The Greek gods are ugly

meltmylungs_

meltmylungs_

absolutely blackpilled
Joined
Oct 21, 2025
Posts
590
Reputation
286
The bros seriously consider them the gold standard. A literal warrior skull, where the nose immediately meets the forehead, looks terrible; I don't understand why anyone considers it beautiful. A slight indentation in the bridge of the nose has always been ideal. I've never seen a single person on whom a warrior skull looks harmonious.

Look at these recessed niggas, the first one even had his dick fall off. Not only their jaws are recessed, but also their penises, just imagine. They need dickfort 3 to push their penis forward

Italy 3104   Apollo 5378415112
Venus de Milo Louvre Ma399 n6


Here is a true Greek god:

Picsart 26 01 15 18 01 17 679
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BeanCelll, AestheticsHell and CaZaDor
Screenshot 20260115 181441 Chrome

Wait until this nigga hears about the dickpill
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: alchqmy, BeanCelll, BlackFag and 4 others
dont know what u are talking about, I find them attractive anyway

and ur edit just looks out of plase, brother. whats the point of comparing the ideal of beauty between BC and the present day in that way? you were raised in the modern world and you are more accustomed to seeing modern standards of beauty, its no surprise
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, BlackFag and bibisilover41
cherry picking the worst
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and Maladie du siècle
dont know what u are talking about, I find them attractive anyway

and ur edit just looks out of plase, brother. whats the point of comparing the ideal of beauty between BC and the present day in that way? you were raised in the modern world and you are more accustomed to seeing modern standards of beauty, its no surprise
They may be attractive, but to hold their skulls up as the gold standard, the most beautiful and ideal, is nonsense (isn't that what people do when they compare their profiles to theirs?). They're recessive, and their noses look bad. And as for standards, I'm firmly convinced that standards have always been the same. The post was made mostly as a joke, of course they are cool, but their jaw development leaves much to be desired
 
They may be attractive, but to hold their skulls up as the gold standard, the most beautiful and ideal, is nonsense (isn't that what people do when they compare their profiles to theirs?). They're recessive, and their noses look bad. And as for standards, I'm firmly convinced that standards have always been the same
bro, their ideal face was plump and round, had a straight line from the nose to the forehead and so on.
They calculated the proportions for the statues of their Gods based on their phenotype, and for some reason not a single God has a snub nose, small eyes and a huge jaw. maybe because that was the standard at the time?
Why is there not a single statue in any ancient culture with a snub nose, a huge jaw and sunken cheeks?
the first one even had his dick fall off.
Many Greeks wrote about the ideal traits of males and big penises were seen as vulgar and a sign of stupidity :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
The bros seriously consider them the gold standard. A literal warrior skull, where the nose immediately meets the forehead, looks terrible; I don't understand why anyone considers it beautiful. A slight indentation in the bridge of the nose has always been ideal. I've never seen a single person on whom a warrior skull looks harmonious.

Look at these recessed niggas, the first one even had his dick fall off. Not only their jaws are recessed, but also their penises, just imagine. They need dickfort 3 to push their penis forward

View attachment 4542322View attachment 4542324

Here is a true Greek god:

View attachment 4542335
nigga have you heard of looksflation?
a sub 3 of 2026 ad
was HTN of BC
:feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and Maladie du siècle
the funny thing is that there are greek people with this exact facial structure and they MOG
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and Maladie du siècle
nigga have you heard of looksflation?
a sub 3 of 2026 ad
was HTN of BC
:feelskek:
a real Greek God (with whom the emperor fell in love and deified him because of ihis beauty) vs a modern pic of a "Greek God" :lul:

I don't argue, the second man is also handsome, but he is not at all of the ancient Greek phenotype, hes modern. And this nigga thinks, that "standards have always been the same":lul::lul::lul:
 

Attachments

  • f5c708a2e2820ff6c83d170ca5f79c67.jpg
    f5c708a2e2820ff6c83d170ca5f79c67.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 0
  • b0e644fd9d81143bb26df1541c817e4c.jpg
    b0e644fd9d81143bb26df1541c817e4c.jpg
    109.7 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and BlackFag
the funny thing is that there are greek people with this exact facial structure and they MOG
they obviously mog the monster the OP made out of the Venus de Milo statue :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and NoExit
@Maladie du siècle

