The Clavicular vs Salludon debate

[Manchild_v2]

Afghanistan is at the crossroads of both Central Asia and South Asia. I have seen people use the term "South Central Asian" and I think that's the most accurate, since they're neither actually South Asian nor actually Central Asian. So they refer to them as the "southern portion of Central Asia." I feel like that makes most sense. Especially if you look at it genetically. Lots of Afghans will be shifted towards Central Asian populations.

Depends though, Afghans like the majority of the ethnicities there are genetically West Asian people. They are most similar to Iranians, Kurds and other west asian shifted central asian people like Uzbeks.

Baloch people, Pashtuns, Tajiks etc are not at all related to curries as they have no south asian ancestry.

Pakistan ofc shares its biggest ethnic group with North India, but they also have balloches, pashtuns, etc at a quarter+ of the population. these people are not related to curries at all and have almost entirely a west asian genome with no more ancestral south asian (the curry component) than eastern iranians or saudi arabians

 

[SecularIslamist]

Salludan is top 1% for pajeets

Clav isnt even top 15% for whites

The white ceiling is a lot higher

I get what you're trying to say. But Salludon mogs 2 billion curries whereas Clav mogs 90% of guys taking a piss at a public restroom in London.

Big difference. The white ceiling is smashed if you are an ethnic and look like Sallu.

 

[goonerboy]

It's fucking amazing the only argument that Clavicular dicksuckers have is he white therefore he mogs Salludon JFL. It's just as retarded as when Clavicular said he has more followers that's why he mogs

Most of his views are derived from him acting like a retard taking pics with his grandma, doing risque stuff. Like yeah nigga anyone can get followers doing shit like that. Salludon is based purely on looks and living in some village in Pakistan JFL

Salludon





Clavicular

View attachment 3719354
View attachment 3719356

Textbook HTN with NT.

salludon mogs clav to hell

 

[Manchild_v2]

Well done at least you know borders on a map mean nothing. But anyway these countries have high curry-passing people. No one thinks of north east Indians who look like gook when you say average indian.

Btw I'd rather say Afghanistan is on the fringes of curry not Pakistan.

You have the worst take on curries on .org. You should be banned on speaking about them. Stick to speaking about Turks not curries.


Genetics cope once.

??? Borders mean a shit ton if you are here talking about "South Asia" as if that geography precludes that all people there are homogeneous and "curry". A pashtun in Pakistan is closer genetically to even a Turk in Istanbul than they are to Punjabis in India

I know you were once east pakistan, but you are genetically nothing like a Western Pakistan mountain dweller like Salidun.

And here's a hint, Nafris are literally a 7km boat ride away from Southern Europe, so it makes sense they share more features with europeans than do North Indians, who are separated from Europe by tens of thousands of kilometers and tons of formidable natural barriers. Being born in a different geographical continuous unit does not mean you are all the same entity. and "negrofied" especially since negroes are seperated in the maghreb but a fucking 4000km desert that is hard to traverse even in 2025.

You don't know shit about genetics and once I start breaking out that information you will start coping again with muh swarth belt.

 

[Gengar]

Well done at least you know borders on a map mean nothing. But anyway these countries have high curry-passing people. No one thinks of north east Indians who look like gook when you say average indian.

Btw I'd rather say Afghanistan is on the fringes of curry not Pakistan.

You have the worst take on curries on .org. You should be banned on speaking about them. Stick to speaking about Turks not curries.


Genetics cope once.

Look at this genetic map. I can see why a Bengali would consider himself a curry, because you are pretty much like >95% of the Indian population.

Meanwhile the only ethnic groups from India (<5%) that you don't see are Khatris, Rors, Jats and Kamboj. Three out of four originated in Pakistan, one out of four originated in Iran.

@Manchild_v2 is correct when Pakistanis don't see themselves as curry (curry being synonymous with Indian). We do see ourselves as South Asian though. I don't think pajeet/curry = South Asian, I think pajeet/curry = Indian. Genetics prove this as well.

