One of the biggest contradictions in Quran

I’m not the most religious but even anyone with above average Somali IQ can tell Jesus was a better person then Mohammed, Jesus did his miracles and such, when Mohammed was asked to do stuff he never could
Also why would Allah protect Jesus and send some imposter on the cross, but let Mohammed be poisoned to death
Another funny surah is after Mo died, people form his crew went to to his tomb to see if he would resserect like Jesus only for nothing to happen
This is a very poor argument, because God specifically allowed him to complete his message, said he was pleased with him, established the faith over the entire Arabian peninsula. Only after all that, did he pass away.

I would advise you to stay away from the low tier polemics you’ve been presenting, it doesn’t support your argument or beliefs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_, Sub5kang, dhusc and 1 other person
In surah 9:30



Prophet Muhammad claims that the Jews worshipped Ezra.

One common defection I've read about is that he was talking about some small sect of Jews but this is again proven to be false in sahih Muslim 1 Hadith 352 that was referring not some small sect but all Jews

View attachment 4874690

No convincing explanation for this by any muslim scholar so far. The only arguments are the first one that he was talking small sect proven to be false. Some argue it refers to extreme veneration not literal belief and the third belief that existed but disappeared and then some argue it's translation or word of play. All mostly deflections. No clear cut explanation for this so far.

And this is condemning all Jews of burning in hell because they worshipped Ezra but there is like
0 proof they ever did. It isn't just a small oopsie and still remains one of the biggest contradictions in Islam alongside crucifixion and identification of Mary.
Ezra Miller? explain in PSL terms:lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: _Nazareth_, Sub5kang and cortisolman2
U think he discovered what’s been known thousand of years before hi
In 1543, Nicolaus Copernicus detailed his radical theory of the Universe in which the Earth, along with the other planets, rotated around the Sun.

low iq fuck dumbass im putting your as son ignore how dumb ass you fucking retard :sick::sick: basic history btw:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: primalmaxer
im so educated myself about this stuff but as a counter i could easily say that the bibleisnt real because its been changed many many times and it has many yes many contradictions its honestly crazy how one contradiction you find is enough to say islam isnt real and honestly im sure its not even a contradiction where is it proven or written that there wasnt a group of jews worshiping ezra?
(Quran 9:31). In other words, Jews venerated Ezra so much that it was as if he were a god to them.4]
An explanation given by Muslim scholars from the time of al-Jāḥiẓ and al-Ṭabarī (d. 923) was that this belief had, in fact, been held by a group of Jews in Arabia, but that this sect had died out.
Nigga when did I say Islam is false or all that you just putting words in my mouth. I just made a thread talking about a contradiction and you are just repeating what I already said in OP and the comment. Give me a single proof of this happening outside of Islamic text.

There's No mention in the Hebrew Bible. No mention in the Talmud or rabbinic literature. No record in Greek, Roman, or early Christian writings. No inscriptional or archaeological evidence. No known sect in entire documented Jewish history holding this belief. It only and only exists in the Qur'an and the Hadith that's it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamechico
This is a very poor argument, because God specifically allowed him to complete his message, said he was pleased with him, established the faith over the entire Arabian peninsula. Only after all that, did he pass away.

I would advise you to stay away from the low tier polemics you’ve been presenting, it doesn’t support your argument or beliefs.
Here we go “thou holier than u” all religions are man made mush imo, ur jsut worried about losing out on ur community and family and even death if you decide to not believe it
 
In 1543, Nicolaus Copernicus detailed his radical theory of the Universe in which the Earth, along with the other planets, rotated around the Sun.

low iq fuck dumbass im putting your as son ignore how dumb ass you fucking retard :sick::sick: basic history btw:lul:
Ancient Egyptians and Greeks knew about this shit way before Adam and even touched down on earth
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: cortisolman2
Here we go “thou holier than u” all religions are man made mush imo, ur jsut worried about losing out on ur community and family and even death if you decide to not believe it
It’s not about being holier than thou. It’s just that these sorts of arguments don’t help your case.
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_, cortisolman2 and dhusc
Nigga when did I say Islam is false or all that you just putting words in my mouth. I just made a thread talking about a contradiction and you are just repeating what I already said in OP and the comment. Give me a single proof of this happening outside of Islamic text.

