Men Under 6ft Look Weird

[Zer0/∞]

>Title

Men under 6’0” literally look like something is wrong them proportionally. They do not look like healthy men who grew normally. I say this as a man below average height. My proportions are completely fucked and look super weird.

Yes, super tall lanklets can look weird too, but it’s dimorphic. Manlets either have weird, stubby limbs or oddly-shaped torsos and short necks.

If your a man with normal-sized legs (at least 30in inseam) and a normal sized torso (around 20in) and a normal length neck and a normal sized head, you should be at least 6’0”. If you’re not, you’re failing in one (or all) of these areas, and it shows even beyond your actual height.

Look at Zac Efron. He’s not that short (5’8”), but look at his arms relative to his torso. He looks like he could scratch his knees standing up straight (I can also do this). Look at the length of his humerous compared to his radius bone. Look at the length of his stomach compared to Dave Franco (also manlet) in the back. Zack has the frame of a cereal box. Look at the length and proportions of his limbs compared to the tallish looking women in the back.

Zac Efron looks wrong. This is true for all manlets. You look sickly. 6’0”-6’4” is the normal range for men. Anything outside of this looks uncanny.

 

[beypazarisoda0]

6’0”-6’4” is the normal range for men. Anything outside of this looks uncanny.

Gigacope

6'0 - 6'2 looks barely human

6'2 - 6'4 looks okay

6'4 - 6'8 looks like a MAN

6'8+ if not lanky looks like a superhuman

 

[Deleted member 27219]

yes

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Is 6ft such a magical number cause it looks different to the number before in a man made measuring system?

 

[St.TikTokcel]

>Title

Men under 6’0” literally look like something is wrong them proportionally. They do not look like healthy men who grew normally. I say this as a man below average height. My proportions are completely fucked and look super weird.

Yes, super tall lanklets can look weird too, but it’s dimorphic. Manlets either have weird, stubby limbs or oddly-shaped torsos and short necks.

If your a man with normal-sized legs (at least 30in inseam) and a normal sized torso (around 20in) and a normal length neck and a normal sized head, you should be at least 6’0”. If you’re not, you’re failing in one (or all) of these areas, and it shows even beyond your actual height.

Look at Zac Efron. He’s not that short (5’8”), but look at his arms relative to his torso. He looks like he could scratch his knees standing up straight (I can also do this). Look at the length of his humerous compared to his radius bone. Look at the length of his stomach compared to Dave Franco (also manlet) in the back. Zack has the frame of a cereal box. Look at the length and proportions of his limbs compared to the tallish looking women in the back.

Zac Efron looks wrong. This is true for all manlets. You look sickly. 6’0”-6’4” is the normal range for men. Anything outside of this looks uncanny.

Under 6'2*

 

[Deleted member 19766]

It's all about proportions. Robert De Niro looks fine to me and he's like 5'9 at best when he was young.

 

[Deleted member 16357]

Is 6ft such a magical number cause it looks different to the number before in a man made measuring system?

Yes, in Europe the magic number is 180cm for the same reason.

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

same for women below 5'8

 

[CT03]

It's all about proportions. Robert De Niro looks fine to me and he's like 5'9 at best when he was young.

Yup, longer legs, proportional head, framecel, and long arms

 

[beypazarisoda0]

It's all about proportions. Robert De Niro looks fine to me and he's like 5'9 at best when he was young.

Robert de niro

Tallchad from euphoria

 

[thereallegend]

same for women below 5'8

lol femletism is dimorphic idiot

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

lol femletism is dimorphic idiot

good luck with your incel factory maxing goals of 2030

dimorphic

 

[thereallegend]

good luck with your incel factory maxing goals of 2030

dimorphic

Yes. estrogen closes growth plates.

 

[Deleted member 19174]

I agree

 

[Momolooksmax]

you mean under 6'3

 

[Deleted member 27932]

Under 6'2*

You love that number a lot

 

[JackHanma]

>Title

Men under 6’0” literally look like something is wrong them proportionally. They do not look like healthy men who grew normally. I say this as a man below average height. My proportions are completely fucked and look super weird.

Yes, super tall lanklets can look weird too, but it’s dimorphic. Manlets either have weird, stubby limbs or oddly-shaped torsos and short necks.

If your a man with normal-sized legs (at least 30in inseam) and a normal sized torso (around 20in) and a normal length neck and a normal sized head, you should be at least 6’0”. If you’re not, you’re failing in one (or all) of these areas, and it shows even beyond your actual height.

Look at Zac Efron. He’s not that short (5’8”), but look at his arms relative to his torso. He looks like he could scratch his knees standing up straight (I can also do this). Look at the length of his humerous compared to his radius bone. Look at the length of his stomach compared to Dave Franco (also manlet) in the back. Zack has the frame of a cereal box. Look at the length and proportions of his limbs compared to the tallish looking women in the back.

