D
Deleted member 17829
Kraken
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2022
- Posts
- 10,148
- Reputation
- 15,934
Putting an end to the "people prefer their own races" "whites do better cos of media" "people just prefer whites cos theyre the tallest&richest" copes
I've said this before and I say it here once again; Racepill is one of most important branches of blackpill, yet it is also probably the most misunderstood branch by the community.
There is this misconception that we learn to think whites are more attractive due to society we live in.
One of the people say about racial preference statistics is: "it is because you ethnics choose to live in white dominated countries, are you surprised whites are deemed more attractive in white countries ?"
th62eathhts2 says
i thought phenotypes were more attracted to their own?
It is because of white supremacy in the west. thats why ethnics are deemed less attractive. the whitey keep us down.
(I dont even remember how many coping ethnics argued for this)
people learn to think non whites are less attractive, it's not the same in non white countries, of course you are deemed unattractive in a white dominant country
There are 2 studies I'd like to share
"Is There an Own-Race Preference in Attractiveness?
Evolutionary Psychology · October 2013
We tested whether there is an own-race preference in attractiveness judgments, and also examined the effect of familiarity by comparing the attractiveness ratings given by participants of different ancestral and geographic origins to faces of European, East Asian and African origin.
The current study is designed to produce as fair a test as practicable of whether people perceive own-race faces to be more attractive (on average) than other-race faces, and to examine the possible role of experience in this. In order to achieve this, familiarity with different races was varied both between groups and within groups. Familiarity with different races was varied between groups by using two Australian born-and-raised participant groups (Australian East-Asians and Australian Europeans) and a Hong Kong born-and-raised participant group (Hong Kong East-Asians).
Despite our attempts to obtain genuine, subjective evaluations of “good looks”, by having heterosexual participants only rate opposite-sex faces, and using a cover story that emphasized memorizing the faces to minimize the effects of social desirability, we did not actually find a strong own-race preference. For female participants there was a universal European face preference, and the Australian East Asian participants did not even rate own-race faces as second most attractive, instead rating African faces as equally attractive (for individual faces) or slightly more attractive (for compound faces) than East Asian faces."
Source:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255957196_Is_There_an_Own-Race_Preference_in_Attractiveness
The other study that shows how beauty standards are ingrained in our genes is:
"Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics"
"To our knowledge, all previous demonstrations of thepreference that infants display for attractive over un-attractive faces have involved conspecific (i.e. human)faces. This aspect of the infant face perception literaturehas left open the question of whether the attractivenesspreference is a consequence of an adaptation to matechoice or reflects the operation of general perceptual-cognitive mechanisms.
In the present series of experiments, we attempted to address this issue by examining how infants respond to nonhuman animal faces.
Screenshot 2018 5 14 Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecif
The results of Experiment 1 demonstrated that the preference for attractive faces by infants that has previ-ously been observed for human faces can also be observed for domestic cat faces. Experiment 3 demonstrated that infants preferred upright, but not inverted, attractiveover unattractive tiger faces, and Experiment 4 showedthat the spontaneous preference for upright tiger faces impacts infant looking performance on a recognitionmemory task involving an attractive versus unattractive tiger face pairing."
We don't learn to find whites more attractive just like we don't learn to find positive canthal tilt more attractive. Whites are OBJECTIVELY more attractive, you are not fully blackpilled until you embrace this truth.
Whites arent just the tallest and richest. But they are the best looking faces too.
I've said this before and I say it here once again; Racepill is one of most important branches of blackpill, yet it is also probably the most misunderstood branch by the community.
There is this misconception that we learn to think whites are more attractive due to society we live in.
One of the people say about racial preference statistics is: "it is because you ethnics choose to live in white dominated countries, are you surprised whites are deemed more attractive in white countries ?"
th62eathhts2 says
i thought phenotypes were more attracted to their own?
It is because of white supremacy in the west. thats why ethnics are deemed less attractive. the whitey keep us down.
(I dont even remember how many coping ethnics argued for this)
people learn to think non whites are less attractive, it's not the same in non white countries, of course you are deemed unattractive in a white dominant country
There are 2 studies I'd like to share
"Is There an Own-Race Preference in Attractiveness?
Evolutionary Psychology · October 2013
We tested whether there is an own-race preference in attractiveness judgments, and also examined the effect of familiarity by comparing the attractiveness ratings given by participants of different ancestral and geographic origins to faces of European, East Asian and African origin.
The current study is designed to produce as fair a test as practicable of whether people perceive own-race faces to be more attractive (on average) than other-race faces, and to examine the possible role of experience in this. In order to achieve this, familiarity with different races was varied both between groups and within groups. Familiarity with different races was varied between groups by using two Australian born-and-raised participant groups (Australian East-Asians and Australian Europeans) and a Hong Kong born-and-raised participant group (Hong Kong East-Asians).
Despite our attempts to obtain genuine, subjective evaluations of “good looks”, by having heterosexual participants only rate opposite-sex faces, and using a cover story that emphasized memorizing the faces to minimize the effects of social desirability, we did not actually find a strong own-race preference. For female participants there was a universal European face preference, and the Australian East Asian participants did not even rate own-race faces as second most attractive, instead rating African faces as equally attractive (for individual faces) or slightly more attractive (for compound faces) than East Asian faces."
Source:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255957196_Is_There_an_Own-Race_Preference_in_Attractiveness
The other study that shows how beauty standards are ingrained in our genes is:
"Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics"
"To our knowledge, all previous demonstrations of thepreference that infants display for attractive over un-attractive faces have involved conspecific (i.e. human)faces. This aspect of the infant face perception literaturehas left open the question of whether the attractivenesspreference is a consequence of an adaptation to matechoice or reflects the operation of general perceptual-cognitive mechanisms.
In the present series of experiments, we attempted to address this issue by examining how infants respond to nonhuman animal faces.
Screenshot 2018 5 14 Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecif
The results of Experiment 1 demonstrated that the preference for attractive faces by infants that has previ-ously been observed for human faces can also be observed for domestic cat faces. Experiment 3 demonstrated that infants preferred upright, but not inverted, attractiveover unattractive tiger faces, and Experiment 4 showedthat the spontaneous preference for upright tiger faces impacts infant looking performance on a recognitionmemory task involving an attractive versus unattractive tiger face pairing."
Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics
Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics
www.academia.edu
We don't learn to find whites more attractive just like we don't learn to find positive canthal tilt more attractive. Whites are OBJECTIVELY more attractive, you are not fully blackpilled until you embrace this truth.
Whites arent just the tallest and richest. But they are the best looking faces too.
Last edited:
