
Crusile
Apricot
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2021
- Posts
- 4,065
- Reputation
- 4,273
Light skin is the worst hindu skin tone it looks so off putting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No light skin on hindus look sickly especially when they are bleached skin victims. No offense anyone but I literally feel nauseous from itCos dark looks dull, ugly, dirty, sickly
White skin looks bright, healthy etc
Imagine a cat with white hair vs a cat with black or brown hair
Which one would u love the most? There's ur answer
Brighter whiter skin will never look sicklyNo light skin on hindus look sickly especially when they are bleached skin victims. No offense anyone but I literally feel nauseous from it
hindu skin undertone makes them look sickly when pale but beautiful when darkBrighter whiter skin will never look sickly
Only darker duller skin looks sickly and like they have some sort of disease
Clearly not hence why they all try make it lighter brighter healthierhindu skin undertone makes them look sickly when pale but beautiful when dark
Darker looks healthierClearly not hence why they all try make it lighter brighter healthier
If darker was beautiful they'd all be tanning. But they're not.
Dark skin looks revolting. Makes me want to throw up.
In the new Delhi mental asylumDarker looks healthier
Why do white people tan their skin lmao? Having naturally tanned skin is a blessingIn the new Delhi mental asylum
Why do white people tan their skin lmao? Having naturally tanned skin is a blessing
Yes because of skin cancer/aging concerns. Everyone agrees tanned looks better because white is an ugly skin toneThey don't. It was just a trend in a tiny part of Western Europe for low class people. Which doesn't exist anymore. North and Eastern europeans didn't ever tan