What are your political views?

What are your political views?


  • Total voters
    85
  • Poll closed .
@n0rthface Ok, I'm gonna answer your essay.

With guns, just like the state does it/would do it.

Their parents lol, they would earn enough money with their jobs to support their kids and if not there would be other caregivers.

Modern technology. For example, nuclear power instead of coal. And of course people would sue other people/corporations/groups if they pollute their place(s).

Everyone who wants to freely live among a state-like community could do it. The only difference to now would be that people would have a choice.

Then why is Mexico not invaded by the U.S., Belgium not invaded by Germany, Uruguay not invaded by Brazil. Your argument would mean "Become the strongest military power in the world or you will be conquered and plundered."
 
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel and AlexAP
inshallah

(I am the only one here who is unironically pro sharia)
Didn't you say Allah can't see inside the house?
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel, goat2x and sytyl
@n0rthface Ok, I'm gonna answer your essay.

With guns, just like the state does it/would do it.

Their parents lol, they would earn enough money with their jobs to support their kids and if not there would be other caregivers.

Modern technology. For example, nuclear power instead of coal. And of course people would sue other people/corporations/groups if they pollute their place(s).

Everyone who wants to freely live among a state-like community could do it. The only difference to now would be that people would have a choice.

Then why is Mexico not invaded by the U.S., Belgium not invaded by Germany, Uruguay not invaded by Brazil. Your argument would mean "Become the strongest military power in the world or you will be conquered and plundered."
1.the most expensive thing for a comoany is genrally labour and immigrants are genrally cheaper so your first point sucks

2. Irresponsible parents exist and want money

3. With no oversight.

5. Its cheaper to trade but if a place isent unified and have alot of resources its just easier to take it
 
@n0rthface
Ind
13721
Ind1
 
  • WTF
  • Ugh..
Reactions: n0rthface and Enfant terrible
1.the most expensive thing for a comoany is genrally labour and immigrants are genrally cheaper so your first point sucks
It was about immigrants who are a danger to the society, I have nothing against peaceful immigrants.
2. Irresponsible parents exist and want money
I doubt that anyone would sell their kids to slavery jfl, but if there are some parents their kids should be taken away fromt them by the police.
3. With no oversight.
What point were you referring to?
5. Its cheaper to trade but if a place isent unified and have alot of resources its just easier to take it
The existence of war means every small country is in danger if a big country attacks them. The only solution is to live among communities who don't do this. Poland was annexed many times in its history despite having an army, now it can exist as its neighbors accept their sovereignity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: hebbewem
It was about immigrants who are a danger to the society, I have nothing against peaceful immigrants.

I doubt that anyone would sell their kids to slavery jfl, but if there are some parents their kids should be taken away fromt them by the police.

What point were you referring to?

The existence of war means every small country is in danger if a big country attacks them. The only solution is to live among communities who don't do this. Poland was annexed many times in its history despite having an army, now it can exist as its neighbors accept their sovereignity.
Good points
 
  • +1
Reactions: AlexAP
“With guns, just like the state does it/would do it.”
not everyone would agree on this though, some people will want immigrants. One town that lives near the boarder might want to bring immigrants in, while the next town won’t, you need ideological consistency and rules which is impossible without a state.

“Their parents lol, they would earn enough money with their jobs to support their kids and if not there would be other caregivers.”

parents never stopped their kids from doing in 200 years ago, when it was rampant. If theirs no strict rules people will do it.
Also what’s ensuring the parents get paid well?
A capitalist could just pay them pennies and gain more profit…they’d be nothing stopping him from doing it, even if people got angry he could hire mercenaries to guard him.

“Modern technology. For example, nuclear power instead of coal. And of course people would sue other people/corporations/groups if they pollute their place(s).”

there’s no guarantee that this will happen, people will choose they cheapest more cost effective route Which rn is coal. There’s no state stopping a corporation from dumping their trash into lakes and wooded areas.

How could you even sue someone in this world?
Is there a 3rd party that ensures the debt is paid?
:unsure:
If someone is wealthy enough they could just build an army and say “fuck off”. You cant sue bullets m8

“Everyone who wants to freely live among a state-like community could do it. The only difference to now would be that people would have a choice.”

what gives the masses the authority to choose? Most people are mentally retarded fools that only care about simple things.

most often, people choose the path of least resistance. When given the power to choose, people will pick the wrong choose, if it leads to short term gratification rather than what’s best for the world etc.

