Mods are wayy too lax on cp

[forevermirin]

There's been a post in offtopic about a 17 year olds ass (literally the title) and I've been avoiding clicking on it all day. But that shit keeps getting bumped and the fucking mods clearly don't give a fuck about it.

Delete it and ban whoever posted it asap.

 

[Deleted member 26116]

CP = Child Porn.

17-year-old = Not a child.

Conclusion: KYS, OP.

 

[forevermirin]

CP = Child Porn.

17-year-old = Not a child.

Conclusion: KYS, OP.

17 year olds are high schoolers and hence children.

 

[cytoplasm]

That was not cp in any way shape or form

 

[MoggerGaston]

Mods need to ban necrophilia-posts.

I am sick and tired of seeing 25+ yo women being posted here. Fucking a 25yo woman is similar to fucking a corpse. Disgusting

Not everyone is a necrophile

 

[Deleted member 26116]

17 year olds are high schoolers and hence children.

That makes no sense, brother.

Children have underdeveloped bodies. In general terms, they cannot menstruate, reproduce, ejaculate, grow pubic hair, do not have milk in their breasts, do not have large butts, their sex hormones are not active.

What you saw in the video was a girl that is clearly developed for sex. Don't lie to yourself.

 

[Deleted member 2981]

Agreed

 

[HerpDerpson]

There's been a post in offtopic about a 17 year olds ass

Link?

 

[cytoplasm]

Link?

17 yo jb with insane ass

mesmerizing motions anmd jiggles, shit face though.

looksmax.org

 

[Xangsane]

 

[Abhorrence]

View attachment 2262158

SQUISHY SQUISHY!!!

 

[Artemis]

There's been a post in offtopic about a 17 year olds ass (literally the title) and I've been avoiding clicking on it all day. But that shit keeps getting bumped and the fucking mods clearly don't give a fuck about it.

Delete it and ban whoever posted it asap.

@forevermirin trying to avoid clicking on JB's ass pictures:

but failing yet again:

 

[BoredPrince]

17 year olds are high schoolers and hence children.

In most of Europe age of consent is 16

 

[Artemis]

In most of Europe age of consent is 16

TBH, it is consent for SEX.

For taking explicit videos/photos, one could get into prison for a few years. Since this is not covered under consent laws in most places.

 

[BoredPrince]

That makes no sense, brother.

Children have underdeveloped bodies. In general terms, they cannot menstruate, reproduce, ejaculate, grow pubic hair, do not have milk in their breasts, do not have large butts, their sex hormones are not active.

What you saw in the video was a girl that is clearly developed for sex. Don't lie to yourself.

And @leontheleanmaxxer showed us that JBs are sluts anyway

 

[omarthegoat195]

There's been a post in offtopic about a 17 year olds ass (literally the title) and I've been avoiding clicking on it all day. But that shit keeps getting bumped and the fucking mods clearly don't give a fuck about it.

Delete it and ban whoever posted it asap.

17 can be legal or illegal depending on AOC

 

[BoredPrince]

TBH, it is consent for SEX.

For taking explicit videos/photos, one could get into prison for a few years. Since this is not covered under consent laws in most places.

Well yeah, but when you see a hot girl would you fuck her or take pictures?

 

[Deleted member 30552]

holy shit at this snowflake its not even a nude butt its in clothes

 

[Artemis]

Well yeah, but when you see a hot girl would you fuck her or take pictures?

We are talking about pics here. Clearly pics are not covered under the consent laws.

 

[LowTrust]

disappointed when I found out she was wearing clothes

 

[BoredPrince]

We are talking about pics here. Clearly pics are not covered under the consent laws.

But the girl is in clothes and she was clearly wearing that tights for attention and wanted to show everyone her ass

I'm pretty sure that's not CP, even if she was nude, she would be to blame since she posted it

 

[Artemis]

But the girl is in clothes and she was clearly wearing that tights for attention and wanted to show everyone her ass

I'm pretty sure that's not CP, even if she was nude, she would be to blame since she posted it

CP has a PRECISE MEANING. We have no CP here, or at least i have not seen any.

This pic is NOT CP.

And no, it does NOT matter if "she wants attention". The law prosecutes the people who store it on their laptop.

But since we are not storing anything, we are good to go

 

[BoredPrince]

CP has a PRECISE MEANING. We have no CP here, or at least i have not seen any.

This pic is NOT CP.

And no, it does NOT matter if "she wants attention". The law prosecutes the people who store it on their laptop.

But since we are not storing anything, we are good to go

And I agree with you...

I'm sorry, but what tf are we even disagreeing about?

 

[Deleted member 28270]

17 year olds are high schoolers and hence children.

Girls get fucked at 13 here. 17 they are pornstars

 

[Guba]

Dunno if this is a troll thread, but how can that qualify as porn by today's standards? If it was actual sex, as in penetrative sex, yes, that's not ok even though 17 is not a child, let's be honest. But that's just some thot in yoga pants. Do we even know her real age? Having sex with a 17-year-old is not even illegal in most countries. I'm not saying that would make it ok to film such an act and distribute the footage, but still.

But it's true that I don't know the legalistic aspects of this kind of stuff, including the girl in yoga pants.

 

[aBetterMii]

While that post isnt technically cp, i have to agree since that one guy isnt banned for posting the one pic even tho it was censored

We should ban everyone who talks about wantng to fuck middle schoolers (and/or younger) as well imo

 

[Deleted member 26116]

13-23 is prime. Teenage girls and women in their early twenties are the most beautiful and fertile females out there.

Screenshot this and come at me later, agecuckolds.

 

[forevermirin]

While that post isnt technically cp, i have to agree since that one guy isnt banned for posting the one pic even tho it was censored

We should ban everyone who talks about wantng to fuck middle schoolers (and/or younger) as well imo

yeah its not cp i know that - but its still sexualizing a minor which isnt something i want to be associated with.

That makes no sense, brother.

Children have underdeveloped bodies. In general terms, they cannot menstruate, reproduce, ejaculate, grow pubic hair, do not have milk in their breasts, do not have large butts, their sex hormones are not active.

What you saw in the video was a girl that is clearly developed for sex. Don't lie to yourself.

unfortunately for your pedo ass that isn't how it works. i hope to god you're a minor yourself.

 

[Deleted member 26116]

yeah its not cp i know that - but its still sexualizing a minor which isnt something i want to be associated with.

unfortunately for your pedo ass that isn't how it works. i hope to god you're a minor yourself.

You're smarter than this, boyo :/

 

[Deleted member 22627]

17 year olds are high schoolers and hence children.

KYS

 

[LowTrust]

12-15 is prime. Teenage girls are the most beautiful and fertile females out there.

tbh