Why are subhuman genes still in the pool?

[Deleted member 49926]

If muh looks matter why are subhuman genes still existing. Balding gene should be extinct, so should manletism, and other subhuman facial traits…

 

[User28823]

because ugly people are horny too

 

[Deleted member 28896]

And something else would be considered subhuman. It's all relative.

 

[Deleted member 49926]

because ugly people are horny too

.org told me that if ur sub 5.5 psl its over and you will never reproduce?

 

[plukee]

Because most tall guys fuck short girls

 

[Deleted member 49926]

And something else would be considered subhuman. It's all relative.

I disagree… If everyone started looking like hexum chico barrett with full heads of hair and 8 inch dongs whatever no one would be subhuman

 

[Deleted member 23359]

u think some indian will care about muh attraction and psl

he will just have his mom find him a wife and have kids

 

[Deleted member 28896]

I disagree… If everyone started looking like hexum chico barrett with full heads of hair and 8 inch dongs whatever no one would be subhuman

It's simply the theory of evolution, some genetic trait will always be considered worst.

 

[User28823]

.org told me that if ur sub 5.5 psl its over and you will never reproduce?

there's a fish in the sea for everybody

 

[Deleted member 49926]

It's simply the theory of evolution, some genetic trait will always be considered worst.

Okay but some dogshit traits shouldve been lost in the meantime. Simply should’ve idc. Why does balding, deformed facial traits and small dicks still somehow exist

 

[lonelycurry]

bro graduated from the mcdonalds parking lot

 

[Deleted member 28896]

Okay but some dogshit traits shouldve been lost in the meantime. Simply should’ve idc. Why does balding, deformed facial traits and small dicks still somehow exist

small dicks are relative, balding being bad is relative, "deformed" facial traits are relative.

 

[AngryShortMale]

Likely due to arranged marriages and war rape in the past.

 

[Deleted member 49926]

small dicks are relative, balding being bad is relative, "deformed" facial traits are relative.

Balding is bad, not relative. Deformed facial traits are also not relative, jaws and chins can get so deformed that it genuinely causes health problems

 

[Deleted member 28896]

Balding is bad, not relative. Deformed facial traits are also not relative, jaws and chins can get so deformed that it genuinely causes health problems

Agree to disagree

 

[Magnum Opus]

If muh looks matter why are subhuman genes still existing. Balding gene should be extinct, so should manletism, and other subhuman facial traits

Some guy had a gene mutation for those traits, and it got passed on, you'd know if you'd have attended 10th grade Biology
Bad traits can occur at any point in nature due to mutations, but our way of living enables them to spread from reproduction as practically most people survive anyways

 

[Deleted member 49926]

Some guy had a gene mutation for those traits, and it got passed on, you'd know if you'd have attended 10th grade Biology
Bad traits can occur at any point in nature due to mutations, but our way of living enables them to spread from reproduction as practically most people survive anyways

I didn’t have biology in school

 

[Deleted member 49926]

but our way of living enables them to spread from reproduction as practically most people survive anyways

exactly you retard, we should disable spreading of any subhuman genes, only way to make next generations bearable they will all get even more mentally ill

 

[Magnum Opus]

exactly you retard, we should disable spreading of any subhuman genes, only way to make next generations bearable they will all get even more mentally ill

It's funny how you always call others a retard when your own cognitive shortcomings get exposed you fucking SHITHEAD
How can you make a thread for some stupid question like that
What you said translated to "Why don't we collectively blackpill the whole planet and convince them of Eugenics?"
Are you fucking stupid?

 

[gribsufer1]

there's a fish in the sea for everybody

yh ur looksmatch

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

Because subhuman women.

 

[Deleted member 49926]

It's funny how you always call others a retard when your own cognitive shortcomings get exposed you fucking SHITHEAD
How can you make a thread for some stupid question like that
What you said translated to "Why don't we collectively blackpill the whole planet and convince them of Eugenics?"
Are you fucking stupid?

You are literally bordering schizo and close to being sent to a mental asylum. You are approaching @_MVP_ levels

 

[pepe999]

If muh looks matter why are subhuman genes still existing. Balding gene should be extinct, so should manletism, and other subhuman facial traits…

Maybe its because of women? Even the ugliest fat bitches have children, no matter how ugly woman is there always be plenty of men who want to have sex with her. Also low class women have more children than high class.

 

[FutureSlayer]

monogamy

 

[Deleted member 16280]

For thousands of years looks actually didn’t matter nearly as much as they do now, so there wasn’t a strong selection pressure for good looks

 

[shortcel88]

Betabux is a thing

 

[jagmogs1000]

If muh looks matter why are subhuman genes still existing. Balding gene should be extinct, so should manletism, and other subhuman facial traits…

lack of eugenics

 

[Outlier]

If muh looks matter why are subhuman genes still existing. Balding gene should be extinct, so should manletism, and other subhuman facial traits…

Cause women are bound to have a child, no matter there genetic quality. Women, not men are responsible for subhuman genes still proliferating.

Humanity Has More Mothers Than Fathers, DNA Reveals

"For much of human history, a greater proportion of women in the population reproduced relative to men, they found. This means "that even though there may be equal numbers of males and females in a population, a larger proportion of the females than the males are reproducing,""