PSL vs Appeal copes EVISCERATED

[xnj]

Mirin the thread and responses, but this section made no sense to me. I agree with all the definitions btw

In list format because I don't really want to quote everything again

1. Why is it inherently incorrect to ask whether facial appeal breadth is more important than having "facial harmony; facial dimorphism; leanness/angularity and positive miscellaneous features?"
2. How is it better to put PSL against SMV than it is to compare the weight of two components of SMV?
3. WDYM "...vs appeal (SMV)?" Appeal and SMV aren't synonymous

Sorry if this was dumb

youre confusing yourself

1. because “appeal” is a term for what group of foids you appeal to; people mix up appeal and smv

2. it is wrong to put psl against smv to begin with, thats the entire point the thread makes

3. exactly. i said psl vs appeal becaude thats what greys say, the (psl) part is what is actually supposed to be said (still shouldnt be compared tho)

again, smv is inherently more important than psl, as psl is a component of smv