Nutrition is probably the most interesting thing

[ey88]

It’s very cool to learn about

 

[playxiing]

human anatomy mogs

 

[ey88]

human anatomy mogs

The two are very connected

 

[noodlelover]

It’s very cool to learn about

It's also complicated as shit.

Any one who says they have nutrition completely figured out is lying.

But it's fun to learn about, because there's near infinite complexity to learn about. Like I have lots of theories, that may or may not turn out to be right.

 

[ey88]

It's also complicated as shit.

Any one who says they have nutrition completely figured out is lying.

But it's fun to learn about, because there's near infinite complexity to learn about.

Insanely complicated

That’s why I like to learn about it more from a biological and natural perspective

I don’t think it’s possible to learn about it properly from studies

 

[RXnd]

I never really went that deep into nutrition I just eat meat, eggs, bread and raw milk.I’ve never really eaten a vegtable by itself but I feel pretty good everyday so I guess it’s working.

 

[noodlelover]

Insanely complicated

That’s why I like to learn about it more from a biological and natural perspective

I don’t think it’s possible to learn about it properly from studies

I think you need to look at the studies to get the full picture, but also history, genetics, different theories, fossil records, and everything really because it's all connected and you need to know all of it to make the best theories.

 

[ineonx]

It’s very cool to learn about

It is, everybody is unique, some foods affect other people differently, I don't think there should be a lot of stress on what you consume considering it's non processed

 

[ey88]

I think you need to look at the studies to get the full picture, but also history, genetics, different theories, fossil records, and everything really because it's all connected and you need to know all of it to make the best theories.

I think most studies done about nutrition are not done well enough to rely on

 

[noodlelover]

I think most studies done about nutrition are not done well enough to rely on

I disagree. You have to look at what they did, and the results they got, but generally ignore the theories for those results. It's still all useful data points.

Take for example glycemic index studies. You know how much different types of food on their own will raise your blood sugar.

But when you combine foods you can make reasonable guesses about how quick they would raise your blood sugar, based on what order you're eating them, and if you blended them.

Basically the studies give some idea of the physics.

Or the study on the carnivore eskimo from 400 years ago that showed she had arterial plaque and heart disease.

Or studies breaking down different foods, showing what size anti-oxidants they have, or the senolytics they have, or other useful properties and how those might effect a human. Or how different food preparation changes food.

Or the eating and life style habits of different long lived populations. None of these studies alone tell us much, because each study has too many unknowns, but considering all of them together you can start to see a clearer picture of everything.

 

[ey88]

I disagree. You have to look at what they did, and the results they got, but generally ignore the theories for those results. It's still all useful data points.

Take for example glycemic index studies. You know how much different types of food on their own will raise your blood sugar.

But when you combine foods you can make reasonable guesses about how quick they would raise your blood sugar, based on what order you're eating them, and if you blended them.

Basically the studies give some idea of the physics.

Or the study on the carnivore eskimo from 400 years ago that showed she had arterial plaque and heart disease.

Or studies breaking down different foods, showing what size anti-oxidants they have, or the senolytics they have, or other useful properties and how those might effect a human. Or how different food preparation changes food.

Or the eating and life style habits of different long lived populations. None of these studies alone tell us much, because each study has too many unknowns, but considering all of together you can start to see a clearer picture of everything.

Ok I do kinda agree with you

I am more talking about the studies done on nutrition that are cohort and case control studies

 

[Never Get Up]

It's also complicated as shit.

Any one who says they have nutrition completely figured out is lying.

But it's fun to learn about, because there's near infinite complexity to learn about. Like I have lots of theories, that may or may not turn out to be right.

All of your theories are incorrect.

 

[noodlelover]

Ok I do kinda agree with you

I am more talking about the studies done on nutrition that are cohort and case control studies

So I will share a few theories I have.

1. As long as we aren't eating too much processed food, and we eat some variety of foods we'll be close to optimally healthy. The human body is very flexible.

2. But we must eat the same foods each week, because our bodies get very good at using different foods. So if we're eating the same foods week after week (and those are mostly non-processed), we'll be very good at using those foods to repair ourselves.

3. We focus on diet because it's easy to conceptualize as helping us, but a much bigger factor on longevity and health is keeping low stress and getting quality sleep. This is the biggest factor, because it's how good our repair state is. (assuming we're eating some variety of whole foods).

