St.TikTokcel
159cm ofiara klinefeltera/Male feminist, Anti JBW
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2022
- Posts
- 28,997
- Reputation
- 51,687
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Whatever helps you sleep.
View attachment 2154744
Some autistic lines and circles? Of course if your mandible is extremely recessed you can still have a normal bite even with a non forward grown maxillaView attachment 2154705View attachment 2154706View attachment 2154707
Do you understand what this means or will you keep coping?
Means her maxilla is recessed. So chink cope thread debunked. Just as this downgrown la creatura.Some autistic lines and circles? Of course if your mandible is extremely recessed you can still have a normal bite even with a non forward grown maxilla
I was thinking you were just disingenuous but now I'm thinking that you are actually blind whilst also being severely autistic.Means her maxilla is recessed. So chink cope thread debunked. Just as this downgrown la creatura.
View attachment 2154756
Now tell me if you agree with the og post i'm asking for the third time.
Why are you coparing those two, one is clearly more recessed. Whats ur point?I was thinking you were just disingenuous but now I'm thinking that you are actually blind whilst also being severely autistic.
Do you not see the difference between these two skulls?
View attachment 2154764
Are you actually measuring forward growth relative to the forehead? If so then that is enough proof that you have no idea what forward growth actually is as well as not having credibility with facial ratios due to blindness.
Is this skull also recessed?Why are you coparing those two, one is clearly more recessed. Whats ur point?
Relative to forehead? I never did that.
Also answer already do you agree or no.
Agree with what? Which one looks better? Hard to pinpoint because I'd say thisAlso answer already do you agree or no.
The overlay is wrong but yes the skull's maxilla is recessed.
You don't call weak undereyes a recessed maxillaThe overlay is wrong but yes the skull's maxilla is recessed.
Of course you can, it's mostly determined by upper maxillary protrusion. But bad undereye is not the only sign.You don't call weak undereyes a recessed maxilla
This whole time you didn't give your definition of "maxillary recession". Because in reality, no surgeon would consider that recessed. I've said this.Of course you can, it's mostly determined by upper maxillary protrusion. But bad undereye is not the only sign.
His maxilla is normal but it's not protrusive exactly under the eyes which gives worse infraorbital support.
You know what's also normal today? Being fat or losing hair or dying of heart disease. That doesn't mean it's healthy or good.This whole time you didn't give your definition of "maxillary recession". Because in reality, no surgeon would consider that recessed.
So you agree that it's recessed. Good.His maxilla is normal but it's not protrusive exactly under the eyes which gives worse infraorbital support.
Yeah, sure. The thing is that I have never seen one human being in my daily life who'd have undereyes that you consider ideal. Such forward grown malars and infraorbital parts of the maxilla were only reserved to humans that have thrived in perfect conditions for multiple generations, this was rare at all times of human existence.You know what's also normal today? Being fat or losing hair or dying of heart disease. That doesn't mean it's healthy or good.
So you agree that it's recessed. Good.
Boy? Not a chance. Idk what ideas you have about sexual dimorphism but females and male skulls are not supposed to be that different. Yesterday you said something about god and didn't let me explain it, but think about why the skull looks the way it looks.Agree with what? Which one looks better? Hard to pinpoint because I'd say thislooks better but not really attractive. This kind of just looks like a very well developed, properly formed prepubescent boy.
Her jaw is "round" because it's horribly downgrown. There is no evolutionary reason for female jaws to be more downgrown than male since it's proven to impair breathing. Cheekbones likewise. Women naturally have slightly smaller cheekbones than men but the difference isn't big and neither of these girs has "manly cheekbones".However the other Asian does look more feminine, with her jaw and chin being round. More feminine cheekbones among other traits that don't look as manly as the former.
This is the time we live in. Todays world is completely different than what we're adjusted for. If i'm being honest humans were doomed with the invention of fire.Yeah, sure. The thing is that I have never seen one human being in my daily life who'd have undereyes that you consider ideal. Such forward grown malars and infraorbital parts of the maxilla were only reserved to humans that have thrived in perfect conditions for multiple generations, this was rare at all times of human existence.
