What is iqmaxxing and is it possible? (GUIDE ON HOW TO INCREASE IQ BY AN AVERAGE OF 23 POINTS NOT CLICKBAIT)

[UMIRINBRAH?]

did read water thread

Iq tests are the biggest copes since Moses

 

[alchqmy]

IF UR A LAZY PIECE OF SHIT SKIP TO PART 3 FOR HOW

IQmaxxing is the new "niche" ive seen so this is how u can actually increase it no cope no bullshit just science
Iqmaxxing revolves arround increasing your IQ as you probably guessed by the name is the act of increasing IQ
Before you guys start spamming DNR in the comments because you think IQ is genetic and capped this isnt some underground unorthodox method with a 5% 95% chance it doesnt work and no studies behind it , Unlike many looksmaxxing methods such as Bonesmashing thumbpulling ect this is proven by a scientific study by people testing it out and not some In theory this should work bullshit.
Im surprised im the first to make a thread on this ive not seen anyone talk about it Im gonna split this thread into 3 different parts

1. b-b-but isnt IQ genetic you cant increase it?
2. Why would i want to increase my IQ in the first place
3. What is this holy method to increase my IQ? And how much will it increase it by?
4. How do i do this method

Part 1: B-b-but Isn't IQ Genetic? The Myth of the Hard Cap
While your baseline potential depends on your genetics your actual functual inteligence operates on neuroplasticity, The brain is a muscle and just like any muscle if you dont train it it atrophies the reason most peoples iqs' say stagnant after childhood isnt because its "physically impossible to change" (one google search figures that out LOL) its school stops challenging your fluid intelligence after a certain age so your not getting the sufficient cognitive input required for growth.
Clinical trials have proven that targeted, high-intensity cognitive training like what im going to show you can literally alter cortical thickness and rewrite neural pathways. You are not hard-capped.

Part 2: Why would i want to increase my IQ in the first place and why should i care
This is kind of a grass is green thing and anyone asking that question probably needs this thread but here we go into the reasons
1. IQ is the biggest determiner of success, wealth and financial stability.
To see how intelligence impacts daily life quality, career, and wealth, researchers frequently use the U.S. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY).​

• The Findings: Meta-analyses and data from the NLSY show that IQ has a moderate-to-strong correlation (r = 0.30 to 0.40) with adult income.
• The Dollar Value: Landmark economic tracking by researchers like Jay Zagorsky found that each single IQ point above average was worth roughly $200 to $600 in additional annual income. Furthermore, individuals with higher cognitive scores showed a significantly lower probability of ever falling into poverty.
  just to put this into perspective the average iq is 98 the top 2% is 130 these people on average make 6400$ - 19200$ 10-30%more than people with average iqs. however you might be thinking yeah well why would i do this just to make 6400 more.
  
  
• The Gottfredson "Complexity Continuum" (Occupational Sorting)
  Dr. Linda Gottfredson, a leading researcher in cognitive epidemiology, published a landmark paper titled "Why g Matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life."
  
  
  The Findings: Gottfredson mapped out occupations along a vertical hierarchy of "cognitive complexity." She found that human intelligence acts as a natural sorting mechanism across the job market.
  The Data:
  
  IQ 110–120 (Top 25% to 10%): This is the baseline required to comfortably enter and compete in highly complex, self-directed professional roles (e.g.,
  managers, accountants, engineers, lawyers).
  IQ 120+ (Top 10% and above): This range heavily clusters in executive leadership, advanced scientific research, and specialized fields where data is highly abstract and the environment changes daily.
  The Logic: Jobs further up the hierarchy have fewer rules and higher ambiguity. They require you to look at a chaotic environment, catch on quickly, and make decisions without a manual. High IQ gives you the raw processing power to handle that complexity without burning out
  IN SHORT HIGHER IQ = BETTER JOBS = MORE MONEY
  Lets say you dont wanna read any of that well this is all you need to see
  Here’s a graph that I found of IQ vs. US Household Income percentiles. In other words, this person looked up the percentiles for IQ and cross-referenced them with the percentiles for US Household Income.
  Heres another graph what shows the strong positive corrlelation between IQ and SAT scores (Of course higher sat score = better chance of ivy league school which then = higher chance of higher pay common knowledge right ​
  
  View attachment 5271826
  
  View attachment 5271814

2. IQ is the best determiner of long term relationships and marriage
Of course looks get you in the door however IQ keeps you in the room this should be common knowledge to the people reading this thread and here are studies to back it up.

The most heavily studied relationship outcome tied to IQ is marital stability.

• The Landmark Study: In The Bell Curve (using data tracking thousands of individuals in the US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth), researchers tracked the probability of divorce within the first 5 years of marriage.
• The Data: Individuals scoring in the top tier of cognitive ability were significantly less likely to divorce within the first 5 years compared to those scoring in the bottom 60%. This effect held true even after controlling for parental background, age of marriage, and socioeconomic status.
• Why it works (The Direct Mechanism): Research from Penn State University breaks down this stability into three cognitive skills:
  Direction: High-IQ individuals tend to plan out big life decisions—like choosing a life partner—with a longer-term horizon rather than rushing in on raw, short-term impulse.
  Adaptation: High fluid intelligence allows people to navigate complex conflicts, change their strategies when a relationship hits a rough patch, and actively problem-solve instead of shutting down.
  Cognitive Decoupling: This is the ability to step back from raw, heated emotion during an argument and look at the situation objectively. Instead of blowing up the relationship over a temporary fight, they find a logical compromise.
  
  When it comes to the actual likelihood of getting married in the first place, evolutionary and social psychologists have documented a stark difference between men and women.
  
  
• The Findings: Massive population studies in the UK and internationally consistently show that higher IQ positively correlates with increased marriage
  rates for men, but can show a flat or even negative correlation for high-IQ women.
• The Male Premium: In the dating and marriage market, evolutionary and sociological pressures cause women to highly value intelligence in a male partner because it is the ultimate predictor of future resource acquisition, stability, and problem-solving capability. A high-IQ male signals high competence, making him highly sought after for long-term commitment.
• The Female Bottle-neck: High-IQ women often face a more limited range of choices because hyper-intelligent women statistically prefer to marry a partner who matches or exceeds their own cognitive and professional level. Because they have incredibly high standards and are highly financially independent, they are far more selective and less likely to enter a marriage just for security. (hypergamy basically lol)​

PART 3. How do i increase my IQ by an average of 23 points? like i claim (RELATIONAL FRAME THEORY)
you guys are probably thinking Mr random grey ive never seen on the forums before stop blueballing me and tell me how i increase my iq by an average of 19 points i only came here for that anyway this is all grass is green shit obviously higher iq = better jobs and relationships Well now i introduce you to relational frame theory, a method to increase your iq by an average of 23 points BACKED AND TESTED BY SCIENCE.

What is RFT and how does it work?
Relational Frame Theory (RFT) is a psychological theory of human language and cognition. Developed primarily by clinical psychologists Steven C. Hayes and Dermot Barnes-Holmes, it explains how the human mind is able to make massive leaps in learning, logic, and intelligence without having to experience every single thing firsthand.

Here is the exact breakdown of what it is and how the mechanics work:
​

1. The Core Concept: Relational Responding​

At its core, RFT states that the building block of human intelligence is our ability to arbitrarily relate things.

Animals learn through direct experience (e.g., a dog learns that the sound of a whistle means food because they happen together). Humans, however, can connect things based purely on rules, language, and abstract logic. We can relate anything to anything else.
​

2. How It Works: The Three Properties​

RFT relies on a mental process called Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding (AARR). Whenever your brain relates two or more concepts, it automatically triggers three specific logical steps:

• Mutual Entailment (Bi-directional learning): If you are told that A is bigger than B, your brain automatically derives the reverse without being taught: B must be smaller than A.​
• Combinatorial Entailment (Network building): If you learn that A > B and B > C, your brain automatically hooks them all together into a network and deduces that A > C and C < A, even though nobody ever explicitly told you the relationship between A and C.​
• Transformation of Stimulus Functions (Changing meaning): The emotional or logical value of something shifts based on its place in the network. For example: If you are terrified of C, and you suddenly find out that A is ten times worse than C, your brain will instantly transfer that fear to A without you ever encountering it.​

3. The Different Types of "Frames"​

Your mind organizes these connections using different types of mental patterns, which RFT calls relational frames. Some of the core frames include:
​

• Coordination: Saying things are the same (e.g., "Apple = Fruit").​
• Opposition / Distinction: Saying things are different or opposite (e.g., "Hot is the opposite of Cold").​
• Comparison: Quantitative scales (e.g., More than, less than, bigger, faster).​
• Hierarchical: Category structures (e.g., "A dollar is a part of a currency system").​
• Temporal / Spatial: Order and position (e.g., Before/After, Above/Below).
  View attachment 5271888​
  
  what the questions look like

4. Why RFT Directly Impacts IQ​

Standard brain training games usually just test your working memory or reaction time—they don't make you fundamentally smarter.

