Muscles > Height. Thoughts?

[LooksPSL]

I think react to muscles much better than they react to height.

a 5’10 man with big arms, v taper, and abs, would be considered hotter than a 6’3 man with average build

yes or nah

 

[OCDMaxxing]

Cope. Nobody wants a compensator, and that's what manlet with muscles is. Face > Height > Muscles

 

[Deleted member 5634]

 

[fauxfox]

You can always work out and develop muscles, you can't work out and develop height. So height is just objectively better if you can put in the effort to work out, they have a higher looks ceiling.

Most people would rather be ottermode and 6'3 than 5'9 with a bodybuilder physique.

 

[LooksPSL]

Cope. Nobody wants a compensator, and that's what manlet with muscles is. Face > Height > Muscles

View attachment 721697

That’s why I said 5’10. 5’10 is not manlet.

AVERAGE height with good body >good height with AVERAGE body

 

[LooksPSL]

First guy is 6’3 second guy is 5’10

do you really think most women would find the first guy more attractive than the second guy?

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Unless the tall guy has shit inserts with short shoulders, which is very rare, then it's out of the question.

 

[Mouthbreath]

View attachment 721711View attachment 721712
First guy is 6’3 second guy is 5’10

do you really think most women would find the first guy more attractive than the second guy?

Yes jfl. First of all, height shows good genetics => women respond more to it than to muscles which can be obtained htrough hard work and chemistry

Second, everybody works out nowadays in some form, the body on the right is nothing too special. However 6'3 is still rare.

Also in clothes you wouldnt be able to tell much of a difference between the too, just that one looks like a kid next to the other

so you could think, roiding and getting huge might compensate for lack of height (at 5'10) which it actually does imo, but just regarding mogging and status amongst males. Women are usually not attracted to roiders.

so no matter how you look at it, average skinny body at 6'3 definitely mogs.

 

[6’1cel]

I think react to muscles much better than they react to height.

a 5’10 man with big arms, v taper, and abs, would be considered hotter than a 6’3 man with average build

yes or nah

this situation is wrong but it is true to a lesser extreme
more like 6’ with muscles mogs 6’3 fatty/skelly

 

[Deleted member 7901]

Being 6'3 is one thing, but having an actual decent frame at that height is a different thing, since majority of people don't have genes which are fit to this height and are just random mutations (usually the only ones this tall in their family)
I very rarely meet people who are this tall and don't have either a fucked up frame (skeleton frame) or shit face,
there is a reason why 99% of this forum is 6'1+

after 6' there is barely any benefit, and its much better 6' with a good frame then a 6'5 with a shit frame

6'3 with good frame > 5'10 and muscles
6'3 with good frame < 5'10 good face and muscles
6'3 with shit frame < 5'10 with muscles

in my opinion at least

 

[fauxfox]

View attachment 721711View attachment 721712
First guy is 6’3 second guy is 5’10

do you really think most women would find the first guy more attractive than the second guy?

Left guy only has to do bodyweight exercises and play some sports for a few months to mog the 5'10 guy. Almost everyone would choose the left guy's base because it can be improved.

 

[LooksPSL]

Left guy only has to do bodyweight exercises and play some sports for a few months to mog the 5'10 guy. Almost everyone would choose the left guy's base because it can be improved.

Left guy only has to do bodyweight exercises and play some sports for a few months to mog the 5'10 guy. Almost everyone would choose the left guy's base because it can be improved.

True but I don’t mean base, I mean just how they are now

 

[SPFromNY914]

I think react to muscles much better than they react to height.

a 5’10 man with big arms, v taper, and abs, would be considered hotter than a 6’3 man with average build

yes or nah

Depends on the face. If the 5'10 guy has a better face then him

 

[Deleted member 5818]

Being 6'3 is one thing, but having an actual decent frame at that height is a different thing, since majority of people don't have genes which are fit to this height and are just random mutations (usually the only ones this tall in their family)
I very rarely meet people who are this tall and don't have either a fucked up frame (skeleton frame) or shit face,
there is a reason why 99% of this forum is 6'1+

after 6' there is barely any benefit, and its much better 6' with a good frame then a 6'5 with a shit frame

