THE WHITE MAN IS STILL EXPLOITING AND COLONIZING AFRICA TO THIS DAY, THIS IS THE REASON WHY AFRICA IS SO POOR

[Wallenberg]

Watch the videos, european leaders are exploiting africa by instaaling corrupt leaders that will sell them africa's resources for cheap causing africa to be unstable and corrupt.
Meanwhile asia was given loans and support by the west
Countries like Japan, korea, china, thailand and central asia were also never colonized by foreign powers

Singapore and Hong Kong were colonies yet they are rich developed countries.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Russian women have a lower life expectancy than women in the 1st world.

It is only 5 years lower then the USA...

Not saying Russia is some amazing place but its going alright in the future it will probably be better off then many places in Western Europe. Russia is doing much better then the 90's I expect their life expectancy for the generations born post USSR to be much better. There are many reports that the population grew 2 inches in height the generation preceding the USSR

 

[Wallenberg]

It is only 5 years lower then the USA...

Not saying Russia is some amazing place but its going alright in the future it will probably be better off then many places in Western Europe. Russia is doing much better then the 90's I expect their life expectancy for the generations born post USSR to be much better. There are many reports that the population grew 2 inches in height the generation preceding the USSR

And the US has lowest life expectancy in 1st world...

Russia wont be doing better than any place in western Europe lol. There's a reason why Russians emigrate yet westerners don't immigrated to Russia.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Watch the videos, european leaders are exploiting africa by instaaling corrupt leaders that will sell them africa's resources for cheap causing africa to be unstable and corrupt.
Meanwhile asia was given loans and support by the west
Countries like Japan, korea, china, thailand and central asia were also never colonized by foreign powers

Yeah Africa had a bad hand but so did every country. Britain literally got 2 in 3 Chinese men addicted to Opioids so they could have an edge in Asia. Then used India to grow the drugs and sold them to China to gain influence.

When the Chinese government tried killing these drug traffickers (which was justified) the UK went to war with various other countries and toppled the government basically leading to a situation where China could not get rid of the drug addiction was dependent on the West

This addiction did not go away until the latter half of the 20th century the communists simply killed all the addicts. China got a horrible deal and look where they are today. You can easily see trends on this some countries despite their hardships always rise up. China has always been an intelligent sophisticated society and rose up. Japan rose up after WW2 Germany rose up after WW2 all these nations were leveled to bricks and are still major players today.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

And the US has lowest life expectancy in 1st world...

Russia wont be doing better than any place in western Europe lol. There's a reason why Russians emigrate yet westerners don't immigrated to Russia.

Western Europe doesn't have much room less the grow and they have been America's lapdog for the past 70 years.

Russia has made so much progress in just 20 years the one big issue they have is they need more young people. Russia will never become a world power like it was but for sure it will be a major player

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Singapore and Hong Kong were colonies yet they are rich developed countries.

Biggest reason is IQ sadly people don't want to admit it. If a society has an average IQ below 90 then it will struggle to become anything great.

 

[Deleted member 19997]

Biggest reason is IQ sadly people don't want to admit it. If a society has an average IQ below 90 then it will struggle to become anything great.

Things can change for the better.

Iodization of salt and better infant nutrition has a key role in improving the quality of infant brains. It is called the Flynn effect.

Current Indian IQ is 82, and India only started to consume Iodised salt in 1990s also while decreasing infant malnutrition (which is reflected in IMR).

With proper nutrition, potential average Indian IQ is likely 95. It will take until the end of this century to achieve these public health goals though.

 

[Deleted member 17311]

Biggest reason is IQ sadly people don't want to admit it. If a society has an average IQ below 90 then it will struggle to become anything great.

Read my post, european and asian IQs were subhuman too and vastly increased once they start developing and improving their standards of living

 

[Deleted member 17311]

Yeah Africa had a bad hand but so did every country. Britain literally got 2 in 3 Chinese men addicted to Opioids so they could have an edge in Asia. Then used India to grow the drugs and sold them to China to gain influence.

When the Chinese government tried killing these drug traffickers (which was justified) the UK went to war with various other countries and toppled the government basically leading to a situation where China could not get rid of the drug addiction was dependent on the West

This addiction did not go away until the latter half of the 20th century the communists simply killed all the addicts. China got a horrible deal and look where they are today. You can easily see trends on this some countries despite their hardships always rise up. China has always been an intelligent sophisticated society and rose up. Japan rose up after WW2 Germany rose up after WW2 all these nations were leveled to bricks and are still major players today.