Zac Efron looks wrong. This is true for all manlets. You look sickly. 6’0”-6’4” is the normal range for men. Anything outside of this looks uncanny.

I’m 5’10”

 

[normie_joe]

Are you talking 6 ft vertically or horizontally?

Cause you only need a few more happy meals to surpass the latter.

 

[omarthegoat195]

men under 5’10* i would say

 

[Deleted member 28039]

lol at "lanklets" manlets coping calling tall guys names. i am a manlet and i dont think that the term lanlet even exist. its actually the opposite. tall skinny guys are insanly attractive in the eyes of woman. tall pretty boys are gigachads

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Your face loses proportion if too tall, best height is like 5’10

 

[Deleted member 28039]

Your face loses proportion if too tall, best height is like 5’10

no such thing "too tall". height is dominance. the taller the better

 

[Lucid]

no such thing "too tall". height is dominance. the taller the better

Klinefelters niggers don't look dominant you grey retard. One rugby tackle and I'm putting them in the ER.

 

[Deleted member 24940]

Robert de niro

Tallchad from euphoria

Euphoria guy has negative canthal tilt, ogre for him.

Memes aside pheno can carry hard. If your a white 5'7 manlet you may not get attractive white girls but you can slay Asians, blacks, and latina HTBs.

SMV is more of a holistic thing and lookism fails to consider factors other than face and height. Income is another massive factor in attractiveness, where being rich and dressing old money has been shown to make the same guy more physically attractive to women.

 

[Deleted member 28039]

Euphoria guy has negative canthal tilt, ogre for him.

Memes aside pheno can carry hard. If your a white 5'7 manlet you may not get attractive white girls but you can slay Asians, blacks, and latinas.

de niro was good looking back in the day. and FACE = EVERYTHING

noticed how none of the holywood actors are bald? because they know they cant sell a good protaganist who is bald to the audience. thats why bald guys are always vilians. even in the dune movie. all the evil ones are bald

 

[Deleted member 19766]

Robert de niro

Tallchad from euphoria

Are you fucking retarded I'm just saying that he looks average height (NOT SHORT) despite only being 5'9

 

[Deleted member 13710]

Thx for the looksmaxxing advice

 

[looksmaxxster]

I'd say under 5 ft 11 looks weird.

5 ft 11 is the bare minimum.

 

[Zer0/∞]

Thx for the looksmaxxing advice

NP

 

[risque_dew]

I will actually agree with you here and I'm one of those "height is cope" kind of guys too (because it is for the most part). Shorter men do look proportionally off though, whether it be stubby limbs or a weird/short torso.

 

[LilJojo]

Gigacope

6'0 - 6'2 looks barely human

6'2 - 6'4 looks okay

6'4 - 6'8 looks like a MAN

6'8+ if not lanky looks like a superhuman

JFL if you aren’t 7 feet

 

[BimaxLaser]

I'd say under 5 ft 11 looks weird.

5 ft 11 is the bare minimum.

Bro might be 5'11

 

[slavicpsycho]

Americans knew what they were doing with the imperial system. 6’0 is the ubermensch height

 

[BWC_virgin]

I’m 5’10 6’2 wingspan 34/35 inch inseam and I think I look pretty proportional, my friends are the same height they have good proportions 5’10 wingspan people have mistake them for bieng like 6’1

There’s one guy at my work he has a big torso but short legs and is like 5’8/5’9 he looks absolutely garbage walking around like a clown srs it just looks wrong

Everyone else there is 5’10+ up to probably 6’2 they all look normal proportions

I was at a party with my relatives and one dude there had good proportions from a distance he looked like he must be at least 5’10 with wide looking shoulders (not gymmaxxed) but when I got closet I realized he was like 5’6 yet somehow he looked good idk how to explain it like tall fully developed skeleton just smaller

My other friend that’s 5’6.5 looks hella underdeveloped like narrow short peanut scull low bonemass

I have a 6’0 friend that’s got the exact same leg length but slightly longer torso he looks proportional too but he’s narrower than me

My dad is 6’1 and has like literally the same proportions as me but just scaled up, his wingspan is like 6’4 looks proportional

people who are average height for their race or ethnicity generally look proportional while people who are way taller or shorter look strange

There’s a certain feeling that when you look at someone they look short and shitty basically, like looking at an actual midget you can tell something went wrong,

I only get this feeling when looking at peoples that are short for their race for example the 5’9 white person at my work looks absolute shit But one of my friends who is like half Vietnamese or something looks normal at 5’7

I think this all makes sense if you think about it