There are no stacies.

Damn fogger women that arent whores are quite rare
She graduated last week. She's in a LTR, but is going to a different college than her bf. I should go to her college and sweep her up...
 
"aesthetics" are subjective
 
  • +1
Reactions: jessepinkman
This used to be my oneitis in high school. She kinda aged a lil bit, but still wifey material.
View attachment 2529148
IMG 0082
 
I got brutally blackpilled by @deadmanwalking who said no girls are foggers and as I searched up actresses in order to disprove him I realized none of them were that attractive. Not sure if this is a dopamine fry that will wear off in 24 hours or if girls just are not that attractive. Want to disprove me? Post a stacy. I can guarantee you their faces are mediocre as fuck. Only feminine behaviour is attractive but no woman truly looks great. Most are ugly and some are alright.

This holds true for all species.
When it comes to other species, males appear flamboyant and 'beautiful”, and  females appear drab by comparison. Why do human beings invert that  evolutionary pattern? - Quora'beautiful”, and  females appear drab by comparison. Why do human beings invert that  evolutionary pattern? - Quora
Female vs Male in their species SS - iFunny
View attachment 2529129
This might genuinely be some of the most IQ-deficient shit I have ever read, like holy shit I could bonesmash enough to develop severe traumatic brain injury and I’d still think you’re retarded
 
This might genuinely be some of the most IQ-deficient shit I have ever read, like holy shit I could bonesmash enough to develop severe traumatic brain injury and I’d still think you’re retarded
Good counter, unfortunately lacks substance and goes into Ad Hominem folder.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003
I think it depends.
But a large appeal for women is their body and hairstyle also.
 
Stacy is a feeling, whereas Chad can be a measurement if you have a rule and protractor. This is because of the colossal imbalance in sex-drive between each sex.

All women are Stacys is the policy I have adopted, because all women are treated like Stacy. The difference in treatment between a plain looking woman and a woman who is more feminine is nowhere near as gigantic a difference as an average looking man and Chad.

When I hear woman / women / girl /girls it means Stacy. Personally I don't even picture any certain woman in my head because they are all so close in attractiveness that even the idea of a woman is Stacy.

I suggested that there could be a distinction between the words good looking and attractive where good looking referred to how closely a human's bone structure (or form of face and body to be more encompassing) conforms to an ideal or set of ideal bone structures and size, and where attractive means strictly the feeling. Like then you would know if I say, Tess Holiday is not good looking, but I am attracted to her, the meaning would be clear. @HarrierDuBois This distinction allows me to state that
Most women are not good looking. All women are attractive regardless.
This I believe is what you're trying to assert. But it's hard to do so without first making this crucial distinction.

Further statements can be made too like
Most men are not good looking. The men who are good looking are the few attractive men.
Which is deductively saying that women are attracted to a very narrow set of features.
 
  • +1
Reactions: hattrick and Deleted member 21716
Cope, it's not about sexual attraction. I'm straight but no women are attractive. It's only my reproduction calling but aesthetically they are mid.
Far in the closet
 
"Stacies" are nothing more then high tier beckies with makeup, fillers, lighting and hourglass shaped bodies.No such thing as a 10/10 person...

Stacy is a feeling, whereas Chad can be a measurement if you have a rule and protractor. This is because of the colossal imbalance in sex-drive between each sex.

All women are Stacys is the policy I have adopted, because all women are treated like Stacy. The difference in treatment between a plain looking woman and a woman who is more feminine is nowhere near as gigantic a difference as an average looking man and Chad.

When I hear woman / women / girl /girls it means Stacy. Personally I don't even picture any certain woman in my head because they are all so close in attractiveness that even the idea of a woman is Stacy.

I suggested that there could be a distinction between the words good looking and attractive where good looking referred to how closely a human's bone structure (or form of face and body to be more encompassing) conforms to an ideal or set of ideal bone structures and size, and where attractive means strictly the feeling. Like then you would know if I say, Tess Holiday is not good looking, but I am attracted to her, the meaning would be clear. @HarrierDuBois This distinction allows me to state that
Most women are not good looking. All women are attractive regardless.
This I believe is what you're trying to assert. But it's hard to do so without first making this crucial distinction.

Further statements can be made too like
Most men are not good looking. The men who are good looking are the few attractive men.
Which is deductively saying that women are attracted to a very narrow set of features.
Everyday I come on here to let myself know there are people doing worse than me
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2122.jpeg
    IMG_2122.jpeg
    83.7 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2121.jpeg
    IMG_2121.jpeg
    198.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2120.jpeg
    IMG_2120.jpeg
    77.6 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2119.jpeg
    IMG_2119.jpeg
    125 KB · Views: 0
In prehistoric times bigger and stronger men with hypermasculine face would be attractive to women and they would be shorter and weaker than they are now. Just remember gorillas and roosters.

