Objective PSL God Megathread.

[Deleted]

Damn.....

This was before my eye hooding got fucked

You can see how left ramus is taller but right mandible is longer. Right cheekbones is wider while left is higher set. Nose towards the right but it's not that obvious in this pic.

 

[2d v2]

Yea, If that was my looksmatch I'd be just as insecure as you.

bruh my looksmatch is a cute fat butt white girl or hispanic girl.

Youd be crying if you saw this sweet screenshot i just took of myself

 

[Korea]

This was before my eye hooding got fucked

View attachment 1539575

You can see how left ramus is taller but right mandible is longer. Right cheekbones is wider while left is higher set. Nose towards the right but it's not that obvious in this pic.

What made your hooding fucked? Did you roid to get lean?

Yea I see what you mean about the other assymmetries.

 

[Korea]

bruh my looksmatch is a cute fat butt white girl or hispanic girl.

Youd be crying if you saw this sweet screenshot i just took of myself

Post it.

 

[2d v2]

This was before my eye hooding got fucked

View attachment 1539575

You can see how left ramus is taller but right mandible is longer. Right cheekbones is wider while left is higher set. Nose towards the right but it's not that obvious in this pic.

lol hes full of shit every girl on this planet would think your face is 10/10 unless you're frauding epicly.

 

[2d v2]

Post it.

 

[Deleted]

What made your hooding fucked? Did you roid to get lean?

No idea

 

[Over]

1. I put Amnesia and Salludon in 7 without measuring anything
Why? They didn't ask to be in my thread, but it's obvious to me they're up there. Not everyone wants their ratios n shit plastered on a big ass thread

2. Shit formatting. (Suck my dick, this is a huge ass thread)
3. I wont be measuring anyone I put below 7, exept O'pry.
4. This is objective. If your reply is along the lines of "OMG he mogs him" or "No appeal clear overrate". I'm not replying, argue amongst yourselfs. You totally missed the point of this thread, read the title again.
5. Typos (Might be a lot)
6. If I already rated the face, their name will be a link.
7. Didn't do Chico because his face is boring as fuck.

----------------------------------------------------------

How the numbers work around here. The scale goes 1 - 7, 1 worst 7 the highest possible.

(1/4,000,000) 7. I do not care what UNI you go to, how many "Chads" you seen today. You have never seen anyone this good looking in person. They could be in a hut, write essays on looksmax, or just not be into fame. This level is insanely high.

(1/2,000,000) 6.5. Basically the same rating as 7, but with more unideal ratios. I also would bet you've never seen this in person, but not impossible.

(1/1,600,000) 6. This person could easily get off their ass and start a modeling career and not be a meme.

(1/100,000) 5.5. Really GL guy, but nothing ridiculous (The last irl 10/10)

(1/88,000) 5. He's GL with a few flaws

(1/70,000) 4. Above avg.

(1/50,000) 3. Average

(1/It doesn't matter). The "It's Over Level"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7's have essentially all perfect ratios, with no more than 5 being unideal, and 1 failo at most. (Negative Hooding Like Maher, hooked nose like Gandy, or T40 and Below Eye Color. You don't need blue eyes, but dirt black isn't good.
6.5's are sorta one in the same with 7s, just something MAJOR being unideal holding them back (i.e SHIT IPD)
6s have top tier ratios & features with no more than 8 being unideal. (cough cough assymetries and eye area)
5s have decent ratios with no more than 9 being unideal.
4s have bad ratios 10+ being unideal, causing a few failos.
3s have bad ratios and a huge fucking failo like a potato nose or some shit.
below 3 is not worth my time explaining.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My list (Each name exept for Amnesia & Salludon are rated on their OBJECTIVE ratios, proportions, and features. Listed names are in NO ORDER.)

7.(Amnesia, Salludon)Korea, Elias Depoot, Hernan Drago, Alain Delon, Jordan Barrett, Jon-Erik Hexum, Jeremy Meeks, Atesh Salih, Brad Pitt (There are more, but this is all I feel like measuring rn)
Honorable Mentions I didn't feel like measuring: Matt Bomer, Chico, Vito Basso, and Mukasa.

6.5.Ian Sommerhalder, Zac Elfron, Tyler Maher, Johny Depp, Cillian Murphy. (There's more I'm tired. I'm writing this part Thurs. night, but the thread prob wont drop till saturday or some shit)

6. Sean O'pry, Alton Mason. (There are DEFINETLY MORE)

5. Dababy forcedsmile Timothee Chamalet, Jeremy Lin, (Orb)

4. Lil Wayne, Jay Z, Ed Sheeran, Adam Driver
3. Mario Jariko (Tired as fuck running out of examples)
3. DEEZ NUTS guy, Big Ed
2. Anthony Palma
1. Elephant Man
---------------------------------------------------------------------

First Up, Elias Depoot (7)

View attachment 1536368
ESR: 47% (Ideal)
FWHR: 2.04 (Ideal)
Midface: 1:1 (Wow, perfect)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.47 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.69 (Too High, Flaw #1. You guys have no idea, but this is the reason why he looks "Gay", extremely feminine ratio.)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.53 (Ideal)
Zygomatic to Bigonial Width: 88% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 85% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: (Ideal) Although they aren't all equal. His lower 3rd is the largest, and middle the shortest. Masculine facial 3rds. His 4hed his not big...
Total FWHR: 1.36 (Ideal)
-----------------
3/4ths
View attachment 1536396
Ogee Curve is great, not too forward. Very High set.
Some of the best Zygomatic Arches in human history.
---------------------------
Side Profile
View attachment 1536403

(For the sake of time, I wont be listing each angle here. There's still the pics as usual, and will have "Ideal" in the photo if so vice versa.)
(Halfway thru Depoot, there's NO FUCKING WAY im doing pics for all off them, sorry. If an angle looks "off", I'll remeasure and show a picture. lol.)

Hope Depoot fans are happy, he's the only one getting pictures.
-------------------------------------------
Features

Eye Area/
Pros:
PCT (5.6°)
Slight Positive & Dark Eyebrows
Almond Shape
White Sclera
Deep Set
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.44 great.

Cons:
Fully Hooded eyes causing Eyelashes 404. Even though in his side profile pic, you can see he has good lashes, just covered by hooding. (Flaw #3)

Nose/
Pros: Everything about it, maybe the best nose I'll see today.

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
Good lips, hence the good ratio
Coloring's good.
Good Cupids Bow.

Cons:
Squiggly Lip Seal (Resting postion of the lips. Should be perfectly straight. My last reasoning for why he looks "Gay") (Flaw #4)

Chin/Jaw:

Pros:
God Tier Chin
Great Ramus (Guys, it doesn't have to be like Hexum's to be good)
Straight Gonions.