 

[Gengar]

View attachment 3719724

Depends though, Afghans like the majority of the ethnicities there are genetically West Asian people. They are most similar to Iranians, Kurds and other west asian shifted central asian people like Uzbeks.

Baloch people, Pashtuns, Tajiks etc are not at all related to curries as they have no south asian ancestry.

Pakistan ofc shares its biggest ethnic group with North India, but they also have balloches, pashtuns, etc at a quarter+ of the population. these people are not related to curries at all and have almost entirely a west asian genome with no more ancestral south asian (the curry component) than eastern iranians or saudi arabians

View attachment 3719726

Yes, many myths have been expelled thanks to the study of genetics. Otherwise they'd have us believe "every South Asian is the same." That's why Secular is rambling instead of accepting facts.

 

[Manchild_v2]

Look at this genetic map. I can see why a Bengali would consider himself a curry, because you are pretty much like >95% of the Indian population.

View attachment 3719740

Meanwhile the only ethnic groups from India (<5%) that you don't see are Khatris, Rors, Jats and Kamboj. Three out of four originated in Pakistan, one out of four originated in Iran.

@Manchild_v2 is correct when Pakistanis don't see themselves as curry (curry being synonymous with Indian). We do see ourselves as South Asian though. I don't think pajeet/curry = South Asian, I think pajeet/curry = Indian. Genetics prove this as well.

Yep, Bangalis are closer to indians than Pakistanis , and Indians are closer to Bangalis than they are to Pakistanis as well

 

[SecularIslamist]

??? Borders mean a shit ton if you are here talking about "South Asia" as if that geography precludes that all people there are homogeneous and "curry".

Border have no bearing on your genetics and much less on your pheno. Pakistan (and Bangladesh) was literally demarcated on religious lines not ethnic, linguistic, genetic or anything else. Although Pakistan later inaugurated urder - but whatever that's a different topic. In

Borders are political, manmade often colonial legacies just like Sykes picot. In fact the durand line in Afghanistan is exactly that.

No one ever fucking said - you have this genetic code or this phenotype therefore you don't belong in this side of the border! @Gengar

A pashtun in Pakistan is closer genetically to even a Turk in Istanbul than they are to Punjabis in India

I know you were once east pakistan, but you are genetically nothing like a Western Pakistan mountain dweller like Salidun.

I never said I was but I'm not the one coping about genetics.

And here's a hint, Nafris are literally a 7km boat ride away from Southern Europe, so it makes sense they share more features with europeans than do North Indians, who are separated from Europe by tens of thousands of kilometers and tons of formidable natural barriers. Being born in a different geographical continuous unit does not mean you are all the same entity. and "negrofied" especially since negroes are seperated in the maghreb but a fucking 4000km desert that is hard to traverse even in 2025.

You don't know shit about genetics and once I start breaking out that information you will start coping again with muh swarth belt.

It doesn't matter if you're a boat ride away. Nafris never went to med countries apart from Spain - and it was mostly confined to andalusia.

My swarthy belt is based on looks. You can see I included the whole of Latin America too. It has nothing to do with genetics. I don't know why you bring this up like as if it makes any difference in real life when you walk past people.

 

[SecularIslamist]

Yep, Bangalis are closer to indians than Pakistanis , and Indians are closer to Bangalis than they are to Pakistanis as well

Where the fuck is this distance based from?
Both countries share a border with India. Even fucking china shares a border with Pakistan.

 

[Gengar]

Yep, Bangalis are closer to indians than Pakistanis , and Indians are closer to Bangalis than they are to Pakistanis as well

Wait until he hears that even two Punjabis from the same village who have been living side by side for each other can have more genetic distance between them compared to all of Europe. @SecularIslamist and other anti-genetics copers cannot wrap their heads around this.