 

[ey88]

So I will share a few theories I have.

1. As long as we aren't eating too much processed food, and we eat some variety of foods we'll be close to optimally healthy. The human body is very flexible.

2. But we must eat the same foods each week, because our bodies get very good at using different foods. So if we're eating the same foods week after week (and those are mostly non-processed), we'll be very good at using those foods to repair ourselves.

3. We focus on diet because it's easy to conceptualize as helping us, but a much bigger factor on longevity and health is keeping low stress and getting quality sleep. This is the biggest factor, because it's how good our repair state is. (assuming we're eating some variety of whole foods).

I definitely agree with the 3rd

The first 2 are questionable for me

 

[Never Get Up]

So I will share a few theories I have.

1. As long as we aren't eating too much processed food, and we eat some variety of foods we'll be close to optimally healthy. The human body is very flexible.

2. But we must eat the same foods each week, because our bodies get very good at using different foods. So if we're eating the same foods week after week (and those are mostly non-processed), we'll be very good at using those foods to repair ourselves.

3. We focus on diet because it's easy to conceptualize as helping us, but a much bigger factor on longevity and health is keeping low stress and getting quality sleep. This is the biggest factor, because it's how good our repair state is. (assuming we're eating some variety of whole foods).

If your variety includes plants, then you are an idiot.

 

[noodlelover]

I definitely agree with the 3rd

The first 2 are questionable for me

The 2nd comes from studying super centenarians (over 100).

I noticed almost all of them eat different things, but they pretty much all eat the same things week after week, year after year.

There are super centenarians that eat mostly meat (rarely), super centenarians that eat mostly plants (mostly), super centenarians that eat ice cream or cookies, but they all pretty much eat the same thing week after week.

So I think it's their consistency more than anything keeping them alive.

If your variety includes plants, then you are an idiot.

I feel good eating some fruit and vegetables. Onions for example, blue berries, strawberries, pineapple.

 

[ey88]

The 2nd comes from studying super centenarians (over 100).

I noticed almost all of them eat different things, but they pretty much all eat the same things week after week, year after year.

There are super centenarians that eat mostly meat (rarely), super centenarians that eat mostly plants (mostly), super centenarians that eat ice cream or cookies, but they all pretty much eat the same thing week after week.

So I think it's their consistency more than anything keeping them alive.

I feel good eating some fruit and vegetables. Onions for example, blue berries, strawberries, pineapple.

I think that could definitely have something to do with the kind of people they are

Sticking to a schedule and not making changes lets your body adapt and is less stressful

They are probably like that in all parts of their life

 

[Never Get Up]

I feel good eating some fruit and vegetables. Onions for example, blue berries, strawberries, pineapple.

Sugar addict not knowing he’s poisoning himself. Enjoy your early death.

 

[imontheloose]

Nigger you’re an engineer fuck biology, pick up that thermo book and get to reading

 

[ey88]

Nigger you’re an engineer fuck biology, pick up that thermo book and get to reading

School starts back up tomorrow, I will then

 

[imontheloose]

School starts back up tomorrow, I will then

Opinions on fruit nigger? My Jew radar will be ready for your response

 

[ey88]

Opinions on fruit nigger? My Jew radar will be ready for your response

It’s fine imo

 

[imontheloose]

It’s fine imo

Unironically haven’t seen any Jewish promotion of it, don’t see anything wrong with growing it and eating it. Might be being retarded tho

 

[Never Get Up]

Unironically haven’t seen any Jewish promotion of it, don’t see anything wrong with growing it and eating it. Might be being retarded tho

I’m glad you are self aware.

 

[imontheloose]

I’m glad you are self aware.

lol seriously why would Jews want us to consume fruits we grow ourselves, I haven’t saw the propaganda push

 

[Never Get Up]

lol seriously why would Jews want us to consume fruits we grow ourselves, I haven’t saw the propaganda push

Fruits aren’t food for humans.

 

[imontheloose]

Fruits aren’t food for humans.

do you say the same for vegetables?

 

[Youㅤ]

i got bored of this topic

just need to get raw milk

 

[Youㅤ]

Fruits aren’t food for humans.

nigga humans evolved from frugivores and any human with normal instincts would eat and enjoy fruits

 

[Never Get Up]

do you say the same for vegetables?

