Of these two, who is more likely to be a Chad factory?

[Xangsane]

I'm more attracted to the second composite. Very surprised to look at the spoilers and see that the 1st is models and such.

Why are you surprised?

Not sure of who'd be a chad factory but I like the 2nd more.

Why are you more attracted to composite 2 over 1?

 

[Xangsane]

1
View attachment 3125289

2
View attachment 3125290

Do NOT vote based on PSL or personal preferences, but who is more likely to be a Chad factory.
Assume both women are 5'5.

Spoiler: Who these faces are

1: Average faces of white actresses and fashion models, or white women with a similar pheno
2: Average faces of white female TikTokers and influencers, or white women with a similar pheno

@Charisma

 

[MA_ascender]

holy shit just let this thread die stop bumping ts

 

[Xangsane]

holy shit just let this thread die stop bumping ts

pat pat

 

[Charisma]

@Charisma

1 is more likely to be a chad factory

2 is more feminine, hotter

 

[Xangsane]

1 is more likely to be a chad factory

2 is more feminine, hotter

Why is 1 more likely a Chad factory and why is 2 hotter?
Would 2 produce incels?

 

[greycel]

And possibly a robust pretty boy?

Nah
Can also be prettyboy with avg dimorphism I'm saying

Well number 1 had a lot of East Slavic women (particularly Russian) in the database, which explains the wider face.

Doesn't central Asia have wider faces. She looks like she's from there

 

[Xangsane]

Nah
Can also be prettyboy with avg dimorphism I'm saying

Example?

Doesn't central Asia have wider faces. She looks like she's from there

Yes

 

[hypernormie]

So a non prettyboy

so a prettyboy

Could number 2 produce incels?

Yeah I think she’s more likely to produce an incel because her features are highly feminine which would work great for a daughter but can go very south if she has a son

#1 is more robust so she has a better guarantee of giving her son bones and bones are the bedrock of a Chad

#2 has a higher likelihood of producing striking features but thats not going to guarantee a Chad as often as bones will

I do however think #2 has greater potential of producing a giga chad but your question was which will produce more Chads rather than which has a higher likelihood of producing a peak Chad

What do you rate them both?

#1 7 out of 9

#2 8 out of 9

 

[Alexios]

Aren't masc and robust the same?

Robust Prettyboy is more masculine than a prettyboy, but less Masculine than someone with the Maesthetic archetype. Robust is like young Brad Pitt but if he had a slightly smaller jaw, and Masc is Brad Pitt too, especially with the stubble he sometimes has, makes him look more masculine. At least that's what I think.

 

[Xangsane]

Yeah I think she’s more likely to produce an incel because her features are highly feminine which would work great for a daughter but can go very south if she has a son

#1 is more robust so she has a better guarantee of giving her son bones and bones are the bedrock of a Chad

#2 has a higher likelihood of producing striking features but thats not going to guarantee a Chad as often as bones will

I do however think #2 has greater potential of producing a giga chad but your question was which will produce more Chads rather than which has a higher likelihood of producing a peak Chad


#1 7 out of 9

#2 8 out of 9

And do you think prettyboys VS masthetic/masc men are more likely than not to prefer a specific face archetype for LTR/marriage?

 

[Xangsane]

Robust Prettyboy is more masculine than a prettyboy, but less Masculine than someone with the Maesthetic archetype. Robust is like young Brad Pitt but if he had a slightly smaller jaw, and Masc is Brad Pitt too, especially with the stubble he sometimes has, makes him look more masculine. At least that's what I think.

And do you think prettyboys VS masthetic/masc men are more likely than not to prefer a specific face archetype for LTR/marriage?

See above

 

[hypernormie]

And do you think prettyboys VS masthetic/masc men are more likely than not to prefer a specific face archetype for LTR/marriage?

I have no opinions on that tbh I’ve never thought about it

I’m rather masthetic myself and while don’t mind a super feminine “pretty” woman for casual sex, if I was having a child I’d require a woman with a lot of facial bone mass, specifically in the cheekbone/zygos area of the face

I’ve also always found small eyes on women really attractive for some reason even though this is a masculine feature

In general I prefer my women to look aggressive/angry and dense facially in terms of bone mass

hyper delicate/agreeable female faces are repulsive to me even though they are typically seen as more feminine and neotenous

 

[Xangsane]

I have no opinions on that tbh I’ve never thought about it

I’m rather masthetic myself and while don’t mind a super feminine “pretty” woman for casual sex, if I was having a child I’d require a woman with a lot of facial bone mass, specifically in the cheekbone/zygos area of the face

I’ve also always found small eyes on women really attractive for some reason even though this is a masculine feature

In general I prefer my women to look aggressive/angry and dense facially in terms of bone mass

hyper delicate/agreeable female faces are repulsive to me even though they are typically seen as more feminine and neotenous

I see where you're coming from
I have noticed a lot of non-prettyboy chads using women of the 2 face type for STR and 1 for LTR kids
It's probably to do with assortative mating

 

[DelonLover1999]

goated poll

 

[hypernormie]

I see where you're coming from
I have noticed a lot of non-prettyboy chads using women of the 2 face type for STR and 1 for LTR kids
It's probably to do with assortative mating

Yeah, I don’t even necessarily want kids or care for the idea but whenever I consider what it would be like, having a woman with an aggressive face is a non negotiable, she doesn’t even have to be the prettiest

I’d choose a 7 out of 10 with an aggressive face over a 9 out of 10 with an agreeable face any day

I wish I knew why