Its cause the west invested heavily in those countries instead of exploting and installing corrupt dictator pawns

 

[Deleted member 17311]

Singapore and Hong Kong were colonies yet they are rich developed countries.

Those are literally island city nations who was used as trading ports and major economical hubs for the british, of course they would be rich and successful.

 

[Deleted member 19997]

Read my post, european and asian IQs were subhuman too and vastly increased once they start developing and improving their standards of living

European IQs have been dropping for decades. It might be due to breakdown of monogamy in Europe, leading to a dysgenic effect.

Flynn effect in stable monogamous Asian societies has shown no sign of slowing down.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Things can change for the better.

Iodization of salt and better infant nutrition has a key role in improving the quality of infant brains. It is called the Flynn effect.

Current Indian IQ is 82, and India only started to consume Iodised salt in 1990s also while decreasing infant malnutrition (which is reflected in IMR).

With proper nutrition, potential average Indian IQ is likely 95. It will take until the end of this century to achieve these public health goals though.

African Americans are still 85 on average... Even when they do adopted studied the difference is 15 IQ points between White's

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Its cause the west invested heavily in those countries instead of exploting and installing corrupt dictator pawns

Why would you invest in Africa long term? Investors rightfully understand the benefits only exist in the short term. No one is going to invest in the human capital of a country where the average person will not be able to read properly

Read my post, european and asian IQs were subhuman too and vastly increased once they start developing and improving their standards of living

Why is this not the case with African Americans? They live in a 1st world nation

 

[Deleted member 17311]

Why would you invest in Africa long term? Investors rightfully understand the benefits only exist in the short term. No one is going to invest in the human capital of a country where the average person will not be able to read properly

Why is this not the case with African Americans? They live in a 1st world nation

Africa is a shithole due to foreign powers installing corrupt dictators that exploit their resources selling it to western powers for cheap and keeping the cash in their wallets instead of spending it on the african people and improving their standard of living. Whenever an african leader tries to save africa from exploitation from foreign powers they always get assassinated.

IQ scores clearly respond to changes in the environment. IQ scores, for example, have risen dramatically throughout the world since the 1930s. In America, 82 percent of those who took the Stanford-Binet test in 1978 scored above the 1932 average for individuals of the same age. The average black did about as well on the Stanford-Binet test in 1978 as the average white did in 1932.

when black or mixed-race children are raised in stable and middle high-income rather unstable low-income homes, their pre-adolescent test scores rise dramatically. These adoptees’ scores seem to fall in adolescence, but this could easily be because their social and cultural environment comes to resemble that of other black teenagers.

 

[Deleted member 17311]

no there not
No one is doing anything for free

Yeah I was wrong ngl
Its also a form of neocolonialism

 

[isis_Bleach]

View attachment 1777945
View attachment 1777946
View attachment 1777947
View attachment 1777948

DESPITE AFRICA BEING THE MOST RESOURCE-RICH CONTINENT IN THE WHOLE WORLD, IT IS STILL VERY POOR, WHY? BECAUSE OF EXPLOITATION FROM THE WHITE MAN STILL TO THIS DAY, THE WHITE MAN DOES NOT WANT AFRICANS TO SUCCEED AND PROSPER, INSTEAD THEY WANT AFRICA TO BE A CORRUPT 3RD WORLD SHITHOLE SO THAT THEY CAN EXPLOIT THE RESOURCES MORE AND GET LOTS OF MONEY FROM IT. 1/3RD OF FRANCE'S LIGHT BULBS ARE LIT UP BY NIGERIEN URANIUM DESPITE NIGER HAVING ONE OF THE LOWEST ELECTRICITY RATES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA ONLY ONE IN SEVEN NIGERIENS HAVE ACCESS TO MODERN ELECTRICITY SERVICES, AND JUST FOUR! (4) PERCENT OF RURAL RESIDENTS HAVE ACCESS THROUGH THE NATIONAL UTILITY. EVERY LEADER THAT TRIES TO UNITE AFRICA AND SAVE IT FROM EXPLOITATION/COLONIALISM GETS EXECUTED AND LABELLED AS A "EVIL DICTATOR". PRIME EXAMPLE OF THIS WOULD BE MUAMMAR GADDAFI. INB4 RACIST CUCKS BLAME THE STATE OF AFRICA DUE TO MUH LOW IQ, IQ IS A MEME. AFRICAN IQ's WILL STEADILY RISE JUST LIKE WHITE AND ASIAN IQ's DID, CHECK OUT THIS GRAPH. ASIANS USED TO HAVE SUBHUMAN-TIER IQ BEFORE MODERNIZATION, BUT THEIR IQ SKYROCKETED AS THEIR STANDARD OF LIVING INCREASED.