There's No mention in the Hebrew Bible. No mention in the Talmud or rabbinic literature. No record in Greek, Roman, or early Christian writings. No inscriptional or archaeological evidence. No known sect in entire documented Jewish history holding this belief. It only and only exists in the Qur'an and the Hadith that's it.
doesnt mean its fake? theres no record of the earth revolving around the sun is there in any of your books does it mean the earth isnt revolving around the sun?

i dont understand the logic here its clearly flawed
 
Ancient Egyptians and Greeks knew about this shit way before Adam and even touched down on earth
dumbass nigger stfu no one asked you for your bitchass opinion fucking useless zygote your daddy shoudvle nutted in a dead monkey ass instead of making you fucking useless pice of oxygen waste the onl thing going on in your body it turning oxygen into cO2 thats it nigger faggot ass niggah stfu now also get iq moggged by me 138iq im am superior you must be a fucking room temperature iq snail
 
It’s not about being holier than thou. It’s just that these sorts of arguments don’t help your case.
I’m not the only one who believes in these sentiments but again people can believe what they want, but shouldn’t be forced to, as the some places will literally kill u if u convert, its a shame in Muslims ruled countries how people who convert to Christianity or even Judaism and try to practice it in silence are still persecuted, even in Libya they own slaves to this day, Mohammed referred to black people as “rasin heads” but ofc ofc too far ik, I might burn in hell for insulting a man who was literally illiterate, thought satan himself was attacking him, literally have verses in the Quran which are controversial called the “satanic verses” and married a literal child, so sorry
 
dumbass nigger stfu no one asked you for your bitchass opinion fucking useless zygote your daddy shoudvle nutted in a dead monkey ass instead of making you fucking useless pice of oxygen waste the onl thing going on in your body it turning oxygen into cO2 thats it nigger faggot ass niggah stfu now also get iq moggged by me 138iq im am superior you must be a fucking room temperature iq snail
Soo much estrogen, and for what?
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: cortisolman2
See none of u ever ask questions and that’s what happens someone like me does and gets harassed by family and at the time the Muslim community I was near so ik first hand how people feel some type of way over some book which they can be, but don’t fkin try to ruin my day or others who may have differing opinions
 
I’m not the only one who believes in these sentiments but again people can believe what they want, but shouldn’t be forced to, as the some places will literally kill u if u convert, its a shame in Muslims ruled countries how people who convert to Christianity or even Judaism and try to practice it in silence are still persecuted, even in Libya they own slaves to this day, Mohammed referred to black people as “rasin heads” but ofc ofc too far ik, I might burn in hell for insulting a man who was literally illiterate, thought satan himself was attacking him, literally have verses in the Quran which are controversial called the “satanic verses” and married a literal child, so sorry
You do realise that the Middle East was majority Christian until around 1200 or so? It became mostly Muslim after 600 years of Islamic Rule, lol. You can fact check this right now. Hard to reconcile that with your claim of Muslims forcefully converting everyone and being violent barbarians.
 
doesnt mean its fake? theres no record of the earth revolving around the sun is there in any of your books does it mean the earth isnt revolving around the sun?

i dont understand the logic here its clearly flawed
You are talking past me here shoe horning science into theology and historical facts.

We know the Earth revolves around the sun because we can measure it right now. But we only know what ancient people believed because they wrote it down or left artifacts. If the only place this Jewish belief' exists is in the Quran, it remains a 'theological claim' for Muslims, but a 'historical error' for everyone else. If there's no evidence outside of one specific book, you can't logically use that book to prove its own claim to a non Muslim. It's as simple as that. Science doesn't require ancient books to be true but history requires corroboration. If a 7th century text claims a massive group held a belief, but there is zero evidence in that group's own 2,000 years of writing and records, it remains a historical error to everyone but those who believe that book to unfiltered truth.
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamechico and MixedBoyo12
You do realise that the Middle East was majority Christian until around 1200 or so? It became mostly Muslim after 600 years of Islamic Rule, lol. You can fact check this right now. Hard to reconcile that with your claim of Muslims forcefully converting everyone and being violent barbarians.
They literally taxed non Muslims who wouldn’t convert like what? Jizzyah tax, ofc how about the Ottoman Empire who killed over 5 million Christians? I’m sure Turkey was founded on “such peace and love”
 
They literally taxed non Muslims who wouldn’t convert like what? Jizzyah tax, ofc how about the Ottoman Empire who killed over 5 million Christians? I’m sure Turkey was founded on “such peace and love”
Yeah, and? Everyone taxes everyone lol.