When females are more dominant in societies, they tend to look at colorful and flashy males, apart of stronger and taller. Just remember peacocks, baboons and bonobos.

But when males choose the females they would look like goddesses, that's why chimpanzees and humans have bigger tits and bigger hips women.
 
I got brutally blackpilled by @deadmanwalking who said no girls are foggers and as I searched up actresses in order to disprove him I realized none of them were that attractive. Not sure if this is a dopamine fry that will wear off in 24 hours or if girls just are not that attractive. Want to disprove me? Post a stacy. I can guarantee you their faces are mediocre as fuck. Only feminine behaviour is attractive but no woman truly looks great. Most are ugly and some are alright.

This holds true for all species.
When it comes to other species, males appear flamboyant and 'beautiful”, and  females appear drab by comparison. Why do human beings invert that  evolutionary pattern? - Quora'beautiful”, and  females appear drab by comparison. Why do human beings invert that  evolutionary pattern? - Quora
Female vs Male in their species SS - iFunny
View attachment 2529129
dnrd faggot
 
Lot of girls are beautiful like her

RussianAryanFogger



But more are ugly sadly, but 3000 years ago average girl had giga forward maxilla and high estrogen

In face i agree its more rare to see a beautiful girl in modern times, but if we look at body most are rapefuel still
 
Lot of girls are beautiful like her

View attachment 3023551


But more are ugly sadly, but 3000 years ago average girl had giga forward maxilla and high estrogen

In face i agree its more rare to see a beautiful girl in modern times, but if we look at body most are rapefuel still
women are far less masculine than they were in the primal times

actually women in the primal times were far more masculine than in civilization

also women's skulls have not changed as dramatically as mens

women relatively have similar sized skulls as they did in the past
 
Last edited:
Idk man but some women literally fog
 
Thoughts?
1720635601480
1720635932020
  2024 07 10  233028
 
  • JFL
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
humans are actually birds theory
 
I would argue therr are more stacies than chads
Retarded thread
madison beer has weird body failo

plus surgerymaxxed, uncanny valley aah foid
 
Last edited:
Proceeds to post one of the best looking women that still looks like shit unfrauded. Can't make this up.


There are way more chads than stacies.
insane subhuman cope
 
@HarrierDuBois go fap to chico and sean opry nigga, that is the only thing you like to do
 
The lion and the lioness are looksmatched

The male just has mane halo

View attachment 2529164

My main response to this thread:

This is half true. Women have the ability to look utterly insane with makeup (the gl ones). But every single day we’re used to seeing them wearing it, so it has become the standard, therefore skewing our judgement. It’s basically a sociological and biological phenomenon where the bar for female beauty has been raised and there’s no going back.

If we went back to a time where there was no makeup, this thought would have never even popped in your head. You would see an attractive woman and your brain would get it. The reproductive process of the species literally relies on this lol.

If you never had running water, you wouldn’t complain about having to go to the river to shower. It’s about perspective.
Don't agree. Was in Vienna and less than 10% of girls there wore any makeup at all. They didn't look better or worse, just less tryhard.
 
Don't agree. Was in Vienna and less than 10% of girls there wore any makeup at all. They didn't look better or worse, just less tryhard.
How do you even know if they looked better or worse? For that you would need to see the same person with and without to see if it actually changed something
 
How do you even know if they looked better or worse? For that you would need to see the same person with and without to see if it actually changed something
Judging off of the average population in respective city there was no difference that was large enough to say that "the bar has gone up and skewed our perception" unless you'd insinuate Vienna just has a higher baseline - then more cities would have to be tested to narrow it down.
 
Judging off of the average population in respective city there was no difference that was large enough to say that "the bar has gone up and skewed our perception" unless you'd insinuate Vienna just has a higher baseline - then more cities would have to be tested to narrow it down.
It's pretty water that well applied makeup (not too much) will ascend any foid, unless she's already 99.9 percentile in both contrast and skin quality, which is extremely rare. All the pinterest girls you post are wearing it, to some extent.
 
It's pretty water that well applied makeup (not too much) will ascend any foid, unless she's already 99.9 percentile in both contrast and skin quality, which is extremely rare. All the pinterest girls you post are wearing it, to some extent.
Don't expose my late night habits to the world bhai....
shy snow white GIF
 
  • JFL
Reactions: DelonLover1999
If we took off the makeup of all women we would see who really are the pretty ones.
For me this one is pretty, she doesn't have to be a Stacy just pleasant to look at:
Images   2024 08 06T221808939

She's probably MTB unfrauded but she still looks feminine
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
16
Views
591
Hernan
Hernan
turneywest
Replies
208
Views
6K
robtical
robtical
Gaygymmaxx
Replies
71
Views
2K
Iraniancel
Iraniancel
0hMan
Replies
62
Views
3K
Haseeb
Haseeb

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top