The science of looksmaxxing - ONLY HIGH IQ

Vvx16

Vvx16

shiloh dynasty enjoyer
Joined
Dec 26, 2024
Posts
490
Reputation
443
PART OF THIS WAS TRANSLATED WITH A AI POWERED TRANSLATOR CUZ I WROTE THIS IN MY MAIN LANGUAGE, ANY AI-LIKE SYNTAX IS BC OF THAT.

This is only for high iq and high effort chads. This may be the start of a new era or just a bunch of DNR. But lets talk about the science of looksmaxxing.


MUSIC



What is looksmaxxing? Self improvement? hit the gym is looksmaxxing then, same with women makeup. Is that looksmaxxing?

Lets take a look at the definition of wikipedia:

is an online self-improvement practice from the manosphere[1] focused on maximizing one's physical attractiveness. The term is a neologism which was coined on incel[2] message boards in the 2010s


Whether you agree with the definition or not, you know perfectly well that this forum and this movement go beyond ratings and going to the gym; the difference is clear: a “gymbro” and a “looksmaxxer” aren’t the same thing—one focuses on the gym, and the other on the big picture. Is it a philosophy? A lifestyle?


If you think about it, incel ideologies and looksmaxxing are rooted in evolutionary biology and some anthropology. Hypergamy traces back to Bateman, building on Darwin’s earlier work—and that’s how science is built.


On this forum—the largest in the movement—we have people discussing evolutionary biology and how human sexual relationships work, based on studies and literature (which is exactly what an evolutionary biologist does).


We also have people who conduct research on nootropics (although there’s a subreddit for that—it’s not Looksmaxx, as you know)—which is also what a neuroscientist or someone studying neurochemistry would do.


We have people who study the endocrine system, cycles, testosterone, etc. (this is what an endocrinologist does).


We have people who are dedicated to rating others and understanding facial symmetry (this is aesthetics, a branch of philosophy).


It’s a lot to ask for 100 people to come together, with different areas of specialization in looksmaxing, but sharing the same philosophy.

Imagine being able to log into this forum and see experts who spend their free time studying symmetry and ratings—and explain it to you—the same goes for evolution or nootropics. That would be awesome. Instead of having questions scattered all over the place, off-topic posts, or just random nonsense, imagine the next level of Looksmaxx. Some high-IQ Blackpillers started this; it’s time for others with high IQs to take it to the next level. LET’S TALK ABOUT THE SCIENCE OF LOOKSMAXX.

Let’s imagine the 100 people out of the more than 200k logged-in accounts. Let’s imagine these 100 people with different goals—some focused on facial symmetry and ratings, others on evolutionary biology and anthropology, others on nootropics, and so on.
You might say, “That’s just how it’s done—everyone posts what they’re looking for, and that’s it.” Is there a comprehensive guide to nootropics? There might be one on BOTB, but they’re scattered, outdated, or missing the full picture—because it’s just one person, not four working together.


This is a multidisciplinary field; looksmaxxing encompasses almost all areas of biology and psychology. We can optimize how we learn much more effectively—instead of having to read Bateman and Trivers from the beginning and correlate their work with studies to figure out if the black pill or red pill is right for me—why isn’t the forum structured more formally? That would be much more effective.


How do I do a cycle? It depends on what you want. Some have had to research diets and cycles, but they still don’t have time to learn how facial surgeries or biochemistry work—and you want to take your IQ a little further than where it is now. Why not turn this into a science or formalize it?


There are morons talking about gay people or who’s the “PSL God of the Year.” Seriously, who gives a damn?


Is it possible to start a movement like this? Where a group of people from the community dedicates themselves to different fields and organizes itself—figuring out what to learn, what to take, and which surgeries work for each case. Something serious and structured, for people who really want to learn. We’d be able to cover more fields over time—we’d learn evolutionary biology, anthropology, facial surgery, cycles, neurochemistry, etc.

Let me know if is possible, if someone is interested or if im just delusional, but it will be a better way to ascend, we could ascend in alot of fields, not only roids and facial surgery.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SA889
Idk man doesn't seem much to me
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vvx16
Idk man doesn't seem much to me
if u want to do real research on nootropics u would not spend that in other fields, if we build a guide with serious research u would be able to understand exactly what to take, an so on.
 
if u want to do real research on nootropics u would not spend that in other fields, if we build a guide with serious research u would be able to understand exactly what to take, an so on.
Nootropics aren't niche dude, look up senolytics and fetal stem cells, neurotechnology isn't a new thing and so is biohacking lmfao
 
Nootropics aren't niche dude, look up senolytics and fetal stem cells, neurotechnology isn't a new thing and so is biohacking lmfao
I never say is a nich thing, quote that affirmation from any of my threads.

U are not saying the big picture, how many ppl belive that a bimax is almost 100% necessary or that bonesmashing grown bones? We can formalize this, we already have a forum to discuss why don't have a group of ppl that can research in different areas and have a insane base, instead of spending money on face IQ why don't build a community of symmetry and rating, why don't do the same with facial surgery. We would be able to Maxx much more faster and in different ways. There is so much noise about everything
 

Similar threads

O
Replies
47
Views
267
Azie555
Azie555
E
Replies
12
Views
67
frauder424
frauder424
O
Replies
5
Views
70
futurechadlites
futurechadlites
Kojo
Replies
31
Views
300
Dolorous
Dolorous
Azi.org
Replies
7
Views
72
ltnwhiteboy
ltnwhiteboy

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top