Bro, I could write the whole thing out here right now, but I'm too lazy. I'll just say one thing: it simply can't be that people with recession were the standard. It's simply illogical: why would nature give humans the opportunity to grow even further if recession is considered beautiful? Complete nonsense. There could be many explanations: you said it yourself, they relied on proportions (most likely the golden ratio), but the golden ratio, when it comes to the face, doesn't always mean beauty. Either they didn't yet know that a face could be recessionary and thought what they were creating was ideal. Or they were simply completely confused. I refuse to accept that such standards existed back then; the logic breaks down. And the god you tossed aside is certainly not ugly, but his jaw is far from ideal. His nose is too long and big; it clearly looks disharmonious.
 
a real Greek God (with whom the emperor fell in love and deified him because of ihis beauty) vs a modern pic of a "Greek God" :lul:

I don't argue, the second man is also handsome, but he is not at all of the ancient Greek phenotype, hes modern. And this nigga thinks, that "standards have always been the same":lul::lul::lul:
I wonder why it is that throughout history, there have been varying standards of beauty (one of which is recessed jaws and the big noses of gods), while in 2026, optimally developed jaws with sharp gonial angles became the most beautiful, when nature has allowed the human face to develop this way throughout human history? If beauty standards are so fickle, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder, why are we all trying so hard to improve our appearance to meet these standards? Because no one invented them; they're ingrained in biology. By this logic, if standards are fickle, there's no need to improve your appearance; you can simply remain a recessive faggot with a negative cantal, for example, then win a girl over through charisma, date her for a month, and she'll start to think you're very beautiful because her standards will change in her mind from being with you for so long. But that doesn't happen, and even a year from now she'll tell her friends she fell in love with you not for your looks but for your intelligence, etc., and she still won't think you're beautiful. You see confirmation of the objectivity and permanence of beauty every day. There's no point in you being on this forum if you think otherwise, because people here are trying to approximate biological standards. Just go and stay the same, hoping that standards will change, bro. I literally didn't get these arguments from anywhere, I just voiced the first thing that came to mind. Your arguments are crumbling before your eyes
 
Last edited:
I wonder why it is that throughout history, there have been varying standards of beauty (one of which is recessed jaws and the big noses of gods), while in 2026, optimally developed jaws with sharp gonial angles became the most beautiful, when nature has allowed the human face to develop this way throughout human history? If beauty standards are so fickle, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder, why are we all trying so hard to improve our appearance to meet these standards? Because no one invented them; they're ingrained in biology. By this logic, if standards are fickle, there's no need to improve your appearance; you can simply remain a recessive faggot with a negative cantal, for example, then win a girl over through charisma, date her for a month, and she'll start to think you're very beautiful because her standards will change in her mind from being with you for so long. But that doesn't happen, and even a year from now she'll tell her friends she fell in love with you not for your looks but for your intelligence, etc., and she still won't think you're beautiful. You see confirmation of the objectivity and permanence of beauty every day. There's no point in you being on this forum if you think otherwise, because people here are trying to approximate biological standards. Just go and stay the same, hoping that standards will change, bro. Your arguments are crumbling before your eyes
I dont think that people dont need to change, It's just that the example with the ancient Greek Gods was inappropriate for me, since we are looking at the ideals of our time and striving for them, how can we, people from 21st century, judge their looks and ideals? we never were there, brother

Im sorry for sounding rude, Im just a big fan of the Greek Gods and seeing such a thread was very strange to me :forcedsmile: we have seen different information and have different opinions, so there is no point in arguing. that happens
 
@Maladie du siècle

Don't take it so personally, bro, the Greek gods are cool, I just wanted to say that their cranial development is far from ideal to be used as a gold standard, in a crude manner as joke. Nothing against them tbh
 
AINT no way you just said Greek gods AINT attractive theres no fucking way someone can be that stupid and disconnected from reality holy fuck your a absolute idiot dude instead of rotting on org how about go to fucking school you idiot
The bros seriously consider them the gold standard. A literal warrior skull, where the nose immediately meets the forehead, looks terrible; I don't understand why anyone considers it beautiful. A slight indentation in the bridge of the nose has always been ideal. I've never seen a single person on whom a warrior skull looks harmonious.

Look at these recessed niggas, the first one even had his dick fall off. Not only their jaws are recessed, but also their penises, just imagine. They need dickfort 3 to push their penis forward

View attachment 4542322View attachment 4542324

Here is a true Greek god:

View attachment 4542335
 

Similar threads

BrrBrrPatapimTralle
Discussion Asian traits
Replies
17
Views
554
BrrBrrPatapimTralle
BrrBrrPatapimTralle
asdvek
Replies
27
Views
2K
avant69420
avant69420
JackThePslDemon
Replies
8
Views
628
JackThePslDemon
JackThePslDemon
gintoki sataka
Replies
18
Views
567
gintoki sataka
gintoki sataka
Celibataire
Replies
87
Views
3K
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top