D
Deleted member 18810
Platinum
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2022
- Posts
- 1,094
- Reputation
- 1,441
1. Bones - not really, I see a lot of guys with excellent bone structure, i.e., popping cheekbones, wide jaws and great mandibles, strong nasal bridge, great projected chin, great brow ridge with extremely good orbital rims producing actual hunter eyes
2. Harmony - again, not so much, I have seen quite a few people that tick most boxes when it comes to ratios and measurements, yet they look bland or sometimes even below bland.
3. Phenotype and Colouring - could be, but we all know that colouring varies from race to race, ethnicity to ethnicity and area to area. Being dark skinned alone doesn't make you unattractive or being extremely light skinned alone doesn't make you extremely attractive. And if we speak about phenotype, it negates the fact that attractive people are/should be in all races, like just discriminating some Indian with dark skin and mixed features despite him having almost no failos and a great bone structure would make us extremely limited in how we see beauty.
4. Good soft features - I'd say to some extent true, but again I have seen people with good soft features, i.e., straight nose, lively eyes, clear and vibrant skin, lips with good definition (cupid's bow and proportional ratios), yet they somehow don't look all that great.
You could argue that it is a combination of all of the above, but I still have my doubts. Could anyone clear my confusion?
2. Harmony - again, not so much, I have seen quite a few people that tick most boxes when it comes to ratios and measurements, yet they look bland or sometimes even below bland.
3. Phenotype and Colouring - could be, but we all know that colouring varies from race to race, ethnicity to ethnicity and area to area. Being dark skinned alone doesn't make you unattractive or being extremely light skinned alone doesn't make you extremely attractive. And if we speak about phenotype, it negates the fact that attractive people are/should be in all races, like just discriminating some Indian with dark skin and mixed features despite him having almost no failos and a great bone structure would make us extremely limited in how we see beauty.
4. Good soft features - I'd say to some extent true, but again I have seen people with good soft features, i.e., straight nose, lively eyes, clear and vibrant skin, lips with good definition (cupid's bow and proportional ratios), yet they somehow don't look all that great.
You could argue that it is a combination of all of the above, but I still have my doubts. Could anyone clear my confusion?