 

[Gengar]

Where the fuck is this distance based from?
Both countries share a border with India. Even fucking china shares a border with Pakistan.

It's based on genetics, on people's DNA. You cannot change that. It's 100% objective, it's not biased like you are.

 

[Gengar]

Where the fuck is this distance based from?
Both countries share a border with India. Even fucking china shares a border with Pakistan.

Since you don't know a thing about genetics, a distance between 0 and 3 is considered a good match (genetically, though a low distance doesn't mean you're part of that ethnic group), anything past 5 is a bad match (little relation), anything past 6 is also a bad match (no relation).

 

[SecularIslamist]

Look at this genetic map. I can see why a Bengali would consider himself a curry, because you are pretty much like >95% of the Indian population.

View attachment 3719740

Meanwhile the only ethnic groups from India (<5%) that you don't see are Khatris, Rors, Jats and Kamboj. Three out of four originated in Pakistan, one out of four originated in Iran.

@Manchild_v2 is correct when Pakistanis don't see themselves as curry (curry being synonymous with Indian). We do see ourselves as South Asian though. I don't think pajeet/curry = South Asian, I think pajeet/curry = Indian. Genetics prove this as well.

we are more related to eastern Indian ethnicities like assemese, while having that Tibetan admixture. Meanwhile you have more closer genetic relationships to north Indians.

You are doing everything in your power to relate Bengalis to "Indians" and create an illusory category of "Indians" (1+ billion people) and hundreds of ethnicity which you claim you have no relation to. Which is total cope even by your own coping genetic standards.

It's based on genetics, on people's DNA. You cannot change that. It's 100% objective, it's not biased like you are.

I'm clearly thinking of distances as in Kms / miles. I'm not always talking about genetics like you.

 

[SecularIslamist]

Wait until he hears that even two Punjabis from the same village who have been living side by side for each other can have more genetic distance between them compared to all of Europe. @SecularIslamist and other anti-genetics copers cannot wrap their heads around this.

No that's actually what Manchild was saying nafris are related to meds because they are a boat ride away.

Showing you have zero reading comprehension skills again, I see.

 

[SecularIslamist]

And also whether you like it or not India and Pakistan was demarcated on religious lines. Not genetic lines. Lots of people from India poured into Pakistan and vice versa. You can't change that.. that's just a fact which happened. There are people who are genetically indistinguishable on both sides of the border. You will have to accept that.

I have no problem with this you do.
@Gengar

 

[Manchild_v2]

It doesn't matter if you're a boat ride away. Nafris never went to med countries apart from Spain - and it was mostly confined to andalusia.

My swarthy belt is based on looks. You can see I included the whole of Latin America too. It has nothing to do with genetics. I don't know why you bring this up like as if it makes any difference in real life when you walk past people.

Genetics are not subject to cope and mental gymnastics like you are doing. If you go back in history you will see that the people of North Africa share 3/5ths of their ancestral genome with Europeans. Even more the people of the Levant as they have no Saharan ancestry. The people of North Africa are genetically mostly of a West Asian origin just like Europeans are.

(Southern) Europeans, Nafris and Middle East people are ancestrally extremely similar.

While the light skin people of India are of a proto-European and West Asian origin, they share the majority of their ancestry with indigenous South Eurasians still, and their european component was heavily deluded with South Asian adjacent West Asian people like eastern iranians

A mestizo from Mexico looks exactly like how his genes say, he looks like a native american and a spaniard hybrid. A northern curry looks like what his genes say as well, 1/4-1/3 like a dark west asian like an gulf arab/persian and the rest like a dravidian sri lankan.

Border have no bearing on your genetics and much less on your pheno. Pakistan (and Bangladesh) was literally demarcated on religious lines not ethnic, linguistic, genetic or anything else. Although Pakistan later inaugurated urder - but whatever that's a different topic. In

Borders are political, manmade often colonial legacies just like Sykes picot. In fact the durand line in Afghanistan is exactly that.

