South Africa was empty before the dutch settlers

BigBiceps

BigBiceps

Kraken
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Posts
31,001
Reputation
71,252
The whites were there before the blacks, and this is a historical FACT. The indigenous population of South Africa were khoesan or san (bushmen). These are nothing like the people that nowadays form the majority of South Africa, which followed the white settlers in to South Africa in search for higher standard of living.
1706912382081

This is what the indigenous people of South Africa looked like and there were very little of them. Today there are around 10 000 San people in South Africa.

The dutch argued the land was empty, which it wasn't completely, but as there were so little of the San people in a vast area that is South Africa, the claim is actually believable. The part of South Africa dutch initially claimed could actually have been empty.
1706913341267


Black people literally came in and later said the land was always theirs. South Africa was whyte pipo land, but the marxists and the American capitalists gave it to blacks for their own purposes. In 1985 the population was still 20% white, now there's less than 10% whites. The blacks have been immigrating in non-stop, and are somehow more South African than the whites that literally started the whole country.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: hiwasuwor, romanstock, Sny and 11 others
based niggers for defeating south africa
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon, zura, shabby890 and 5 others
Do you have evidence that the black population came after
 
idc that shit was last century
 
The Koi San had low population numbers because the Bantu people killed them all

@PrinceLuenLeoncur
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • Woah
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer, Beetlejuice, Deleted member 25377 and 5 others
based niggers for defeating south africa
They'll ask whyte boys to step back in power soon, the country is deteriorating so fast.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Trilogy, PrinceLuenLeoncur and thereallegend
Ok but like you're mongolian so why do you care
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gilbert_Durandal and ElTruecel
I need a san people jb sex slave tbh
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 18522
This is what the indigenous people of South Africa looked like and there were very little of them. Today there are around 10 000 San people in South Africa.
They look like the average finn with darker skin
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Gilbert_Durandal and Agendum
America did the same with hawai and some are still trying to keep the "hawain" language alive, just lol.

I wonder how long those 10k are going to last
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBiceps
The whites were there before the blacks, and this is a historical FACT. The indigenous population of South Africa were khoesan or san (bushmen). These are nothing like the people that nowadays form the majority of South Africa, which followed the white settlers in to South Africa in search for higher standard of living.
View attachment 2719287
This is what the indigenous people of South Africa looked like and there were very little of them. Today there are around 10 000 San people in South Africa.

The dutch argued the land was empty, which it wasn't completely, but as there were so little of the San people in a vast area that is South Africa, the claim is actually believable. The part of South Africa dutch initially claimed could actually have been empty.
View attachment 2719308

Black people literally came in and later said the land was always theirs. South Africa was whyte pipo land, but the marxists and the American capitalists gave it to blacks for their own purposes. In 1985 the population was still 20% white, now there's less than 10% whites. The blacks have been immigrating in non-stop, and are somehow more South African than the whites that literally started the whole country.
I mean most European majority states outside of Europe were started on mostly empty land. I.e North America(excluding Central America), Australia,, Southern Africa and South America excluding Andes. Claims of genocide are mostly myths and stupid. If the Colombian exchange of the New World and Old World diseases are considered genocide then why isn't Black death spread by Mongols not classified the same?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: radicalrationalist and BigBiceps
Do you have evidence that the black population came after
Yes. Bantu are the blacks that mostly inhabit Sub-Saharan Africa today. Now this map showcases the expansion of the Bantus. You can clearly see they didn't expand to the land that was shown in the top post inhabited by early dutch settlers.
San people live more so in Namibia and in the very top areas of western South Africa.
1706914798713
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer, Agendum and thenewhebbe
The whites were there before the blacks, and this is a historical FACT. The indigenous population of South Africa were khoesan or san (bushmen). These are nothing like the people that nowadays form the majority of South Africa, which followed the white settlers in to South Africa in search for higher standard of living.
View attachment 2719287
This is what the indigenous people of South Africa looked like and there were very little of them. Today there are around 10 000 San people in South Africa.

The dutch argued the land was empty, which it wasn't completely, but as there were so little of the San people in a vast area that is South Africa, the claim is actually believable. The part of South Africa dutch initially claimed could actually have been empty.
View attachment 2719308

Black people literally came in and later said the land was always theirs. South Africa was whyte pipo land, but the marxists and the American capitalists gave it to blacks for their own purposes. In 1985 the population was still 20% white, now there's less than 10% whites. The blacks have been immigrating in non-stop, and are somehow more South African than the whites that literally started the whole country.
Knowmore
Good post
 