@Wallenberg
@GypsyEyes
@PrinceLuenLeoncur
@Racky

big water
how else will crackers support themselves without stealing from niggers

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Africa is a shithole due to foreign powers installing corrupt dictators that exploit their resources selling it to western powers for cheap and keeping the cash in their wallets instead of spending it on the african people and improving their standard of living. Whenever an african leader tries to save africa from exploitation from foreign powers they always get assassinated.

IQ scores clearly respond to changes in the environment. IQ scores, for example, have risen dramatically throughout the world since the 1930s. In America, 82 percent of those who took the Stanford-Binet test in 1978 scored above the 1932 average for individuals of the same age. The average black did about as well on the Stanford-Binet test in 1978 as the average white did in 1932.

when black or mixed-race children are raised in stable and middle high-income rather unstable low-income homes, their pre-adolescent test scores rise dramatically. These adoptees’ scores seem to fall in adolescence, but this could easily be because their social and cultural environment comes to resemble that of other black teenagers.

This all seems like cope. Not saying you don't have merit in your claims Africa is taken advantage of for sure but these things aren't ever zero sum two things can be true at the same time. Africa is poor/taken advantage of and its IQ ranges are below the Western and Asian world.

This says nothing about your IQ or other Africans but averages do define a society if it were truly circumstantial there would be at least a handful of successful black societies on a large scale. You would be able to find a city in the USA or a few black countries that proved this wrong. But the truth is there aren't any organic black societies like this.

 

[Deleted member 17311]

This all seems like cope. Not saying you don't have merit in your claims Africa is taken advantage of for sure but these things aren't ever zero sum two things can be true at the same time. Africa is poor/taken advantage of and its IQ ranges are below the Western and Asian world.

This says nothing about your IQ or other Africans but averages do define a society if it were truly circumstantial there would be at least a handful of successful black societies on a large scale. You would be able to find a city in the USA or a few black countries that proved this wrong. But the truth is there aren't any organic black societies like this.

Africans arent low IQ

Humans can’t determine iq since we barely know anything about about the brain and second

that map is based on richard lynns data and he used literal disabled people from a isolated tribe for a nations IQ stat this fucker has been critiqued ruthlessly. Here is a enviromental alternative here is 3 factors.

When black or mixed-race children are raised in white rather than black homes, their preadolescent test scores rise dramatically. Black adoptees’ scores seem to fall in adolescence, but this is what we would expect if, as seems likely, their social and cultural environment comes to resemble that of other black adolescents and becomes less like that of the average white adolescent. 4 —Even nonverbal IQ scores are sensitive to environmental change. Scores on nonverbal IQ tests have risen dramatically throughout the world since the 1930s.5The average white scored higher on theStanford-Binet in 1978 than 82 percent of whites who took the test in 1932.6 Such findings reinforce the implications of adoption studies: large environmental changes can have a large impact on test performance. —Black-white differences in academic achievement have also narrowed throughout the twentieth century. The best trend data come from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), which has been testing seventeen-year-olds since 1971 and has repeated many of the same items year after year. Figure 1-2 shows that the black-white reading gap narrowed from 1.25 standard deviations in 1971 to 0.69 standard deviations in 1996. The math gap fell from 1.33 to 0.89 standard deviations.7 When MinHsiung Huang and Robert Hauser analyzed vocabulary scores for adults born between 1909 and 1969, the black-white gap also narrowed by half. In a country as racially polarized as the United States, no single change taken in isolation could possibly eliminate the entire legacy of slavery and Jim Crow or usher in an era of full racial equality

puerto rico are about 60 percent white there IQ is about 92 roughly and yet they are just as unemployed as SSA almost so nearly white folks are about as unemployed just about as full class blacks it would appear it's not

Nigerians are the most successful ethnic group on america along with east asians with the highest household incomes

 

[Deleted member 19997]

Africans arent low IQ

Humans can’t determine iq since we barely know anything about about the brain and second

that map is based on richard lynns data and he used literal disabled people from a isolated tribe for a nations IQ stat this fucker has been critiqued ruthlessly. Here is a enviromental alternative here is 3 factors.