No one ever fucking said - you have this genetic code or this phenotype therefore you don't belong in this side of the border! @Gengar

Do you know what happened when The Rajj was partitioned? the largest transfer and population exchange in human history by a large margin. The geography of the indian subcontinent shows extremely well the pheno spread and genetic distances. Religion and ethnicity are heavily correlated as lighter skinned muslims never bred with hindus.

Like exactly well. Southern dravidan indians became muslim while it was mostly hindus who never bred with Muslim ethnicities that still look curry asf.

Pakistan via a russian anglo border autism ended up right on the frontier with Persia and inherited a lot of west asian people.

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

Salludon definitely mogs in terms of psl, I think clav has more appeal though to jbs especially, I think its just racist and self hating ethnics who shit on salludon, can’t forget you shouldn’t take what people say on jewtok seriously just a bunch of tiny trolls.

 

[Manchild_v2]

Where the fuck is this distance based from?
Both countries share a border with India. Even fucking china shares a border with Pakistan.

It's because of migration patterns due to geographic bottlenecks and population density.

Bangladesh's border with India was always more densely populated and more easily accessed than that of Pakistan. China's border in both countries is sparsely populated and cuts through a shit ton of natural barriers. And by the time you even reach China's far West the people living there are not Han Chinese, but Tibetan, Uyghur, etc. And in the case of India they have gook looking people in their north east.

Is this Uyghur woman a gook just because she's Chinese?

West Asian ethnicities in India exist, they are just extremely rare (less than 5% of the population, while in Pakistan they are over 25%)

Guys like Freddy Mercury is obviously not a Curry. Hell, a lot of those people in India are unlike the west asians in pakistan, they hold zero cultural ties to the Indian nation and the overwhelmingly dominant hindu or sikh culture.

You need to stop coping, just because you are Muslim. Your genes and phenotype pass better in India than Pakistan. You have even less of a West Asian overlap than does India.

 

[SecularIslamist]

Genetics are not subject to cope and mental gymnastics like you are doing. If you go back in history you will see that the people of North Africa share 3/5ths of their ancestral genome with Europeans. Even more the people of the Levant as they have no Saharan ancestry. The people of North Africa are genetically mostly of a West Asian origin just like Europeans are.

(Southern) Europeans, Nafris and Middle East people are ancestrally extremely similar.

Genetics are fluid not as fixed as you are making them out to be. Going all the way back to a cient times is as ridiculous as Indians who claim they are genetically related to Europeans.

So why do you want to acknowledge one race are related to Europeans but not the other? By your same logic??

While the light skin people of India are of a proto-European and West Asian origin, they share the majority of their ancestry with indigenous South Eurasians still, and their european component was heavily deluded with South Asian adjacent West Asian people like eastern iranians

A mestizo from Mexico looks exactly like how his genes say, he looks like a native american and a spaniard hybrid. A northern curry looks like what his genes say as well, 1/4-1/3 like a dark west asian like an gulf arab/persian and the rest like a dravidian sri lankan.

ARe you retarded? While most people look like as they should - regardless of what they are Mexican Indian, Spanish , there are clearly uncommon phenos that are common enough to mean they don't look like it.

Do you know what happened when The Rajj was partitioned? the largest transfer and population exchange in human history by a large margin. The geography of the indian subcontinent shows extremely well the pheno spread and genetic distances. Religion and ethnicity are heavily correlated as lighter skinned muslims never bred with hindus.

Like exactly well. Southern dravidan indians became muslim while it was mostly hindus who never bred with Muslim ethnicities that still look curry asf.

Pakistan via a russian anglo border autism ended up right on the frontier with Persia and inherited a lot of west asian people.

My point is that these borders don't matter. Geography doesn't determine your genetics.

 

[Manchild_v2]

Genetics are fluid not as fixed as you are making them out to be. Going all the way back to a cient times is as ridiculous as Indians who claim they are genetically related to Europeans.

