
a.i.ngel
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
- Posts
- 246
- Reputation
- 184
It's mostly health-related, but also about penis aesthetics.
I have to fix my phimosis and basically have 2 options.
Preputioplasty (widening the foreskin) or Partial Circumcision (removing a part of the foreskin). I'm not considering full circumcision.
Stretching is cope in my case, and I need to have frenuloplasty anyway (short frenulum is probably the main cause of my phimosis), so I'm 95% having the surgery.
Partial Circumcision is slightly more effective, but also more invasive.
Any experience or opinions which is better?
I think partially circumcised dicks look kinda meh, full circumcision looks actually good, but it's a good procedure for women (dick looks better and lasts longer), and not you - loss of the sensitivity, painful recovery, less enjoyable handjobs, blowjobs and masturbation. So at the moment, I'm going for preputioplasty, or possibly some mild partial circumcision.
But feel free to leave your opinions.
I have to fix my phimosis and basically have 2 options.
Preputioplasty (widening the foreskin) or Partial Circumcision (removing a part of the foreskin). I'm not considering full circumcision.
Stretching is cope in my case, and I need to have frenuloplasty anyway (short frenulum is probably the main cause of my phimosis), so I'm 95% having the surgery.
Partial Circumcision is slightly more effective, but also more invasive.
Any experience or opinions which is better?
I think partially circumcised dicks look kinda meh, full circumcision looks actually good, but it's a good procedure for women (dick looks better and lasts longer), and not you - loss of the sensitivity, painful recovery, less enjoyable handjobs, blowjobs and masturbation. So at the moment, I'm going for preputioplasty, or possibly some mild partial circumcision.
But feel free to leave your opinions.