RFT training (like SMART protocols) is different because it targets the core engine of human thought. It forces you to solve abstract, complex relational puzzles involving multiple frames at high speeds (e.g., "If X is opposite to Y, and Y is more than Z, is Z the same as X?").

By forcing your brain to rapidly derive these connections, you are essentially strengthening your fluid intelligence—improving your raw capacity for pattern recognition, logical reasoning, and abstract problem-solving.


SCIENTIFIC STUDY TO PROVE IT
https://www.psychologytoday.com/sites/default/files/lind.diff_cassidy_roche_et_al_2016_0.pdf
Read it if u want if u dont and just wanna see proof skip to experiment 2 u see it in the first page.

If you dont want to read this is the study summarized

Experiment 1&2​

1. The Setup​

Researchers took 15 kids (aged 11–12) and put them through an intensive online SMART training protocol. The program forced them to rapidly derive abstract relations—like Same, Opposite, and More/Less. Their general intelligence was tested before and after using gold-standard standardized IQ tests.
​

2. The Raw Data​

The results completely shatter traditional psychological cope:
​

• Pre-Intervention Mean: 96.93 IQ (completely average baseline).​
• Post-Intervention Mean: 120.2 IQ (propelling the group baseline straight into the top 10% globally).​
• The Net Average Increase: 23.27 IQ points.​

3. Individual High-Value Gains​

This wasn't just driven by one or two lucky anomalies; every single participant blew past their original limits:
​

• Participant 4: Started at an average 98 IQ and spiked a massive +32 points, finishing at 130 IQ (Gifted/Mensa tier).​
• Participant 11 & 14: Both recorded massive +28 point gains, jumping from low-92 baselines up to a high-tier 120 IQ.​
• The Floor: The lowest gain in the entire group was still a massive +14 points (Participant 12).​

​

This completely disproves the cope i mentioned in part 1 that you're stuck with the brain you're born with. The training didn't look anything like the final IQ test, meaning they didn't just "practice the questions"—they literally upgraded their raw fluid processing engine by an average of over 23 points.


In the 2016 Maynooth University study, Experiment 2 was designed to test whether the exact same Relational Frame Theory (RFT) training protocol used on younger kids could also work on older adolescents and directly improve their school-level aptitude.​

1. The Setup​

• The Participants: 30 students aged 15–17 years old.
• The Training: They were put through the identical intensive online training intervention targeting abstract relations like Same, Opposite, and More/Less.

2. The Measurement (The Real Test)​

Experiment 2 wanted to prove far-transfer. They tested the students using the Differential Aptitude Test (DATs). The DATs are highly rigorous, independent standardized tests used by schools to measure practical scholastic capability.
However you may be thinking wait i want to increase my IQ not get good grades well in experiment 2 they also take a test on the RAI (Relational Abilities Index) this is a different test to the DAT and is shown to be strongly correlating with IQ tests (https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/11786/1/RocheB_Proxy_2017.pdf study showing proof it correlates to IQ tests)

proof the RAI correlates to an IQ test for all the people who might say its cope Table B1 Column 1 the researchers ran it side by side an actual clinical IQ test the correlation is a massive 0.739 an r=0.74 means they are fundamentally the same underlying cognitive engine, the RAI shares a 54% match with the WAIS this seems small but compared to other iq tests it is not
THE RAI USED IN EXPERIMENT 2 VS IQ TESTS AND THERE CORRELATION WITH THE WAIS THE IQ TEST USED IN EXPERIMENT 1 ​

Cognitive Measure / Test	Correlation (r)	Shared Variance Overlap (r2)
Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Ability (Metz, 2005)	0.82	67.2%
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) (High End)	0.81	65.6%
General Ability Measure for Adults (GAMA) (Martin et al., 2000)	0.80	64.0%
General Ability Measure for Adults (GAMA) (Naglieri & Bardos, 1997)	0.75	56.2%
The RAI (Colbert et al., 2017)	0.74	54.8%
Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Ability (Cheramie et al., 2012)	0.71	50.4%
Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (Wechsler, 1997)	0.64	41.0%
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) (Low End)	0.53	28.1%