The Ottoman Empire that killed 5 Million Christians was the secularised, Westernised version in the late 1800s and early 1900s lol. And Turkey itself distances itself from Islam.
 
You are talking past me here shoe horning science into theology and historical facts.

We know the Earth revolves around the sun because we can measure it right now. But we only know what ancient people believed because they wrote it down or left artifacts. If the only place this Jewish belief' exists is in the Quran, it remains a 'theological claim' for Muslims, but a 'historical error' for everyone else. If there's no evidence outside of one specific book, you can't logically use that book to prove its own claim to a non Muslim. It's as simple as that. Science doesn't require ancient books to be true but history requires corroboration. If a 7th century text claims a massive group held a belief, but there is zero evidence in that group's own 2,000 years of writing and records, it remains a historical error to everyone but those who believe that book to unfiltered truth.
so if i say that i gave you an apple yesterday and only you and me know it does it mean that in the future that i didnt give the apple to you just because i have no proof of giving you the apple?
 
Yeah, and? Everyone taxes everyone lol.

The Ottoman Empire that killed 5 Million Christians was the secularised, Westernised version in the late 1800s and early 1900s lol. And Turkey itself distances itself from Islam.
What about present day persecution like in Nigeria, India, Iraq? Lemme guess “the Jews” are somehow behind this and truu Islam isn’t that, what about Mormonism? Why would Joseph smith say “mohammed was such An inspiration” to him? If people know Mormonism is horse crap, and that many people and scholars connect Mohammed and Joseph smith as well as Islam and Mormonism as very similar, then in the end, Mohammed was a good for nothing promiscuous schizophrenic warlord, but hey again I can’t rly say much, u can find fault in all religions tbh
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: cortisolman2
You are talking past me here shoe horning science into theology and historical facts.

We know the Earth revolves around the sun because we can measure it right now. But we only know what ancient people believed because they wrote it down or left artifacts. If the only place this Jewish belief' exists is in the Quran, it remains a 'theological claim' for Muslims, but a 'historical error' for everyone else. If there's no evidence outside of one specific book, you can't logically use that book to prove its own claim to a non Muslim. It's as simple as that. Science doesn't require ancient books to be true but history requires corroboration. If a 7th century text claims a massive group held a belief, but there is zero evidence in that group's own 2,000 years of writing and records, it remains a historical error to everyone but those who believe that book to unfiltered truth.
not a contradiction aslong as there issnt any proof to show there wasnt any jewish people who worshipped ezra idk what your on about having lack of proof of something does not mean its necessarily wrong if i get raped and i only have myself to testify and no other proof it doesnt really mean i never got rapped its just that i dont have any proof foor it but if you have proof of me not getting raped then that means im lying
 
What about present day persecution like in Nigeria, India, Iraq? Lemme guess “the Jews” are somehow behind this and truu Islam isn’t that, what about Mormonism? Why would Joseph smith say “mohammed was such An inspiration” to him? If people know Mormonism is horse crap, and that many people and scholars connect Mohammed and Joseph smith as well as Islam and Mormonism as very similar, then in the end, Mohammed was a good for nothing promiscuous schizophrenic warlord, but hey again I can’t rly say much, u can find fault in all religions tbh
 
won’t read something, send an edit only a fkin retard would have in their camera roll
 
What about present day persecution like in Nigeria, India, Iraq? Lemme guess “the Jews” are somehow behind this and truu Islam isn’t that, what about Mormonism? Why would Joseph smith say “mohammed was such An inspiration” to him? If people know Mormonism is horse crap, and that many people and scholars connect Mohammed and Joseph smith as well as Islam and Mormonism as very similar, then in the end, Mohammed was a good for nothing promiscuous schizophrenic warlord, but hey again I can’t rly say much, u can find fault in all religions tbh
none of the countries you mentioned are Islamically ruled, they’re all secular

India and Nigeria aren’t even Muslim majority

Joseph Smith never said he was inspired by him
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_
They literally taxed non Muslims who wouldn’t convert like what? Jizzyah tax, ofc how about the Ottoman Empire who killed over 5 million Christians? I’m sure Turkey was founded on “such peace and love”
doesn’t your government tax you too?

what’s the difference
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_
doesn’t your government tax you too?

what’s the difference
The difference is you’re not forced to convert to another religion, see in the US and other western nations, most Muslim kids start researching and breaking away, as you do so freely here ofc most Muslims will be like “muhhh the corrupt west:soy::soy::soy:” in reality people are just freeing their minds, u should see Iran and their women before the Islam revolution seemed like a good and nice place Fr, not that it still isn’t, but u literally had Iranians celebrating when Israel attacked Iran a couple months ago it should tell u something.
 
Last edited:
Muslims when 250 Sri Lankans were massacred on 2019 Easter Day: 🫣

Muslims when u make one question of their beliefs and their prophet: :feelswah:
 
They literally taxed non Muslims who wouldn’t convert like what? Jizzyah tax, ofc how about the Ottoman Empire who killed over 5 million Christians? I’m sure Turkey was founded on “such peace and love”
jizya was exempt on women and elderly but also non muslim males who fought to defend the land ( as the whole premise of the jizya was that the muslim men had to fight for the nation and protect its citizens but the rest didn't)
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_
Muslims when 250 Sri Lankans were massacred on 2019 Easter Day: 🫣

Muslims when u make one question of their beliefs and their prophet: :feelswah:
every muslim who actually is a muslim condemn the easter massacre in sri lanka
 
jizya was exempt on women and elderly but also non muslim males who fought to defend the land ( as the whole premise of the jizya was that the muslim men had to fight for the nation and protect its citizens but the rest didn't)
But u still had to serve right? So in all just seems like of political and power gain book then some higher way of thinking
 
The difference is you’re not forced to convert to another religion, see in the US and other western nations, most Muslim kids start researching and breaking away, as you do so freely here ofc most Muslims will be like “muhhh the corrupt west:soy::soy::soy:” in reality people are just freeing their minds, u should see Iran and their women before the Islam revolution seemed like a good and nice place Fr, not that it still isn’t, but u literally had Iranians celebrating when Israel attacked Iran a couple months ago it should tell u something.
there was no forced conversion and also the jizya tax was historically set lower than the zakat which muslims had to pay to the government (which then distributed it amoungst the poor)
 
Were there any proper rebuttals here @Jason Voorhees ?

I had come upon this a couple years ago and didn't look too far into it as I assumed such an easy claim to verify/disprove wouldn't be said by the messenger of God if it was false.
 
there was no forced conversion and also the jizya tax was historically set lower than the zakat which muslims had to pay to the government (which then distributed it amoungst the poor)
Why does a religion need to impose taxes and “taking over Territory” couldn’t they just try to peacefully go about it? No because people at first knew Islam made no sense and it didn’t have a large following till after lands were being conquested, same for Christianity post reconquista I’m not letting one off the hook
 
But u still had to serve right? So in all just seems like of political and power gain book then some higher way of thinking
Why does a religion need to impose taxes and “taking over Territory” couldn’t they just try to peacefully go about it? No because people at first knew Islam made no sense and it didn’t have a large following till after lands were being conquested, same for Christianity post reconquista I’m not letting one off the hook
Islam did not need conquests or taxes to survive or grow. For 13 years in Makkah, the Prophet spread the message purely through peaceful invitation and moral example despite severe persecution. Hundrds converted voluntarily before any state or military power existed. By the time of the Hijrah and the conquest of Makkah, Islam had already unified much of Arabia through conviction, not force.Territorial expansion and jizyah came after the faith was established. jizyah was a protection tax paid by non-Muslim men (in place of military service) in exchange for full state protection of life, property, and worship — often lighter than taxes under previous Byzantine or Persian rule. The Qur’an explicitly forbids forced conversion (2:256). Wars were mainly defensive or to remove oppression and allow free da’wah, not to compel belief. Also major Muslim populations today (e.g., Indonesia) became Muslim centuries later through trade and peaceful preaching, without armies and many Christians and Jews lived peacefully as dhimmis for generations and converted voluntarily over time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_
In surah 9:30



Prophet Muhammad claims that the Jews worshipped Ezra.