Cons:
None

SYMMETRY: Amazing, this is super important, I'm not sparring any super assymetrical faces.

Quick Recap. Of all I measured, Depoot Has 4 Objective Flaws stopping him from being perfect (Could be more duh, but definetly not more than 5).
1. Mouth to Nose Ratio.
2. Bad Nasal Angle.
3. Fully Hooded Eyes.
4. Sqiggly Lip Seal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Up next, Hernan Drago(7) (Wont be grading his skin or hairline, he's 40+).
View attachment 1536518
FWHR: 2 (Ideal)
ESR: 44% (Unideal) Flaw #1 and one of the reasons why he looks "Ogre"
Midface Ratio: .92 (Unideal) Flaw #2 another reason for his "Ogre" look.
Chin to Philtrum Ratio: 2.90 (Unideal) Flaw #3 (Male Gaze nigg*s on suicide watch. His chin is just too big. Chill though, his flaws are coming to a halting stop
Mouth to Nose Ratio: 1.45 (Ideal)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.93 (Ideal)
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 90% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 86% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: (Ideal Masculine Distribution)
Total FWHR: 1.3 (Ideal)

3/4th:
View attachment 1536571
Every good thing I've said over and over.

Side Profile:
(This is the best pic I could find.)
View attachment 1536572
All of the angles here are amazing, rest assured.

----------------------------------
Features:

Eyes/
Pros:
3° PCT
Slight Positve Tilt & Dark Eyebrows
Almond Shape
White Sclera
Deep Set
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.84 great

Cons:
Fully Hooded Causing Eyelash 404 (Flaw #4)

Nose/
Pros: Everything
Cons: Don't Exist

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
Fair Lips, but good ratio so they pass the test.
Good shape & Lip seal
Good coloring

Cons: None.

Chin/Jaw:
Pros:
Aside from it's size, it's a very good chin.
Straight Gonions
A somewhat short ramus, but what really decides that for me is the gonial angle, and his is ideal at 112.5°

Symmetry: Very Good.

Quick Recap. 4 Flaws.
1. Cyclop ESR
2. A .20 off the Ideal range of .94 to 1.1 Midface (Remeasured 5x)
3. Ogre Chin to Philtrum Ratio
4. Fully Hooded Eyes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alain's Turn (7).

View attachment 1536614


FWHR: 2 (Ideal)
ESR: 45.4% (Almost a cyclop, but Ideal)
Midface Ratio: .97 (Ideal)
Chin to Philtrum Ratio: 2.27 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose Ratio: 1.58 (Ideal)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 2.4 (Unideal, his top lip is 404) Flaw #1
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 88% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 89% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: (Unideal) When they aren't all equal, the order should go (Mid, Top, Lower in terms of what 3rd is the shortest vs longest.)
His are Top, Mid, Lower. Flaw #2 (This is why a 3 finger forehead isn't ideal, called 4hed for a reason)
Total FWHR: 1.31 (Ideal)

3/4ths:
View attachment 1536659
For men, the Ogee Curve is more of a plus. I'm worried about the Zygomatic Arch and it's prominence. Alain takes this one.

Side Profile:

View attachment 1536671


Only thing wrong here is the 126.7° Gonial Angle. Flaw #3

-----------------------------------
Features:

Eyes/
Pros:
Minimal UEE letting the eyelashes show.
3.5° PCT
Deep Set
White Sclera
Slight Positive Dark Eyebrows
Almond Shape

Cons:
PFL to Height Ratio is only 2.87 Flaw #4

Nose/
Pros: Yes
Cons: None

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
Good coloring

Cons:
Already mentioned the size
Assymetrical Lip Seal (Flaw #5). This shit is not okay Alain...

Chin/Jaw:
Pros:
Everything.

No Cons.

Symmetry: Everything, but the Lip Seal is symmetrical to the human eye.

Quick Recap.
1. Lower to Upper Lip Ratio
2. Facial 3rds.
3. 126.7° Gonial Angle (1.67° out the Ideal lol)
4. PFL to Height is only 2.87
5. Lip Seal.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jordan Barrett (7)
(YES, I KNOW THIS IS EDITED, BUT IT'S RATEABLE)
View attachment 1536710

FWHR: 2.43 (Holy shit) Flaw #1
ESR: 49% (Unideal) To my knowledge, he doesn't have African DNA. Flaw #2
Midface Ratio: 1.12 (Ideal by 0.03, he's too compact)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.43 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.86 (Unideal, I could've guessed he was gay off this ratio alone) Flaw #3
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.99 (DSL's, but still Ideal)
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 88% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 90% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Masculine Distribution (Ideal)
Total FWHR: 1.26 (Too Wide once again) (Unideal) Flaw #4

3/4ths:
View attachment 1536736
Do you really need me to say why it's perfect?

Side Profile:
View attachment 1536739
Not a single unideal angle here.
------------------------------------------
Features:

Eyes/
Pros:
6° PCT
Slight Positve Tilt & Dark Eyebrows
Almond Shape
White Sclera
Deep Set
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.26 great

Cons:
Fully Hooded = Eyelash 404 Flaw #5

Nose/
Pros: Yes
Cons: None.

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
DSL's, but good ratio so they pass the test.
Good shape & Lip seal
Good coloring

Cons: None.

Chin/Jaw: No cons.

Quick Recap.
1. ESR is .49%, way of the caucasian ideal
2. FWHR is way too fucking high
3. Mouth to Nose is too feminine
4. Total FWHR is too low, skull overall too wide.
5. Fully Hooded Eyes.
---------------------------------------------------
Jon-Erik Hexum (7)

View attachment 1536761
ESR: 46% (Ideal)
FWHR: 2.03 (Ideal)
Midface: .98 (Ideal)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.34 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.4 (Ideal)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.33 (Unideal) Flaw #1
Zygomatic to Bigonial Width: 87% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 90% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Masculine Distribution (Ideal)
Total FWHR: 1.34 (Ideal)
--------------------------------
3/4ths
View attachment 1537699
Yes.

Side Profile

View attachment 1537702
Gonial Angle (125.1 deg) Flaw # ..... haha no, I'm not that much of a bitch. .01 deg off is fine.
Unharminous Labiolmental Angle (135.6 deg) Shouldn't be above 130 or below 105. Flaw #2
This is why his chin in some candids just looks "off" (Pics provided HERE.)
------------------------------
Features:

Eye Area (You know what's coming).
Pros:
Minimal UEE
Dark & Dense Brows with a slight positive tilt.
White Sclera
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.77 (Ideal)

Cons:
NCT forcedsmile Flaw #3
NCT instantly disqualifies him from almond shaped eyes. Flaw #4

Nose
Pros: The Nose.
No Cons.