View attachment 5272057View attachment 5272061View attachment 5272066

3. The Results​

• While the students only showed an average increase of 0.72 SD percentiles on the DATs what test maths/english/science they showed an increase of 1.52 SD on the RAI which since the RAI and WAIS both on bell curves correlates to a you guessed it 22.8 iq point increase

4. How do i use RFT and the SMART Protocol to increase my IQ
The people who Created RFT figured it would be easier to advertise to parents who have children struggling in school Instead of Incels on looksmax.org anyways this is how to buy it, you might think its a scam because of the fact its tailored towards people in highschool, If you think its a scam look at the about of the website and look at who wrote the studies​

To buy it you need to go to https://raiseyouriq.com/personal/ it cost 70 dollars for 6 months, Studies show semax upregulates BDNF expression maximizing synaptic plasticity in theory using it will increase gains

• The Baseline (Day 1): Before the system lets you do a single training module, it forces you to sit down and take the RAI Assessment to establish your starting point. This is the 128-trial matrix that correlates heavily with the WAIS Full Scale IQ.
• The 70-Stage Grind: Once your baseline RAI is logged, the platform unlocks the actual training blocks. It consists of 70 progressive stages that drill your brain on complex relational loops (Same, Opposite, More Than, Less Than) under a strict timer.
• The Blocks: You cannot skip ahead. The system operates on a mastery gate—you have to hit a certain accuracy and speed threshold on Stage 1 to unlock Stage 2, all the way until you clear all 55 stages.

​

Is a 23 point increase even good?
a 23 point increase takes an average person from the 50% percentile to the 94% percentile a person with a 110 iq goes from above average to mensa level and the top 2 percent, Good is a very vague word but combine 123 iq with a 1 in 1000 or more face and boom suddenly ur statistical anomaly and ur life is better than 99% of people


Conclusion:
RFT and SMART protocol is a scientifically proven way to increase ur iq by an average of 23 points studies have tested it ect so if u want to live a better life have more success in relationships more success in moneymaking, and just a better life in general iqmaxxing is the method ive been researching these methods for 3 months now it just happens to be people are talking about iqmaxxing alot now i enjoyed making this thread Cya
this is my first ever guide ect so please rep me sorry if this looks ass LOL also im not gonna bullshit u i used AI for some of this the iq gains are real specifically for part 1 and 2

​

Good fucking thread I read it through and def gonna go check it out

 

[acac]

dnr saving 4 later

 

[chudmaxxingvodka]

ima give ts a try

Any updates ?

 

[zenserenity]

me, the superior who doesnt need it

 

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

I can't believe I actually read this shit.

First of of all the sample size is 15 and second of all of course their IQ score will increase when they are trained on questions that mimic the ones on IQ tests. It doesn't even specify which indices were the ones that improved, I guarantee you it only affected FRI and maybe WMI amd PSI to a lesser extent while Verbal and spatial didn't change at all because they are completely different item types than the ones the kids were trained on. Or a good way to prove it would be to see how the grades of the kids changed because academic achievment correlates with IQ obviously. But they didn't do that because it didn't make a difference

This is a complete BS scam I hope nobody falls for it and actually pays 70 for it. I'm pretty sure the studies were payrolled by the person who is selling this RFT course because they realized there is a decent market for it.

I partially agree with your point. Since to a degree it does train for certain tasks you'd see on an IQ test.

However, after researching this. Your conclusion seems to be wrong. From the evidence OP presented, VCI and PRI all did increase substantially. Under your logic, you didn't even spare it benefit of the doubt that it would increase VCI and PRI; in which it did. This would have been obvious if you practiced basic argumentive skills and read on the subject you're arguing against. Besides, academic and behavioral performance also did improve after training with RFT. This is also well documented. You can however make the argument against my evidence for this claim and state the apparent conflict of interest [1] . This is justified but using it as an end all be all point would also neglect the substantial evidence from other independent organizations showing very similar beneficial results in academic and behavioral outcomes[2][3][4] (these are the sources I corrobated to best represent my point, however I've came across many more). Better yet, RFT training seems to be the only tool that also administers a very substantial train-to-transfer effect when it comes to processing speed with analogical based mapping task. Along with other tasks conducted the researchers noted RFT training seems to be significantly beneficial in far-domain generalization performance in total [5]. This further shows that it's not only training you for tasks you'd see on IQ tests as the only or the major reason why there's an increase in IQ as of what you stated, but it the evidence i've shown shows the very opposite.


