anemo
I’m what eve saw
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2025
- Posts
- 2,575
- Reputation
- 1,477
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Just an absolute insane ideology. So you think all of the Eucharistic miracles which were studied in labs by atheist and could not be explained in anyway was man made?Stories made by men to explain the universe
Christianity is a belief, not a truth. It is an internalized truth within humans but not an universal truth. Just as I can believe in the Lord God I can believe in any other god that humans have fabricated to explain the things around them that they couldn't explain due to a lack of understandingJust an absolute insane ideology. So you think all of the Eucharistic miracles which were studied in labs by atheist and could not be explained in anyway was man made?![]()
No where, there has been multiple.where did all the miracles go when cameras were invented
what are some good modern day miracle examplesNo where, there has been multiple.
Ok ill get to that later, but you just completely pivoted from my point.Christianity is a belief, not a truth. It is an internalized truth within humans but not an universal truth. Just as I can believe in the Lord God I can believe in any other god that humans have fabricated to explain the things around them that they couldn't explain due to a lack of understanding
Eucharistic miracles. look them up.what are some good modern day miracle examples
There are hoardes of proof for many religions. Everything is an invention in our heads, a story to give sense and order to our worldOk ill get to that later, but you just completely pivoted from my point.
Lol? give me some "proofs" for muslims then.There are hoardes of proof for many religions. Everything is an invention in our heads, a story to give sense and order to our world
quite literally isthere's no evidence of any miracles
showquite literally is
provide itquite literally is
even if miracles did exist it couldnt be easily attributed to the Christian god , would not the one an only god make himself known ? after all miracles happen in every religion and cult, i can easily say that im god and that i did it but i wont any more because im testing humanity or attribute it to allah, buddha. etc.where did all the miracles go when cameras were invented
hopefully this is coherenteven if miracles did exist it couldnt be easily attributed to the Christian god , would not the one an only god make himself known ? after all miracles happen in every religion and cult, i can easily say that im god and that i did it but i wont any more because im testing humanity or attribute it to allah, buddha. etc.
i could easily as well say that an aesthetic god did for their own entertainment but you get the point
Muhammed (avdol) was a real person who created real world effects. During his life he was claimed to talk to angels and perform miracles. Many people converted to his faith while avdol was still alive. Shouldn't that be proof enough that there was something he did that convinced people to convert?Lol? give me some "proofs" for muslims then.
https://www.miracolieucaristici.org/en/liste/list.html read through this, it shows the evidence etcshow
eucharistic miracles.There are no documented miracles my guy
are u retarded? in what way is this evidence of the muslim faith. the catholic church has real miracles in this century that were studied lol.Muhammed (avdol) was a real person who created real world effects. During his life he was claimed to talk to angels and perform miracles. Many people converted to his faith while avdol was still alive. Shouldn't that be proof enough that there was something he did that convinced people to convert?
im not going to argue against that seems reasonable from a non-nuanced viewpointeucharistic miracles.
This is not evidence lol.https://www.miracolieucaristici.org/en/liste/list.html read through this, it shows the evidence etc
No, ive just studied enough to where it makes wayy too much sense to not be true. not only that ive experienced miracles first hand.im not going to argue against that seems reasonable from a non-nuanced viewpoint
other than that why defend this positionn dearly?
is it just eucharistic miracles that convince you?
your anecdotal proof is insufficient to justify your claimNo, ive just studied enough to where it makes wayy too much sense to not be true. not only that ive experienced miracles first hand.
Okay but nobody is saying that finding human tissue under a microscope automatically proves a miracle. The argument is cumulative: you have a consecrated Eucharistic host, a documented history surrounding the event, physical material that is subsequently found to be human tissue, scientific testing identifying what that tissue is, and the question of whether fraud, contamination, or some other natural explanation actually accounts for the entire set of facts.This is not evidence lol.
I mean, it is, but it's not evidence for a miracle. There's real scientific studies tied to eucharistic 'miracles' but the studies show what a sample is and not that a miracle caused it to be the sample.