  • Love it
Reactions: BigBiceps
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Agendum and FascisstChad
Finns should take over ngl. Finnish South Africa, would move there instantly.
china is buying up africa anyways, finland's population is likely too small for a takeover.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer
100% true niggers can’t handle non nigger tropical environments, not to mention their bad travelling abilities.
Sea monkeys made it to Madagascar before the continental monkeys because niggers don’t know how to make sea worthy boats. Anything of note in sub Saharan Africa was built by non niggers. Mogadishu and the East African cities were built by Arabs. And South Africa was developed by whites.
The anunnaki must have forgotten to evolve the niggers!
IMG 0718
IMG 0254
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: fuxkdakikez and DR. NICKGA
The Koi San had low population numbers because the Bantu people killed them all

@PrinceLuenLeoncur
Change that to “Dutch and English” then yes. The Khoi Khoi were displaced from their native land of cape by the Europeans (they were nomadic). The Bantu didn go to war with them sure but the Bantu didn’t fuck their population like today thag was the Boers which fucked them up

Khoi were cattle thieves and the farmers hated them and hunted them like wild game and enslaved the poor natives. So in conclusion their small numbers is due to Europeans and disease
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Trilogy, Agendum and thereallegend
The whites were there before the blacks, and this is a historical FACT. The indigenous population of South Africa were khoesan or san (bushmen). These are nothing like the people that nowadays form the majority of South Africa, which followed the white settlers in to South Africa in search for higher standard of living.
View attachment 2719287
This is what the indigenous people of South Africa looked like and there were very little of them. Today there are around 10 000 San people in South Africa.

The dutch argued the land was empty, which it wasn't completely, but as there were so little of the San people in a vast area that is South Africa, the claim is actually believable. The part of South Africa dutch initially claimed could actually have been empty.
View attachment 2719308

Black people literally came in and later said the land was always theirs. South Africa was whyte pipo land, but the marxists and the American capitalists gave it to blacks for their own purposes. In 1985 the population was still 20% white, now there's less than 10% whites. The blacks have been immigrating in non-stop, and are somehow more South African than the whites that literally started the whole country.
Blacks like the Xhosa have alwyas lived in South Africa but keep making up lies to claim land on another continent on the other side of the world
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon and thereallegend
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon and thereallegend
.kkk at it again. Feels like 2021

Tumblr no2y5lfm4v1smy9ueo1 400
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon, Deleted member 25377 and thereallegend
Change that to “Dutch and English” then yes. The Khoi Khoi were displaced from their native land of cape by the Europeans (they were nomadic). The Bantu didn go to war with them sure but the Bantu didn’t fuck their population like today thag was the Boers which fucked them up

Khoi were cattle thieves and the farmers hated them and hunted them like wild game and enslaved the poor natives. So in conclusion their small numbers is due to Europeans and disease
Knowmore
Knowmore
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Boer lives matter
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Blacks like the Xhosa have alwyas lived in South Africa but keep making up lies to claim land on another continent on the other side of the world
Not where the colony initially existed, it expanded to much larger reach later on though. You could make that Xhosa argument for Rhodesia, and then it is valid.
 
Can't believe you say it. I'm playing it right now.

I prefer PS2-PS3 games in general.
Yeah, old games mog. Nowadays most games are shit, because they focus too much on graphics instead of the story.
 
Change that to “Dutch and English” then yes. The Khoi Khoi were displaced from their native land of cape by the Europeans (they were nomadic). The Bantu didn go to war with them sure but the Bantu didn’t fuck their population like today thag was the Boers which fucked them up

Khoi were cattle thieves and the farmers hated them and hunted them like wild game and enslaved the poor natives. So in conclusion their small numbers is due to Europeans and disease
Yep also that African woman who was famous for having a gigantic ass (Sarah Baartman) was a Khoi Khoi woman who was enslaved by Dutch colonists.
 87508513 spl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer and PrinceLuenLeoncur
nigs follow whites around like they enjoy the scent of our ass
 
Yep also that African woman who was famous for having a gigantic ass (Sarah Baartman) was a Khoi Khoi woman who was enslaved by Dutch colonists.
View attachment 2719566
Yep. But dickheads like OP will spread bullshit nonsense to make claim to land half way accross the world on a BLACK continent then he has the NERVE to complain when ethncis claim Europe. The hypocrisy of the alt right is as baffling as the lunacy of the left
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon and Trilogy
Not where the colony initially existed, it expanded to much larger reach later on though. You could make that Xhosa argument for Rhodesia, and then it is valid.
The Capioid groups lived In the PART Cumskins STOLE and settled and yes I use the word STOLE because th Capioid groups had that land they were just migratory so they’d leave it and return every couple seasons but when they returned this time a group of pale Cumskin freaks had laid claim to their territory. The fact is IT IS IN AFRICA IT BELONGS TO BLACKS end of, doesn’t fucking matter, it makes 0 sense for a group so fucking far away to claim land that would NATRALLY fall to blacks due to proximity. Bantus ACCIDENTALY walk south and enter South Africa VS Cumskins getting on a ship for years to reach South Africa UNNATURALLY.