Of course robbie isn't ideal, she is also somewhat downgrown, but i can't find a better female example today unfortunately.Even Robbie doesn't have perfect undereyes.
And he also had to wear braces to fix crooked teeth
Dude, just no. Human skulls are VERY different. Even on malformed skulls you can see the very clear difference. Humans are an extremely dimorphic species.Boy? Not a chance. Idk what ideas you have about sexual dimorphism but females and male skulls are not supposed to be that different. Yesterday you said something about god and didn't let me explain it, but think about why the skull looks the way it looks.
These are nonexistent, forged animals. A LOT of actually real animals have dimorphism.Look at this for example - male and female bonobo skull.
They are very similar. Same core features, most angles and ratios.
What makes them different is size and soft features.
"Short lower third" isn't a thing. It depends on mouth placement. Those eyebrows are obviously caked on and plucked. High set eyebrows aren't necessarily feminine. Nose tissue growth depends on estrogen levels and androgen sensitivity (same with gonion growth).You can tell that the girls i posted has feminine soft features - thin arched, high set eyebrows, small sloped nose with small holes, high cheek fat, thicker, darker lips. As well as some hard features, like short lower third and inward gonions (which are probably the only major differences between the male and female human skull).
Those are easily affected by maldevelopment, like in these cases. There is just as much cheekbone variance between males. Some have giant cheekbones amd many are boneless. Many women have bigger cheekbones than the average man. It is dimorphic but you won't guess the sex based on cheekbones alone. The inward gonion is a much better sign.Dude, just no. Human skulls are VERY different. Even on malformed skulls you can see the very clear difference. Humans are an extremely dimorphic species.
From the front the differences are extremely apparent. The general skull width, orbit size, zygo projection, chin and the entire mandible.
They look pretty similar from the side, but the male is very maldeveloped in this example. Still, browridge is a good sign for sure. Ramus length as well but as you can see it doesn't apply to these pics due to how badly developed the male is.
The sides too. More zygo, growth around the ramus and gonions. Brow growth. Forehead slope (this can be affected by trauma extremely easily and the male here doesn't showcase it in this example). It's very obvious, male and female bone structure differs extremely. Body proportions and frame is very different too.
They do, humans do too, but not much in the skull itself, mainly other features.These are nonexistent, forged animals. A LOT of actually real animals have dimorphism.
Not really , you measure that either by measuring the ramus or from bottom of mandible to teeth."Short lower third" isn't a thing. It depends on mouth placement.
It's a desired dimorphic feature if women fraud it. But yea, not 100% feminine it's more regulated by epigenetics, although women had differnt epigenetic conditions so their eyebrows stayed high set.Those eyebrows are obviously caked on and plucked. High set eyebrows aren't necessarily feminine.
Dude don't even use modern "males" as an example for morphology. You don't know the shit that happened in this god forsaken place. Old skeletal finding are the only good source of anything regarding this.There is just as much cheekbone variance between males. Some have giant cheekbones amd many are boneless. Many women have bigger cheekbones than the average man. It is dimorphic but you won't guess the sex based on cheekbones alone. The inward gonion is a much better sign.
Back then you obviously could determine the sex just from cheekbones, but the fact you no longer can proves that it's tied more to epigenetic development than to x/y chromosomes.Dude don't even use modern "males" as an example for morphology. You don't know the shit that happened in this god forsaken place. Old skeletal finding are the only good source of anything regarding this.
Post the evidenceClouDer has been exposed for being a troll recently
Op is retarded
remember my words
To me it proves that males were killed off. Because dimorphisms were clear even on the malformed skulls.Back then you obviously could determine the sex just from cheekbones, but the fact you no longer can proves that it's tied more to epigenetic development than to x/y chromosomes.
You measure from forehead and LIP?? Idiot.View attachment 2154938 its not recessed
Post the evidence
bro everything else you measure is bullshitYou measure from forehead and LIP?? Idiot.
The other foid in that gif still looks Mongoloid (probably Latina).Same species.
View attachment 2154450
Too many retards recently like @cloUder and @Meshuggahballsoup who are either half homosexuals or mouthbreathers in denial saying that recessed and downgrown mtf trannies like this asian "female" mog proprely developed women like margot robbie.