So why do you want to acknowledge one race are related to Europeans but not the other? By your same logic??

ARe you retarded? While most people look like as they should - regardless of what they are Mexican Indian, Spanish , there are clearly uncommon phenos that are common enough to mean they don't look like it.

My point is that these borders don't matter. Geography doesn't determine your genetics.

I acknowledged that Indians are related to West Asians and by extension, proto-Europeans. But the relation is distant and very faint. Its why you speak a European related language.

In the same way Europeans are all related to Central Asian people like Manchurians, Kazhks, etc and by extension China is related to Persia/Iran due to their border regions having west asian genes. I would be stupid to say Finnish people are gooks or are part of a "gook belt" or that Chinese people are European.

But the difference is that Nafris and Southern Europeans are extremely closely related, not only do they completely border them by an easily accessible sea with dozens of Islands in between, they have been ruled and ruled each other dozens of times for hundreds of years.

If you look at actual academic papers done on genetics, pure bred North Africans, West Asians and Europeans are ALWAYS counted as one race. While Indians are considered South Asian genetically, with Pakistan being an intermediate between South Asia and West Asia.

 

[SecularIslamist]

It's because of migration patterns due to geographic bottlenecks and population density.

Bangladesh's border with India was always more densely populated and more easily accessed than that of Pakistan. China's border in both countries is sparsely populated and cuts through a shit ton of natural barriers. And by the time you even reach China's far West the people living there are not Han Chinese, but Tibetan, Uyghur, etc. And in the case of India they have gook looking people in their north east.

That has nothing to do with what I said. If you're going to save that bengali's are genetically related to Indians. Yes I agree but you're going to have to get specific because we are clearly not related to certain ethnics as much as others. Gengar is coping acting like there is no overlap and you are coping the same way - trying to act like "Pakistan" - whose national identity is as made up as Turkey and now is somehow a genetically distinct species of south Asia.

Is this Uyghur woman a gook just because she's Chinese?

No she looks slightly gook but not fully. That's my point it's irrelevant if she's in "China".

West Asian ethnicities in India exist, they are just extremely rare (less than 5% of the population, while in Pakistan they are over 25%)

25% of Pakistanis do not look west Asian.

Guys like Freddy Mercury is obviously not a Curry. Hell, a lot of those people in India are unlike the west asians in pakistan, they hold zero cultural ties to the Indian nation and the overwhelmingly dominant hindu or sikh culture.

You need to stop coping, just because you are Muslim. Your genes and phenotype pass better in India than Pakistan. You have even less of a West Asian overlap than does India.

I get mistaken as Paki 99% of the time hardly ever Indian (usually as a second guess after paki) and rarely more Bengali. I have zero paki genetics - not that there is such a thing.

You just don't get it that genotype doesn't produce the stereotypical phenotype that is associated with it.

 

[Gengar]

we are more related to eastern Indian ethnicities like assemese, while having that Tibetan admixture. Meanwhile you have more closer genetic relationships to north Indians.

You are doing everything in your power to relate Bengalis to "Indians" and create an illusory category of "Indians" (1+ billion people) and hundreds of ethnicity which you claim you have no relation to. Which is total cope even by your own coping genetic standards.


I'm clearly thinking of distances as in Kms / miles. I'm not always talking about genetics like you.

I'm using my genetic data as a point of reference here and I will list genetic distances between them. Keep in mind, a distance of 6+ means no relation in any way, shape or form.

Average distance to Baloch: 8.65, Gujarati: 8.41, Lahore Punjabi: 6.41, Uttar Pradesh: 13.33, Sri Lankan: 13.31, Bengali Bangladesh: 14.54.

