The Unbiased Rating System (Smartcels GTFIH)

[Deleted member 5467]

Advice, I want to create a more accurate rating system that is unbiased on race and pheno, and more so focused on facial features and bones.

using measurements from

Ideal facial ratios and proportions

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+ measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper...

looksmax.org

and measuring forward growth from facial plane method

https://looksmax.org/threads/measuring-forward-growth.139722/#post-2375225

Requirements
1. Low Body Fat Percentage. Able to see Facial Features (10-12%)
2. Well lit photo with minimal lens distortion [Front & Profile] (50mm and above)

Total Possible Points = 25
Take your photos, Get your measurements, then take your total points and divide by 2.5 = True Rating

• (2 points) FWHR (facial width to height ratio) - 1.8+
• (1 point) Lower/full face ratio - 0.62+
• (1 point) IPD (inter pupillary distance) - (average)
• (1 point) ESR (eye separation ratio) - 0.45 - 0.47
• (1 point) EME (eye mouth eye) angle - 47°- 50°
• (1 point) PFL (Palpebral fissure length) - (average is ok)
• (1 point) Palpebral fissure length to height ratio - 3 - 3.5
• (1 point) Bizygomatic to Bigonial width - 1.35
• (1 point) Midface ratio - 1 - 1.1
• (2 points) PCT (positive canthal tilt) - 4° - 6°
• (2 points) Mouth to nose ratio - 1.5 - 1.62
• (2 points) Lower to upper lip ratio - 1.62
• (2 points) Chin to Philtrum ratio - 2 - 2.5
• (1 point) Forehead height - 3 fingers or equal to other thirds
• (1 point) Balanced Facial Thirds - ⅓ of face length
• (1 point) Balanced Facial Fifths - ⅕ of ear to ear width
• (2 points) Forward Growth
• (1 point) Gonial Angle - 115° - 130°
• (1 point) Cervicomental Angle - 105° - 120° (double chins exceed 120°)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

 

[Deleted member 2506]

what autism am i witnessing?

the only accurate scale is:

ur either invisible,

the invisibility glitches sometimes and turns off,

or ur visible

thats it

 

[Deleted member 5467]

what autism am i witnessing?

the only accurate scale is:

ur either invisible,

the invisibility glitches sometimes and turns off,

or ur visible

thats it

PSL scale is too basic, plus this could apply to females as well

 

[Deleted member 2506]

PSL scale is too basic, plus this could apply to females as well

every female above 3/10 is visible 24/7

60% of guys are invisible, 30% it glitches on and off, 10% are visible

 

[Deleted member 5467]

every female above 3/10 is visible 24/7

60% of guys are invisible, 30% it glitches on and off, 10% are visible

You have no way of knowing those numbers are accurate. There should be a more objective way to determine beauty

 

[Deleted member 2506]

You have no way of knowing those numbers are accurate. There should be a more objective way to determine beauty

it will never be as autistic and complicated as u think

only sexual market value matters

factor in ripped bodies, social skills, etc etc etc

too many factors at play, the simpler the better

 

[Deleted member 5467]

it will never be as autistic and complicated as u think

only sexual market value matters

factor in ripped bodies, social skills, etc etc etc

too many factors at play, the simpler the better

this is purely face, not smv

 

[thecel]

I got 3.2