To establish a miracle, you'd need evidence that the material was ORIGINALLY ordinary bread, and then it transformed human tissue, and that natural explanations were ruled out. The scientific investigations don't establish that. So there is evidence of unusual physical findings, but not scientific evidence that a supernatural christian miracle occurred.
The relic can contain human tissue and there's no way to know what caused that. For all we know someone could've put it there.
This is the case with all 'christian miracles'. It's all word of mouth and so called 'connecting the dots' but there's no real evidence tied to them.
You asked me specifically, i told you my reasons lol?your anecdotal proof is insufficient to justify your claim
coming back to your eucharist miracles claim though documented there is a lack of controlled scientific evidence/arent scientifically documented, there is the problem of confirmation bias of course the Catholic CHURCH is going to say those are miracles
fair mbYou asked me specifically, i told you my reasons lol?
Shut the fuck up you probably didn’t even readNo, ive just studied enough to where it makes wayy too much sense to not be true. not only that ive experienced miracles first hand.
Saying of course the catholic church says its a miracle isnt a argument against the evidence.your anecdotal proof is insufficient to justify your claim
coming back to your eucharist miracles claim though documented there is a lack of controlled scientific evidence/arent scientifically documented, there is the problem of confirmation bias of course the Catholic CHURCH is going to say those are miracles
@ICXCLuvr
Okay?Shut the fuck up you probably didn’t even read
agreed, i am however arguing that the evidence provided needs to establish the supernatural claim rather than just just saying soomething unusual happened therefore godSaying of course the catholic church says its a miracle isnt a argument against the evidence.
Low iq ignorant slop.What miracles nigga there’s none that happen u believe in some bullshit god for ur whole life js to realize nothing happens after death jfl i js dont know how u can still believe in this stuff after all u experienced
Calling me low iq when u believe in god is crazy dude if someone believes in that shit that’s how ik they are retarded jfl grown adults believe this shitLow iq ignorant slop.
but I'm not arguing “something unusual happened, therefore God." either, im arguing that the evidence is better explained by a miracle than by the proposed natural alternatives. If you reject that, provide a plausible natural explanationagreed, i am however arguing that the evidence provided needs to establish the supernatural claim rather than just just saying soomething unusual happened therefore god
You couldn't have expected a thread like this to get good responses, right
Correct, i believe in the religion with one of the most extensively transmitted and studied bodies of ancient literature, with thousands of surviving Greek manuscripts and enormous amounts of early textual evidence. you havent given an argument yet, so i presume youre just too low iq to even form one, so you revert to ad hominems.Calling me low iq when u believe in god is crazy dude if someone believes in that shit that’s how ik they are retarded jfl grown adults believe this shit
No i dont, but i wanted to see peoples arguments, but it seems they have none except calling me retarded.You couldn't have expected a thread like this to get good responses, right
Pretty cringe, suit yourself ig
What can u expect man, ur on org. I don’t bother to discuss religion here with low iqsNo i dont, but i wanted to see peoples arguments, but it seems they have none except calling me retarded.
before coming to that conclusion have you eliminated other variables like contamination and human intervention etcbut I'm not arguing “something unusual happened, therefore God." either, im arguing that the evidence is better explained by a miracle than by the proposed natural alternatives. If you reject that, provide a plausible natural explanation
Jfl wait till niggas realize this shits all fake, humans made it to cope with the fact of death because it’s an even worse event when a family member dies and u have no cope that’s why people say they are going to be in heaven it’s all js cope dawgCorrect, i believe in the religion with one of the most extensively transmitted and studied bodies of ancient literature, with thousands of surviving Greek manuscripts and enormous amounts of early textual evidence. you havent given an argument yet, so i presume youre just too low iq to even form one, so you revert to ad hominems.
I do not fear death, nor care about death.Jfl wait till niggas realize this shits all fake, humans made it to cope with the fact of death because it’s an even worse event when a family member dies and u have no cope that’s why people say they are going to be in heaven it’s all js cope dawg