South Africa being black today is proof of this, it was inevitable the region was going and is always going to be black.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Agendum
This forum is such an interesting mix of characters
 
  • +1
Reactions: Agendum
Yep. But dickheads like OP will spread bullshit nonsense to make claim to land half way accross the world on a BLACK continent then he has the NERVE to complain when ethncis claim Europe. The hypocrisy of the alt right is as baffling as the lunacy of the left
Black continent? I can tell you are an idiotic Afro-centrist based on that statement alone. First of all North Africa and regions of the horn have people with significant non SSA DNA. Secondly Bantu migration into Southern Africa with their displacement of Southern Custhics and Khoi San peoples is a documented fact. None of the historical revisionist nonsense you spout aligns with reality at any figment of the imagination. Just because a bunch of Bantus immigrated just so they could live within close vicinity to Dutch/British SA for their benefits and breed like rats to then make claims in the future that they are being oppressed and are claiming rightful ownership of land doesn't prove anything.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer, nofap and Agendum
Yep. But dickheads like OP will spread bullshit nonsense to make claim to land half way accross the world on a BLACK continent then he has the NERVE to complain when ethncis claim Europe. The hypocrisy of the alt right is as baffling as the lunacy of the left
Also many right-wingers claim that Black slaves in the Atlantic Slave Trade were all sold by Africans. But the Europeans (especially the Portuguese) actually did raid Africa themselves to enslave Africans many times

Portuguese incursions into Africa
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer
I
Black continent? I can tell you are an idiotic Afro-centrist based on that statement alone. First of all North Africa and regions of the horn have people with significant non SSA DNA. Secondly Bantu migration into Southern Africa with their displacement of Southern Custhics and Khoi San peoples is a documented fact. None of the historical revisionist nonsense you spout aligns with reality at any figment of the imagination. Just because a bunch of Bantus immigrated just so they could live within close vicinity to Dutch/British SA for their benefits and breed like rats to then make claims in the future that they are being oppressed and are claiming rightful ownership of land doesn't prove anything.
North Africa was orginally black and I don’t say this as an afrocentrist idiot this is a well known fact look up the “black mummy of Libya” and the ancient cave carvings in the region of the Maghreb as well as the haplogroup North Africans have. This all points to the region being black dominated pre history which makes sense and only became non black when the Berbers mixed with Europeans and migrating middle easterners to create the modern Berber.

The Bantu were migrating to the south regardless and the Xhosa were within the South African borders before Europeans got there they even admit it. Keep crying but you’re just a stupid bitch. Bantus have more claim to SA for this reason alone and the fact that they would have eventually reached SA Natrally unlike the EUROFUCKS who had to make high tech ships to get there UNNATURALLY
Also many right-wingers claim that Black slaves in the Atlantic Slave Trade were all sold by Africans. But the Europeans (especially the Portuguese) actually did raid Africa themselves to enslave Africans many times

View attachment 2719741
Tbf most slaves were sold by Africans, it’s what it is. Sure Portugal did raid a few times but 90% of slaves were sold by Africans but that’s ok because there was no concept of “African” to the natives at the time.
 
Last edited:
I

North Africa was orginally black and I don’t say this as an afrocentrist idiot this is a well known fact look up the “black mummy of Libya” and the ancient cave carvings in the region of the Maghreb as well as the haplogroup North Africans have. This all points to the region being black dominated pre history which makes sense and only became non black when the Berbers mixed with Europeans and migrating middle easterners to create the modern Berber.

The Bantu were migrating to the south regardless and the Xhosa were within the South African borders before Europeans got there they even admit it. Keep crying but your just a stupid bitch

Tbf most slaves were sold by Africans, it’s what it is. Sure Portugal did raid a few times but 90% of slaves were sold by Africans but that’s ok because there was no concept of “African” to the natives at the time.
Oh God now you actually claim NA as black. Which studies actually prove this? Ofc NA has SSA DNA due to proximity to SSA also geography places a big role because there's a near impassable(on foot) desert beneath NA. How can Sub Sharan DNA even get there in high quantities to even make it "black". Also show details of this black mummy in question. I could just as easily claim NAs are white because there was one with ginger hair but we know this isn't true.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer
Oh God now you actually claim NA as black. Which studies actually prove this? Ofc NA has SSA DNA due to proximity to SSA also geography places a big role because there's a near impassable(on foot) desert beneath NA. How can Sub Sharan DNA even get there in high quantities to even make it "black". Also show details of this black mummy in question. I could just as easily claim NAs are white because there was one with ginger hair but we know this isn't true.
North Africa wasn’t always a fucking desert you dumbass, just use Google I don’t see the point In telling you shit you can look up yourself. Whites were in North Africa (Euro immigrants like the vandals) hence the multi coloured hair in some tribes. The Nubians, garamantines(modern day Libyans) and Mauritanian’s (modern day morrocans) as described by romans and Greeks many of them were “black” even Metatron who is right wing admits this himself