(ask me for free versions will show, running out of time rn)
1 - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212144723000327?via=ihub
2 - https://researchrepository.universi...b1edd5c1-fc4e-4f46-bd35-7e268c1f5706/download
3 - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-0996-0_6
4 - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/S41465-020-00187-Z#Sec1
5 - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S002396902600072X

 

[lookism...]

IF UR A LAZY PIECE OF SHIT SKIP TO PART 3 FOR HOW

IQmaxxing is the new "niche" ive seen so this is how u can actually increase it no cope no bullshit just science
Iqmaxxing revolves arround increasing your IQ as you probably guessed by the name is the act of increasing IQ
Before you guys start spamming DNR in the comments because you think IQ is genetic and capped this isnt some underground unorthodox method with a 5% 95% chance it doesnt work and no studies behind it , Unlike many looksmaxxing methods such as Bonesmashing thumbpulling ect this is proven by a scientific study by people testing it out and not some In theory this should work bullshit.
Im surprised im the first to make a thread on this ive not seen anyone talk about it Im gonna split this thread into 3 different parts

1. b-b-but isnt IQ genetic you cant increase it?
2. Why would i want to increase my IQ in the first place
3. What is this holy method to increase my IQ? And how much will it increase it by?
4. How do i do this method

Part 1: B-b-but Isn't IQ Genetic? The Myth of the Hard Cap
While your baseline potential depends on your genetics your actual functual inteligence operates on neuroplasticity, The brain is a muscle and just like any muscle if you dont train it it atrophies the reason most peoples iqs' say stagnant after childhood isnt because its "physically impossible to change" (one google search figures that out LOL) its school stops challenging your fluid intelligence after a certain age so your not getting the sufficient cognitive input required for growth.
Clinical trials have proven that targeted, high-intensity cognitive training like what im going to show you can literally alter cortical thickness and rewrite neural pathways. You are not hard-capped.

Part 2: Why would i want to increase my IQ in the first place and why should i care
This is kind of a grass is green thing and anyone asking that question probably needs this thread but here we go into the reasons
1. IQ is the biggest determiner of success, wealth and financial stability.
To see how intelligence impacts daily life quality, career, and wealth, researchers frequently use the U.S. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY).​

• The Findings: Meta-analyses and data from the NLSY show that IQ has a moderate-to-strong correlation (r = 0.30 to 0.40) with adult income.
• The Dollar Value: Landmark economic tracking by researchers like Jay Zagorsky found that each single IQ point above average was worth roughly $200 to $600 in additional annual income. Furthermore, individuals with higher cognitive scores showed a significantly lower probability of ever falling into poverty.
  just to put this into perspective the average iq is 98 the top 2% is 130 these people on average make 6400$ - 19200$ 10-30%more than people with average iqs. however you might be thinking yeah well why would i do this just to make 6400 more.
  
  
• The Gottfredson "Complexity Continuum" (Occupational Sorting)
  Dr. Linda Gottfredson, a leading researcher in cognitive epidemiology, published a landmark paper titled "Why g Matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life."
  
  
  The Findings: Gottfredson mapped out occupations along a vertical hierarchy of "cognitive complexity." She found that human intelligence acts as a natural sorting mechanism across the job market.
  The Data:
  
  IQ 110–120 (Top 25% to 10%): This is the baseline required to comfortably enter and compete in highly complex, self-directed professional roles (e.g.,
  managers, accountants, engineers, lawyers).
  IQ 120+ (Top 10% and above): This range heavily clusters in executive leadership, advanced scientific research, and specialized fields where data is highly abstract and the environment changes daily.
  The Logic: Jobs further up the hierarchy have fewer rules and higher ambiguity. They require you to look at a chaotic environment, catch on quickly, and make decisions without a manual. High IQ gives you the raw processing power to handle that complexity without burning out
  IN SHORT HIGHER IQ = BETTER JOBS = MORE MONEY
  Lets say you dont wanna read any of that well this is all you need to see
  Here’s a graph that I found of IQ vs. US Household Income percentiles. In other words, this person looked up the percentiles for IQ and cross-referenced them with the percentiles for US Household Income.
  Heres another graph what shows the strong positive corrlelation between IQ and SAT scores (Of course higher sat score = better chance of ivy league school which then = higher chance of higher pay common knowledge right ​
  
  View attachment 5271826
  
  View attachment 5271814

2. IQ is the best determiner of long term relationships and marriage
Of course looks get you in the door however IQ keeps you in the room this should be common knowledge to the people reading this thread and here are studies to back it up.