One common defection I've read about is that he was talking about some small sect of Jews but this is again proven to be false in sahih Muslim 1 Hadith 352 that was referring not some small sect but all Jews

View attachment 4874690

No convincing explanation for this by any muslim scholar so far. The only arguments are the first one that he was talking small sect proven to be false. Some argue it refers to extreme veneration not literal belief and the third belief that existed but disappeared and then some argue it's translation or word of play. All mostly deflections. No clear cut explanation for this so far.

And this is condemning all Jews of burning in hell because they worshipped Ezra but there is like
0 proof they ever did. It isn't just a small oopsie and still remains one of the biggest contradictions in Islam alongside crucifixion and identification of Mary.
Yep they copied Jesus’a word. Also this is in their Quran sura 9:30 says the Jews took Ezra as a son of Allah


Islams a fucking joke RELGION :feelscry: I pity the Mohammedens. Oh well it’s their life lol

Since when were u interested in religion though
 
Last edited:
1000011609

NGL that lowkey aura
 
The Quran has been unchanged since its inception, verified by countless oral chains and carbon dated manuscripts
It has changed… your book is the 1924 Cairo edition before then each college has their own qurans (quirats) which had different verses that’s why it took you 1924 to
Standardise it because colleges would fight over it in the streets

And now today even verses in the Haffs Warsh Doori all have DIFFERNCES and this is even after Caliph Uthman destroyed and burnt all the other Qurans that didn’t appeal to him. So your Quran has undergone multiple changes even Ibn MASU’D said that the Quran Ibn Thabic chose (which 3rd caliph Uthman chose) is false due to adding extra chapters. Yes theirs beef over is the Qurans is 112 chapters or 116 lol🤣:lul:
 
T
gnu even chritain scholars say the quran has not been changed we muslims have th eoriginal quran which was made at the time of the phrophet and its exactly word by word the same to the one today lowest iq claim ive ever seen
They do not say this. Infact we say the opposite. Liberal WHITES who want liberal brownie points may but they aren’t to be discussed
 
It has changed… your book is the 1924 Cairo edition before then each college has their own qurans (quirats) which had different verses that’s why it took you 1924 to
Standardise it because colleges would fight over it in the streets

And now today even verses in the Haffs Warsh Doori all have DIFFERNCES and this is even after Caliph Uthman destroyed and burnt all the other Qurans that didn’t appeal to him. So your Quran has undergone multiple changes even Ibn MASU’D said that the Quran Ibn Thabic chose (which 3rd caliph Uthman chose) is false due to adding extra chapters. Yes theirs beef over is the Qurans is 112 chapters or 116 lol🤣:lul:
ahruf and qiraat are a feature, not a bug.
 
ahruf and qiraat are a feature, not a bug.
It’s a bug when they say different things entirely where the context is soemthing different. (If you want an exmaple I can shape you many, becuase it’s not even scribal errors or DIFFERNCES in the word being used but the context remaining the same it’s completely a diff context it is what it is)

There’s also manuscripts like the Birmingham one if I’m remembering correctly that have entire things scribbled out 🤣:lul: showing your people Would alter their own manuscripts

Tbh I no longer debate religion too much as most people are naturally hard hearted and doomed to go hell, I have helped many to Christ and I feel ive done my part and so im
Content. As for Mohammedens well its over for yall niggas :lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
It’s a bug when they say different things entirely where the context is soemthing different. (If you want an exmaple I can shape you many, becuase it’s not even scribal errors or DIFFERNCES in the word being used but the context remaining the same it’s completely a diff context it is what it is)

There’s also manuscripts like the Birmingham one if I’m remembering correctly that have entire things scribbled out 🤣:lul: showing your people Would alter their own manuscripts

Tbh I no longer debate religion too much as most people are naturally hard hearted and doomed to go hell, I have helped many to Christ and I feel ive done my part and so im
Content. As for Mohammedens well its over for yall niggas :lul::lul::lul::lul:
Different words being used is also a feature. In fact, if anything it makes the case for Islam stronger for an oral recitations variants to all align in meaning and deepen it. You’re free to show me one where one version says something that opposes another.
 