View attachment 2154455View attachment 2154456
@cloUder:
View attachment 2154458
View attachment 2154463
And his loyal abused dog @Meshuggahballsoup:
View attachment 2154460
Jfl if you take these homosexuals and their "opinions" seriously.
@krisal @5'7 zoomer @ike57 @ascension! @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @anticel @julianchicago @Mouthbreath @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @beatEMinGTA @Grel Hellscream @ripcordgod1 @copefuel @positivecoper @malicieusss @Ragnar @FrameMaxxed @BongMog @Whatashame @exo @gioscotti
Oh, I think he just changed his mind. He has more recent posts where he worships aryan foids
There is some truth to this, metaphorically. I was goning to make a thread called "men don't exist". Fact is the the embryonic base is female and without enough stimulation by male hormones the human will basically remain female through most of the development. Even tho he has a Y chromosome.To me it proves that males were killed off. Because dimorphisms were clear even on the malformed skulls.
I will make a man more precious than fine gold; even a man than the golden wedge of Ophir.
Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.
Yeah right, changing your mind on attraction. Just fucking lolOh, I think he just changed his mind. He has more recent posts where he worships aryan foids
Bruuh what a dumbass you are. So if he makes a duckface his maxilla suddendly becomes forward grown...bro everything else you measure is bullshit
Anteface projection is genetic, nothing to do with "maxillary recession"
No? And in this pic the girl is recessedBruuh what a dumbass you are. So if he makes a duckface his maxilla suddendly becomes forward grown...
View attachment 2154943
This does make sense. Kill off males and let this hybrid female being repopulate in their place. I mean, if you were someone with enough power and desire to keep control at all cost this would be a thing you'd want to do.There is some truth to this, metaphorically. I was goning to make a thread called "men don't exist". Fact is the the embryonic base is female and without enough stimulation by male hormones the human will basically remain female through most of the development. Even tho he has a Y chromosome.
You can't tell if she's recessed by this method anyways, bluecel. This method is for determining maxillary rotation.
Cope Dr BruhYou can't tell if she's recessed by this method anyways, bluecel. This method is for determining maxillary rotation.
Proprely developed girls like the one i posted are rare as well, bacause it's not as much about hormones as about physical disturbance nowadays. Hormones don't make you downward grown.This does make sense. Kill off males and let this hybrid female being repopulate in their place. I mean, if you were someone with enough power and desire to keep control at all cost this would be a thing you'd want to do.
You need to use the frankurt palne perpendicular line. (Or you can just see most of the time.)Cope Dr Bruh
this method is bullshit, otherwise it would mean that for example brad pitt is recessed , except he isn'tYou need to use the frankurt palne perpendicular line. (Or you can just see most of the time.)
He is tho...this method is bullshit, otherwise it would mean that for example brad pitt is recessed , except he isn't
lol he's not, he just genetically has a flat maxillaHe is tho...
You can keep coping with genetics but there is no such thing as flat maxilla. Only recession. Look at his undereye.lol he's not, he just genetically has a flat maxilla
Undereyes is genetic , I have already seen subhuman recessed peoples with good eye supports and I saw chad 7 psl with subhuman eyes supports.You can keep coping with genetics but there is no such thing as flat maxilla. Only recession. Look at his undereye.
View attachment 2154976
Any sort a properly developed human is rare today. Everything is smaller, that includes the brain which is probably very desired by the people running all of the chains. Anyways, what are you going to do about it?Proprely developed girls like the one i posted are rare as well, bacause it's not as much about hormones as about physical disturbance nowadays. Hormones don't make you downward grown.
View attachment 2154957View attachment 2154960
View attachment 2154961View attachment 2154963
I'm not saying he needs bimax. But thinking that bad undereye is genetic is wild.Undereyes is genetic , I have already seen subhuman recessed peoples with good eye supports and I saw chad 7 psl with subhuman eyes supports.
No surgeon will want to perform bimax on Brad Pitt, they will call him crazy
he will just look like a monkey after bimax
Btw shame on u to think this guy is recessedYou can keep coping with genetics but there is no such thing as flat maxilla. Only recession. Look at his undereye.
View attachment 2154976