2d v2
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2022
- Posts
- 7,542
- Reputation
- 7,899
keep coping cuck it means tall dravidian bad boy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
keep coping cuck it means tall dravidian bad boy
No there was both ethnic and white girls who wanted them(were all the girls interested in them white?)
Because I can see the fact they clearly don’t have a girlfriend or FWB with my eyes and also most of the people I have associated myself with throughout my entire life are other white men(how do you know that "almost" all the white guys got nothing?)
brutal racepillmost of the people I have associated myself with throughout my entire life are other white men
The fuck does that have to do with the racepill? Wow people primarily are friends with people of the same race and gender as them shocking revelationbrutal racepill
brutal, ethnics cant even befriend jbw normiespeople primarily are friends with people of the same race
Niggers and spics are almost always rude and stand-offish with me assuming they even acknowledge I exist. And the main type of ethnic I do generally get along with is ricecels who have way lower SMV then niggers and spics.brutal, ethnics cant even befriend jbw normies
Because all these "studies" are usually based on random OLD apps or with populations of less than a couple hundred/thousand people. Doesn't really mean much. There are also too many variables that doesn't get taken into consideration."Sample size" is not written anywhere. How do you know how big is the sample size?
Whites have better facial features on average. For example, better eye area, nose shape, bone structure etc. Whites are taller on average than ethnics.
Still blacks have lower average smv compared to whites. This is my point.If that were true, blacks wouldn't have such high SMV.
Ya but mulattos have equal SMV to whitesStill blacks have lower average smv compared to whites. This is my point.
Mulattos are between white and black smv wiseYa but mulattos have equal SMV to whites
no, estrogen darkens your skin.I've never heard of this before.. isn't it the opposite?
youre coping because it fits your narrative. tanned skin is the bbeauty standard in white countries. and dark hair is equal to or worse t han blondeBeing blonde and tanned is cope for low class Scandinavians who can't achieve actual ideal coloring:
View attachment 3119446
Striking high pedigree imperial species like WASPs and Northern Han have pale skin (aristocratic trait since they it means you stay indoors) and dark hair (high color contrast)
I'm literally textbook tall dark and handsome (6'5, jet black hair and low-mid Chadlite) and SMVmog and classmog the fuck out of the guys in the OP
A foid called my buddy tall,dark,handsome yet he's pale and has black hair.You guys echo chamber to say its dark hair
BECAUSE you have dark hair. You wish that was what it meant
But it really means this
View attachment 3118486
View attachment 3118495
Dirty blonde with tan skin and tall is the ultimate peak appeal in Europe.
It just looks better, more high class, more sexy
Well, hair colour doesn't matter that much, but my point is, it's about having tanned skin.
And no, not because its "more masculine" because white men prefer tanned girls too. It's simply the beauty standard for men and women.
Also its not just a light tan, a light glow. It's about having a deep tan. Light/medium brown.
But of course not dark brown like an indian.
Same .png that has been posted for 1647200 time. Definition of insanity.Another shitskin posting the same statistics of roasties looking for a white betabuxx from 1910 @St.TikTokcel @russiancelreturns @Richard Cheese
It's been a decade man. That's borderline a whole generation of people at this point. You can find studies that show the opposite these days:2014 study moron.
I smell gigacoping ethnic ramblings anyway.
He said the study is from "1738" with irony.It's been a decade man. That's borderline a whole generation. I can find studies that show the opposite these days:
Asian American Women’s Racial Dating Preferences: An Investigation of Internalized Racism, Resistance and Empowerment against Racism, and Desire for Status - Sex Roles
Asian American women’s racialized dating choices have drawn widespread attention both in academic and public spheres. However, little empirical research has examined racially relevant sociocultural factors that may affect this population’s dating and physical attraction preferences. To further...link.springer.com
You can find plenty of ethnic women glazing other races especially asian as well. That doesn't mean anything. It's a bias. In that study white men are ranked dead last and one of the driving forces is perceived status.He said the study is from "1738" with irony.