“Then why is Mexico not invaded by the U.S., Belgium not invaded by Germany”

this has happened in past lol, I imagine if Mexico fell into complete anarchy America would invade.
 


my political views
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AlexAP
Where is CCP
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AlexAP
“With guns, just like the state does it/would do it.”
not everyone would agree on this though, some people will want immigrants. One town that lives near the boarder might want to bring immigrants in, while the next town won’t, you need ideological consistency and rules which is impossible without a state.
Come on, communities can have their own rules.
“Their parents lol, they would earn enough money with their jobs to support their kids and if not there would be other caregivers.”

parents never stopped their kids from doing in 200 years ago, when it was rampant. If theirs no strict rules people will do it.
Also what’s ensuring the parents get paid well?
A capitalist could just pay them pennies and gain more profit…they’d be nothing stopping him from doing it, even if people got angry he could hire mercenaries to guard him.
When parents did this 200 years ago it was because they needed it to survive. Today we are in an industrialized society and parents don't need child labor to survive.

Workers will get paid because that's how the labor market (and every market) works, supply and demand, meaning workers with higher skills will be paid more etc. The competition won't allow to pay them pennies as they could change their employer. JFL at mercenaries, workers will leave when they aren't getting paid.
“Modern technology. For example, nuclear power instead of coal. And of course people would sue other people/corporations/groups if they pollute their place(s).”

there’s no guarantee that this will happen, people will choose they cheapest more cost effective route Which rn is coal. There’s no state stopping a corporation from dumping their trash into lakes and wooded areas.

How could you even sue someone in this world?
Is there a 3rd party that ensures the debt is paid?
:unsure:
If someone is wealthy enough they could just build an army and say “fuck off”. You cant sue bullets m8
There's nothing inherently bad about coal, it provides millions with energy which is a good thing, but nuclear power can become better and more efficient in future.

There will be courts and police and you can sue people who break the rules. Private courts for corporations exist already today.

Everyone can built an army and take over, but this just won't happen. Corporations aren't inherently good, but 99,99% want to make money, not conquer land. The latter is for political ideologues like the Taliban.
“Everyone who wants to freely live among a state-like community could do it. The only difference to now would be that people would have a choice.”

what gives the masses the authority to choose? Most people are mentally retarded fools that only care about simple things.

most often, people choose the path of least resistance. When given the power to choose, people will pick the wrong choose, if it leads to short term gratification rather than what’s best for the world etc.
Everyone has to live with their chocie. It's the same in todays world isn't it?
“Then why is Mexico not invaded by the U.S., Belgium not invaded by Germany”

this has happened in past lol, I imagine if Mexico fell into complete anarchy America would invade.
Exactly. Every country can be conquered by a stronger country. There is never safety from that. Not in this system and not in any other.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15099
I think society will collapse in the future and we will be able to form new societies.
 
btw self employed sleep schedule
a privilege only a few have
 
  • +1
Reactions: AlexAP
btw self employed sleep schedule
a privilege only a few have
Yeah, it's weird sometimes but I get always enough sleep (at least 7 hours) and gym (the only place I go regularly) is always open.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Enfant terrible
left anarchist but disagree with modern anarchist and leftists on a lot so idk
 
Looksmaxxing > Politics/Coping w politics
 
  • +1
Reactions: AlexAP
Yes, following politics is just a hobby, looksmaxing is more important in life.
used to care a lot about politics when I was younger, don't really care now
 
  • +1
Reactions: AlexAP
Yes, following politics is just a hobby, looksmaxing is more important in life
It’s a good hobby to engage in alongside interests you have. Like I hold interest in the Abortion debate (firmly Pro-life) But I won’t cope and say laws against it in anyway stop them (that’s where the coping w politics comes into play)
 
Remember that high IQ africancel was anarcho-libertarian.
Afri
 
politics are gay asf
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AlexAP
I am in favour of absolute lawlessness. Everything else is cope.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15099 and thecel
I agree tbh. High IQ = incel trait.

Anything within centre left - centre right is a low IQ normie/chad trait. You have no critical opinions on society or the world and just take the opinions you are told to have.

You can, have strong-polarizing opinions about different issues and about different aspects/pros/cons of the issues and these views average to a moderate/centrist stance overall.
 
Last edited:
Proud ancap
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 16369
neoliberal centrist

generally more left wing on social issues and more right wing on economic issues
 
Most important poll on this forum and I miss it jfl
 
Screenshot 20211218 164824 Chrome


All of these users be like:
1571686318958
 
Torn between national socialism and hyper darwinistic capitalism
 

Similar threads

EdgeLord69
Replies
74
Views
952
mogstars
mogstars
<6PSLcel
Replies
2
Views
65
dantemaxxing
dantemaxxing
i_love_roosters
Replies
22
Views
348
Funnyunenjoyer1
Funnyunenjoyer1
BullyofAlphaBitches
Replies
1
Views
168
Maalik
Maalik
imabetanumale
Replies
3
Views
67
imabetanumale
imabetanumale

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top