What’s worst: small forearms vs small calves

Forearms vs calves

  • Forearms

    Votes: 24 80.0%
  • Calves

    Votes: 6 20.0%

  • Total voters
    30
Deleted member 12270

Deleted member 12270

Banned
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Posts
1,460
Reputation
2,364
I have 15” calves and 12” forearms at 15% bodyfat :feelswhy::feelswhy: I rather have small calves tbh I look like a tranny with my small wrists and forearms. Women literally have bigger forearms and wrists than me:feelscry:
 
  • +1
Reactions: BrettyBoy
Lmao nobody cares about calves
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: unluckylucky and DesiChad
aesthetically its too biased. I'd much rather have proportioned and large calves than forearms. all of the lower body is very hard to grow and largely genetic. forearms have more leeway
 
  • +1
Reactions: ASM5
small calves aren't even bad functionally speaking, they're associated with fast-twitch muscle fibers you see in sprinters, jumpers, and basketball players.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ProAcktiv and SPFromNY914
B6497176 51E1 4E90 A3B8 CB8058F520C7
 
small calves aren't even bad functionally speaking, they're associated with fast-twitch muscle fibers you see in sprinters, jumpers, and basketball players.
and boxers
 
calves are the least important muscle jfl, dont be a gymcel and waste time training them.
 

Similar threads

flowiza
Replies
20
Views
205
flowiza
flowiza
rubenlambert
Replies
7
Views
62
sync!
sync!
isba816
Replies
8
Views
87
Frenulum
Frenulum
theframeguy
Replies
6
Views
103
GODFATHER_0
GODFATHER_0

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top