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
Coloring is good.

Cons:
Lip seal not an exact absolute perfect straight line. Flaw #5
Size, already dicussed.

Chin/Jaw
Pros:
Flared Gonions + everything, but the cons.
Cons:
Unharminous Labiomental Angle, aleady discussed.

Quick Recap
1. Lower to Upper Lip Ratio is too low.
2. Unharminous Labiolmental Angle
3. NCT
4. Eye Shape
5. Lip Seal

Jeremy Meeks (7)

View attachment 1537722
ESR: 48% (Ideal)
FWHR: 2.04 (Ideal)
Midface: 1.03 (Ideal)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.41 (Haha nice, Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.42 (Ideal)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.44 (Ideal)
Zygomatic to Bigonial Width: 90% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 81% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Masculine Distribution (Ideal)
Total FWHR: 1.31 (Ideal)

3/4ths

View attachment 1537810
Yes.

Side Profile Done Here. (TLDR it's great)

-----------------------------------------
Features:

Eye Area/
Pros:
Minimal UEE
4 deg PCT
Almond Shape
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.44

Cons:
Eyebrows pretty much did 404. Flaw #1
Sorta Assymetrical, prevalent in most pictures. Flaw #2

Nose/
Pros:
Everything, but the cons.

Cons:
The nostrils flare out, not by a lot obviously, but it's there. Flaw #3

Mouth/
Pros:
Good Cupids Bow
Perfect Lip Seal
Good lip color contrast.

Cons:
The Oral Commisures do not meet the iris. Flaw #4

Chin/Jaw
Pros: Everything is good here, check my side profile analysis.

Quick Recap
1. Eyebrows 404
2. Assymmetry in the eye area
3. Slight Nostril Flare
4. A Narrow Mouth, within reason.

------------------------------------------------------

Atesh Salih (Best Eye Area here, reminds me of that Korea guy. Also he's 49, I'm using pics from his youth).

View attachment 1537828
FWHR: 2.08 (Ideal)
ESR: 46% (Ideal)
Midface Ratio: .96 (Ideal)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.23 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.53 (Ideall)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 2.29 (Pitiful Atesh, just pitiful) Flaw #1
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 87% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 81% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Bad Distro (Top -> Mid -> Lower) Flaw #2
Total FWHR: 1.3 (Ideal)

3/4ths
View attachment 1537843
Everything Ideal here. And yes, he somehow pulled off full hooding + lashes.

Side Profile.
(Sorry yall this is the best side I could find....I suspect something must be wrong with it)

View attachment 1537848

Wow, almost flawless.

Bad Nasolabial Angle. See here. Flaw #3

-----------------------------------------------
Features

Eye Area: Literally Perfect.

Nose: Also also a really good nose like depoot. Just has the 1 bad angle I spoke about

Mouth/
Pros:
Good Color Contrast
Oral Commissures are within the Iris

Cons:
Bad Lip Seal Caused by top lip 404. Flaw #4

Chin/Jaw:
Amazing Jaw.
Chin being somewhat narrow, slighty smaller than the mouth. Flaw #5

Quick Recap
1. Lower to Upper Lip Ratio
2. Facial 3rds
3. Bad Labiomental Angle
4. Lip Seal
5. Slightly Narrow Chin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NGL, I'm bitchin' out of measuring Pitt. Don't really wnna look at his ass rn. Will do a thread when I wake up
Sean O'No (6) No Cherrypicks, only his best shit.

View attachment 1538110View attachment 1538111View attachment 1538117

Front
View attachment 1538145
FWHR: 2.05 (Ideal)
ESR: 47.30% (Unideal for Caucasians) Flaw #1
Midface Ratio: 1:1 (Perfect)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.97 (More than fucking Drago. Unideal) Flaw #2
Mouth to Nose: 1.45 (Ideall)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.91(Ideal)
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 87% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 84% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Bad Distro (Mid -> Lower -> Top) Flaw #3
Total FWHR: 1.33 (Ideal)

3/4ths: Pic Here. Had to start using imgur, passed the file limit lol.

This is his best view.

Side

View attachment 1538149



Gonial Angle 127, even higher than Delon's. Flaw #4
Nasal Angles Appear to be fine.
------------------------------------
Features
Eye Area/
Pros:
Eyebrows are good, but the ideal tilt is Sligthly Positive -> Positive -> Neutral. This isn't a flaw though. That would be Brad Pitt's cucked eyebrows.
PFL to Height is 3.03. Suprisingly low tbh, but within the ideal.
5 deg PCT
Almond Shape.
Cons:
Fully Hooded = Eyelash 404. This goes for anyone, but the eye area God Atesh. Haven't seen anyone else do that. Flaw #5
Noticable Assymmetry. Flaw #6 (Offcially out of the 7 range)

Nose/

Pros: The overall size, shape etc is fine. Pay attention to the cons.
Cons:
Hooked Nose Failo #7
Serious Assymmetry: Flaw #8 (Offcially in 6 range)

Mouth/
Pros: He has a really good mouth area. Everything I've been saying is ideal he has.
Cons: None.

Chin/Jaw
Pros:
Other than the size, the chin is fine.
His gonions are actually straight out like most of the 7s.
Decent Ramus Length, but all of this is overshawdowed by what I'm about to say.
Cons:
Over sized Massters.
This makes his jaw look rounded in profile & frontal view. This shit doesn't look good guys. Not on Pitt, Not on O'pry. Flaw #9.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Have Fun.
@Frank Jack
@germanlooks
@AscendingHero
@Preston
@astatine

not a single photon read

 

[Korea]

not a single photon read

View attachment 1549694

At least you came out as gay publicly unlinke 99% of users here.

 

[Pakicel]

Massive overrating in this thread.

 

[Korea]

Massive overrating in this thread.

 

[justadude]

absolute joke of a thread stop making your own shitty scale that no one cares about

 

[Anchor_Ship]

also wtf is a widows peak, are you calling him a roastie fucker?

 

[Anchor_Ship]

High effort thread ngl. Probably took hours.

It’s interesting to see these objective ratings and it also really shows you that being objectively flawless and good looking is mostly about aesthetics and not necessarily appeal.
Someone like Elias de Poot looks extremely aesthetic but Brad Pitt would be better looking in most women eyes even though he most certainly scores less in the objective rating.
And I guess many people here don’t understand this or just don’t get the point of this thread.

I have two things were I kind of disagree with.

1) Hooded eyes are a flaw
I don’t think that hooded eyes are an objective flaw just because the eyelashes get less visible.