Any other questions use google and stfu cos you don’t KNOW JACK SHIT. Come back once you have an genuine argument that isn’t easy to dismantle like a LEGO
 
  • JFL
Reactions: nofap
North Africa wasn’t always a fucking desert you dumbass, just use Google I don’t see the point In telling you shit you can look up yourself. Whites were in North Africa (Euro immigrants like the vandals) hence the multi coloured hair in some tribes. The Nubians, garamantines(modern day Libyans) and Mauritanian’s (modern day morrocans) as described by romans and Greeks many of them were “black” even Metatron who is right wing admits this himself

Any other questions use google and stfu cos you don’t KNOW JACK SHIT. Come back once you have an genuine argument that isn’t easy to dismantle like a LEGO
If you are referring to the Green Sahara period then it still doesn't prove anything as Mediterranean and Sinai Peninsula allows for easy access to NA plus what proof is there of SSAs having any significant presence in NA? Any DNA analysis or is this a bunch of baseless speculation without proof. Also you ape how is Mauritania and Morocco the same?

Also do not try to use vague statements such as Roman's considering Mauritanians "black" what was the actual context. If you are alluding to anything related to modern Mauritania then you might as well rope because there's no way you could be this stupid as to claim a country where majority of its inhabitants live BELOW the Sahara as Moroccans. Ofc Mauritanians are more black. Plus no one considers them North African.

Mauritania Population Density 2000 6172443546
 
Do you have evidence that the black population came after

Yeah the colonists documented everything. There were a few low pop tribes in the area and surrounding area, they have stories of fighting them or conning them, there's one really funny story which i cant remember properly, something to do with a cow and the tribe's belief and how the colonists manipulated them.
 
If you are referring to the Green Sahara period then it still doesn't prove anything as Mediterranean and Sinai Peninsula allows for easy access to NA plus what proof is there of SSAs having any significant presence in NA? Any DNA analysis or is this a bunch of baseless speculation without proof. Also you ape how is Mauritania and Morocco the same?

Also do not try to use vague statements such as Roman's considering Mauritanians "black" what was the actual context. If you are alluding to anything related to modern Mauritania then you might as well rope because there's no way you could be this stupid as to claim a country where majority of its inhabitants live BELOW the Sahara as Moroccans. Ofc Mauritanians are more black. Plus no one considers them North African.

View attachment 2719792
Your a stupid cunt I literally said “Mauratanians which was the Roman province name for MORROCO at the TIME OF ROME” so no IM NOT SPEAKING ABOUT MODERN MAURITANIA YOU BRAINLET nations tend to steal historical names of places in their continent. Ghana stealing Ghana from modern day Mali, Sudan stealing the name from the Sahel of west Africa, Congo stealing the name from Angola etc. if humans came from Africa and spread out all evidence shows that humans went to North Africa to leave the continent therefore by logic blacks were there first and genetics proves this until the last 8k years when they mixed with euro and Arabs to make modern Berbers hence why Berbers have E haplogroup instead of European R and Arab J. E haplo is an BLACK AFRICAN haplogroup that originated in Eastern Africa and most blacks have it barring Capioids/Pygmies and nilotics

CLEARLY YOU DONT KNOW JACK SHIT about history if you made such a mistake keep spouting nonsensical pseudoscience shit from the alt right buffoons, leave the historical debates to real connoisseurs of the topic.
 
  • Woah
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Agendum and Latinolooksmaxxer
Keep crying for 1000 million of 6'6 bantu BBC bvll survivors

 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
The whites were there before the blacks, and this is a historical
IMG 1282


No


Black people literally came in and later said the land was always theirs
The land was already inhabited and black people like the Xhosa already lived there

white, now there's less than 10% whites
Good lol look at what whites do to natives literally everywhere you go. No reason we should tolerate invaders in our land
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur
Black people literally came in and later said the land was always theirs.
Yeah cause Africa is our land cumskins are from Europe
 
South African than the whites that literally started the whole country.
How can whites be South African when they aren’t even from Africa?
 
Yeah cause Africa is our land cumskins are from Europe
They wanna cry about immigration when no other race immigrates as much as whites they literally invaded an entire continent and became the majority in the Americas
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
everything was better with apartheid. My dad even lived there for a while but left when Nelson Mandela came to power.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thereallegend

Similar threads

D
Replies
6
Views
485
pablomaxx
pablomaxx
Debetro
Replies
147
Views
9K
Debetro
Debetro
BrahminBoss
Replies
29
Views
3K
BWC_virgin
BWC_virgin
womanfearer
Discussion 0% turnover jfl
Replies
49
Views
4K
truecel12
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top