The Problem With The Decile Scale’s Tiers

[thecel]

The 1–10 Loox Scale​
1 – 1.9̅​ Truecel​ 2 – 2.9̅​ Incel​ 3 – 3.9̅​ Nearcel / Incellite / Semicel / Incelish​ 4 – 4.9̅​ Low-Tier Normie / Melvin​ 5 – 5.9̅​ Mid-Tier Normie / Tanner​ 6 – 6.9̅​ High-Tier Normie / Brad​ 7 – 7.9̅​ Chadlite​ 8 – 8.9̅​ Low-Tier Chad​ 9 – 9.9̅​ High-Tier Chad​ 10​ Gigachad​

The Problem

The “default” numbers of looks tiers are at the bottom of their respective ranges. For example, the Chadlite value is 7/10, but the Chadlite range is 7 to 7.9̅. Tiers’ default numbers don’t reflect their centers. The middle of the Chadlite range is 7.5, but 7/10 is stated as the Chadlite proper. A man rated 7.75 is a Chadlite, and a man rated 6.75 is a high-tier normie, even though 7.75 is way further from the 7.0 Chadlite mark than 6.75 is.

You could say this isn’t an issue because it’s just rounding down to the nearest integer. But there is a big issue. The middle of the mid-tier normie range is 5.5, but 5 is designated as the population mean of the 1–10 scale. Therefore, the scale’s aesthetic center doesn’t line up with its statistical center.

5/10 = statistical looks average
5.5/10 = center of the attractiveness spectrum, neutral
​

​

​

The Solution

The 1–10 system has been in use since the beginnings of humans rating things, and the tiers of 1–10 looks have been defined the way they currently are since the beginnings of the incelosphere. As people are so used to the current tiers, adjusting the categorizations by shifting each of their ranges downward half a point wouldn’t catch on. It’d be too much work for people. I think a good solution is to just move our idea of the average looks level from a 5 to a 5.5.

Move the mark of average upward 0.5
Current: the average man is 5/10
New: the average man is 5.5/10


​

Thoughts?

---

Semicel

Semicel or Failed normie is a synonym of the phrase incelish person who on the decile scale are roughly a 3-4.

incels.wiki

 

[volcelfatcel]

The 1–10 Loox Scale

1 – 1.9̅	Truecel
2 – 2.9̅	Incel
3 – 3.9̅	Nearcel / Incellite / Semicel / Incelish
4 – 4.9̅	Low-Tier Normie / Melvin
5 – 5.9̅	Mid-Tier Normie / Tanner
6 – 6.9̅	High-Tier Normie / Brad
7 – 7.9̅	Chadlite
8 – 8.9̅	Low-Tier Chad
9 – 9.9̅	High-Tier Chad
10	@thecel - gigachang

 

[Deleted member 13197]

Good idea

 

[Deleted member 6892]

not adjusting im used to it

 

[bernanddrago]

Good thread

 

[court monarch777]

it is not a relevant change

 

[SadLivwr]

Didnt Grimba already make a thread about this?? @thecel

 

[thecel]

Didnt Grimba already make a thread about this?? @thecel

Link? I can’t find one by @Grimba, but I know about this one by @Selinity:

The Problem With Rating Male Attractiveness | Why The 1-10 'Looks Scale' Is Flawed

-Wheat Waffles YT The 1-10 scale that we have been using in heavily flawed. In this post I will be going over my main critisisms of this manner of appraising male aesthetics, and in the end offering a better way of measuring your attractiveness. Inconsistent Numbers 🔢 You would assume that the...

looksmax.org

My response to @Selinity’s loose vagina tier thread (which is also a response to Wheat Waffles’s video as the thread’s content is taken from it) is pending.

The Problem With Rating Male Attractiveness | Why The 'PSL Scale' Is Flawed

The 'PSL system' is the widely used rating system on looksmaxxing forums in appraising male attractiveness. This model of rating beauty is based on the 'population distribution model,' which if you haven't seen before, looks something like this: This model of appraising attractiveness--although...

looksmax.org

^This thread is better than his critique about the 1–10 scale

 

[SadLivwr]

Link? I can’t find one by @Grimba, but I know about this one by @Selinity:

The Problem With Rating Male Attractiveness | Why The 1-10 'Looks Scale' Is Flawed

-Wheat Waffles YT The 1-10 scale that we have been using in heavily flawed. In this post I will be going over my main critisisms of this manner of appraising male aesthetics, and in the end offering a better way of measuring your attractiveness. Inconsistent Numbers 🔢 You would assume that the...

looksmax.org

My response to @Selinity’s loose vagina tier thread (which is also a response to Wheat Waffles’s video as the thread’s content is taken from it) is pending.

The Problem With Rating Male Attractiveness | Why The 'PSL Scale' Is Flawed

The 'PSL system' is the widely used rating system on looksmaxxing forums in appraising male attractiveness. This model of rating beauty is based on the 'population distribution model,' which if you haven't seen before, looks something like this: This model of appraising attractiveness--although...

looksmax.org

^This thread is better than his critique about the 1–10 scale

Rating Attractiveness IRL (Men)

Men Non-Competing People who put no effort into there appearance (acne, overweight, poor posture, bad haircut) or people who have very bad failos. It's irrelevant to rate people in this zone because they usually have no interest in dating or would have 0 success in dating. Competing...

looksmax.org

yours is more detailed i guess, but personally his one is more comprehensive tbh

 

[thecel]

Rating Attractiveness IRL (Men)

Men Non-Competing People who put no effort into there appearance (acne, overweight, poor posture, bad haircut) or people who have very bad failos. It's irrelevant to rate people in this zone because they usually have no interest in dating or would have 0 success in dating. Competing...

looksmax.org

yours is more detailed i guess, but personally his one is more comprehensive tbh

Thx 4 da link to a high-IQ thread by @Grimba

 

[thecel]

b