JewishNationalist
Luminary
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2026
- Posts
- 4,889
- Reputation
- 5,802
bro i look like my avinot opposing evil and being good just shows ur low test bro
to say im low t is like to say nothing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
bro i look like my avinot opposing evil and being good just shows ur low test bro
Wtf is this retarded ass take? even my takes here arent as badnot opposing evil and being good just shows ur low test bro
nigga grow some balls and stand for sth goodbro i look like my avi
to say im low t is like to say nothing
well if morality is relative then why debating that following evil is bad? it depends on individual personU Cope
relativistic morality is law
nah its geneticnigga grow some balls and stand for sth good
sure, broGood and evil are subjective
he claimed a lot of bswdym
good manwell if morality is relative then why debating that following evil is bad? it depends on individual person
not rly but tell urself whatever makes u sleep good at nightnah its genetic
polygenism yeah is bs but it doesn't mean his racial classification or explanation of origin of races is bad lolhe claimed a lot of bs
U talked bout jews being evil and this is only reason I could think of luloml bro ur cooked
btw im not talking abt israel vs palestine
Nigga u talking about urself?sure, bro
just tell urself whatever makes u happy
nah id put the responsible ones in prison / kill themIf a black man blamed the issues of his community on the CIA you’d say it’s skill issue
he literally opposed jewsJesus
killing innocent children for instanceprove anything is objectivly bad
he is literally “jews”he literally opposed jews
that’s not objectively wrong (i would never do it, i just can’t say it’s objectively wrong)killing innocent children for instance
watch some nazi speeches or read the epstine files and ull seeWhy are they evil then
it is manthat’s not objectively wrong (i would never do it, can’t say it’s objectively wrong though)
yeah he was one and opposed themhe is literally “jews”
why do u westoids lie to urselves so hard
The issue are those umbrella terms than, we should go back to identifying ourselfs based on our tribesThe genetic differences between a somali and west african are more vast than ones between slavs and germanics, but yes also the existence of subraces within races does not disqualify them as not being part of the black race. this is how even racial anthropologists from the 19th century viewed european races which you ironically reject lol
U made a subjective claimkilling innocent children for instance
give me a realistic scenario where it would be ok to kill a innocent child lil niggaU made a subjective claim
Im not gonna sit here and prove a negetivegive me a realistic scenario where it would be ok to kill a innocent child lil nigga
the fact that you need systems or “moral standpoints” means that it’s wrong according to somethingit is man
there is no moral standpoint that would justify killing innocent children
therefore it is objectively and morally bad
"The Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth." - Benjamin franklin although he was one of the few founding fathers that had prejudices to even germans he considered all of them to be white and that white to the founding fathers meant euro descentyea true facts
Nope. It was originally mostly exclusive to anglo saxons. Fucking retarted ass take
thanks for prooving my point that there is no scenario where its ok to harm a inncent childIm not gonna sit here and prove a negetive
Its on you to prove ur claim
aka human lensescertain lenses
White being a race that includes all of europe does not disqualify subraces within itself like nordic, slavic, celtic or etc, trying to coopt the term white to say it only applies to YOUR group is just retardedThe issue are those umbrella terms than, we should go back to identifying ourselfs based on our tribes
Actually there is, wiping out enemy races is normal and pillaging villages which includes the death of children is quite normal throughout history, morality has never been objective or fully applied to every single person, especially when differing nations are in playit is man
there is no moral standpoint that would justify killing innocent children
therefore it is objectively and morally bad
How does Benjamin Franklin help ur take? White originally ment Anglo Saxon and theres nothing u can do about that. Idc about what some niggas a 100 years later taking the term white and putting everyone in Europe under that umbrella term, and I definitely don’t give afk that some niggas 400 years later dna tested the Slavs and found the most aryan dna lol."The Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth." - Benjamin franklin although he was one of the few founding fathers that had prejudices to even germans he considered all of them to be white and that white to the founding fathers meant euro descent
"Hamilton said... that all the old world [Europe] was in a state of alignment... that there was no such thing as a regular government there... that we were the only republic of the white race in existence." - Thomas Jefferson grouping all of europe into the white race
also slavs fell under the legal definitions of white stated by the Naturalization Act of 1790
"The General congratulates the army on the very interesting intelligence lately received of the pious and generous efforts of the inhabitants of Ireland to succour the liberties of America... [He] directs that all fatigues and working parties cease for to-morrow... [to] celebrate the day with a more than common pleasure." - George Washington
"We have had too many Irishmen among us, but they are our fellow-men of Europe, and we must treat them with justice." - John Addams
your retarded anglo saxon only american fantasy falls apart when faced with the actual reality of what the founding fathers believed
It’s no ok and it’s bad, every judgment u make of an act is subjective. I never claimed it was ok or badthanks for prooving my point that there is no scenario where its ok to harm a inncent child
that prooves that there is morality
cus if ther was 0 objective morality then u coud just give me some random example
Because benjamin franklin regarded all euros as swarthy but states that they are all of the european race (though he also specifically took this back and stopped viewing them as swarthy), also every quote i sent completely disproves that take with the irish and spainards with the founding fathers, your claim has zero basis nor any backingHow does Benjamin Franklin help ur take? White originally mentioned Anglo Saxon theres nothing u can do about.
White is not some feel good cultural word, its a real biological race which we have classified, if you dont care abt actual evidence or definitions then don't bother starting these debates considering you arent smart enough to do soIdc about what some niggas a 100 years later putting everyone in Europe under that umbrella term, and I definitely don’t give afk that some niggas 400 years later dna tested the Slavs and found the most aryan dna lol
nopeActually there is, wiping out enemy races is normal and pillaging villages which includes the death of children is quite normal throughout history, morality has never been objective or fully applied to every single person, especially when differing nations are in play
? They were a supressed people for 1000 years, to this day they compete with browsn in the opression olympicsIrish? huh? nigger nations fr fr? well they do say gingers are black now ig
View attachment 5735568
Im asking how that specific Benjamin Franklin quote support ur take? GenuinelyBecause benjamin franklin regarded all euros as swarthy but states that they are all of the european race (though he also specifically took this back and stopped viewing them as swarthy), also every quote i sent completely disproves that take with the irish and spainards with the founding fathers, your claim has zero basis nor any backing
White is not some feel good cultural word, its a real biological race which we have classified, if you dont care abt actual evidence or definitions then don't bother starting these debates considering you arent smart enough to do so
no broevery judgment u make of an act is subjective.
Lol? They were a supressed people for 1000 years, to this day they compete with browsn in the opression olympics
You claimed that all peoples saw it as a unique objective evil but at the same time throughout history they have regularly not applied this to their enemies or outside nations, morality is very much subjective.nope
just cus sth has been happining doesnt make it ok
In Ancient Greece and Rome pedophilia was normal. What are ur thoughts?no bro
if everyone agrees on sth then its objectively bad
just cus it happend desnt mean it was morally goodYou claimed that all peoples saw it as a unique objective evil but at the same time throughout history they have regularly not applied this to their enemies or outside nations, morality is very much subjective.
Because his take was borderline retarded and was in the minority (which he also took back), it shows how stupid these views are considering the anglo saxons he speak of were of germanic descent. also funny how you ONLY focus on this part because you cant address any other pointIm asking how that specific Benjamin Franklin quote support ur take? Genuinely
Ur framework has been - if all people agree on something, that their judgment is correct.just cus it happend desnt mean it was morally good
ur actually retarded no offenseaka human lenses
if everyone shares the same opinion its objective
everyone shares that opinion lil bro
again, just cus sth happened doesnt make it morally goodIn Ancient Greece and Rome pedophilia was normal. What are ur thoughts?
i dont switch upUr framework has been - if all people agree on something, that their judgment is correct.
Dont switch up now
Let’s not play the assumption games.again, just cus sth happened doesnt make it morally good
those pedophiles were probably very concious that what they were doing was evil. they just did it cus others did it too
ik that, i was just using the words u used for the sake of the argument.“human lenses” aren’t a thing
yes, everyone knows child murder isnt ok“everyone” here is just the majority, not actually everyone
Whatever I concedei dont switch up
they knew what they were doing was bad wth
no, im saying:Let’s not play the assumption games.
U are changing frameworks consistently: first it was if majority agree on something, their judgment is objective, now it’s “they knew deep down they were evil”
Also we have multiple direct quotes of the founding fathers praising slavic figures hereBecause his take was borderline retarded and was in the minority (which he also took back), it shows how stupid these views are considering the anglo saxons he speak of were of germanic descent. also funny how you ONLY focus on this part because you cant address any other point
“...the 1. whites, 2. blacks, 3. indigenous...”