The most heavily studied relationship outcome tied to IQ is marital stability.

• The Landmark Study: In The Bell Curve (using data tracking thousands of individuals in the US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth), researchers tracked the probability of divorce within the first 5 years of marriage.
• The Data: Individuals scoring in the top tier of cognitive ability were significantly less likely to divorce within the first 5 years compared to those scoring in the bottom 60%. This effect held true even after controlling for parental background, age of marriage, and socioeconomic status.
• Why it works (The Direct Mechanism): Research from Penn State University breaks down this stability into three cognitive skills:
  Direction: High-IQ individuals tend to plan out big life decisions—like choosing a life partner—with a longer-term horizon rather than rushing in on raw, short-term impulse.
  Adaptation: High fluid intelligence allows people to navigate complex conflicts, change their strategies when a relationship hits a rough patch, and actively problem-solve instead of shutting down.
  Cognitive Decoupling: This is the ability to step back from raw, heated emotion during an argument and look at the situation objectively. Instead of blowing up the relationship over a temporary fight, they find a logical compromise.
  
  When it comes to the actual likelihood of getting married in the first place, evolutionary and social psychologists have documented a stark difference between men and women.
  
  
• The Findings: Massive population studies in the UK and internationally consistently show that higher IQ positively correlates with increased marriage
  rates for men, but can show a flat or even negative correlation for high-IQ women.
• The Male Premium: In the dating and marriage market, evolutionary and sociological pressures cause women to highly value intelligence in a male partner because it is the ultimate predictor of future resource acquisition, stability, and problem-solving capability. A high-IQ male signals high competence, making him highly sought after for long-term commitment.
• The Female Bottle-neck: High-IQ women often face a more limited range of choices because hyper-intelligent women statistically prefer to marry a partner who matches or exceeds their own cognitive and professional level. Because they have incredibly high standards and are highly financially independent, they are far more selective and less likely to enter a marriage just for security. (hypergamy basically lol)​

PART 3. How do i increase my IQ by an average of 23 points? like i claim (RELATIONAL FRAME THEORY)
you guys are probably thinking Mr random grey ive never seen on the forums before stop blueballing me and tell me how i increase my iq by an average of 19 points i only came here for that anyway this is all grass is green shit obviously higher iq = better jobs and relationships Well now i introduce you to relational frame theory, a method to increase your iq by an average of 23 points BACKED AND TESTED BY SCIENCE.

What is RFT and how does it work?
Relational Frame Theory (RFT) is a psychological theory of human language and cognition. Developed primarily by clinical psychologists Steven C. Hayes and Dermot Barnes-Holmes, it explains how the human mind is able to make massive leaps in learning, logic, and intelligence without having to experience every single thing firsthand.

Here is the exact breakdown of what it is and how the mechanics work:
​

1. The Core Concept: Relational Responding​

At its core, RFT states that the building block of human intelligence is our ability to arbitrarily relate things.

Animals learn through direct experience (e.g., a dog learns that the sound of a whistle means food because they happen together). Humans, however, can connect things based purely on rules, language, and abstract logic. We can relate anything to anything else.
​

2. How It Works: The Three Properties​

RFT relies on a mental process called Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding (AARR). Whenever your brain relates two or more concepts, it automatically triggers three specific logical steps:

• Mutual Entailment (Bi-directional learning): If you are told that A is bigger than B, your brain automatically derives the reverse without being taught: B must be smaller than A.​
• Combinatorial Entailment (Network building): If you learn that A > B and B > C, your brain automatically hooks them all together into a network and deduces that A > C and C < A, even though nobody ever explicitly told you the relationship between A and C.​
• Transformation of Stimulus Functions (Changing meaning): The emotional or logical value of something shifts based on its place in the network. For example: If you are terrified of C, and you suddenly find out that A is ten times worse than C, your brain will instantly transfer that fear to A without you ever encountering it.​

3. The Different Types of "Frames"​

Your mind organizes these connections using different types of mental patterns, which RFT calls relational frames. Some of the core frames include:
​

• Coordination: Saying things are the same (e.g., "Apple = Fruit").​
• Opposition / Distinction: Saying things are different or opposite (e.g., "Hot is the opposite of Cold").​
• Comparison: Quantitative scales (e.g., More than, less than, bigger, faster).​
• Hierarchical: Category structures (e.g., "A dollar is a part of a currency system").​
• Temporal / Spatial: Order and position (e.g., Before/After, Above/Below).
  View attachment 5271888​
  
  what the questions look like

4. Why RFT Directly Impacts IQ​

Standard brain training games usually just test your working memory or reaction time—they don't make you fundamentally smarter.

