kanderior
Luminary
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2023
- Posts
- 5,537
- Reputation
- 8,482
When it comes to muscles and SMV, this is bad:
this is better,
this is great,
and this is bad
when it comes to body fat and SMV, this is bad
this is better,
this is great,
and this is bad
yet there's this common attitude here that for height the sky's limit and there's no such thing as too tall for women, even though studies are clear that women have a preference for a minimum height difference, but also a maximum one, and in every country there's a clear optimum with regard to SMV (for example 6'2 in the US, 6'1 according to some studies). Plus it's understood with all the other SMV factors that it's about balance and harmony. For example some people have described Chico's face as "the perfect average". Why not apply the logic from the above examples to this spectrum too:
this is better,
this is great,
and this is bad
when it comes to body fat and SMV, this is bad
this is better,
this is great,
and this is bad
yet there's this common attitude here that for height the sky's limit and there's no such thing as too tall for women, even though studies are clear that women have a preference for a minimum height difference, but also a maximum one, and in every country there's a clear optimum with regard to SMV (for example 6'2 in the US, 6'1 according to some studies). Plus it's understood with all the other SMV factors that it's about balance and harmony. For example some people have described Chico's face as "the perfect average". Why not apply the logic from the above examples to this spectrum too:
