[REMADE] Do you prefer East Asians or Mestiza Latinas? What is your ethnicity? (@cloUder GTFIH)

[Xangsane]

Remade poll split by ethnicity.

Hypothesis: most non-White users will prefer Mestizas solely for their proximity to whiteness, as Latinas are seen as a sub race of white.

I'm mixed Arab/White, 5.5 PSL and I like Arab, Asian, mixed (clearly ambiguous or mixed-looking and not white-passing) and black women.

Northeast Asian/hapa

Latina

Asian women or Latinas, who do you prefer?

Cute and squishy Asian women? Or the Latinas who are perceived to have closer proximity to white Europeans? Original thread by @swaggyp1 https://looksmax.org/posts/10818080/ Inspired by @HeightPilledum https://looksmax.org/posts/10818174/

looksmax.org

This is how much uglier Asian girls are compared to Latina - and my parents don’t understand why I have 0 interest in Asian

looksmax.org

Worldwide, east asian women are not desired highly. @clouder debunked

I take that as a yes? Yass

looksmax.org

Worldwide, east asian women are not desired highly. @clouder debunked

I take that as a yes? Yass

looksmax.org

@cloUder @swaggyp1

 

[Deleted member 28414]

Get a life nigga

 

[Suimaxxer]

Pics?

 

[stevielake]

Get the best of both worlds and fuck a thick Filipina.

 

[Deleted member 28398]

Latinas.

Who df willingly would fuck a chink?

 

[Xangsane]

Latinas.

Who df willingly would fuck a chink?

Do you think Latinas are a subset of white?

 

[Deleted member 23115]

now in the morning i sleep alone sweep the streets i used to own

 

[Deleted member 28398]

Do you think Latinas are a subset of white?

Nope. Most latinas don't pass as the standard white stacy

 

[Xangsane]

Nope. Most latinas don't pass as the standard white stacy

But though they are similar (both are half Mongoloid-Caucasoid) you'd take a latina over a hapa because of their proximity to whiteness.

 

[Deleted member 23115]

But though they are similar (both are half Mongoloid-Caucasoid) you'd take a latina over a hapa because of their proximity to whiteness.

that was when i ruled the world

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Does my comment from your previous thread still apply?

 

[Xangsane]

Does my comment from your previous thread still apply?

But though they are similar (both are half Mongoloid-Caucasoid) you'd take a latina over a hapa because of their proximity to whiteness.

 

[Deleted member 23115]

one minute i held the key next the walls closed on me

 

[Xangsane]

Nope. Most latinas don't pass as the standard white stacy

What's your ethnicity? You sound black or Latino.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Definitely asian women

 

[Reckless Turtle]

If you count Fernanda Tavarez and Raica Oliveira as textbook Mestizas (roughly 50:50 European and American) then I've never seen an East Asian close to being that attractive.

 

[Xangsane]

If you count Fernanda Tavarez and Raica Oliveira as textbook Mestizas (roughly 50:50 European and American) then I've never seen an East Asian close to being that attractive.

"I like Latinas because of their proximity to whiteness"

 

[Deleted member 13787]

If you count Fernanda Tavarez and Raica Oliveira as textbook Mestizas (roughly 50:50 European and American) then I've never seen an East Asian close to being that attractive.

The first one has really disgusting lowset eyebrows and rectangular eye orbits. She gets fogged by pretty much everyone.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

"I like Latinas because of their proximity to whiteness"

Except you botched the thread because Hapas can have the same proximity to that as Mestizas.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Except you botched the thread because Hapas can have the same proximity to that as Mestizas.

No they can't. East asian women are more mongoloid than full native women.

 

[Xangsane]

Except you botched the thread because Hapas can have the same proximity to that as Mestizas.

Some people would consider Mestizos as closer in proximity because hapa niggas seem to be seen as Asian by most because of their cultures (Latinos can hide under European culture as they were introduced to their lands centuries ago through colonisation) @SubSigma

 

[Reckless Turtle]

No they can't. East asian women are more mongoloid than full native women.

East Asians are closer to Europeans than (indigenous) South Americans because South Americans are the furthest (and newest) major, isolated settlement.

 

[Wallenberg]

East Asians obviously.

 

[Xangsane]

East Asians obviously.

Some people would consider Mestizos as closer in proximity because hapa niggas seem to be seen as Asian by most because of their cultures (Latinos can hide under European culture as they were introduced to their lands centuries ago through colonisation) @SubSigma

But though they are similar (both are half Mongoloid-Caucasoid) you'd take a latina over a hapa because of their proximity to whiteness.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

East Asians are closer to Europeans than (indigenous) South Americans because South Americans are the furthest (and newest) major, isolated settlement.

Being the newest isolated settlement would only mean less time for genetic drift to take place. And indigenous americans are partly caucasoid due to ancient north eurasian admixture, who were west eurasian genetically. It's why theyre genetically closer to euros.