Because while that’s almost everytime the case fully hooded eyes are really interesting looking in itself which kind of makes up for the lack of eyelash appearance. So I see it more as situation where both fully hooded and eyes with slight UEE have their own cons/pros.
Fully hooded eyes like Gandys, O prys, De poots etc give the eyes a striking and intimidating appearance and I don’t think you can say they are objectively worse.
View attachment 1538437
View attachment 1538443

2) Sean O pry as 6
While I can’t argue against the objective rating of his ratios it still is ridiculous to say that someone on his lookslevel isn’t as rare as the other men from the 7PSL category. You will never see someone with just his eye area alone irl. And if you compare him with Alain delon for example O pry makes him look like a normal person whereas he himself looks almost like a morph
View attachment 1538450View attachment 1538451

Based on the descriptions here his face definitely sounds more like the 7PSL option
He isn’t just a person who could become a model. I mean there is a reason that he is the most famous male model after all. But maybe his striking appearance is just so strong that it makes me be biased against his objective flaws.

(1/4,000,000) 7. I do not care what UNI you go to, how many "Chads" you seen today. You have never seen anyone this good looking in person. They could be in a hut, write essays on looksmax, or just not be into fame. This level is insanely high.

(1/1,600,000) 6. This person could easily get off their ass and start a modeling career and not be a meme.

@AscendingHero @ForeverRecession

Agree O’Pry is literally not human

 

[Anchor_Ship]

Great way to close out this thread James.

Thanks bro.

Caging

 

[Anchor_Ship]

Interesting read, thanks OP

 

[Korea]

absolute joke of a thread stop making your own shitty scale that no one cares about

Thread is 4 pages of people agreeing with me.

go LDAR alone please.

 

[Biiyo03]

No imo Gandy has better medial canthus and PFL, this dudes eyes look pinched as fuck though maybe with better lashes
I wouldn't call hooded eyes a con, it's a trait that's very prevalent among the top male models, eyelashes not so much but great for appeal

from a psl perspective yes

but idk i started to steer away from psl slowly without heading too much towards the retarded takes(e.g people think hacker has more appeal than actual mogger prettyboys where it's only his status that allow him to ascend higher. on actual candids he looks meh as fuck), too much PSL can rot your mind tbh @looksmaxxer234


prettyboy with minimal hooding and strong lashes mogs the fuck out of their eye areas but their eye areas also has a halo. It's just that eyes like jorge del romero mogs much more harder IMO

id prefer these but gandy still mogs, I just don't prefer his face that much.

robust prettyboys mogs and would most likely age good if they have good hair genes

thoguhts @volcelfatcel @AscendingHero @Korea @Frank Jack @Preston @Blue @germanlooks

 

[Xangsane]

Gavrilovic moggs because balkan
View attachment 1538370

Looks like rylan clark

 

[Korea]

from a psl perspective yes

but idk i started to steer away from psl slowly without heading too much towards the retarded takes(e.g people think hacker has more appeal than actual mogger prettyboys where it's only his status that allow him to ascend higher. on actual candids he looks meh as fuck), too much PSL can rot your mind tbh @looksmaxxer234


prettyboy with minimal hooding and strong lashes mogs the fuck out of their eye areas but their eye areas also has a halo. It's just that eyes like jorge del romero mogs much more harder IMO

View attachment 1570334View attachment 1570335View attachment 1570337View attachment 1570338View attachment 1570339View attachment 1570341

id prefer these but gandy still mogs, I just don't prefer his face that much.

robust prettyboys mogs and would most likely age good if they have good hair genes

thoguhts @volcelfatcel @AscendingHero @Korea @Frank Jack @Preston @Blue @germanlooks

Yea.

The Fully Hooded vs Minimal UEE all boils down to striking feature vs facial averageness.

Someone may have a more striking appearance with fully hooded eyes.

But, when you have slight UEE, the lashes can come out much more, and the eyebrows become more accentuated.

https://looksmax.org/threads/eye-area-mog-battle-without-including-eye-color.459305/

It seems like Fully Hooded eyes without an Eye Color Halo is really bad.

 

[Biiyo03]

Yea.

The Fully Hooded vs Minimal UEE all boils down to striking feature vs facial averageness.

Someone may have a more striking appearance with fully hooded eyes.

But, when you have slight UEE, the lashes can come out much more, and the eyebrows become more accentuated.

https://looksmax.org/threads/eye-area-mog-battle-without-including-eye-color.459305/

It seems like Fully Hooded eyes without an Eye Color Halo is really bad.

They have a certain disease where their eye looks that way even normal brown doesnt look like that according to @Preston


But dark anything on hunter eyes looks disgusting, u need light limbal rings eyes for it to look good or its over

 

[germanlooks]

from a psl perspective yes

but idk i started to steer away from psl slowly without heading too much towards the retarded takes(e.g people think hacker has more appeal than actual mogger prettyboys where it's only his status that allow him to ascend higher. on actual candids he looks meh as fuck), too much PSL can rot your mind tbh @looksmaxxer234


prettyboy with minimal hooding and strong lashes mogs the fuck out of their eye areas but their eye areas also has a halo. It's just that eyes like jorge del romero mogs much more harder IMO

View attachment 1570334View attachment 1570335View attachment 1570337View attachment 1570338View attachment 1570339View attachment 1570341

id prefer these but gandy still mogs, I just don't prefer his face that much.

robust prettyboys mogs and would most likely age good if they have good hair genes

thoguhts @volcelfatcel @AscendingHero @Korea @Frank Jack @Preston @Blue @germanlooks

My top 3 PSL objective eye area ranking is
1) De Poot
2) Gandy
3) O pry/Salih

For appeal Jorge del Romeo Rio has overall the best eye area because it fits pretty much every criteria of a great eye area but it also looks still normal and not too striking or intimidating. And on top of that he has god tier eyelashes which boost appeal even more.

If his eye color was as light as on his morphed pics or maybe even better light blue, his eye area would be completely unmoggable in appeal no discussion

 

[Korea]

They have a certain disease where their eye looks that way even normal brown doesnt look like that according to @Preston


But dark anything on hunter eyes looks disgusting, u need colored eyes for it to look good or its over

Yea, although they don't look "real".

It's still a good gauge to see how a truly good eye area consists of, outside of eye coloring.

 

[Deleted member 18032]

Shit thread that needs to be purged. I saw no pics of Ranbir Kapoor, Ahaan Panday, Sidharth Malhotra or Hrithik Roshan ITT

 

[tyronelite]

lil Wayne 4 PSL? That’s generous lol

 

[Alexanderr]

On which planet is @Amnesia equal to Hernan Drago, Jeremy Meeks and Atesh Salih?

