
iblamemygenes
Diamond
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2024
- Posts
- 1,356
- Reputation
- 548
What would usually look better, a low ESR with good FWHR and facial index, or a good ESR with low FWHR and long skull
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
In my case my overall face shape thirds facial index and fwhr are all ideal. My esr though is at .43, my ipd is 65 mm and my icd is 1-1. My mfr is bad as well tho at .92 but I do have a long philtrum so with a normal philtrum it would be .96. My skull is broad and tall yet people say the esr failos meThat depends on how you define good, since both measurements are obviously strongly correlated.
A low ESR can appear acceptable if it's due to a broad skull and the IPD remains within a normal range.
However, a low IPD, especially below 60 mm, almost always results in subhumanity, and this is further exacerbated by an excessively long mid-face.
In these cases, a shorter mid-face can somewhat compensate for a low ESR.
If your eye separation ratio is 1:1, that’s ideal. A ratio of around 0.43 is still okay-ish and only looks off when paired with a poor overall eye separation.In my case my overall face shape thirds facial index and fwhr are all ideal. My esr though is at .43, my ipd is 65 mm and my icd is 1-1. My mfr is bad as well tho at .92 but I do have a long philtrum so with a normal philtrum it would be .96. My skull is broad and tall yet people say the esr failos me
Well my esr in the mirror with back cam is .42 but I used a 50mm focal length camera and it was .431. Also those people you mentioned don’t have bad midface ratios mine is 0.92If your eye separation ratio is 1:1, that’s ideal. A ratio of around 0.43 is still okay-ish and only looks off when paired with a poor overall eye separation.
For example, people like Chris Hemsworth, Alain Delon, or Johnny Depp do have 0.43, none of whom are generally considered to have noticeably close-set eyes.