Yes

 

[Never Get Up]

nigga humans evolved from frugivores and any human with normal instincts would eat and enjoy fruits

Enjoy your glycation and elevated blood glucose levels.

 

[Youㅤ]

Enjoy your glycation and elevated blood glucose levels.

retard

u: muh soyienceeeeeee tERms

 

[Never Get Up]

retard

Another user that whom I’m mirin’ their self awareness levels.

 

[imontheloose]

Yes

Nigger you’re fucking retarded, the mineral and vitamin deficiencies are getting to you

 

[Youㅤ]

Another user that I’m mirin’ their self awareness levels.

"muh i know soyience terms and use them to mislead myself and try to mislead others with retardcope"

 

[Never Get Up]

Nigger you’re fucking retarded, the mineral and vitamin deficiencies are getting to you

 

[Never Get Up]

"muh i know soyience terms and use them to mislead myself and try to mislead others with retardcope"

Your inadequacy to understand basic biology terms doesn’t equate to me being a charlatan.

 

[Youㅤ]

Your inadequacy to understand basic biology terms doesn’t equate to me being a charlatan.

i read science articles 10 hours a day for months nigga

 

[Never Get Up]

i read science articles 10 hours a day for months nigga

Does not capitalize the beginning of his sentences >

Reads >

Choose one.

 

[swt]

They should start teaching it in schools more often and also earlier in grades. It’s very important.

 

[imontheloose]

Enjoy your glycation and elevated blood glucose levels.

nigger what do you think the antioxidants and polyphenols in fruits/veg do??

 

[Never Get Up]

nigger what do you think the antioxidants and polyphenols in fruits/veg do??

You clearly do not understand what the word “glycation” means. Eating carbohydrates will result in it no matter what you do.

You can kill yourself now.

 

[enriquecel]

It’s very cool to learn about

@Never Get Up i ate my little brother is this optimal?

 

[imontheloose]

You clearly do not understand what the word “glycation” means. Eating carbohydrates will result in it no matter what you do.

You can kill yourself now.

not all carbs are equal, pretty sure the fibre rich fruit and veg reduces blood sugar spikes which literally drives glycation. I never said it wouldn’t happen you fucking idiot

 

[Never Get Up]

@Never Get Up i ate my little brother is this optimal?

Eat his testicles too.

 

[enriquecel]

Eat his testicles too.

cat got them before i could

 

[Never Get Up]

not all carbs are equal, pretty sure the fibre rich fruit and veg reduces blood sugar spikes which literally drives glycation. I never said it wouldn’t happen you fucking idiot

False. All carbohydrates break down into glucose, expect for fructose.

 

[imontheloose]

False. All carbohydrates break down into glucose, expect for fructose.

View attachment 3408440

It’s not about glucose existing it’s about how your body processes it. The fibre and nutrients literally slow that process down and prevent crazy blood sugar spikes

 

[Never Get Up]

It’s not about glucose existing it’s about how your body processes it. The fibre and nutrients literally slow that process down and prevent crazy blood sugar spikes

You’re low IQ. Fiber is indigestible and has 0 effect on sugar binding to proteins (glycation).

All carbohydrates convert into sugar except for fructose which is metabolized into triacylglycerides in the liver.

Fiber is extremely toxic and contra-indicated (bad).

Anytime you eat a surplus of carbohydrates that go above your homeostatic set point, you WILL spike your blood glucose and those cells will sacrificed to protect more important cells in the body.

You do not understand how the Randle Cycle defense mechanism works and it shows.

Die now faggot. Get IQ mogged.

 

[imontheloose]

You’re low IQ. Fiber is indigestible and has 0 effect on sugar binding to proteins (glycation).

All carbohydrates convert into sugar except for fructose which is metabolized into triacylglycerides in the liver.

Fiber is extremely toxic and contra-indicated (bad).

Anytime you eat a surplus of carbohydrates that go above your homeostatic set point, you WILL spike your blood glucose and those cells will sacrificed to protect more important cells in the body.

I’m genuinely trying to figure this out, unless I’m going mad, I remember that yeah fibre is indigestible but it still has a role in slowing carb absorption and stabilising blood sugar. Plus fruits and veg aren’t gonna lead to a carb surplus unless you’re blending fucking bananas. How is fibre toxic???