I meant to say it is not that old.
The research you shared is irrelevant. First of all, it only examines Asian-Americans. Secondly, the research does not contradict what I said. And thirdly, it is a sociology study and sociology is one of the least credible and provable fields. What I shared is a survey.
It cannot properly explain women's choice of white men.
The JBW theory is not because white people came up with it. It's that ethnics strive to be with whites as a consequence of the fact that whites are more attractive, whether men or women.
It's not because ethnics accept that they are inferior, but because they want to be with whites.
"Muhh it's actually JBW but because psychological and sociological reasons, not about white people have better looks."
Just scroll social media for 30 minutes and you will see women with different backgrounds simping for white guys. What a cruel world.
Of course every ethnicity wants sexual and emotional connection with people of its own ethnicity. And with white people, JFL
doesnt mean thats what it means for everyoneA foid called my buddy tall,dark,handsome yet he's pale and has black hair.
you cant change the fact white men are the tallest, most handsome, ideal skin colour, in a decade. it will be like this forever. you're coping yourself to another dimensionIt's been a decade man.
seethe and copeShut the fuck up retard
Nah blonde nordics with tan are peak appeal in europe.tall dark and handsome just means a white non ginger non nerdic white Chad.
Carmack is TDH while being nordic and very light brown as he has the los angeles tan.
So how come obesity, malocclusion, baldness and autism have become more widespread than ever?all physical traits that are widespread in a population were purposely selected for, bad traits don't spread.
europeans already had light eyes before they had light skin, they selected for that, if they preferred darker skin or if it was a survival advantage then they would've kept it.
Cos broke subhumans reproduce the most. Rich good genes people decide its best to not have kidsSo how come obesity, malocclusion, baldness and autism have become more widespread than ever?
Red hair is fucking repulsive.Moreover, pale skin is much rarer, it is one of the extremes of appearance, like green and blue eyes, blond and red hair, and it is superior when all other parameters are held constant.
It's like blue eyes being superior to brown eyes
A ginger guy being white is like a fat foid having a large rack- doesn't count!tall dark and handsome just means a white non ginger non nerdic white Chad.
Carmack is TDH while being nordic and very light brown as he has the los angel
You've just contradicted yourself.Cos broke subhumans reproduce the most. Rich good genes people decide its best to not have kids
In white countries, tan is preferred on men and women@ALP as a man with pale skin I can tell you it is a failo on men
Even then, "pale" means untanned Fitzpatrick 3 in Asian countries or Fitzpatrick 4-5 in African countries. No one likes Fitzpatrick 1-2. Fitzpatrick 3 is what humans are wired to prefer by default.In white countries, tan is preferred on men and women
In all other countries in the entire world, pale white skin is preferred on men and women
According to British lexicographer Eric Partridge, the phrase "tall, dark and handsome" originates from cheap fiction novels produced in the early 20th century.[1] The term was commonly used in Hollywood during the 1920s to describe Rudolph Valentino.[3] As an idiom it is both lexically and sequentially fixed.[4] Alan Axelrod writes that "tall, dark and handsome" is often assumed as a compliment, but notes that Eric Partridge wrote that it is actually a mild insult, given the term originates from cheap and cheesy novels from the 1910s; making it an ironic phrase.[5][1]
might be wrong but is that an aussie?You guys echo chamber to say its dark hair
BECAUSE you have dark hair. You wish that was what it meant
But it really means this
View attachment 3118486
View attachment 3118495
Dirty blonde with tan skin and tall is the ultimate peak appeal in Europe.
It just looks better, more high class, more sexy
Well, hair colour doesn't matter that much, but my point is, it's about having tanned skin.
And no, not because its "more masculine" because white men prefer tanned girls too. It's simply the beauty standard for men and women.
Also its not just a light tan, a light glow. It's about having a deep tan. Light/medium brown.
But of course not dark brown like an indian.
Sounds like Jewish fictionThe phrase originates from cheap romantic fiction that was popular in the early 1900's, when a pale complexion was considered ideal. Sissy.