Size vs looks mog battle

[Pietrosiek]

I want to know your opionions. Lets say that 2 dudes have same attractivness level for foids, but one dude achive that by size (height,frame, musle mass, skull) other by looks (face, body aesthetics). Lets sat that gl guy is not manlet and rather big guy is tall af. Without extremes. Which would you choose? I would pick gl guy becouse at certain height you start having problems fitting to cars etc (cars the most important for me, 6'2 dudes barely fit to lambo, not even mentioning 6'7 guys)

 

[Deleted member 3328]

In history size
Today looks

I'd chose face always

 

[Pillarman]

For dumb people being bigger/stronger would be better ded srs

 

[Pietrosiek]

In history size
Today looks

I'd chose face always

same, especially afrer seeing chad (not even chadlite today) classmate, his frame is skull, he's averge height but still propably the hottest dude in school

 

[Deleted member 1100]

vs

The answer is obvious

 

[Pietrosiek]

vs

View attachment 174205


The answer is obvious

Dude on bottom is more attractive. I mean that both dudes are same attractivness but when dude i has slight worst face but better height and bigger frame. Both same attractivness tier

 

[Deleted member 2661]

JFL if you don't choose the good-looking, aesthetic guy

 

[Pietrosiek]

JFL if you don't choose the good-looking, aesthetic guy

Some guys prefer height and frame mogging other dudes

 

[friendly local]

its not really a discussion, it will be different if the good looking guy was below 5'7 (170cm) or so but at anything above that being good looking is just plain better

 

[Deleted member 2745]

Size theory doesn't hold without a decent face.
Jfl at this thread, you're Implying an ugly big dude can outslay ab average (height frame ) aesthetics dude, obviously not face is King.
But a decent (facially) huge dude, will have a big attraction to him, especially after foids pass 20-21.

vs

View attachment 174205


The answer is obvious

Jfl at this retarded comparison
Compare Tyler Maher to the buttom guy, a much fairer comparison.

 

[Deleted member 3299]

Would rather be a big average dude than be an aesthetic twink

but aesthetic twinks slay more

 

[Deleted member 1100]

Size theory doesn't hold without a decent face.
Jfl at this thread, you're Implying an ugly big dude can outslay ab average (height frame ) aesthetics dude, obviously not face is King.
But a decent (facially) huge dude, will have a big attraction to him, especially after foids pass 20-21.

Jfl at this retarded comparison
Compare Tyler Maher to the buttom guy, a much fairer comparison.

Of course Tyler would be better, he's also better looking facially. OP said the big guy got his SMV from body, not from body and face

 

[LordNorwood]

If they have the same attraction level then the bigger guy is the mogger, easy.