 

[AscendingHero]

On which planet is @Amnesia equal to Hernan Drago, Jeremy Meeks and Atesh Salih?

Ayesha Salih, i saw that bro lmao

Someone in mind?

 

[Alexanderr]

Ayesha Salih, i saw that bro lmao

Someone in mind?

Auto-correct is killing me bro

 

[AscendingHero]

Auto-correct is killing me bro

I prefer using this on PC, typos are soo annoying tbh.

Before i had mod powers, making typos in rating section and not be able to edit was soo annoying tbh lol

 

[SendMePicsToRate]

1. I put Amnesia and Salludon in 7 without measuring anything
Why? They didn't ask to be in my thread, but it's obvious to me they're up there. Not everyone wants their ratios n shit plastered on a big ass thread

2. Shit formatting. (Suck my dick, this is a huge ass thread)
3. I wont be measuring anyone I put below 7, exept O'pry.
4. This is objective. If your reply is along the lines of "OMG he mogs him" or "No appeal clear overrate". I'm not replying, argue amongst yourselfs. You totally missed the point of this thread, read the title again.
5. Typos (Might be a lot)
6. If I already rated the face, their name will be a link.
7. Didn't do Chico because his face is boring as fuck.

----------------------------------------------------------

How the numbers work around here. The scale goes 1 - 7, 1 worst 7 the highest possible.

(1/4,000,000) 7. I do not care what UNI you go to, how many "Chads" you seen today. You have never seen anyone this good looking in person. They could be in a hut, write essays on looksmax, or just not be into fame. This level is insanely high.

(1/2,000,000) 6.5. Basically the same rating as 7, but with more unideal ratios. I also would bet you've never seen this in person, but not impossible.

(1/1,600,000) 6. This person could easily get off their ass and start a modeling career and not be a meme.

(1/100,000) 5.5. Really GL guy, but nothing ridiculous (The last irl 10/10)

(1/88,000) 5. He's GL with a few flaws

(1/70,000) 4. Above avg.

(1/50,000) 3. Average

(1/It doesn't matter). The "It's Over Level"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7's have essentially all perfect ratios, with no more than 5 being unideal, and 1 failo at most. (Negative Hooding Like Maher, hooked nose like Gandy, or T40 and Below Eye Color. You don't need blue eyes, but dirt black isn't good.
6.5's are sorta one in the same with 7s, just something MAJOR being unideal holding them back (i.e SHIT IPD)
6s have top tier ratios & features with no more than 8 being unideal. (cough cough assymetries and eye area)
5s have decent ratios with no more than 9 being unideal.
4s have bad ratios 10+ being unideal, causing a few failos.
3s have bad ratios and a huge fucking failo like a potato nose or some shit.
below 3 is not worth my time explaining.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My list (Each name exept for Amnesia & Salludon are rated on their OBJECTIVE ratios, proportions, and features. Listed names are in NO ORDER.)

7.(Amnesia, Salludon)Korea, Elias Depoot, Hernan Drago, Alain Delon, Jordan Barrett, Jon-Erik Hexum, Jeremy Meeks, Atesh Salih, Brad Pitt (There are more, but this is all I feel like measuring rn)
Honorable Mentions I didn't feel like measuring: Matt Bomer, Chico, Vito Basso, and Mukasa.

6.5.Ian Sommerhalder, Zac Elfron, Tyler Maher, Johny Depp, Cillian Murphy. (There's more I'm tired. I'm writing this part Thurs. night, but the thread prob wont drop till saturday or some shit)

6. Sean O'pry, Alton Mason. (There are DEFINETLY MORE)

5. Dababy forcedsmile Timothee Chamalet, Jeremy Lin, (Orb)

4. Lil Wayne, Jay Z, Ed Sheeran, Adam Driver
3. Mario Jariko (Tired as fuck running out of examples)
3. DEEZ NUTS guy, Big Ed
2. Anthony Palma
1. Elephant Man
---------------------------------------------------------------------

First Up, Elias Depoot (7)

View attachment 1536368
ESR: 47% (Ideal)
FWHR: 2.04 (Ideal)
Midface: 1:1 (Wow, perfect)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.47 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.69 (Too High, Flaw #1. You guys have no idea, but this is the reason why he looks "Gay", extremely feminine ratio.)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.53 (Ideal)
Zygomatic to Bigonial Width: 88% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 85% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: (Ideal) Although they aren't all equal. His lower 3rd is the largest, and middle the shortest. Masculine facial 3rds. His 4hed his not big...
Total FWHR: 1.36 (Ideal)
-----------------
3/4ths
View attachment 1536396
Ogee Curve is great, not too forward. Very High set.
Some of the best Zygomatic Arches in human history.
---------------------------
Side Profile
View attachment 1536403

(For the sake of time, I wont be listing each angle here. There's still the pics as usual, and will have "Ideal" in the photo if so vice versa.)
(Halfway thru Depoot, there's NO FUCKING WAY im doing pics for all off them, sorry. If an angle looks "off", I'll remeasure and show a picture. lol.)

Hope Depoot fans are happy, he's the only one getting pictures.
-------------------------------------------
Features

Eye Area/
Pros:
PCT (5.6°)
Slight Positive & Dark Eyebrows
Almond Shape
White Sclera
Deep Set
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.44 great.

Cons:
Fully Hooded eyes causing Eyelashes 404. Even though in his side profile pic, you can see he has good lashes, just covered by hooding. (Flaw #3)

Nose/
Pros: Everything about it, maybe the best nose I'll see today.

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
Good lips, hence the good ratio
Coloring's good.
Good Cupids Bow.

Cons:
Squiggly Lip Seal (Resting postion of the lips. Should be perfectly straight. My last reasoning for why he looks "Gay") (Flaw #4)

Chin/Jaw:

Pros:
God Tier Chin
Great Ramus (Guys, it doesn't have to be like Hexum's to be good)
Straight Gonions.

Cons:
None

SYMMETRY: Amazing, this is super important, I'm not sparring any super assymetrical faces.

Quick Recap. Of all I measured, Depoot Has 4 Objective Flaws stopping him from being perfect (Could be more duh, but definetly not more than 5).
1. Mouth to Nose Ratio.
2. Bad Nasal Angle.
3. Fully Hooded Eyes.
4. Sqiggly Lip Seal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Up next, Hernan Drago(7) (Wont be grading his skin or hairline, he's 40+).
View attachment 1536518
FWHR: 2 (Ideal)
ESR: 44% (Unideal) Flaw #1 and one of the reasons why he looks "Ogre"
Midface Ratio: .92 (Unideal) Flaw #2 another reason for his "Ogre" look.
Chin to Philtrum Ratio: 2.90 (Unideal) Flaw #3 (Male Gaze nigg*s on suicide watch. His chin is just too big. Chill though, his flaws are coming to a halting stop
Mouth to Nose Ratio: 1.45 (Ideal)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.93 (Ideal)
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 90% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 86% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: (Ideal Masculine Distribution)
Total FWHR: 1.3 (Ideal)

3/4th:
View attachment 1536571
Every good thing I've said over and over.

Side Profile:
(This is the best pic I could find.)
View attachment 1536572
All of the angles here are amazing, rest assured.

----------------------------------
Features:

Eyes/
Pros:
3° PCT
Slight Positve Tilt & Dark Eyebrows
Almond Shape
White Sclera
Deep Set
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.84 great

Cons:
Fully Hooded Causing Eyelash 404 (Flaw #4)

Nose/
Pros: Everything
Cons: Don't Exist

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
Fair Lips, but good ratio so they pass the test.
Good shape & Lip seal
Good coloring

Cons: None.

Chin/Jaw:
Pros:
Aside from it's size, it's a very good chin.
Straight Gonions
A somewhat short ramus, but what really decides that for me is the gonial angle, and his is ideal at 112.5°

Symmetry: Very Good.

Quick Recap. 4 Flaws.
1. Cyclop ESR
2. A .20 off the Ideal range of .94 to 1.1 Midface (Remeasured 5x)
3. Ogre Chin to Philtrum Ratio
4. Fully Hooded Eyes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alain's Turn (7).

View attachment 1536614


FWHR: 2 (Ideal)
ESR: 45.4% (Almost a cyclop, but Ideal)
Midface Ratio: .97 (Ideal)
Chin to Philtrum Ratio: 2.27 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose Ratio: 1.58 (Ideal)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 2.4 (Unideal, his top lip is 404) Flaw #1
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 88% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 89% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: (Unideal) When they aren't all equal, the order should go (Mid, Top, Lower in terms of what 3rd is the shortest vs longest.)
His are Top, Mid, Lower. Flaw #2 (This is why a 3 finger forehead isn't ideal, called 4hed for a reason)
Total FWHR: 1.31 (Ideal)

3/4ths:
View attachment 1536659
For men, the Ogee Curve is more of a plus. I'm worried about the Zygomatic Arch and it's prominence. Alain takes this one.

Side Profile:

View attachment 1536671


Only thing wrong here is the 126.7° Gonial Angle. Flaw #3

-----------------------------------
Features:

Eyes/
Pros:
Minimal UEE letting the eyelashes show.
3.5° PCT
Deep Set
White Sclera
Slight Positive Dark Eyebrows
Almond Shape

Cons:
PFL to Height Ratio is only 2.87 Flaw #4

Nose/
Pros: Yes
Cons: None

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
Good coloring

Cons:
Already mentioned the size
Assymetrical Lip Seal (Flaw #5). This shit is not okay Alain...

Chin/Jaw:
Pros:
Everything.

No Cons.

Symmetry: Everything, but the Lip Seal is symmetrical to the human eye.

Quick Recap.
1. Lower to Upper Lip Ratio
2. Facial 3rds.
3. 126.7° Gonial Angle (1.67° out the Ideal lol)
4. PFL to Height is only 2.87
5. Lip Seal.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jordan Barrett (7)
(YES, I KNOW THIS IS EDITED, BUT IT'S RATEABLE)
View attachment 1536710

FWHR: 2.43 (Holy shit) Flaw #1
ESR: 49% (Unideal) To my knowledge, he doesn't have African DNA. Flaw #2
Midface Ratio: 1.12 (Ideal by 0.03, he's too compact)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.43 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.86 (Unideal, I could've guessed he was gay off this ratio alone) Flaw #3
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.99 (DSL's, but still Ideal)
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 88% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 90% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Masculine Distribution (Ideal)
Total FWHR: 1.26 (Too Wide once again) (Unideal) Flaw #4

3/4ths:
View attachment 1536736
Do you really need me to say why it's perfect?

Side Profile:
View attachment 1536739
Not a single unideal angle here.
------------------------------------------
Features:

Eyes/
Pros:
6° PCT
Slight Positve Tilt & Dark Eyebrows
Almond Shape
White Sclera
Deep Set
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.26 great

Cons:
Fully Hooded = Eyelash 404 Flaw #5

Nose/
Pros: Yes
Cons: None.

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
DSL's, but good ratio so they pass the test.
Good shape & Lip seal
Good coloring

Cons: None.

Chin/Jaw: No cons.

Quick Recap.
1. ESR is .49%, way of the caucasian ideal
2. FWHR is way too fucking high
3. Mouth to Nose is too feminine
4. Total FWHR is too low, skull overall too wide.
5. Fully Hooded Eyes.
---------------------------------------------------
Jon-Erik Hexum (7)

View attachment 1536761
ESR: 46% (Ideal)
FWHR: 2.03 (Ideal)
Midface: .98 (Ideal)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.34 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.4 (Ideal)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.33 (Unideal) Flaw #1
Zygomatic to Bigonial Width: 87% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 90% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Masculine Distribution (Ideal)
Total FWHR: 1.34 (Ideal)
--------------------------------
3/4ths
View attachment 1537699
Yes.

Side Profile

View attachment 1537702
Gonial Angle (125.1 deg) Flaw # ..... haha no, I'm not that much of a bitch. .01 deg off is fine.
Unharminous Labiolmental Angle (135.6 deg) Shouldn't be above 130 or below 105. Flaw #2
This is why his chin in some candids just looks "off" (Pics provided HERE.)
------------------------------
Features:

Eye Area (You know what's coming).
Pros:
Minimal UEE
Dark & Dense Brows with a slight positive tilt.
White Sclera
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.77 (Ideal)

Cons:
NCT forcedsmile Flaw #3
NCT instantly disqualifies him from almond shaped eyes. Flaw #4

Nose
Pros: The Nose.
No Cons.

Mouth/
Pros:
Oral Commissures are within the Iris
Coloring is good.

Cons:
Lip seal not an exact absolute perfect straight line. Flaw #5
Size, already dicussed.

Chin/Jaw
Pros:
Flared Gonions + everything, but the cons.
Cons:
Unharminous Labiomental Angle, aleady discussed.

Quick Recap
1. Lower to Upper Lip Ratio is too low.
2. Unharminous Labiolmental Angle
3. NCT
4. Eye Shape
5. Lip Seal

Jeremy Meeks (7)

View attachment 1537722
ESR: 48% (Ideal)
FWHR: 2.04 (Ideal)
Midface: 1.03 (Ideal)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.41 (Haha nice, Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.42 (Ideal)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.44 (Ideal)
Zygomatic to Bigonial Width: 90% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 81% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Masculine Distribution (Ideal)
Total FWHR: 1.31 (Ideal)

3/4ths

View attachment 1537810
Yes.

