What is the average height of men who repeatedly refer to females as "trannies?"

What is the average height of men who repeatedly refer to females as "trannies?"


  • Total voters
    90
Ok, then replace her with literally any of the other models you posted. Still stands
The issue is that you avoided the main point which is manlet insecurity due to getting heightmogged by a female. The "unobtainability" factor is important but isn't primary.
Current average = 173.7 cm (5'8.4)

Average user guesses from Celebheights:
Adriana Lima: 177.6 cm
Gisele Bundchen: 177.2 cm
Bella Hadid: 172.1 cm

In other words, this forum has predicted that the average individual of the aforementioned criteria would be slightly shorter than the average female target of derogation depicted in the examples.

Also, lol at you coping here.
VTHqPDe.png
 
The issue is that you avoided the main point which is manlet insecurity due to getting heightmogged by a female. The "unobtainability" factor is important but isn't primary.
Then you're moving the goalposts. That's a different issue then the one you suggested in the previous post, which implied my argument entirely collapsed not because I was privileging the unobtainability factor over the height one but because I posted a picture of a woman who was less likely to be described as a tranny than a number of other models.

In any case, I don't agree. Their being unobtainable is more important to the psychological effect I am describing than their height, even though short height in general makes women more unobtainable. That manlet insecurity may predispose them to call women a number of things in general, but is not the primary factor in what motivates them to specifically call these women trannies.
 
Then you're moving the goalposts. That's a different issue then the one you suggested in the previous post, which implied my argument entirely collapsed not because I was privileging the unobtainability factor over the height one but because I posted a picture of a woman who was less likely to be described as a tranny than a number of other models.

In any case, I don't agree. Their being unobtainable is more important to the psychological effect I am describing than their height. That manlet insecurity may predispose them to call women a number of things in general, but is not the primary factor in what motivates them to specifically call these women trannies.
Margot Robbie is unobtainable to most of the users here (due to being way too attractive).

Madison Beer is unobtainable to most of the users here (due to being way too attractive).

Average-to-below-average height OnlyFans and IG models with frauded bodies are also unobtainable to most of the users here (due to having way too many options).

The aforementioned examples will hardly ever be referred to as "trannies." At least 90% of "tranny" comments specifically involve a man being heightmogged by a woman. Even if I posted an example of an ugly, 5'10 female from Reddit claiming to have poor success with men, manlets will still call her a tranny.

Users neg unobtainable women all the time too, but their first resort is rarely a "tranny" comment.
 
You're comparing horizontal growth plates to vertical plates. The correlation is probably weak at best due to some influence from overall GH levels. If the difference was significant, it would be extremely difficult to find manlets with wide biacromials.
Idk, manlets tend to not have wide clavicles, it's always +5'10 dudes
That's an outlier height and I've never posted an example that tall as a serious example of optimal female aesthetics. The optimal range is 170 to 180 cm, and that's without even controlling for skull size. A 180 cm female with an average skull is still going to be more attractive than an average-height female with an average skull.
True
They're much rarer.
True
Masculine skulls are an ancillary factor, but not the primary one. Once a female is over 5'9 she's emasculating over half of the male population. And a 99th-percentile skull in terms of masculinity compared to the average female skull is fundamentally less attractive whereas the same percentile comparison for height makes a female more attractive. None of the examples in the OP represent a 99th-percentile masculine female skull anyway.

All of the other factors you mentioned are much less important except in outlier conditions.
Debate finished.

Only thing I'll add is that I prefere them more with some more fat than the ones you usually post even though I'm 186 cm and only 70 kg. That's it
 
The 2nd is fine, other 2 are trannies. Did an upset woman make this thread?
 
Only thing I'll add is that I prefere them more with some more fat than the ones you usually post even though I'm 186 cm and only 70 kg. That's it
I already addressed that here. Low BF% on women only has a weak correlation with "tranny" comments and yields other forms of negging.
Another theory is that "anorexia" negging correlates with being a fatass. @Xangsane and @thickdickdaddy27 seem to have this issue, so it has some potential as well.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Meteor21
The 2nd is fine, other 2 are trannies.
Also, this comment hilariously leads me to believe that you're somewhere between 172 and 177 cm, depending on how accurately you can eyeball female heights.
Average user guesses from Celebheights:
Adriana Lima: 177.6 cm
Gisele Bundchen: 177.2 cm
Bella Hadid: 172.1 cm
 
Last edited:
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Meteor21
Also, this comment hilariously leads me to believe that you're somewhere between 172 and 177 cm, depending on how accurately you can eyeball female heights.
This is how women argue. You gonna call me gay next?
 
This is how women argue. You gonna call me gay next?
No, because that isn't relevant. Ironic coming from the guy who immediately resorted to ad hominem in his first comment.
 
Yes ik, you don't like your own medicine, foid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7926
This WNBA player is very tall but still very feminine

Its facial features more than height (skull size, jaw)
 

Attachments

  • NINTCHDBPICT000612874810.jpg
    NINTCHDBPICT000612874810.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG-20230803-WA0004.jpg
    IMG-20230803-WA0004.jpg
    27.8 KB · Views: 0
This WNBA player is very tall but still feminine

Its facial features more than height (skull size, jaw)
Lol if you think the results for her would skew significantly less in the "tranny" direction than this example:
24% of voters currently believe that she is likely a tranny, which is significant enough to frequently come up in conversations. I ended up using her teammate because she came up first in reverse search, but you can partially blame yourself for that due to choosing a tiny picture with no name.
HWhddmt.png

 
This WNBA player is very tall but still very feminine

Its facial features more than height (skull size, jaw)
I love this bitch, Liz Cambage is truly a goddess and I want to get heightmogged by her irl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mewton
They’re troons to any man with normal T levels and not views propogated by faggot ass niggers like you
dennias
 

Similar threads

Xangsane
Replies
124
Views
9K
Michael-Davis
Michael-Davis
mogstars
Replies
82
Views
6K
swt
swt
heightmaxxing
Replies
56
Views
5K
lurking truecel
lurking truecel
Baban
Replies
40
Views
8K
looks>books
looks>books

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top