When black or mixed-race children are raised in white rather than black homes, their preadolescent test scores rise dramatically. Black adoptees’ scores seem to fall in adolescence, but this is what we would expect if, as seems likely, their social and cultural environment comes to resemble that of other black adolescents and becomes less like that of the average white adolescent. 4 —Even nonverbal IQ scores are sensitive to environmental change. Scores on nonverbal IQ tests have risen dramatically throughout the world since the 1930s.5The average white scored higher on theStanford-Binet in 1978 than 82 percent of whites who took the test in 1932.6 Such findings reinforce the implications of adoption studies: large environmental changes can have a large impact on test performance. —Black-white differences in academic achievement have also narrowed throughout the twentieth century. The best trend data come from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), which has been testing seventeen-year-olds since 1971 and has repeated many of the same items year after year. Figure 1-2 shows that the black-white reading gap narrowed from 1.25 standard deviations in 1971 to 0.69 standard deviations in 1996. The math gap fell from 1.33 to 0.89 standard deviations.7 When MinHsiung Huang and Robert Hauser analyzed vocabulary scores for adults born between 1909 and 1969, the black-white gap also narrowed by half. In a country as racially polarized as the United States, no single change taken in isolation could possibly eliminate the entire legacy of slavery and Jim Crow or usher in an era of full racial equality

puerto rico are about 60 percent white there IQ is about 92 roughly and yet they are just as unemployed as SSA almost so nearly white folks are about as unemployed just about as full class blacks it would appear it's not

Nigerians are the most successful ethnic group on america along with east asians with the highest household incomes

I have to call you out on that one.


The gap between blacks and whites has stayed constant or widening

ACT Scores by Race:
Year White Black Asian
2009 22.2 16.9 23.2
2010 22.3 16.9 23.4
2011 22.4 17.0 23.6
2012 22.4 17.0 23.6
2013 22.2 16.9 23.5
2014 22.3 17.0 23.5
2015 22.4 17.1 23.9