RFT training (like SMART protocols) is different because it targets the core engine of human thought. It forces you to solve abstract, complex relational puzzles involving multiple frames at high speeds (e.g., "If X is opposite to Y, and Y is more than Z, is Z the same as X?").

By forcing your brain to rapidly derive these connections, you are essentially strengthening your fluid intelligence—improving your raw capacity for pattern recognition, logical reasoning, and abstract problem-solving.


SCIENTIFIC STUDY TO PROVE IT
https://www.psychologytoday.com/sites/default/files/lind.diff_cassidy_roche_et_al_2016_0.pdf
Read it if u want if u dont and just wanna see proof skip to experiment 2 u see it in the first page.

If you dont want to read this is the study summarized

Experiment 1&2​

1. The Setup​

Researchers took 15 kids (aged 11–12) and put them through an intensive online SMART training protocol. The program forced them to rapidly derive abstract relations—like Same, Opposite, and More/Less. Their general intelligence was tested before and after using gold-standard standardized IQ tests.
​

2. The Raw Data​

The results completely shatter traditional psychological cope:
​

• Pre-Intervention Mean: 96.93 IQ (completely average baseline).​
• Post-Intervention Mean: 120.2 IQ (propelling the group baseline straight into the top 10% globally).​
• The Net Average Increase: 23.27 IQ points.​

3. Individual High-Value Gains​

This wasn't just driven by one or two lucky anomalies; every single participant blew past their original limits:
​

• Participant 4: Started at an average 98 IQ and spiked a massive +32 points, finishing at 130 IQ (Gifted/Mensa tier).​
• Participant 11 & 14: Both recorded massive +28 point gains, jumping from low-92 baselines up to a high-tier 120 IQ.​
• The Floor: The lowest gain in the entire group was still a massive +14 points (Participant 12).​

​

This completely disproves the cope i mentioned in part 1 that you're stuck with the brain you're born with. The training didn't look anything like the final IQ test, meaning they didn't just "practice the questions"—they literally upgraded their raw fluid processing engine by an average of over 23 points.


In the 2016 Maynooth University study, Experiment 2 was designed to test whether the exact same Relational Frame Theory (RFT) training protocol used on younger kids could also work on older adolescents and directly improve their school-level aptitude.​

1. The Setup​

• The Participants: 30 students aged 15–17 years old.
• The Training: They were put through the identical intensive online training intervention targeting abstract relations like Same, Opposite, and More/Less.

2. The Measurement (The Real Test)​

Experiment 2 wanted to prove far-transfer. They tested the students using the Differential Aptitude Test (DATs). The DATs are highly rigorous, independent standardized tests used by schools to measure practical scholastic capability.
However you may be thinking wait i want to increase my IQ not get good grades well in experiment 2 they also take a test on the RAI (Relational Abilities Index) this is a different test to the DAT and is shown to be strongly correlating with IQ tests (https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/11786/1/RocheB_Proxy_2017.pdf study showing proof it correlates to IQ tests)

Prueba de que el RAI se correlaciona con una prueba de CI para todas las personas que podrían decir que es una prueba de CI Tabla B1 Columna 1 los investigadores la ejecutaron lado a lado con una prueba de CI clínica real la correlación es un enorme 0.739 y r=0.74 significa que son fundamentalmente el mismo motor cognitivo subyacente, el RAI comparte una coincidencia del 54% con el WAIS esto parece pequeño pero comparado con otras pruebas de CI no lo es
EL RAI UTILIZADO EN EL EXPERIMENTO 2 VS LAS PRUEBAS DE CI Y SU CORRELACIÓN CON EL WAIS LA PRUEBA DE CI UTILIZADA EN EL EXPERIMENTO 1 ​

