Should angularity cease to be a pillar of beauty?

β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 

β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 

Fallen Angel
Joined
Jul 2, 2026
Posts
2,540
Reputation
5,194
Title.

In my opinion, angularity is inherently linked to the pillar of dimorphism; there isn't a single person on earth who possesses low dimorphism and high angularity, because angularity is tied to dimorphism, and dimorphism is tied to angularity.

Raters, give me your opinion on this.
@Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @ESR
 
  • +1
Reactions: kered, KT-34, Mai Sakurajima. and 10 others
Pretty much all pillars are linked together bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: KT-34, Mai Sakurajima., Jgns and 5 others
Title.

In my opinion, angularity is inherently linked to the pillar of dimorphism; there isn't a single person on earth who possesses low dimorphism and high angularity, because angularity is tied to dimorphism, and dimorphism is tied to angularity.

Raters, give me your opinion on this.
@Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @ESR
There’s those afghan dad who have the prettiest daughter on earth
They are fat but highly dimorphic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., xye, Mansur and 2 others
Title.

In my opinion, angularity is inherently linked to the pillar of dimorphism; there isn't a single person on earth who possesses low dimorphism and high angularity, because angularity is tied to dimorphism, and dimorphism is tied to angularity.

Raters, give me your opinion on this.
@Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @ESR
Actually a good insight yet there are tons of people that are angular without dimorphic feautures.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., Jgns, xye and 2 others
2nd most importanr
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., jnxy, xye and 1 other person
Actually a good insight yet there are tons of people that are angular without dimorphic feautures.
Probably because they lack a good eye area or specific facial features, like lip width, that affect sexual dimorphism rather than angularity; for example, Oussama Guessom. I see your point.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., n1ks09, xye and 3 others
Probably because they lack a good eye area or specific facial features, like lip width, that affect sexual dimorphism rather than angularity; for example, Oussama Guessom. I see your point.
I think people get dimorphism mixed up with the angularity pillar and skue things together.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., xye, Jordan Barrett and 1 other person
You can absolutely have low dimorphism and high angularity, look at timothee chalamet

Coorelation =/= association

1789758464261
1789758478152
1789758492895
 
  • +1
Reactions: KT-34, Mai Sakurajima., xye and 3 others
He lacks good angularity
but i mean yeah
How come, I mean in some Its the lighting but he has very high angularity
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., xye and β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 
How come, I mean in some Its the lighting but he has very high angularity
But in my opinion, that TimothΓ©e Chalamet guy is an extreme outlier; obviously, there are people with low dimorphism and good angularity, but, you know what I mean.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., n1ks09, xye and 2 others
But in my opinion, that TimothΓ©e Chalamet guy is an extreme outlier; obviously, there are people with low dimorphism and good angularity, but, you know what I mean.
You could technically put those 2 in the same category I agree
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., xye, β„€π•ͺπ•˜π•  and 1 other person
Should be keeped as it is :feelsyay:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., xye and β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 
Title.

In my opinion, angularity is inherently linked to the pillar of dimorphism; there isn't a single person on earth who possesses low dimorphism and high angularity, because angularity is tied to dimorphism, and dimorphism is tied to angularity.

Raters, give me your opinion on this.
@Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @ESR
angularity is lowk just good forward growth and being lean or am i just stupid :feelswah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., xye and β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 
true. they are linked together
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., xye and β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 
Title.

In my opinion, angularity is inherently linked to the pillar of dimorphism; there isn't a single person on earth who possesses low dimorphism and high angularity, because angularity is tied to dimorphism, and dimorphism is tied to angularity.

Raters, give me your opinion on this.
@Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @ESR
tbh no
You can absolutely have low dimorphism and high angularity, look at timothee chalamet

Coorelation =/= association

View attachment 5659253View attachment 5659254View attachment 5659257
this
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye and β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima. and β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 
im sorry bro
I didn't mean to "copy" your thread; I honestly didn't see it. Sorry
no bro thats not what i meant lmao your thread is fine i like it i was just commenitng it as a response so you could understand my perspective
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima. and β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 
Title.

In my opinion, angularity is inherently linked to the pillar of dimorphism; there isn't a single person on earth who possesses low dimorphism and high angularity, because angularity is tied to dimorphism, and dimorphism is tied to angularity.

Raters, give me your opinion on this.
@Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @ESR
@j1gga
@Mai Sakurajima.
i forgot to tag my day ones... :feelswah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima.

Similar threads

xye
Replies
189
Views
1K
killcry
killcry
truefoidslayerpqoqo
Replies
80
Views
512
abdo 1569
abdo 1569
killcry
Replies
0
Views
19
killcry
killcry
horseman.
Replies
34
Views
180
killuacel
killuacel
AmazighMaxxer
Replies
1
Views
43
AmazighMaxxer
AmazighMaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

  • DeeVeeDee
  • fw.hiy
  • β„€π•ͺπ•˜π• 
  • KT-34
  • xye
  • CloudyCuck
  • TheDragon
  • jnxy
Back
Top