couragecel
𝓑𝓳𝓸𝓻𝓷 𝓐𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2026
- Posts
- 6,552
- Reputation
- 8,598
Delon, unfrauded obv, htn max in org
Bjorn anderssen jfl
For sure: "dimolet" "htb"
Marlon
Ben barnes
Padalekki
Blue smith
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Whoidk abt some of these
Is sátire, "moggers"Who tf says ' Moggers '
alain and bjorn also padalekki
look at this forums standards, how is he chadlite in that photo?not lorenzo i think he could get a lcl
look at this forums standards, how is he chadlite in that photo?
You have a great point, but 1% looks is htn, no chad, your scale will be horrible if chad is just 1%Ratings have become so deflated because we have all these fruitless discussions comparing supermodels trying to figure out who mogs, which necessitates higher and higher standards for reaching chad tier to distinguish between them. Imo if you're in the top 1% of facial attractiveness you're chad, at that point you're subject to almost all benefits of pretty privilege
not a chancenot lorenzo i think he could get a lcl
This post is a critique of the "org's" beauty standard; everyone on the list is extremely attractive.Ppl see this and think “hardcore” when it’s rlly a normie mindset, trying to distinguish a niche by being disingenuous on how good looking they are isn’t intelligent.
Most of these dudes were/are sex SMV icons
Well my point is that it's unpractical to make any discernment beyond the top 1% (or something around that, maybe top 0.1% at most). If you're in that top percentile you've already locked down all the important aspects of facial attractiveness that everybody agrees is important like facial harmony, dimo, health indicators, contrast, bone structure, etc. You're going to have a great life.You have a great point, but 1% looks is htn, no chad, your scale will be horrible if chad is just 1%
nigga he already gets rated mostly htn , some people already even rated him hmtn.not lorenzo i think he could get a lcl
Truth nukenigga he already gets rated mostly htn , some people already even rated him hmtn.
theres no chance hed get higher than lhtn if he posted here as a random
"zero dimorphism, you look like a girl"bjorn would unironically be rated ltn here
Boneless, philtrumcel, 0 misc and etc"zero dimorphism, you look like a girl"
Ben barnes is "unanimously very attractive"? He is very glazed by foidsWell my point is that it's unpractical to make any discernment beyond the top 1% (or something around that, maybe top 0.1% at most). If you're in that top percentile you've already locked down all the important aspects of facial attractiveness that everybody agrees is important like facial harmony, dimo, health indicators, contrast, bone structure, etc. You're going to have a great life.
The remaining things to base a judgement on are miscellaneous things that there is less consensus about, like eye and hair color, archetypes, etc. If you're like mhtn you're not going to have any noteworthy less success with women than if you were true adam.
People will never agree on who's the facially hottest among this elite, just see for youself, constantly on the forums we see these endless debates trying to figure out who mogs, is it Hexum? Alfredo Hernandez De La Cruz? Vasiliy Stepanov? Archie Cranch? David Gandy? There is no point anymore, these guys are just unanimously very attractive.
Eric roberts mogs himanother actor that is overly glazed that would be rated mtn here
View attachment 5707719
eric roberts only looked good in one movieEric roberts mogs him
Brutaleric roberts only looked good in one movie
But the prime was insaneeric roberts only looked good in one movie
I never said thatBen barnes is "unanimously very attractive"?
Yes, but i want knowI never said that
Well my point is that it's unpractical to make any discernment beyond the top 1% (or something around that, maybe top 0.1% at most). If you're in that top percentile you've already locked down all the important aspects of facial attractiveness that everybody agrees is important like facial harmony, dimo, health indicators, contrast, bone structure, etc. You're going to have a great life.
The remaining things to base a judgement on are miscellaneous things that there is less consensus about, like eye and hair color, archetypes, etc. If you're like mhtn you're not going to have any noteworthy less success with women than if you were true adam.
People will never agree on who's the facially hottest among this elite, just see for youself, constantly on the forums we see these endless debates trying to figure out who mogs, is it Hexum? Alfredo Hernandez De La Cruz? Vasiliy Stepanov? Archie Cranch? David Gandy? There is no point anymore, these guys are just unanimously very attractive.
Ben Barnes is alright in my opinion. Sometimes he can look really goodYes, but i want know
With short hair he is "ok" but with long hairBen Barnes is alright in my opinion. Sometimes he can look really good
View attachment 5707871
Maybe like top 5 percentile when he's at his best.