Source: ACT, Inc.
~~~~~~~
Black-White SAT Score Gap by Year:
Year White Black Gap
1985 1038 839 199
1990 1031 849 185
1996 1052 857 195
2000 1060 859 201
2005 1061 863 197
2010 1063 855 208
2015 1047 846 201
(Source: U.S. Dept. of Education, 2016)

Fast Facts: SAT scores (171)

The NCES Fast Facts Tool provides quick answers to many education questions (National Center for Education Statistics). Get answers on Early Childhood Education, Elementary and Secondary Education and Higher Education here.

nces.ed.gov

The SAT correlates with an IQ test at 0.86, almost the same as an IQ test correlates with itself. For this reason, we can very reliably take SAT scores and convert them to IQ scores.
In the 20 year period from 1994-2014 the Black-White difference increased on both the verbal and math SATs. On the reading test, it rose from .91 to .96 standard deviations. On the math test, it rose from .95 to 1.03 standard deviations.
In 2015 only 15% of Blacks scored 1550 or higher, the threshold the College Board calls the "college and career readiness" level.
In fact, the truncated nature of the SAT math score distribution suggests that these race gaps would be even larger given a harder exam with a bigger score variance. Note for example how the black score distribution is cut off at the bottom while the Asian score distribution is cut off at the top. That suggests that a redesigned exam might feature even more pronounced race gaps.
Percent by Race Reaching the SAT College and Career Readiness Benchmark:
15% = Black
24% = Non-White Hispanic
35% = Native American
53% = White
56% = Asian
Source: The College Board, 2014
New York Times, 2003:
Large-scale meta-analyses by researchers at the University of Minnesota have found that SAT performance is as good of a predictor of overall college grade point average as it is of freshman grade point average, and Vanderbilt researchers David Lubinski and Camilla Benbow have documented that the SAT predicts life outcomes well beyond the college years, including income and occupational achievements.
Furthermore, the SAT is largely a measure of general intelligence. Scores on the SAT correlate very highly with scores on standardized tests of intelligence, and like IQ scores, are stable across time and not easily increased through training, coaching, or practice. SAT preparation courses appear to work, but the gains are small — on average, no more than about 20 points per section.
Vanderbilt University researchers tracked the educational and occupational accomplishments of more than 2,000 people who as part of a youth talent search scored in the top 1 percent on the SAT by the age of 13. Scores on the SAT correlate so highly with I.Q. that they are described as a "thinly disguised" intelligence test. The remarkable finding of their study is that, compared with the participants who were "only" in the 99.1 percentile for intellectual ability at age 12, those who were in the 99.9 percentile — the profoundly gifted — were between three and five times more likely to go on to earn a doctorate, secure a patent, publish an article in a scientific journal or publish a literary work. A high level of intellectual ability gives you an enormous real-world advantage.
The Widening Racial Scoring Gap on the SAT College Admissions Test
"The racial scoring gap on the SAT test has now become wider than has been the case for the past two decades. Many believe that in the years to come the gap may grow smaller, not because blacks are catching up to whites in educational achievement, but rather because the test makers are adding a writing component to the test that may be manipulated to lessen racial differences and therefore reduce public criticisms of the test.
If we eliminate Asians and other minorities from the calculations and compare only Blacks and Whites, we find that 0.2 percent of all Black test takers scored 750 or above on the verbal SAT compared to 2.2 percent of all White test takers. Thus, Whites were 11 times as likely as Blacks to score 750 or above on the verbal portion of the test. Overall, there were 49 times as many Whites as Blacks who scored at or above the 750 level.
On the math SAT, only 0.16 percent of all Black test takers scored 750 or above compared to 1.8 percent of White test takers. Thus, Whites were more than 11 times as likely as Blacks to score 750 or above on the math SAT. Overall, there were more than 61 times as many Whites as Blacks who scored 750 or above on the math section of the SAT.
In a race-neutral competition for the approximately 50,000 places for first-year students at the nation's 25 top-ranked universities, high-scoring Blacks would be buried by a huge mountain of high-scoring non-Black students. Today, under prevailing affirmative action admissions policies, there are about 3,000 Black first-year students matriculating at these 25 high-ranking universities, about 6 percent of all first-year students at these institutions. But if these schools operated under a strict race-neutral admissions policy where SAT scores were the most important qualifying yardstick, these universities could fill their freshman classes almost exclusively with students who score at the very top of the SAT scoring scale. As shown previously, Black students make up at best between 1 and 2 percent of these high-scoring groups."

The Widening Racial Scoring Gap on the SAT College Admissions Test

The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education is dedicated to the conscientious investigation of the status and prospects for African Americans in higher education.

www.jbhe.com

#
Blacks and Whites with Equal Educational Attainment Differ in Cognitive Ability
Black and White Americans with the same formal level of education differ significantly in their cognitive abilities. Specifically, within any given level of formal education Whites consistently outperform Blacks. Moreover, this effect is so strong that Blacks often underperform Whites who have lower levels of formal education than they do.
Consider the following data from the General Social Survey. This public data is frequently used in social science research and contains a test of verbal intelligence as well as measurements of participant’s self-identified race and highest educational degree obtained. Verbal intelligence tests correlate at around .75 with full-scale IQ and so this data can also be taken as a fair measure of intelligence in general (Lynn, 1998). If we set the White mean score on this test to 100 and the standard deviation to 15, we can come up with an "IQ" style scale.
As can be seen, using this method Blacks with a graduate degree have a level of verbal intelligence indistinguishable from that of Whites with a junior college degree. Blacks with a four-year degree are roughly on par with Whites who never went to college at all.
IQ BY RACE AND HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED (1972 - 2014):
Highest Degree White IQ Black IQ Gap
High School Drop-out: 89 82 7
High School Diploma 98 90 8
Junior College Degree 102 95 7
Bachelor's Degree 108 100 8
Graduate Degree 113 102 11

This data is consistent with evidence from the National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS) which administered tests of cognitive ability to 26,000 US adults in 1992. These tests were designed to measure how well people could take information and use it in a way which would help them function in modern society.
~~~~~~~
Blacks are such poor academic achievers that the National Achievement Scholarship Program was created with lower standards for Black candidates only, instead of the National Merit Scholarship Program which is open to everyone else.
THE SMARTEST STUDENTS: The National Merit Scholarship Program was founded to identify and honor scholastically talented American youth and to encourage them to develop their abilities to the fullest.
BLACK STUDENTS ONLY: The National Achievement Scholarship Program was initiated specifically to identify academically promising Black American youth and encourage their pursuit of higher education.
They are both measured on the PSAT.
Minimum score for National Achievement: 190
Minimum score for National Merit: 220
Roughly, PSAT x 10 = SAT (out of 2400)