 

[SubSigma]

Some people would consider Mestizos as closer in proximity because hapa niggas seem to be seen as Asian by most because of their cultures (Latinos can hide under European culture as they were introduced to their lands centuries ago through colonisation) @SubSigma

Most hapa niggas that can try to larp as white if they look the part. I try to hide my Asian side and tell everyone I’m Greek when they ask about my ethnicity Jfl

 

[Deleted member 9003]

You didn’t post any good looking latinas tbh

 

[swaggyp1]

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Being the newest isolated settlement would only mean less time for genetic drift to take place. And indigenous americans are partly caucasoid due to ancient north eurasian admixture, who were west eurasian genetically. It's why theyre genetically closer to euros.

View attachment 2145842

Classifying the entire extent of Americans as "East Eurasian" without any sub-classes is laughable and the "East Asian" category in that graph extends as far as Greenland, not to mention that some of the "East Asian" dots are closer to "West Eurasians" than any of the "Native American" dots.

Also, this assumes that the genetic testing from that source managed to find a large enough sample of pure, American lineages.

 

[mecha72]

The Asians you posted are built like 12 yr old boys when fucking idgaf about her face much I look for big bubble booty and titties hip to waist ratio

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Classifying the entire extent of Americans as "East Eurasian" without any sub-classes is laughable and the "East Asian" category in that graph extends as far as Greenland, not to mention that some of the "East Asian" dots are closer to "West Eurasians" than any of the "East Eurasian" dots.

Youre completely missing the point here. They classified the 3 extremes of that graph as the three macro races. Those east asian dots which are closer are mongolians and siberians who are west eurasian admixed, not han chinese or japanese. And most importantly, amerindians as a whole are clearly closer to west eurasians than east asians are.

Even the most east eurasian amerindian dot on that graph is closer to euros than the majority of east asian ones.

 

[rand anon]

But though they are similar (both are half Mongoloid-Caucasoid) you'd take a latina over a hapa because of their proximity to whiteness.

They’re also more wholesome

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Youre completely missing the point here.

I understood the basics of the graph, but I made a typo by repeating "East Eurasians" rather than "Native Americans" in the last part of the first sentence.

And most importantly, amerindians as a whole are clearly closer to west eurasians than east asians are.

And I'm arguing that there's potentially a huge amount of variance when testing the Amerindian lineage (which isn't accounted for in the graph) because it's negligible in size compared to the East Asian lineage (especially using modern humans and recent human remains).

This is also assuming that the scaling in the graphs accurately reflects statistical significance in terms of the differences between the American and East Asian pools rather than simply showing a statistical significance between the three major groups (I haven't read the source material because you neither linked it nor quoted it).

 

[rand anon]

You didn’t post any good looking latinas tbh

Even then the Latinas posted fog the East Asians

 

[Deleted member 6305]

East asians look all the same
Latinas vary a lot since it's not a race

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Being the newest isolated settlement would only mean less time for genetic drift to take place.

Also, the Peruvian pool apparently has similar genetic variability to that of East Asians.

 

[Xangsane]

East asians look all the same
Latinas vary a lot since it's not a race

MESTIZA Latinas.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Youre completely missing the point here. They classified the 3 extremes of that graph as the three macro races. Those east asian dots which are closer are mongolians and siberians who are west eurasian admixed, not han chinese or japanese. And most importantly, amerindians as a whole are clearly closer to west eurasians than east asians are.

Even the most east eurasian amerindian dot on that graph is closer to euros than the majority of east asian ones.

The general proposed distribution model suggests that the Bering Strait group could have had substantial contributions from East Asia rather than a strict regurgitation of central Eurasians.

Recent African origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Deleted member 13787]

The general proposed distribution model suggests that the Bering Strait group could have had substantial contributions from East Asia rather than a strict regurgitation of central Eurasians.

Recent African origin of modern humans - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

That's what im saying. Otherwise amerindians would've been majority west eurasian genetically, like their ANE ancestors. Theyre only 1/4 or 1/3 (cant remember exactly) ANE. So sure, theyre generally east eurasian, but because of that ancient admixture theyre a bit closer to euros than pure east asians are.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

That's what im saying. Otherwise amerindians would've been majority west eurasian genetically, like their ANE ancestors. Theyre only 1/4 or 1/3 (cant remember exactly) ANE. So sure, theyre generally east eurasian, but because of that ancient admixture theyre a bit closer to euros than pure east asians are.

I'm still skeptical that modern testing can sufficiently isolate the original American lineage from European interference in order to substantiate your rebuttal of my initial point. There are hundreds of millions of robust data points (modern humans) for the East Asian lineage whereas Americans only exist in small pockets.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

I'm still skeptical that modern testing can sufficiently isolate the original American lineage from European interference in order to substantiate your rebuttal of my initial point. There are hundreds of millions of robust data points (modern humans) for the East Asian lineage whereas Americans only exist in small pockets.

You dont need to test many individuals from one specific group in order to get an idea of their genetic composition in regards to proximity to europeans. That is, as long as theyre pure and unmixed. Which can easily be checked and the authors wouldn't inlcude mixed individuals. Whether you test 20 or 20 000 individuals wont change much, except for finding some extreme outliers.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

You dont need to test many individuals from one specific group in order to get an idea of their genetic composition in regards to proximity to europeans. That is, as long as theyre pure and unmixed. Which can easily be checked and the authors wouldn't inlcude mixed individuals. Whether you test 20 or 20 000 individuals wont change much, except for finding some extreme outliers.