  • +1
Reactions: cortisolman2
Debating in big 2026 some fairy tales written by some schizos incels who, instead of getting laid and raising kids, were writing shit like that thousands of years ago..

1000006891


Getting back to the thread’s main point, every religion is full of paradoxes and logical inconsistencies that it cannot resolve (nor does it need to)

This is because it was never about gods or religion (these things are relative and depend on the culture and geographical location where you are born) but about proving to/assuring your future partner that you were raised in a certain way, that you want your partner to be raised in a certain way just like you, and that you want a family and children who will grow up just like you, because the system works, so you continue it

The mental comfort and low cortisol levels that religion anesthetically induces in our monkey brains from birth through the notion that “it doesn’t matter, we’ll end up in heaven anyway / if something bad happened, we don’t get upset, it’s just God’s plan” is a very helpful and successful tool that works and is passed down from one generation to the next

As the girls below say for ex, this mental anesthesia is “the solution to life” (against the chaotic, cruel and wild life/reality we must navigate in this life)

 
It’s a bug when they say different things entirely where the context is soemthing different. (If you want an exmaple I can shape you many, becuase it’s not even scribal errors or DIFFERNCES in the word being used but the context remaining the same it’s completely a diff context it is what it is)

There’s also manuscripts like the Birmingham one if I’m remembering correctly that have entire things scribbled out 🤣:lul: showing your people Would alter their own manuscripts

Tbh I no longer debate religion too much as most people are naturally hard hearted and doomed to go hell, I have helped many to Christ and I feel ive done my part and so im
Content. As for Mohammedens well its over for yall niggas :lul::lul::lul::lul:
HOLY DODGE:lul::lul: dumbass niggah its over for you and your book is filled bye filled i mean filled with clear contradictions and there are so many:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: ccwb
HOLY DODGE:lul::lul: dumbass niggah its over for you and your book is filled bye filled i mean filled with clear contradictions and there are so many:lul:
No no contradictions only translation errors because duh Bible isn’t written in English doofus. Scribal copyist errors manly only in the Masoretic (translation) which is what Protestants in English speaking countries read. I read the Septuigant so it’s not in mine anyways 🤣:lul:. And idiots who don’t understand the Bible and historical relationally to specific verses leading to idiots claiming a contradiction where there is none

God bless InspiringPhilosphy for debunking all this spunk pushed esp by GAYtheists and Mohammeden pedophile followers like you
 
In surah 9:30



Prophet Muhammad claims that the Jews worshipped Ezra.

One common defection I've read about is that he was talking about some small sect of Jews but this is again proven to be false in sahih Muslim 1 Hadith 352 that was referring not some small sect but all Jews

View attachment 4874690

No convincing explanation for this by any muslim scholar so far. The only arguments are the first one that he was talking small sect proven to be false. Some argue it refers to extreme veneration not literal belief and the third belief that existed but disappeared and then some argue it's translation or word of play. All mostly deflections. No clear cut explanation for this so far.

And this is condemning all Jews of burning in hell because they worshipped Ezra but there is like
0 proof they ever did. It isn't just a small oopsie and still remains one of the biggest contradictions in Islam alongside crucifixion and identification of Mary.
Debunked years ago btw :lul::lul::lul:
 
HOLY DODGE:lul::lul: dumbass niggah its over for you and your book is filled bye filled i mean filled with clear contradictions and there are so many:lul:
This guy pretty much said Quran wasn’t preserved till the Cairo meeting jfl he thinks Quran is only written not orally memorized thus gathered everyone and the best hafizez
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_ and cortisolman2
Different words being used is also a feature. In fact, if anything it makes the case for Islam stronger for an oral recitations variants to all align in meaning and deepen it. You’re free to show me one where one version says something that opposes another.
No it’s not different “words” you fucking moron even the Bible has that :lul:

It’s DIFFERENT CONTEXTS that is the issue. Different words can convey the same meaning that’s fine and good my own Bible has this. What I’m talking about is YOU GAYRAN HAS DIFFERERENT CONTEXTS for example

From Surah al-Baqarah (2:184):

In one reading (e.g. Ḥafṣ):

“…a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person (مِسْكِينٍ).”

  • In another reading (e.g. Warsh):
“…a ransom of feeding poor people (مَسَاكِين).”

Difference: singular vs plural.
Impact: One suggests feeding one person per missed fast; the other suggests multiple—this has been discussed in Islamic legal interpretation.

another one


From Surah al-Baqarah (2:191) variations across readings and interpretive traditions
  • A common reading:
“And kill them wherever you overtake them…”

  • Other transmitted readings/interpretive variants emphasise:
“And fight them wherever you encounter them…”

Difference: “kill” (اقتلوهم) vs “fight” (قاتلوهم).

Impact: “Fight” can imply engagement in battle, whereas “kill” is more direct—though many scholars argue the broader context (warfare) governs the meaning.
 
No no contradictions only translation errors because duh Bible isn’t written in English doofus. Scribal copyist errors manly only in the Masoretic (translation) which is what Protestants in English speaking countries read. I read the Septuigant so it’s not in mine anyways 🤣:lul:. And idiots who don’t understand the Bible and historical relationally to specific verses leading to idiots claiming a contradiction where there is none

God bless InspiringPhilosphy for debunking all this spunk pushed esp by GAYtheists and Mohammeden pedophile followers like you
translation issues? more like contradictions niggah where in one bible theres something completely differ to tanother fucking useless zygote
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_
No it’s not different “words” you fucking moron even the Bible has that :lul:

It’s DIFFERENT CONTEXTS that is the issue. Different words can convey the same meaning that’s fine and good my own Bible has this. What I’m talking about is YOU GAYRAN HAS DIFFERERENT CONTEXTS for example

From Surah al-Baqarah (2:184):

In one reading (e.g. Ḥafṣ):

“…a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person (مِسْكِينٍ).”

  • In another reading (e.g. Warsh):
“…a ransom of feeding poor people (مَسَاكِين).”

Difference: singular vs plural.
Impact: One suggests feeding one person per missed fast; the other suggests multiple—this has been discussed in Islamic legal interpretation.

another one


From Surah al-Baqarah (2:191) variations across readings and interpretive traditions
  • A common reading:
“And kill them wherever you overtake them…”

  • Other transmitted readings/interpretive variants emphasise:
“And fight them wherever you encounter them…”

Difference: “kill” (اقتلوهم) vs “fight” (قاتلوهم).

Impact: “Fight” can imply engagement in battle, whereas “kill” is more direct—though many scholars argue the broader context (warfare) governs the meaning.
You proved my point, the meanings reinforce and add on to one another lol

I don’t get what you’re trying to prove. This isn’t something Islam tries to hide. It’s literally intended.
 
  • +1
Reactions: _Nazareth_
This guy pretty much said Quran wasn’t preserved till the Cairo meeting jfl he thinks Quran is only written not orally memorized thus gathered everyone and the best hafizez
Your dumb asf. I’m aware it was memorised but the reality is each Qirat is diff with diff recitations ahrufs you should know this you dumb Mohammeden.

Reality is the standardised Quran you have today is from 1924. So you don’t all recite the same shit and even during the time of your Gay Al Zutt loving prophet his own best man Ibn MASU’D and another guy both disagree with the modern Qurans chapters and this dude is very crucial as your prophet mentions him First when it comes to who is the best to get the full recitation from

Let’s not forget Aisha even says in a Hadith that a Goat ate an ENTIRE PAGE from the Quran and now it’s lost to time :feelscry: and that many Mohammedens died in Jihad and the verses are lost with them :feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope:

Hopefully they died like dogs and it was to Christian’s killing them and sending them to your demonic overlord
 

Similar threads

Saint Casanova
Replies
0
Views
19
Saint Casanova
Saint Casanova
Big Boss
Replies
35
Views
207
sonic55555
S
J
Replies
11
Views
66
Reinhard_Heini
Reinhard_Heini
Timmy the last
Replies
7
Views
46
Timmy the last
Timmy the last
isis_Bleach
Replies
36
Views
247
nestivv
nestivv

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top