You claim I'm genetically closer to North Indians. However, Uttar Pradeshi people are North Indians and my genetic distance to them is literally 13.3, at least double the number that decides there's no relation. Hell, even with people I share a province with there's a distance of 6+ (Lahore Punjabis, although Punjabis are genetically diverse too so some will have a distance of around 3 which is still pretty distant).

It's time you stop coping.

@Manchild_v2

 

[Shahnameh]

I get what you're trying to say. But Salludon mogs 2 billion curries whereas Clav mogs 90% of guys taking a piss at a public restroom in London.

Big difference. The white ceiling is smashed if you are an ethnic and look like Sallu.

The Average White Incel rotting in his parwnts basemwnt MOGs 2 billion curries

 

[Manchild_v2]

I'm using my genetic data as a point of reference here and I will list genetic distances between them. Keep in mind, a distance of 6+ means no relation in any way, shape or form.

Average distance to Baloch: 8.65, Gujarati: 8.41, Lahore Punjabi: 6.41, Uttar Pradesh: 13.33, Sri Lankan: 13.31, Bengali Bangladesh: 14.54.

You claim I'm genetically closer to North Indians. However, Uttar Pradeshi people are North Indians and my genetic distance to them is literally 13.3, at least double the number that decides there's no relation. Hell, even with people I share a province with there's a distance of 6+ (Lahore Punjabis, although Punjabis are genetically diverse too so some will have a distance of around 3 which is still pretty distant).

It's time you stop coping.

@Manchild_v2

Yes, more than 10 is a huge fucking difference. Like that's the distance between Saudi Arabians and Russians

 

[SecularIslamist]

I acknowledged that Indians are related to West Asians and by extension, proto-Europeans. But the relation is distant and very faint. Its why you speak a European related language.

Well you are making a stupid retarded claim to claim that. I hope you do t in real life it sounds almost as bad as Iranians.

In the same way Europeans are all related to Central Asian people like Manchurians, Kazhks, etc and by extension China is related to Persia/Iran due to their border regions having west asian genes. I would be stupid to say Finnish people are gooks or are part of a "gook belt" or that Chinese people are European.

But the difference is that Nafris and Southern Europeans are extremely closely related, not only do they completely border them by an easily accessible sea with dozens of Islands in between, they have been ruled and ruled each other dozens of times for hundreds of years.

If you look at actual academic papers done on genetics, pure bred North Africans, West Asians and Europeans are ALWAYS counted as one race. While Indians are considered South Asian genetically, with Pakistan being an intermediate between South Asia and West Asia.

Send me these "academic papers" where they consider west Asians, north Africans and Europeans as one race. Meanwhile they consider Pakistan as intermediate between south Asia (codeword for India) and West Asia.

 

[Gengar]

Yes, more than 10 is a huge fucking difference. Like that's the distance between Saudi Arabians and Russians

Exactly. You read that, @SecularIslamist? The distance between a Saudi Arab and Russian is 10, and there's more genetic distance between you and I. Because it's gonna be at least 13. You have to stop coping.

 

[warmth]

Exactly. You read that, @SecularIslamist? The distance between a Saudi Arab and Russian is 10, and there's more genetic distance between you and I. Because it's gonna be at least 13. You have to stop coping.

GENGAR TELL ME WHATS THE POINT OF BEING ALIVE IF I DONT INTOXICATE MYSELF AND TAKE OVER THE ENTIRE WORLD

 

[Gengar]

GENGAR TELL ME WHATS THE POINT OF BEING ALIVE IF I DONT INTOXICATE MYSELF AND TAKE OVER THE ENTIRE WORLD

The point of life is to come and meet your brother Gengar. In the Netherlands.

 

[warmth]

The point of life is to come and meet your brother Gengar. In the Netherlands.

I FUCKING WILL, BUT NOT WITHOUT A LAMBO. THAT'S WHY IM ABOUT TO TAKE THE ENTIRE WORLD RN

 

[SecularIslamist]

I'm using my genetic data as a point of reference here and I will list genetic distances between them. Keep in mind, a distance of 6+ means no relation in any way, shape or form.

Average distance to Baloch: 8.65, Gujarati: 8.41, Lahore Punjabi: 6.41, Uttar Pradesh: 13.33, Sri Lankan: 13.31, Bengali Bangladesh: 14.54.

You claim I'm genetically closer to North Indians. However, Uttar Pradeshi people are North Indians and my genetic distance to them is literally 13.3, at least double the number that decides there's no relation. Hell, even with people I share a province with there's a distance of 6+ (Lahore Punjabis, although Punjabis are genetically diverse too so some will have a distance of around 3 which is still pretty distant).

It's time you stop coping.

@Manchild_v2

Where are you basing this genetic data from? Sounds selective. Whether you like it or not there are people in Pakistan who have a deeper genetic relationship with ethnicities in India like Punjabs and the same is true vice versa.

You can selectively calculate 'distance' based on the people you are furthest away from. That's why when I said north Indian you now default to "no that's not true because of Uttar Pradesh JFL."

You are related to Indians. Just admit this. I do. It's not even an admission to me. It's just the way it is. I don't care about genetics as much as you. After all you did a genetic test because you cared so much.

 

[Gengar]

I FUCKING WILL, BUT NOT WITHOUT A LAMBO. THAT'S WHY IM ABOUT TO TAKE THE ENTIRE WORLD RN

I cannot wait to see you, brother. You're a good dude.

 

[warmth]

Where are you basing this genetic data from? Sounds selective. Whether you like it or not there are people in Pakistan who have a deeper genetic relationship with ethnicities in India like Punjabs and the same is true vice versa.

You can selectively calculate 'distance' based on the people you are furthest away from. That's why when I said north Indian you now default to "no that's not true because of Uttar Pradesh JFL."

You are related to Indians. Just admit this. I do. It's not even an admission to me. It's just the way it is. I don't care about genetics as much as you. After all you did a genetic test because you cared so much.

NOT READING THAT ESSAY BRO GO TAME A CAMEL OR SUM

 

[warmth]

I cannot wait to see you, brother. You're a good dude.

ILL BE THERE EVENTUALLY WHEN THIS WAR STOPS IMA VISIT THE ENTIRE WEST EUROPE

 

[SecularIslamist]

NOT READING THAT ESSAY BRO GO TAME A CAMEL OR SUM

I'm not a sandnigger you retard. At least tell me to go fish.

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

The fuck is this bullshit ?? Curries are so damn narcy they literally derail threads to debate who's curry and who's not

 

[warmth]

I'm not a sandnigger you retard. At least tell me to go fish.

THERE ARE ONLY SLAVICS AND THE REST
AND TO ME YOU ARE THE REST
NOT THAT IM RACIST THO
JUST NOT READING THAT ESSAY

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Good thread OP, all the forum heavyweights normally dont engage in these mog battles but you enticed them into engaging

 

[warmth]

Good thread OP, all the forum heavyweights normally dont engage in these mog battles but you enticed them into engaging

YOU CHOOSE THE CORRECT WORD BECAUSE ONLY OBESE 14YOS DISCUSS WHOS FORUM MEMBER IS MORE HANDSOME

 

[Manchild_v2]

Well you are making a stupid retarded claim to claim that. I hope you do t in real life it sounds almost as bad as Iranians.

View attachment 3719798

Send me these "academic papers" where they consider west Asians, north Africans and Europeans as one race. Meanwhile they consider Pakistan as intermediate between south Asia (codeword for India) and West Asia.

Nearly all of them ? Nafris are a little bit more different due to their ancestral saharan ancestry but West Asians and Europeans are genetically on the exact same genetic continuum. The fringes of Western Eurasian races, like a Baltic person and a Gulf Arab is still more similar than is a Sri Lankan and a regular Pakistani

Notice how there is gigantic spread between South Asia while Middle East and Europe are clumped up together very neatly.

