Why do normies focus on shoulder - waist and not shoulder - hip

[ElTruecel]

Is it because having narrow hips in comparison to shoulders is rare? Most people have a decent shoulder to waist ratio unless you’re unlucky but the shoulder to hip ratio well shoulder to waist to hip is what will carry an aesthetic build.

 

[PROMETHEUS]

Nigga what?

You type like I would imagine your avi speaks

 

[ElTruecel]

Nigga what?

You type like I would imagine your avi speaks

Why do people focus on the ratio of your shoulders - waist when most people already have a decent ratio.

The one that makes up aesthetics is shoulder - hips well shoulder - waist - hips.

Compare a standard ectomorph frame such as mine to someone like David Laid, Jeff Seid or Zyzz. I have very narrow shoulders and a small waist but my hips aren’t super narrow compared to theirs.

 

[PROMETHEUS]

Someone lock this thread

 

[ElTruecel]

Someone lock this thread

I just explained it to u cunt

 

[Deleted member 59699]

Yap

 

[Deleted member 6305]

Waists me

 

[Deleted member 41390]

i cope with shoulder waist because i have wide hips not cuz im a normie

my shoulder waist is elite but shoulder hip.....

Mirin squint maxxing boyo

 

[Deleted member 44486]

They're usually correlated though, a guy that has a high shoulder-to-waist ratio also usually has a high shoulder-to-hip ratio (provided his hips aren't wide, in relation to his waist).

 

[fuse]

View attachment 2791735Mirin squint maxxing boyo

"chadlite"

 

[alurmo]

Is it because having narrow hips in comparison to shoulders is rare? Most people have a decent shoulder to waist ratio unless you’re unlucky but the shoulder to hip ratio well shoulder to waist to hip is what will carry an aesthetic build.

this is just straight up gay

 

[alurmo]

View attachment 2791735Mirin squint maxxing boyo

 

[Copeful]

shoulder to hip is cope
you can have wider hips if you hit legs and glutes
x shape physique isn't bad at all

 

[Deleted member 44486]

shoulder to hip is cope
you can have wider hips if you hit legs and glutes
x shape physique isn't bad at all
View attachment 2981587

Nah I wouldn't say it's cope, it definitely matters and wide hips obv look like shit on guys. Ideal male shoulder-to-hip ratio is 1.40 or higher and ideal waist-to-hip ratio for guys is 0.86-88, anything below or above that waist-hip ratio and you either have Kleinfelterz, or a shit ton of heart/abdominal problems.

 

[Copeful]

Nah I wouldn't say it's cope, it definitely matters and wide hips obv look like shit on guys. Ideal male shoulder-to-hip ratio is 1.40 or higher and ideal waist-to-hip ratio for guys is 0.86-88, anything below or above that waist-hip ratio and you either have Kleinfelterz, or a shit ton of heart/abdominal problems.

yeah obviously overly wide looks bad
all about proportions and being balanced
what would you say ideal shoulder to waist ratio is? people say 1.6 but imo 1.7-1.9 looks more aesthetic

 

[Deleted member 44486]

yeah obviously overly wide looks bad
all about proportions and being balanced
what would you say ideal shoulder to waist ratio is? people say 1.6 but imo 1.7-1.9 looks more aesthetic

I personally think 1:1.75-1.85 is best. The traditional one is 1:1.618 but the problem with it is that the v-taper will disappear in most clothing and it'd only look attractive whilst shirtless. Anything over 1.9 though looks cartoonish like pics-related.

 

[Copeful]

I personally think 1:1.75-1.85 is best. The traditional one is 1:1.618 but the problem with it is that the v-taper will disappear in most clothing and it'd only look attractive whilst shirtless. Anything over 1.9 though looks cartoonish like pics-related.
View attachment 2981674View attachment 2981675

imo higher than 1.9 can look better if you arent as big as those guys
this guy has a little over 2.0 and looks super aesthetic cause he isn't as big to look cartoonish

 

[Saint Casanova]

Ideal is having your upper hips to waist at a near 1:1 ratio with a good hip inclination. It gives you a sort of arrow look to the pelvis.

I only see the best fitness influencers with this. 99.9th percentile Chad trait in terms of physique

 

[gooner23]

imo higher than 1.9 can look better if you arent as big as those guys
this guy has a little over 2.0 and looks super aesthetic cause he isn't as big to look cartoonish



View attachment 2982886

this dude has bad insertions, when he takes off his shirt his chest looks super weird, thats why he never poses without the tank top or compression shirt

 

[R@m@]

its the same just in different terms

 

[Copeful]

this dude has bad insertions, when he takes off his shirt his chest looks super weird, thats why he never poses without the tank top or compression shirt

looks good to me jfl

 

[gooner23]

looks good to me jfl

i think his chest is his worst aspect despite it being super full, his brother mogs his physique by quite a lot but im not sure if his brother is natty


even in this tiktok his chest just looks a little weird but i can't explain why maybe it just doesn't harmonize with his other muscle groups maybe lacking upper chest fullness

 

[Copeful]

i think his chest is his worst aspect despite it being super full, his brother mogs his physique by quite a lot but im not sure if his brother is natty


even in this tiktok his chest just looks a little weird but i can't explain why maybe it just doesn't harmonize with his other muscle groups maybe lacking upper chest fullness

idk man yeah his brother is bigger but he still mogs his brothers ratios with the thinner waist etc
maybe im coping cause i resemble his insertions and ratios jfl

 

[Deleted member 62811]

because you can't really see shoulder-waist unless you are shirtless, or using adherent clothes

 

[Deleted member 45794]

Most people here have the flaw of seeing everything at face value, black or white, chad or truecel trait.

Shoulder to waist ratio is important too, someone could just have a small overall frame, especially lanklets...