a difference bro. change it with photoshop you will see.

 

[Aesthetics_III]

opry's are still better but the chantus on the other guy makes a difference bro. change it with photoshop you will see.

Missing the point, both eriksen and O’Pry would look better with a downward, elongated medial canthus, but it’s not required to have a god like eye area

 

[DutchPrettyBoy]

Missing the point, both eriksen and O’Pry would look better with a downward, elongated medial canthus, but it’s not required to have a god like eye area

no but it will always look better is what im trying to say

 

[Golden Glass]

How so?

For starters that picture is from very far.

And If you think Sean O’Pry has “shit tier” medial canthi, you’re delusional.

His medial canthus is easily 95th percentile.
So again, you seem to be under the impression that a downward tilted medial canthus is what makes one good, and anything less, no matter how elongated, if it’s still not downward tilted, is “shit tier” or even average. You’re wrong.


Below, is a true shit tier medial canthus. And it even slightly tilts downward.

Spoiler

Order of importance for a good medial canthus:
1. Bare Minimum Length to look normal and not look like the spoiler above.
2. “Sharpness”
3. Extra length, to the point of having that Cat like look.
4. Downward tilt (with all the other three, plus this one, you get Atesh Salih tier)

 

[Deleted member 656]

All the men you mentioned have at least good ones. Ericksen and atesh have god tier ones.

Eriksen's medial canthus is too downturned and looks unnatural. There's more to a medial canthus than how downturned it is.

Atesh Salih's medial canthus is not as deep, nor as downturned as Eriksen's, but it's better because the way that it feeds into the rest of the eye area is more natural and graceful.

 

[Aesthetics_III]

For starters that picture is from very far.

And If you think Sean O’Pry has “shit tier” medial canthi, you’re delusional.
View attachment 257674
His medial canthus is easily 95th percentile.
So again, you seem to be under the impression that a downward tilted medial canthus is what makes one good, and anything less, no matter how elongated, if it’s still not downward tilted, is “shit tier” or even average. You’re wrong.


Below, is a true shit tier medial canthus. And it even slightly tilts downward.

Spoiler

View attachment 257675

Order of importance for a good medial canthus:
1. Bare Minimum Length to look normal and not look like the spoiler above.
2. “Sharpness”
3. Extra length, to the point of having that Cat like look.
4. Downward tilt (with all the other three, plus this one, you get Atesh Salih tier)

very interesting and you do seem correct. so overall, it’s more the length that matters? Guess that makes pfl even more important than I thought

 

[Golden Glass]

very interesting and you do seem correct. so overall, it’s more the length that matters? Guess that makes pfl even more important than I thought

Yes. PFL is insanely important, and incredibly hard to change, in fact, for all intents and purposes—impossible to change and end up looking natural afterwards (unless you have the money and low inhibition to try to get some crazy osteotomies done).

Eriksen's medial canthus is too downturned and looks unnatural. There's more to a medial canthus than how downturned it is.

Atesh Salih's medial canthus is not as deep, nor as downturned as Eriksen's, but it's better because the way that it feeds into the rest of the eye area is more natural and graceful.

Yes I agree. Ericksen’s medial canthus on its own is a marvel, but it doesn’t fit him, and he doesn’t have a lateral canthus long enough to match the length of his medial one (and it’s questionable if having both of them that long would make his PFL too wide) so it makes it look like he can’t look straight at you:

Nick Bateman, on the other hand a PFLcel, also has this issue:

Though for him, it’s obvious that the problem is his lateral canthi being too short, not his medial ones being too long.

 

[owlofathena]

David Gandy medial canthus is not that downward, he is just a pro squint

you kidding right he has one of the best