flippasav
Flippin Savauge
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2022
- Posts
- 32,182
- Reputation
- 32,956
SmortIts not excatly a "proof" but it does show that being 6’3 isnt that good compared to 6’2 or 61 and can already be concidered as too tall for some
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
SmortIts not excatly a "proof" but it does show that being 6’3 isnt that good compared to 6’2 or 61 and can already be concidered as too tall for some
Dnr Manlet cope (I’m 5’10)Its not excatly a "proof" but it does show that being 6’3 isnt that good compared to 6’2 or 61 and can already be concidered as too tall for some
6’1 is ideal. Most tennis champions are 6’1( fedderer... )Good answer, so I guess I'll never know the level of tennis you played. Btw I'm not watching that. And your essays on this topic are retarded, all I said is that you stand no chance at 5'8 and to be among tennis elite its now required to be 6'2-3+. No newgen is shorter among top 50. All your manlet cope leave to yourself
And before their era most were 5'11 and so on. Now every gs winner will be 6'36’1 is ideal. Most tennis champions are 6’1( fedderer... )
if i was short i would not care abt what better 6’1 or 6’3 since i would be none of themDnr Manlet cope (I’m 5’10)
Yep, brutal being a Manlet in 2024if i was short i would not care abt what better 6’1 or 6’3 since i would be none of them
No. If being taller was an advantage they would still be taller than 6’1 like basketball player or volleyball. And actual champion are still winning against 6’3+ in 2024And before their era most were 5'11 and so on. Now every gs winner will be 6'3
The only one who is still somehow winning is djokovicNo. If being taller was an advantage they would still be taller than 6’1 like basketball player or volleyball. And actual champion are still winning against 6’3+ in 2024
Yh he is the world champion so there isnt really anyone that "win" compared to himThe only one who is still somehow winning is djokovic
What do you mean by world champion?Yh he is the world champion so there isnt really anyone that "win" compared to him
its the best player in the world/ of all time. He won the most grand slamWhat do you mean by world champion?
And you said you will research glucosamine+chondroitin and reply to my thread about it
Gluco +don are 100% not good for open growth plates.i may do a thread on this in the futur if i feel like itWhat do you mean by world champion?
And you said you will research glucosamine+chondroitin and reply to my thread about it
The time is different nowits the best player in the world/ of all time. He won the most grand slam
Well in my thread that I bumped today you csn see a clear explanation that its a myth. Can you disprove it rn? Or link studyGluco +don are 100% not good for open growth plates.i may do a thread on this in the futur if i feel like it
It became the best player of all time last year at rolan garros in franceThe time is different now
Well i’ll see. need to be a genious to anderstand that something who stun the spine will also stun spin growthWell in my thread that I bumped today you csn see a clear explanation that its a myth. Can you disprove it rn? Or link study
1 google search isnt rlly proof. too tall is like 7 foot and aboveIts not excatly a "proof" but it does show that being 6’3 isnt that good compared to 6’2 or 61 and can already be concidered as too tall for some
You just help retaining eater and minerals thereWell i’ll see. need to be a genious to anderstand that something who stun the spine will also stun spin growth
The time is different now
The only one who is still somehow winning is djokovic
Well in my thread that I bumped today you csn see a clear explanation that its a myth. Can you disprove it rn? Or link study
Pm me your atp page. Or how many points do / did you have max
Brutal assumptions btw
And also why do you have to write 2020og? Nobody believes otherwise?
Extremly low iq if you acc think this
dnrThey are fakes. They care about appearances and seeming cool.
They aren't aware or intelligent enough to realise 6'1-6'2 mogs 6'3-6'6 in any realm of life outside of basketball.
Sure if you have no charisma, personality, intelligence, humour or you are just full out aspergers... you'll need to be 6'4-6'6 to get bitches to sleep with you. But that's not me, so why would I want that? (In a LTR currently)
These guys PROJECT their autistic situations onto others. Lol, it's too funny.
All I said was I would choose 6'1-6'2 over 6'3-6'6 any day and but if it was any shorter than 6'1 then I'd choose 6'3, obviously.
Now all this moron has done the entire thread has throw ad hominems. Falsely misrepresenting my statements saying I'm choosing 5'8 over 6'3 and that I've been coached by a fat nerd in tennis LOL. When I was thrown into the best tennis academy in London from when I was a toddler? Imagine listening to this shit.
Some retards here are just gas lighters because they are losers irl.
Stop replying at least where I dont speak to you. I dont care midget opinions and your assumptions. Better watch your midget father 5'11 alcaraz being declassified in real timeBro you are low iq
Not one of your arguments is valid.
You make no points of any substance and you act deliberately disengenuous.
I've met a ton of mid intelligence, intellectually dishonest, pretentious, egocentric faggots like you and each time they have one tjjng in common..... Poor character.
You don't care about the truth. You only care about serving your emotions and making you feel like you are winning an argument
I understand what you are saying but you are too dense to understand what I am saying. This is typically what happened and then the person that's right has to dumb himself down to the person that's not
I never said 5'8 mogs 6'3 - 6'6 in life. I said 6'1-6'2 mogs 6'3-6'6 in life. Now you can act all fake alpha and pretetncous like you are based and edgy but you aren't. You are just a faggot that thinks he's better than others because of his height. Emotional bias. Lacking critical thought and lacking objective thinking. Fuck off.
Why do you think 6'1-6'2 mogs 6'3-6'6 in life?Bro you are low iq
Not one of your arguments is valid.
You make no points of any substance and you act deliberately disengenuous.
I've met a ton of mid intelligence, intellectually dishonest, pretentious, egocentric faggots like you and each time they have one tjjng in common..... Poor character.
