Normie 1–10 Rating Scale and Looksmax Lingo Scale

[Bully]

1.0–2.9 on the Normie Scale = Subhuman on the Looksmax Scale

3.0–4.5 on the Normie Scale = LTN on the Looksmax Scale

4.6–5.9 on the Normie Scale = MTN on the Looksmax Scale

6.0–7.5 on the Normie Scale = HTN on the Looksmax Scale

7.6–8.5 on the Normie Scale = Chadlite on the Looksmax Scale

8.6–9.5 on the Normie Scale = Chad on the Looksmax Scale

9.6–10.0 on the Normie Scale = Gigachad on the Looksmax Scale

Do you agree with this? If not, what would you change?
@iblamechico @ltnbrownacnecel @PeenoResurrected @joao23 @Anakin_10k

 

[iblamechico]

It's not that simple I think. Normies would probably rate Chris Hemsworth, Chris Evans, etc an 8.5/10 and they're definitely not high chadlite.

 

[iblamechico]

Normie rating probably goes like this

0-3 genuinely disfigured
4-5 ugly as fuck
6-7 average
8-9 handsome
10 model level handsome

 

[UserE_7.random]

It's not that simple I think. Normies would probably rate Chris Hemsworth, Chris Evans, etc an 8.5/10 and they're definitely not high chadlite.

HTNs in their prime, I’d have to see hemsworth in his prime but for now I’d say HMTN

 

[Bully]

It's not that simple I think. Normies would probably rate Chris Hemsworth, Chris Evans, etc an 8.5/10 and they're definitely not high chadlite.

I meant looks-wise, but you're right. Normies also take other things into account, such as celebrity status and money.

Normie rating probably goes like this

0-3 genuinely disfigured
4-5 ugly as fuck
6-7 average
8-9 handsome
10 model level handsome

Yeah most of the foids consider mtns to be ugly as fuck

 

[Former Shortcel]

Most normies rate someone 6-7/10 to their face when they are typically average looking and dont want to hurt any feelings

(average in the sense that theyre MTN and dont have any standout really bad features)

 

[ltnbrownacnecel]

Normies rate average looking people 7/10

 

[Jidion]

Normies who think 7 is average rate themselves 7,5-8 thinking they are above average in delusion. Girls usually have more confidence and rate themselves a 9 or 10.
Concerning rating others, it usually is way more brutal. Guys overate and consider body into rating because they are cucks. While foids underate guys as long as they are not conventionally attractive, giving them scores under a 3. An average dude has more chance of scoring a 3 than a 5 in the eyes of a foid. But then, when its an attractive guy, htn and above, they always get rated 8-10 by foids. The gap is huge from ratings where 4-7 dont get used often.
Just my opinion