Central Asians are not used in this sample, the East Asians are entirely Koreans, costal Chinese and Japanese

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

YOU CHOOSE THE CORRECT WORD BECAUSE ONLY OBESE 14YOS DISCUSS WHOS FORUM MEMBER IS MORE HANDSOME

Nah this thread turned into who is Pajeet and who is not now it turned into a different thing. South Asians really be tweaking when it comes to claiming superiority amongst each other

 

[warmth]

Nearly all of them ? Nafris are a little bit more different due to their ancestral saharan ancestry but West Asians and Europeans are genetically on the exact same genetic continuum. The fringes of Western Eurasian races, like a Baltic person and a Gulf Arab is still more similar than is a Sri Lankan and a regular Pakistani

Notice how there is gigantic spread between South Asia while Middle East and Europe are clumped up together very neatly.
View attachment 3719814

Central Asians are not used in this sample, the East Asians are entirely Koreans, costal Chinese and Japanese

HERES THE ONLY GRAPH YOU NEED UNC

 

[Manchild_v2]

HERES THE ONLY GRAPH YOU NEED UNC

View attachment 3719821

Im schooling a random self hating bangladeshi in london on his race/history instead of fucking a stacy on friday night.

brutal

 

[FastBananaCEO]

Really strange that he decided to namedrop salludon like that in the one clip.

 

[AuraMaxxing]

Even Clav admitted Salludon mogs him, he is just clip farming and it clearly worked.

 

[SecularIslamist]

Nearly all of them ? Nafris are a little bit more different due to their ancestral saharan ancestry but West Asians and Europeans are genetically on the exact same genetic continuum. The fringes of Western Eurasian races, like a Baltic person and a Gulf Arab is still more similar than is a Sri Lankan and a regular Pakistani

Holy fuk bro you are so far up the euro asshole. Go tell a normal non-autistic person Baltic people are closer to gulf Arab than a Pakistani to a Sri Lankan. Both comparisions are far apart but this level of coping and how close you are to Eurasians is peak inferiority. The last thing I would expect from a Cuban commie.

Notice how there is gigantic spread between South Asia while Middle East and Europe are clumped up together very neatly.
View attachment 3719814

So my question remains why don't you want to acknowledge south Asian races and ethnicities answer relation to euros, but so willing to when it comes to middle easterners and nafris?

 

[Gengar]

Where are you basing this genetic data from? Sounds selective. Whether you like it or not there are people in Pakistan who have a deeper genetic relationship with ethnicities in India like Punjabs and the same is true vice versa.

You can selectively calculate 'distance' based on the people you are furthest away from. That's why when I said north Indian you now default to "no that's not true because of Uttar Pradesh JFL."

You are related to Indians. Just admit this. I do. It's not even an admission to me. It's just the way it is. I don't care about genetics as much as you. After all you did a genetic test because you cared so much.

I can't post a screenshot atm because of the snipping tool being a dick, but when it functions normally again I can send it in PMs or whatever.

I have not calculated these numbers myself, I added my genetic file and they compared it to the genetic files of all the other ethnic groups for which there is data of.

I only selected a handful of Indian groups and two that weren't Indian (Baloch & Lahore Punjabi), just to give you an idea.

 

[Gengar]

Nah this thread turned into who is Pajeet and who is not now it turned into a different thing. South Asians really be tweaking when it comes to claiming superiority amongst each other

I'm just dispelling myths and copes using scientific data.

 

[Gengar]

I'm not a sandnigger you retard. At least tell me to go fish.

Don't call him a retard, faggot! Go fish.

 

[warmth]

I'm just dispelling myths and copes using scientific data.

is there casino in nethelrand

 

[Gengar]

Im schooling a random self hating bangladeshi in london on his race/history instead of fucking a stacy on friday night.

brutal

You deserve a Turkish HTB unlike that self-hating Bangladeshi.