You don't care about the truth. You only care about serving your emotions and making you feel like you are winning an argument
I understand what you are saying but you are too dense to understand what I am saying. This is typically what happened and then the person that's right has to dumb himself down to the person that's not
I never said 5'8 mogs 6'3 - 6'6 in life. I said 6'1-6'2 mogs 6'3-6'6 in life. Now you can act all fake alpha and pretetncous like you are based and edgy but you aren't. You are just a faggot that thinks he's better than others because of his height. Emotional bias. Lacking critical thought and lacking objective thinking. Fuck off.
Do you recommend blocking such users? I cant stand the retardness. No sport besides F1 and chess are adapted for manlets now. Even in golf people are 6'4 now
Because he is 5'8Why do you think 6'1-6'2 mogs 6'3-6'6 in life?
then why would it make a difference to him?Because he is 5'8
blud's writting essaysDo you recommend blocking such users? I cant stand the retardness. No sport besides F1 and chess are adapted for manlets now. Even in golf people are 6'4 now
Whatever helps to feel and cope better. Tbh I'm shocked that he is not an advocate for the ultimate men's height of 5'9then why would it make a difference to him?
Stop replying at least where I dont speak to you. I dont care midget opinions and your assumptions. Better watch your midget father 5'11 alcaraz being declassified in real time
blud's writting essays
ur subhuman kysYou're not the funny guy of .Org. You were never the class-clown. You are a failed LTN funny guy.
Keep practising on a forum to get better for the real thing though. You can do it. Some day you'll master the art.
Why do you think 6'1-6'2 mogs 6'3-6'6 in life?
Imagine saying this while writing like this:Learn to speak the world-wide language you Eastern European reject.
Trivia question for you: In the last 20 years how many men over the height of 6'3 have won Grandslams?
Tennis hasn't changed. Nothing has changed. The three best players ever all are 6'1-6'2. Only Medvedev at 6'5, Sinner at 6'4 and Del Potro at 6'6 have won slams in the past 20 years and been super tall.
And Sinner was only recently and because Djokovic was injured and old.
You won't look at the nuances and details because you are dumb broken up English speaking foreign stupid fuck and you APPRECIATE the only power you have in this life is: YOUR HEIGHT. So you cling to it and defend it like your life is on the line. Willing to go to the lengths of FAKING what you believe and intellectually think.
PHONEY. Fuck off. You got owned and your shit foreign ass counter arguments are so piss-poor that it is very apparent that your confidence outweighs your IQ.
Conclusion:And I'm saying all this through my smartphone hence all the typos
Unlike you fat fuckinf bastard loser that's indoors on a Saturday
@Roge my ass you are anything but high class material
ur subhuman kys
Do you state on tinder that you are 5'8 irl but 7'8 "SOCIALLY"I think it depends on your personality. If you don't have much personality (Positive traits) etc and you are much more of an introvert, then may be 6'3-6'6 is a better deal for you, as you can hide behind your height.
But for me personally, I prefer to be SOCIALLY tall. That's just a personal preference. However I can understand how someone with low self-confidence, self-esteem, autism, aspergers, socially unaware etc would prefer to be 6'3-6'6 as they could just take shelter behind that for faking it.
Imagine saying this while writing like this:
Conclusion:
Do you state on tinder that you are 5'8 irl but 7'8 "SOCIALLY"
then why would it make a difference to him?
I wasn't attacking you, I was calling his reply nonsensical, i.e. why is he claiming that a 5'8 guy would "cope" by saying that x height which is taller than him is better than y height that is also taller than him. You need to chill out dude.Because I can think in theory and hypotheticals dumb fuck. It's called abstract thinking.
Have you never had a conversation with anyone where they've asked you; 'what/who would you rather be?'
I'm saying if I had to choose my height, I'd choose 6'2 and not 6'3-6'6. However if I had a choice between 6'0 and 6'3-6'6 it would be 6'3-6'6. All this faggot eastern european cunt has done is act emotional over the fact he himself is a lanky INCEL and got mad at me for choosing 6'2 over his height. You can immediately sense he is a horse faced fuck.
Where I act emotionally when you are the one with 10 essays hereBecause I can think in theory and hypotheticals dumb fuck. It's called abstract thinking.
Have you never had a conversation with anyone where they've asked you; 'what/who would you rather be?'
I'm saying if I had to choose my height, I'd choose 6'2 and not 6'3-6'6. However if I had a choice between 6'0 and 6'3-6'6 it would be 6'3-6'6. All this faggot eastern european cunt has done is act emotional over the fact he himself is a lanky INCEL and got mad at me for choosing 6'2 over his height.
You can immediately sense he is a horse faced fuck.
height is cope without face anywayBwing 6"6 is the reson i still had some girls into me when i was ltn and blaoted im htn rn and syill get aproached by the same level of women at the club only thing that changed is thta im getting aporached in daylight now
Actually, partially true. Most modeling agencies are very height specific and do not like models to be over 6'2. They want 5'11 to 6'2 bracke, very few exceptions for under or over that.Its not excatly a "proof" but it does show that being 6’3 isnt that good compared to 6’2 or 61 and can already be concidered as too tall for some
Women rate men’s faces which appear more upward tilted at a neutral angle to be more attractive. The theory is because this gives the illusion of looking at a taller subject and height is masculine.If people at 6'1 and 6'2 have to question if theyre tall then they must not be thought of as tall. I think 6'1-6'3 is considered tall and 6'4+ is very tall, 6'6 and up is extremely tall and undesirable. There is more to life than women, nobody is factoring in the height of ceilings, height of door frames, the size of the interior of cars, such as supercars, sports cars, or anything that is not an SUV, the ability to ride motorcycles if thats what you like to do or want to do, your ability to blend in and the fact that girls are always looking up to you, which is an unattractive angle if its extreme.