It would affect the variance. Small sample sizes result in less precision. Determining the percentage of admixture is a relative process that depends on the number of reference points.

Ancestral DNA test services apparently claim ~99.9% accuracy. The ratio of adequate Americans compared to adequate East Asians is probably less than 1:1,000.

Fact or Science Fiction? Putting DNA Rumors to the Test

There is a lot of misinformation about taking a DNA test. Before you spit or swab, discover the truth behind 6 common genetic genealogy myths.

familytreemagazine.com

Using 2021 global population data, estimate the attractiveness percentile of the average, purebred "white" (at least 90% European DNA) female

Only consider prime-age females for this poll. You are comparing to the entire geographic population. Region (2021) Number Percentage[27][28] Asia 4,690,000,000 59.5% Africa 1,370,000,000 17.4% Europe 748,800,000 9.5% North America 592,300,000 7.5% South America 438,000,000...

looksmax.org

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Also, we are using ethnics.org. Only 36% of active users are white.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

It would affect the variance. Small sample sizes result in less precision. Determining the percentage of admixture is a relative process that depends on the number of reference points.

They can affect the variance but the average wouldnt change all that much. The east asians all cluster really close to each other on that graph. The detached group and the outlier east asian samples are "east asians" from northwest china who are mixed with west eurasians.

You can keep introducing new samples and they'll end up being around the average mostly. New outliers will the a small proportion of the new samples. So you might end up finding some amerindians who are basically as distant to europeans as the japanese, han chinese are, but it wouldnt change the whole picture.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

They can affect the variance but the average wouldnt change all that much. The east asians all cluster really close to each other on that graph. The detached group and the outlier east asian samples are "east asians" from northwest china who are mixed with west eurasians.

You can keep introducing new samples and they'll end up being around the average mostly. New outliers will the a small proportion of the new samples. So you might end up finding some amerindians who are basically as distant to europeans as the japanese, han chinese are, but it wouldnt change the whole picture.

This is assuming that the average distance of the Native American group isn't being skewed by European genetic contributions when testing modern humans.

It’s possible to have Native American ancestors, but not have the Indigenous Americas region in your ethnicity estimate. This is because there’s a difference between lineage and DNA.

A child receives 50% of each parent’s DNA, but they typically do not receive 50% of each parent’s ethnicity. This is due to the randomness of genetic inheritance. For example, a parent with half Nigerian and half Indigenous American DNA may pass down more Nigerian DNA to their child (or vice versa). Over generations, the randomness of genetic inheritance results in more DNA being passed down from some ethnicities and others being lost entirely.

To further illustrate, let’s say you have a Native American great-grandmother who has 25% Indigenous American DNA. Although about 12.5% of your DNA comes from your great-grandmother, you might not have inherited her Indigenous DNA. Alternatively, you may have inherited such a small amount that it doesn’t appear in a DNA test.

The AncestryDNA test surveys over 700,000 locations in your DNA, but there is still a chance that we missed evidence of Indigenous American DNA. This is because you may have inherited genetic markers that AncestryDNA does not use to identify Indigenous American ethnicity. Additionally, some Native American communities are underrepresented in genetics research, largely due to distrust in tribal communities because of centuries of extractive and exploitative research practices.

The presence of Indigenous DNA does not make someone more or less Native American. Tribal citizenship is determined by tribal nations, not by DNA.

AncestrySupport

support.ancestry.com

 

[Deleted member 13787]

This is assuming that the average distance of the Native American group isn't being skewed by European genetic contributions when testing modern humans.

AncestrySupport

support.ancestry.com

This presumes that they didnt pass down that component, if it doesnt show up in their descendants. In that case, it wouldnt place the descendants closer to europeans on that PCA chart, since they didnt inherit those genes.

 

[Xangsane]

@Prettyboy you're white.

 

[Deleted member 21735]

i need her to punch me rn

 

[Reckless Turtle]

This presumes that they didnt pass down that component, if it doesnt show up in their descendants. In that case, it wouldnt place the descendants closer to europeans on that PCA chart, since they didnt inherit those genes.

IDK what you're suggesting. Certain SNPs that were contributed by European interbreeding (through European colonization) could be misinterpreted as uniquely American.

What is genetic ancestry testing?: MedlinePlus Genetics

Genetic ancestry testing is one way for people to learn about their family history. Learn more about ancestry testing.

medlineplus.gov

 

[Deleted member 13787]

IDK what you're suggesting. Certain SNPs that were contributed by European interbreeding (through European colonization) could be misinterpreted as uniquely American.

What is genetic ancestry testing?: MedlinePlus Genetics

Genetic ancestry testing is one way for people to learn about their family history. Learn more about ancestry testing.

medlineplus.gov

Probably not lol. We have ample skeletal remains of pure native americans. That's what they'd use to determine recent intermixing.