6'3 with good frame > 5'10 and muscles
6'3 with good frame < 5'10 good face and muscles
6'3 with shit frame < 5'10 with muscles

in my opinion at least

extreme fucking cope

 

[SPFromNY914]

Being 6'3 is one thing, but having an actual decent frame at that height is a different thing, since majority of people don't have genes which are fit to this height and are just random mutations (usually the only ones this tall in their family)
I very rarely meet people who are this tall and don't have either a fucked up frame (skeleton frame) or shit face,
there is a reason why 99% of this forum is 6'1+

after 6' there is barely any benefit, and its much better 6' with a good frame then a 6'5 with a shit frame

6'3 with good frame > 5'10 and muscles
6'3 with good frame < 5'10 good face and muscles
6'3 with shit frame < 5'10 with muscles

in my opinion at least

Roman Reigns is one of the ultimate Gigachads at 6'3 great frame great face

 

[LooksPSL]

Depends on the face. If the 5'10 guy has a better face then him

Faces held equal

 

[RAITEIII]

View attachment 721711View attachment 721712
First guy is 6’3 second guy is 5’10

do you really think most women would find the first guy more attractive than the second guy?

Stop deluding urself height >

 

[SPFromNY914]

Faces held equal

Oh then 6'3 easily jfl

 

[Deleted member 8846]

Yes jfl. First of all, height shows good genetics => women respond more to it than to muscles which can be obtained htrough hard work and chemistry

Second, everybody works out nowadays in some form, the body on the right is nothing too special. However 6'3 is still rare.

Also in clothes you wouldnt be able to tell much of a difference between the too, just that one looks like a kid next to the other

so you could think, roiding and getting huge might compensate for lack of height (at 5'10) which it actually does imo, but just regarding mogging and status amongst males. Women are usually not attracted to roiders.

so no matter how you look at it, average skinny body at 6'3 definitely mogs.

tallfag cope

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

You can always work out and develop muscles, you can't work out and develop height. So height is just objectively better if you can put in the effort to work out, they have a higher looks ceiling.

Most people would rather be ottermode and 6'3 than 5'9 with a bodybuilder physique.

Mirin that beautiful Susano’o Avi

 

[LooksPSL]

Yes jfl. First of all, height shows good genetics => women respond more to it than to muscles which can be obtained htrough hard work and chemistry

Second, everybody works out nowadays in some form, the body on the right is nothing too special. However 6'3 is still rare.

Also in clothes you wouldnt be able to tell much of a difference between the too, just that one looks like a kid next to the other

so you could think, roiding and getting huge might compensate for lack of height (at 5'10) which it actually does imo, but just regarding mogging and status amongst males. Women are usually not attracted to roiders.

so no matter how you look at it, average skinny body at 6'3 definitely mogs.

Oh then 6'3 easily jfl

If Jeff seid lost all his muscle and grew 5 inches do you think he would get laid and approached more?

 

[Mouthbreath]

If Jeff seid lost all his muscle and grew 5 inches do you think he would get laid and approached more?

just have 1 in a billion muscle genetics bro

 

[SPFromNY914]

If Jeff seid lost all his muscle and grew 5 inches do you think he would get laid and approached more?

Obv not but what is he grew 5 inches and kept all his muscle

 

[LooksPSL]

just have 1 in a billion muscle genetics bro

Obv not but what is he grew 5 inches and kept all his muscle

That’s not the point. If there is a dude with a 10/10 body and average height he will do better than 10/10 height with average body

 

[Mouthbreath]

That’s not the point. If there is a dude with a 10/10 body and average height he will do better than 10/10 height with average body

you can not compare his muscle genetics to height. Height is pretty generic, you'd have to compare his physique to someone who is 7ft but then again 7ft is not really attractive anymore so it doesnt make sense

 

[Mr.cope]

Anyone can get muscles
Everyone cant get height

 

[EckhartTollemaxx]

Cope. Nobody wants a compensator, and that's what manlet with muscles is. Face > Height > Muscles

The best option is to have them all and that's what you pretty much need these days.

 

[Torero]

never, assuming they have similar faces

 

[Deleted member 6573]

Height >>>>>>>> muscles

always

every time

you are coping hard

 

[Deleted member 5634]

That’s why I said 5’10. 5’10 is not manlet.

AVERAGE height with good body >good height with AVERAGE body

Jay cutler the bb from the pick is 5'10

 

[LooksPSL]

Jay cutler the bb from the pick is 5'10

True.
Cutler doesn’t have a good body though, and that dude is well over 6’3

 

[Secretariat12]

In a smaller example, 6'-6'1 with good build mogs 6'3-6'4 tho. 5'10 is manlet territory tbh

 

[Alexanderr]

I think react to muscles much better than they react to height.

a 5’10 man with big arms, v taper, and abs, would be considered hotter than a 6’3 man with average build

yes or nah

But would they a 5’3 man with those features be considered hotter? No, of course not.
5’10 is a decent height. Being a decent height is essential to even being considered by women.

 

[Deleted member 8080]

evidence that u r wrong:

 

[Deleted member 4720]

everybody is coping hard itt

Im 5 ft 9.5 and girls mire me HARD in the gym because I insert, frame and muscle mog 90 % of tallcels. i have JEff seid type ratios

Its like on paper 5ft 4 is a shit height for a woman but if she has huge tits you just cant resist the urge to fuck her

 

[Deleted member 5634]

evidence that u r wrong:

Uff poor gymcel, getting ignored lol

 

[Deleted member 8080]

Uff poor gymcel, getting ignored lol

5 4 and bald. it's over

 

[loksr]

I think react to muscles much better than they react to height.

a 5’10 man with big arms, v taper, and abs, would be considered hotter than a 6’3 man with average build

yes or nah

Not muscles, frame. Frame (basically shoulder width) mogs height as long as you’re around average height.

Both are absolutely nothing compared to face, obviously. But the average woman will prefer average height with big frame over tall with pencil frame, only height fetishists will prefer the taller one in that case (provided all other factors are identical obviously)

 

[LooksPSL]

evidence that u r wrong:

How is that evidence?
1.) he doesn’t have an attractive body
2.) oh no he didn’t get laid in a 2 minute video. You think if some 6’3 skinny dude were walking around the pool random women would hit on him constantly?

 

[Deleted member 8080]

How is that evidence?
1.) he doesn’t have an attractive body
2.) oh no he didn’t get laid in a 2 minute video. You think if some 6’3 skinny dude were walking around the pool random women would hit on him constantly?

cope

 

[LooksPSL]

cope

10/10 argument

 

[Deleted member 5393]

Muscles win over height for sure

tall isnt rare, but if you have a nice body u really stand out because all guys have shit bodies in 2020

but ideal is tall + muscular

 

[SexuallyAbusive]

Muscles > Height

 

[piscicide]

Muscles peacock more than height does. 1/5 of guys are 6' and above, but a top tier physique is extremely rare especially with everyone gaining 20 pounds in the lockdown.

 

[Deleted member 5393]

Muscles peacock more than height does. 1/5 of guys are 6' and above, but a top tier physique is extremely rare especially with everyone gaining 20 pounds in the lockdown.

Thats what im saying

1 in 2000 guys has a good impressive body irl
1 in 5 guys are tall

 

[OCDMaxxing]

I'm over 6 feet and ripped, very muscular with ideal proportions.
My lay count at age of 40 is 3.

Draw your own conclusions.

 

[LooksPSL]

I'm over 6 feet and ripped, very muscular with ideal proportions.
My lay count at age of 40 is 3.

Draw your own conclusions.

N=1

 

[Chinacurry]

I agree with OP, to an extent. OP did not mean manlets, he said 5'10'', I'd even argue a very well proportioned and well postured 5'9'' beats a <5/10 face, average frame 6'3'' guy.

This only holds though with higher class foids, lower class, or less experienced foids will worship height especially in places where both height and frame/muscles are rare, such as Asia.

In the Dinaric Alps, the good frame, good face, good muscle 5'10'' guy wins.

 

[Need2Ascend]

Height > Muscles
But it's still better to have a good physique than not to have one, no matter your height, so just make the best out of what you have tbh.
And maybe there will be a way to grow taller for adults in some years, who knows

 

[oldcell]

Jay cutler the bb from the pick is 5'10

U really dont see proportions correctly
5"10 guy can looks tallish with shoes, Cutler is clear manlet, low 5"8

https://www.celebheights.com/s/Jay-Cutler-46944.html