​

0

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Jfl if you believe a word of this. Niggers sabotage themselves on the daily. Whenever they got their power back they sold their people out to the highest bidder.

It's amazing that it's only black people who consistently fail and make excuses.

This.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

View attachment 1777945
View attachment 1777946
View attachment 1777947
View attachment 1777948

DESPITE AFRICA BEING THE MOST RESOURCE-RICH CONTINENT IN THE WHOLE WORLD, IT IS STILL VERY POOR, WHY? BECAUSE OF EXPLOITATION FROM THE WHITE MAN STILL TO THIS DAY, THE WHITE MAN DOES NOT WANT AFRICANS TO SUCCEED AND PROSPER, INSTEAD THEY WANT AFRICA TO BE A CORRUPT 3RD WORLD SHITHOLE SO THAT THEY CAN EXPLOIT THE RESOURCES MORE AND GET LOTS OF MONEY FROM IT. 1/3RD OF FRANCE'S LIGHT BULBS ARE LIT UP BY NIGERIEN URANIUM DESPITE NIGER HAVING ONE OF THE LOWEST ELECTRICITY RATES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA ONLY ONE IN SEVEN NIGERIENS HAVE ACCESS TO MODERN ELECTRICITY SERVICES, AND JUST FOUR! (4) PERCENT OF RURAL RESIDENTS HAVE ACCESS THROUGH THE NATIONAL UTILITY. EVERY LEADER THAT TRIES TO UNITE AFRICA AND SAVE IT FROM EXPLOITATION/COLONIALISM GETS EXECUTED AND LABELLED AS A "EVIL DICTATOR". PRIME EXAMPLE OF THIS WOULD BE MUAMMAR GADDAFI. INB4 RACIST CUCKS BLAME THE STATE OF AFRICA DUE TO MUH LOW IQ, IQ IS A MEME. AFRICAN IQ's WILL STEADILY RISE JUST LIKE WHITE AND ASIAN IQ's DID, CHECK OUT THIS GRAPH. ASIANS USED TO HAVE SUBHUMAN-TIER IQ BEFORE MODERNIZATION, BUT THEIR IQ SKYROCKETED AS THEIR STANDARD OF LIVING INCREASED.

@Wallenberg
@GypsyEyes
@PrinceLuenLeoncur
@Racky

Ugh... the "MuH rESourCeS" cope again. I had this African guy tell me this and I cringed.

The only resource that can make a country rich nowadays is oil.
Besides that, a nations' main (and stable) asset is science, technology, population (for now), entrepreneurship and data.
Microsoft and Google is worth more than the continent, and 90% of their business is software.

They aren't successful because they can't manage their own nations. The value of resources isn't static. Aluminum used to be more valuable then gold, now people throw that stuff away w/o care. Gold could be rendered useless by space mining this century. Diamonds can be made in labs. Population and the labor force can be rendered useless by robots and artificial intelligence.

I believe these nations have a very finite time until they have NOTHING to offer the "developed world" which made it past the finish line before the timer goes out, and when that timer does, it's game over for any non-develop country (when the deadline arrives) because they can't make anything the world wants. We're talking like the deadline may be before 2050 kind of finite.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Then would you say africa has the stronger culture? since africans and arabs literally enslaved and conquered europe for much longer, enslaved more people and made it more barbaric.

Africans, conquering Europe?
The Arabs almost conquered Europe but got stopped at the Battle of Tours but AFRICANS??????