What is better ESR or FWHR

iblamemygenes

iblamemygenes

Diamond
Joined
Aug 12, 2024
Posts
1,496
Reputation
643
What would usually look better, a low ESR with good FWHR and facial index, or a good ESR with low FWHR and long skull
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 176085
That depends on how you define good, since both measurements are obviously strongly correlated.
A low ESR can appear acceptable if it's due to a broad skull and the IPD remains within a normal range.
However, a low IPD, especially below 60 mm, almost always results in subhumanity, and this is further exacerbated by an excessively long mid-face.
In these cases, a shorter mid-face can somewhat compensate for a low ESR.
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamemygenes
That depends on how you define good, since both measurements are obviously strongly correlated.
A low ESR can appear acceptable if it's due to a broad skull and the IPD remains within a normal range.
However, a low IPD, especially below 60 mm, almost always results in subhumanity, and this is further exacerbated by an excessively long mid-face.
In these cases, a shorter mid-face can somewhat compensate for a low ESR.
In my case my overall face shape thirds facial index and fwhr are all ideal. My esr though is at .43, my ipd is 65 mm and my icd is 1-1. My mfr is bad as well tho at .92 but I do have a long philtrum so with a normal philtrum it would be .96. My skull is broad and tall yet people say the esr failos me
 
  • +1
Reactions: NoaA99
In my case my overall face shape thirds facial index and fwhr are all ideal. My esr though is at .43, my ipd is 65 mm and my icd is 1-1. My mfr is bad as well tho at .92 but I do have a long philtrum so with a normal philtrum it would be .96. My skull is broad and tall yet people say the esr failos me
If your eye separation ratio is 1:1, that’s ideal. A ratio of around 0.43 is still okay-ish and only looks off when paired with a poor overall eye separation.
For example, people like Chris Hemsworth, Alain Delon, or Johnny Depp do have 0.43, none of whom are generally considered to have noticeably close-set eyes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: copester2
If your eye separation ratio is 1:1, that’s ideal. A ratio of around 0.43 is still okay-ish and only looks off when paired with a poor overall eye separation.
For example, people like Chris Hemsworth, Alain Delon, or Johnny Depp do have 0.43, none of whom are generally considered to have noticeably close-set eyes.
Well my esr in the mirror with back cam is .42 but I used a 50mm focal length camera and it was .431. Also those people you mentioned don’t have bad midface ratios mine is 0.92
 

Similar threads

autisticular
Replies
6
Views
90
GoldenSeahorse
GoldenSeahorse
atomstetic
Discussion Horrendous ESR
Replies
0
Views
56
atomstetic
atomstetic
HijabiZ
Replies
14
Views
178
GoldenSeahorse
GoldenSeahorse
kl09
Replies
7
Views
73
MohamadCuh
MohamadCuh
zhylo
Replies
12
Views
252
zhylo
zhylo

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top