eduardkoopman
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Posts
- 22,725
- Reputation
- 28,467
I experienced a few times, the significant halo one gets from preselection. When being preselected, by women. But I never hear dudes talk about that here.
I experienced that effect once on a holiday with a group. And most significantly, when I was together with my last 4 year lasting LTR. Now that I became single again, I also noticed that one fell off again. It legit imo, adds like 1 point (or researches said 1.3 points) to ones attractiveness.
My opinion:
If a dude wants to be serious about maxxing his dating life. he should not overlook the concept of "preselection". There is almost no better or quicker status boost and attractiveness boost, then having a attractive woman (preselection) by your side.
Guys should not be ashamed imo; to use this knowledge. And cheat their way into preselection. Even paying an attractive looking woman to act asif, should not be looked down uppon, imo. Or being a gay-ass bestie with some hot chicks.
Most mistakes these dudes make. They try to be friends with good looking women, to get in these womens pants. But they should, use these women as preselection bait. Just try to be friends or whatever with hot women, and aim to be seen outside as much as possible with them. Don't stay in or do private 1-on-1 meetings (as little as possible), be seen with them out and about.
Studies: on this matter, constantly confirm this. preselection can be a legit boostfor most men.
Study:
www.sciencedirect.com
"The results showed that only single women were more interested in pursuing an attached target rather than a single target"
"When single women were given the choice to pursue a relationship with either a single man or a taken man, 59 percent said they were interested in the single man, while 90 percent said they give the man who’s attached a try."
Study:
www.nature.com
"In other words, on average, a participant changed from their initial rating around 13% of the way towards the social rating, when rating the attractiveness of faces."
Aka, 13% more attractive. Aka, 1+ point more attractive irl/decile. Like you are on face value a 6/10 irl; with good preselection: 7+/10 irl.
Now, don't be seen with ugly women though!
Here is a graph from a study. How the attractiveness of a woman affects a man his percieved attractiveness.
As we can see in the graph. the benifit is mainly only there for men that are at face value: normie or ugly. There is no preselction benifit for Chad (not that he needs one anyways).
study:
www.semanticscholar.org
LOL @ the how "evolution scientists". try to hamster wheel the reason behind preselection (i have no idea if they are correct, evolution science is alot of BS often imo):
"If you consider close relationships, they take a ridiculous amount of time to form. Researchers have actually studied how long it takes to build a relationship. They found that it takes on average of 50 hours to turn an acquaintance into a friend, 90 hours to turn a friend to a good friend, and 200 hours to turn a good friend to a best friend."
Hamster wheeling it into: Women simply don’t have the time to go on a date with every single guy they find attractive. So what they do? They outsource that task to other women.
study source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0265407518761225?journalCode=spra
I experienced that effect once on a holiday with a group. And most significantly, when I was together with my last 4 year lasting LTR. Now that I became single again, I also noticed that one fell off again. It legit imo, adds like 1 point (or researches said 1.3 points) to ones attractiveness.
My opinion:
If a dude wants to be serious about maxxing his dating life. he should not overlook the concept of "preselection". There is almost no better or quicker status boost and attractiveness boost, then having a attractive woman (preselection) by your side.
Guys should not be ashamed imo; to use this knowledge. And cheat their way into preselection. Even paying an attractive looking woman to act asif, should not be looked down uppon, imo. Or being a gay-ass bestie with some hot chicks.
Most mistakes these dudes make. They try to be friends with good looking women, to get in these womens pants. But they should, use these women as preselection bait. Just try to be friends or whatever with hot women, and aim to be seen outside as much as possible with them. Don't stay in or do private 1-on-1 meetings (as little as possible), be seen with them out and about.
Studies: on this matter, constantly confirm this. preselection can be a legit boostfor most men.
Study:
Who’s chasing whom? The impact of gender and relationship status on mate poaching
Are women more interested in men who are already in a relationship? Female and male participants who were single or in a relationship viewed informati…
"When single women were given the choice to pursue a relationship with either a single man or a taken man, 59 percent said they were interested in the single man, while 90 percent said they give the man who’s attached a try."
Study:
Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning
Women appear to copy other women’s preferences for men’s faces. This ‘mate-choice copying’ is often taken as evidence of psychological adaptations for processing social information related to mate choice, for which facial information is assumed to be particularly salient. No experiment, however...
www.nature.com
Aka, 13% more attractive. Aka, 1+ point more attractive irl/decile. Like you are on face value a 6/10 irl; with good preselection: 7+/10 irl.
Now, don't be seen with ugly women though!
Here is a graph from a study. How the attractiveness of a woman affects a man his percieved attractiveness.
As we can see in the graph. the benifit is mainly only there for men that are at face value: normie or ugly. There is no preselction benifit for Chad (not that he needs one anyways).
study:
Mate Choice Copying in Humans | Semantic Scholar
There is substantial evidence that in human mate choice, females directly select males based on male display of both physical and behavioral traits. In non-humans, there is additionally a growing literature on indirect mate choice, such as choice through observing and subsequently copying the...
www.semanticscholar.org
LOL @ the how "evolution scientists". try to hamster wheel the reason behind preselection (i have no idea if they are correct, evolution science is alot of BS often imo):
"If you consider close relationships, they take a ridiculous amount of time to form. Researchers have actually studied how long it takes to build a relationship. They found that it takes on average of 50 hours to turn an acquaintance into a friend, 90 hours to turn a friend to a good friend, and 200 hours to turn a good friend to a best friend."
Hamster wheeling it into: Women simply don’t have the time to go on a date with every single guy they find attractive. So what they do? They outsource that task to other women.
study source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0265407518761225?journalCode=spra