Medida cognitiva / Prueba	Correlación (r)	Superposición de varianza compartida (r2)
Prueba de Habilidad Cognitiva de Woodcock Johnson (Metz, 2005)	0,82	67,2%
Prueba de Logro Individual de Wechsler (WIAT) (Nivel Avanzado)	0,81	65,6%
Medida de Capacidad General para Adultos (GAMA) (Martin et al., 2000)	0,80	64,0%
Medida de la capacidad general para adultos (GAMA) (Naglieri y Bardos, 1997)	0,75	56,2%
El RAI (Colbert et al., 2017)	0,74	54,8%
Prueba de Habilidad Cognitiva de Woodcock Johnson (Cheramie et al., 2012)	0,71	50,4%
Matrices progresivas estándar de Raven (Wechsler, 1997)	0,64	41,0%
Prueba de Logro Individual de Wechsler (WIAT) (Nivel bajo)	0,53	28,1%

View attachment 5272057View attachment 5272061View attachment 5272066

3. Los resultados​

• Si bien los estudiantes solo mostraron un aumento promedio de 0.72 percentiles de desviación estándar en las pruebas DAT (matemáticas, inglés y ciencias), mostraron un aumento de 1.52 desviaciones estándar en el RAI, lo que, dado que tanto el RAI como el WAIS siguen curvas de campana, se correlaciona con un aumento de 22.8 puntos de coeficiente intelectual.

4. ¿Cómo puedo usar RFT y el protocolo SMART para aumentar mi coeficiente intelectual?
Los creadores de RFT pensaron que sería más fácil anunciarlo a padres con hijos con dificultades escolares en lugar de a incels en looksmax.org. De todos modos, así es como se compra. Puede que pienses que es una estafa porque está dirigido a personas de secundaria. Si crees que es una estafa, lee la sección "Acerca de" del sitio web y fíjate en quién escribió los estudios.​

Para comprarlo debes ir a https://raiseyouriq.com/personal/ cuesta 70 dólares por 6 meses. Los estudios muestran que Semax aumenta la expresión de BDNF maximizando la plasticidad sináptica. En teoría, usarlo aumentará las ganancias.

• El punto de partida (Día 1): Antes de que el sistema te permita realizar un solo módulo de entrenamiento, te obliga a sentarte y completar la Evaluación RAI para establecer tu punto de partida. Esta es la matriz de 128 ensayos que se correlaciona estrechamente con el CI de escala completa de la WAIS.
• El entrenamiento de 70 etapas: Una vez registrado tu RAI inicial, la plataforma desbloquea los bloques de entrenamiento. Consta de 70 etapas progresivas que ejercitan tu cerebro con bucles relacionales complejos (Igual, Opuesto, Mayor que, Menor que) bajo un estricto cronómetro.
• Los Bloques: No puedes saltarte ninguna etapa. El sistema funciona mediante un proceso de dominio: debes alcanzar un cierto umbral de precisión y velocidad en la Etapa 1 para desbloquear la Etapa 2, y así sucesivamente hasta completar las 55 etapas.

​

¿Un aumento de 23 puntos es siquiera bueno?
Un aumento de 23 puntos lleva a una persona promedio del percentil 50 al percentil 94; una persona con un coeficiente intelectual de 110 pasa de estar por encima del promedio al nivel de Mensa y al 2% superior. "Bueno" es una palabra muy vaga, pero combina un coeficiente intelectual de 123 con un rostro que es 1 entre 1000 o más, y ¡boom!, de repente eres una anomalía estadística y tu vida es mejor que la del 99% de las personas.


Conclusión:
El protocolo RFT y SMART es una forma científicamente probada de aumentar tu coeficiente intelectual en un promedio de 23 puntos. Los estudios lo han comprobado, etc. Así que si quieres vivir una vida mejor, tener más éxito en tus relaciones, más éxito en tus finanzas y, en general, una vida mejor, el iqmaxxing es el método. Llevo tres meses investigando estos métodos y resulta que ahora mucha gente habla de iqmaxxing. Me ha gustado crear este hilo. ¡Hasta luego!
Esta es mi primera guía, etc., así que por favor denme puntos. Lo siento si se ve mal, jajaja. Además, no voy a mentir, la interfaz de usuario usó IA para algunas de estas cosas. Las ganancias de CI son reales, específicamente para la parte 1 y 2.

​

Mucho texto bro Dnr...