Side Profile Done Here. (TLDR it's great)

-----------------------------------------
Features:

Eye Area/
Pros:
Minimal UEE
4 deg PCT
Almond Shape
PFL to Height Ratio is 3.44

Cons:
Eyebrows pretty much did 404. Flaw #1
Sorta Assymetrical, prevalent in most pictures. Flaw #2

Nose/
Pros:
Everything, but the cons.

Cons:
The nostrils flare out, not by a lot obviously, but it's there. Flaw #3

Mouth/
Pros:
Good Cupids Bow
Perfect Lip Seal
Good lip color contrast.

Cons:
The Oral Commisures do not meet the iris. Flaw #4

Chin/Jaw
Pros: Everything is good here, check my side profile analysis.

Quick Recap
1. Eyebrows 404
2. Assymmetry in the eye area
3. Slight Nostril Flare
4. A Narrow Mouth, within reason.

------------------------------------------------------

Atesh Salih (Best Eye Area here, reminds me of that Korea guy. Also he's 49, I'm using pics from his youth).

View attachment 1537828
FWHR: 2.08 (Ideal)
ESR: 46% (Ideal)
Midface Ratio: .96 (Ideal)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.23 (Ideal)
Mouth to Nose: 1.53 (Ideall)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 2.29 (Pitiful Atesh, just pitiful) Flaw #1
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 87% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 81% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Bad Distro (Top -> Mid -> Lower) Flaw #2
Total FWHR: 1.3 (Ideal)

3/4ths
View attachment 1537843
Everything Ideal here. And yes, he somehow pulled off full hooding + lashes.

Side Profile.
(Sorry yall this is the best side I could find....I suspect something must be wrong with it)

View attachment 1537848

Wow, almost flawless.

Bad Nasolabial Angle. See here. Flaw #3

-----------------------------------------------
Features

Eye Area: Literally Perfect.

Nose: Also also a really good nose like depoot. Just has the 1 bad angle I spoke about

Mouth/
Pros:
Good Color Contrast
Oral Commissures are within the Iris

Cons:
Bad Lip Seal Caused by top lip 404. Flaw #4

Chin/Jaw:
Amazing Jaw.
Chin being somewhat narrow, slighty smaller than the mouth. Flaw #5

Quick Recap
1. Lower to Upper Lip Ratio
2. Facial 3rds
3. Bad Labiomental Angle
4. Lip Seal
5. Slightly Narrow Chin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NGL, I'm bitchin' out of measuring Pitt. Don't really wnna look at his ass rn. Will do a thread when I wake up
Sean O'No (6) No Cherrypicks, only his best shit.

View attachment 1538110View attachment 1538111View attachment 1538117

Front
View attachment 1538145
FWHR: 2.05 (Ideal)
ESR: 47.30% (Unideal for Caucasians) Flaw #1
Midface Ratio: 1:1 (Perfect)
Chin to Philtrum: 2.97 (More than fucking Drago. Unideal) Flaw #2
Mouth to Nose: 1.45 (Ideall)
Lower to Upper Lip Ratio: 1.91(Ideal)
Zygomatic to Gonial Width: 87% (Ideal)
Bitemporal to Zygomatic Width: 84% (Ideal)
Facial 3rds: Bad Distro (Mid -> Lower -> Top) Flaw #3
Total FWHR: 1.33 (Ideal)

3/4ths: Pic Here. Had to start using imgur, passed the file limit lol.

This is his best view.

Side

View attachment 1538149



Gonial Angle 127, even higher than Delon's. Flaw #4
Nasal Angles Appear to be fine.
------------------------------------
Features
Eye Area/
Pros:
Eyebrows are good, but the ideal tilt is Sligthly Positive -> Positive -> Neutral. This isn't a flaw though. That would be Brad Pitt's cucked eyebrows.
PFL to Height is 3.03. Suprisingly low tbh, but within the ideal.
5 deg PCT
Almond Shape.
Cons:
Fully Hooded = Eyelash 404. This goes for anyone, but the eye area God Atesh. Haven't seen anyone else do that. Flaw #5
Noticable Assymmetry. Flaw #6 (Offcially out of the 7 range)

Nose/

Pros: The overall size, shape etc is fine. Pay attention to the cons.
Cons:
Hooked Nose Failo #7
Serious Assymmetry: Flaw #8 (Offcially in 6 range)

Mouth/
Pros: He has a really good mouth area. Everything I've been saying is ideal he has.
Cons: None.

Chin/Jaw
Pros:
Other than the size, the chin is fine.
His gonions are actually straight out like most of the 7s.
Decent Ramus Length, but all of this is overshawdowed by what I'm about to say.
Cons:
Over sized Massters.
This makes his jaw look rounded in profile & frontal view. This shit doesn't look good guys. Not on Pitt, Not on O'pry. Flaw #9.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Have Fun.
@Frank Jack
@germanlooks
@AscendingHero
@Preston
@astatine

127 gonial angle is not a flaw in any universe and has been shown to be ideal from the front?

 

[tyronelite]

On which planet is @Amnesia equal to Hernan Drago, Jeremy Meeks and Atesh Salih?

Agreed anyone who’s gotten surgery / fillers should be in a separate category

 

[Korea]

On which planet is @Amnesia equal to Hernan Drago, Jeremy Meeks and Atesh Salih?

Ayesha Salih, i saw that bro lmao

Someone in mind?

lil Wayne 4 PSL? That’s generous lol

This thread I basically uped the scale by one point to make it easier for me 8 = 7, 6 = 7 etc.

Also, someone already told me to move Amnesia out of that categroy, but I couldn't edit the actual post.

 

[Korea]

127 gonial angle is not a flaw in any universe and has been shown to be ideal from the front?

Yea, it is lol.

 

[SendMePicsToRate]

Yea, it is lol.

Would you like to show a study to prove that? or are you going to pull that out of nowhere?

We have covered this topic countless times on this site, it is ideal as far as measurements go.

What you find attractive is not what the average human being finds attractive on men.

 

[Korea]

Would you like to show a study to prove that? or are you going to pull that out of nowhere?

View attachment 1581656

We have covered this topic countless times on this site, it is ideal as far as measurements go.

What you find attractive is not what the average human being finds attractive on men.

130 Gonial Angle is not ideal.

Ask everyone, no one will agree with you.

Those who do will gladly go on my ignore list.

The best Gonial Angles are 110 - 125.

 

[SendMePicsToRate]

130 Gonial Angle is not ideal.

Ask everyone, no one will agree with you.

Those who do will gladly go on my ignore list.

The best Gonial Angles are 110 - 125.

As I said, would you like to show that using some other method than "I say so"? Everyone isn't going to magically just agree with you though unless this site has truly gone to shit since I left it.

 

[Korea]

As I said, would you like to show that using some other method than "I say so"? Everyone isn't going to magically just agree with you though unless this site has truly gone to shit since I left it.

It's not "I say so". Go and compare the lower3rds of men with a gonial angle between 110 - 125 degrees.

VS. men with near or 130 degrees. The men with lower gonial angles will have a better lower3rd 100%

Once again, ask everyone. Anyone who agrees with downward grown gonial angles is insane.

Make a poll and you'll see lmao.

 

[SendMePicsToRate]

It's not "I say so". Go and compare the lower3rds of men with a gonial angle between 110 - 125 degrees.

VS. men with near or 130 degrees. The men with lower gonial angles will have a better lower3rd 100%

Once again, ask everyone. Anyone who agrees with downward grown gonial angles is insane.

Make a poll and you'll see lmao.

Which I have already done, I have found the exact opposite most men hover around the magic number 127 if they are attractive to women, it is an average feature but when properly developed looks good. Having a too low gonial angle will cause the face to lose proportion from the front and will cause the face to be visually too bottom heavy because the gonians fall below the lip height or causing the chin height to be too weak relative to the rest of the face.

Feel free to make a poll about it, but this is just arguing with things that have already been established for years.

 

[Korea]

Which I have already done, I have found the exact opposite most men hover around the magic number 127 if they are attractive to women, it is an average feature but when properly developed looks good. Having a too low gonial angle will cause the face to lose proportion from the front and will cause the face to be visually too bottom heavy because the gonians fall below the lip height or causing the chin height to be too weak relative to the rest of the face.

Feel free to make a poll about it, but this is just arguing with things that have already been established for years.

Give me the names of men with a 127 - 130 gonial angle so I can make a poll.

You're seriously degenmaxxed if you think downward jaws are more attractive LMAO.

 

[SendMePicsToRate]

Give me the names of men with a 127 - 130 gonial angle so I can make a poll.

You're seriously degenmaxxed if you think downward jaws are more attractive LMAO.

Okay I will do:

Alain Delon - 127

Sean O pry - 127

Nessman - 127

Bomber - 125-130 depending on pic (ignoring his poor below jaw region)

Leonard dicaprio -127-130

Glynehall - 129

Jordan barrett - 130

De poot - 128

 

[Korea]

Okay I will do:

Alain Delon - 127

View attachment 1581682

Sean O pry - 127

View attachment 1581685

No

Nessman - 127

View attachment 1581690

No.

Bomber - 125-130 depending on pic (ignoring his poor below jaw region)

View attachment 1581695

No.

Leonard dicaprio -127-130

View attachment 1581699

Glynehall - 129

View attachment 1581702

Jordan barrett - 130

View attachment 1581704

No.

De poot - 128

View attachment 1581715

Fuck no.

As for the people who did have the gonial angles you showed, have worse lower3rds than those who DO NOT have gonial angles above 124.9

 

[SendMePicsToRate]

No

No.

No.

No.

Fuck no.

As for the people who did have the gonial angles you showed, have worse lower3rds than those who DO NOT have gonial angles above 124.9

You unable to measure or what?

 

[Korea]

You unable to measure or what?

YOU are definetly shit at measuring if you came out with 128 on depoot LMAO.

AND BARRET AT 130???

I feel SO BAD for people who have been rated by you, a true tragedy.

Also, NONE of these pictures are good for measuring, it needs as close to frankfurt plane as possible.

Each of them have WAY better photots to measure from.

You sir, are retarded.

 

[SendMePicsToRate]

YOU are definetly shit at measuring if you came out with 128 on depoot LMAO.

AND BARRET AT 130???

I feel SO BAD for people who have been rated by you, a true tragedy.

Also, NONE of these pictures are good for measuring, it needs as close to frankfurt plane as possible.

Each of them have WAY better photots to measure from.

You sir, are retarded.

I mean all the signs point to him having that gonial angle with how his front face lines up so?

Yes, barrett has a gonial angle in that region, it is very clear to the eye if you just look.

Well you can feel bad for them but I really do not care.

Please go ahead find those pictures if you don't mind sifting around the internet for ages, they do job to show that yet again 127 is the ideal jaw angle for a man.

 

[Korea]

I mean all the signs point to him having that gonial angle with how his front face lines up so?

Yes, barrett has a gonial angle in that region, it is very clear to the eye if you just look.

View attachment 1581734

Well you can feel bad for them but I really do not care.

Please go ahead find those pictures if you don't mind sifting around the internet for ages, they do job to show that yet again 127 is the ideal jaw angle for a man.

No, that would be a waste of time since I already did that in this thread lmao.

You're just wrong. You can't trust studies for everything lmao.

Especially, since I'm pretty sure that's the only study stating 127 - 130 is ideal lol.

 

[Deleted member 17501]

Deloin mogs everyone because of his harmony and pheno + good bones

To girls eye he will be forever the best

 

[SendMePicsToRate]

No, that would be a waste of time since I already did that in this thread lmao.

You're just wrong. You can't trust studies for everything lmao.

Especially, since I'm pretty sure that's the only study stating 127 - 130 is ideal lol.

There are plastic surgeons stating that 130 is ideal for a man on instagram, I mean are you sure you are even measuring it correctly?

Studies are by far one of the easiest ways to look for what is actually attractive to the vast majority of people without being an autist and asking them all yourself.

Well please show other studies showing otherwise?

 

[Moggedbyevery1]

Arghhh yet another thread arguing if top 1% man mogs another top 1% man

Thanks for all this information guys, since we all know 8 psl perfect gigachads can materialise at any given moment to cuck you

 

[Korea]

Arghhh yet another thread arguing if top 1% man mogs another top 1% man

Thanks for all this information guys, since we all know 8 psl perfect gigachads can materialise at any given moment to cuck you

This wasn't even the point of the thread LMAO.

The people I tagged asked me to make this and understand the point.

Everyone else started arguing over men likes gays lol.

 

[Moggedbyevery1]

This wasn't even the point of the thread LMAO.

The people I tagged asked me to make this and understand the point.

Everyone else started arguing over men likes gays lol.

Point is the objectively bad or good trait theory seems cope, I’ve seen a diverse portfolio of guys getting simped for, at a certain point of a combination of facial features, you will get lumped into the good looking category

Fuck I don’t even think women talk about male facial features this much