BrahminBoss
Kraken
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2022
- Posts
- 63,616
- Reputation
- 88,486
Any guesses? I know the answer ( 3 reasons )
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't careAny guesses? I know the answer ( 3 reasons )
How is stating facts sucking cock@normie_joe muh curries don’t suck white cock
Any guesses? I know the answer ( 3 reasons )
ElaborateMore progressive features according to Anthropologist.
I remember reading an article about it on theapricity. Caucasoid features are more "progressive" in the physical anthropology sense.Elaborate
I don’t think op meant what are the traits but the biological reason to whyBigger squarer chin, more refined noses and better coloring.
Second one is underrated af
At least for noses, europeans have the best nose shape by far but i don't know why this is exactly, for me it could be subjective because of being European so other races can think of their own noses as being the bestI remember reading an article about it on theapricity. Caucasoid features are more "progressive" in the physical anthropology sense.
Progressive features include things like tall nasal bridges, strong chins, narrow skull,upright rather than sloping foreheads, etc. The features that are considered to be high class. Whites, especially Northern Europeans, tend to have the most progressive features, obviously not all northern euros have progressive features and not all progressive features are necessarily good. A long midface and high hairline is progressive features but can be a death sentence.
Narrow skull is progressive how? Most curries have narrow, what you meant was a tall skull which makes the skull look relatively narrow compared to brachy skulls, gandy has giga sloped forehead and is the most high class out of the psl godsI remember reading an article about it on theapricity. Caucasoid features are more "progressive" in the physical anthropology sense.
Progressive features include things like tall nasal bridges, strong chins, narrow skull,upright rather than sloping foreheads, etc. The features that are considered to be high class. Whites, especially Northern Europeans, tend to have the most progressive features, obviously not all northern euros have progressive features and not all progressive features are necessarily good. A long midface and high hairline is progressive features but can be a death sentence.
True, give them all same nutrition diet and environment too.Maybe colonialism? I’d love to see an (unethical) experiment where a bunch of babies are kidnapped and put in a neutral environment and see what they find attractive
Maybe colonialism
Based progressive featuresI remember reading an article about it on theapricity. Caucasoid features are more "progressive" in the physical anthropology sense.
Progressive features include things like tall nasal bridges, strong chins, narrow skull,upright rather than sloping foreheads, etc. The features that are considered to be high class. Whites, especially Northern Europeans, tend to have the most progressive features, obviously not all northern euros have progressive features and not all progressive features are necessarily good. A long midface and high hairline is progressive features but can be a death sentence.
Some have big noses though.At least for noses, europeans have the best nose shape by far but i don't know why this is exactly, for me it could be subjective because of being European so other races can think of their own noses as being the best
Nose is mostly pheno and maxilla projection/rotation.Some have big noses though.
Depends on what you define as ideal.
I personally think men should have somewhat bigger noses.
Looks high T as hell, like gandy.
Big nose women look like trannies tho
Chat gpt?Statements or questions that imply one race is inherently superior in appearance to others are not appropriate or productive. Beauty and attractiveness are subjective concepts influenced by cultural, societal, and personal preferences.
It's essential to promote respect, inclusivity, and appreciation for the diversity of human appearances, recognizing that every individual, regardless of race or ethnicity, possesses unique beauty.
Instead of focusing on notions of superiority or ranking based on race, it's more valuable to celebrate and embrace the beauty and diversity found across all races and cultures.
It’s could be a valid reason why. I understand bones and things of that nature due to being indicators of health/youth and maybe exotic features but fairer skin? Small nose. Hair Types. There’s no real evolutionary reason I can think of that explains why society as a whole prefers these things.
Already debunked garbage. @CFW432 pajeets were worshipping light features way before muh colonialism. Nordcucks were still chimping out in the tundra at the time. Also, jewropeans do not have small noses. All about the bones, broski.It’s could be a valid reason why. I understand bones and things of that nature due to being indicators of health/youth and maybe exotic features but fairer skin? Small nose. Hair Types. There’s no real evolutionary reason I can think of that explains why society as a whole prefers these things.
Olive /Light brown skin not white( pink)Already debunked garbage. @CFW432 pajeets were worshipping light features way before muh colonialism. Nordcucks were still chimping out in the tundra at the time. Also, jewropeans do not have small noses. All about the bones, broski.
He is not wrong.
For an example take a gook that grew up in South Korea vs a gook that grew up in Baltimore.
The former never sees negroes on a day to day basis, and they are imposed the overtly pale beauty standard where an ounce of melanin is seen as unattractive.
We are talking about male lookz, not sheboonsCompare that with a gook that grew up with negroes; their beauty standard is going to be shaped by the negroes around them. They prefer a curvy black woman.
Mostly browns nowadays and most pinkoid actors that are/were popular have good PSL. Pinkoid subhumans are still subhumanPoint is whites dominate media and you see whites predominately. BBC halo and Kpop halo were recent, also due to media as well.
Thing is, subhumans like Cera are rare. Most zoomies amog the shit out of him and have full package i.e. zygos, jaw, eyes and etc.If subhumans like Michael Cera were shown as the face of white men like Aziz Ansari is to curries, the thread title would be "why are Europeans ugly on average?"
Yeah due to their culture. Not because it’s biologically programmed as an attractive feature.Already debunked garbage. @CFW432 pajeets were worshipping light features way before muh colonialism. Nordcucks were still chimping out in the tundra at the time. Also, jewropeans do not have small noses. All about the bones, broski.
Vedic Aryans worshipped light brown skin, tall arms and height, long eyelashes, thick eyebrows, strong torso, strong upper chest, sharp canines, strong nasal bridge. Pinkoid skin was considered ugly. Btw even European explorers (both Iberian and Greek) worshipped intermediate skinYeah due to their culture. Not because it’s biologically programmed as an attractive feature.
Trees for the forest god am i aretard, ephedrine hypoglycaemia is dogshitNiggas seeing the forest for the trees only one good reason in all the comments above me
okList the 3 reasons
Im not yet convinced this has anything to do w sexual attractivenessin europe there is more interraccial reproduction, or at least more distance between genes which makes the children better looking.
Maybe colonialism? I’d love to see an (unethical) experiment where a bunch of babies are kidnapped and put in a neutral environment and see what they find attractive
Thyroid, chin projection, bite oclussionAny guesses? I know the answer ( 3 reasons )
Not sure about the chins or eyes or zygos but yea maxilla colouring(when tanned) and taller are trueeuropeans to my knowledge have stronger chins, deepset eyes, protuding cheekbones and zygos, forward maxillas, coloring, taller
Not sure about the chins or eyes or zygos but yea maxilla colouring(when tanned) and taller are true
Not sure about the chins or eyes or zygos but yea maxilla colouring(when tanned) and taller are true
Australoids have the biggest brow ridges and Native Americans the biggest zygo projection afaik
I mean both of those races barely exist anymore, most people jut talk about asians, blacks and whites, and out of the three whites have the most projected zygosAustraloids have the biggest brow ridges and Native Americans the biggest zygo projection afaik
this is about as unbiased as it gets
but thats too general, take the masai for example they are consistently taller than even WASPs (or atleast used to be) with much better zygo projection and maxillas even though they would be termed black.I mean both of those races barely exist anymore, most people jut talk about asians, blacks and whites, and out of the three whites have the most projected zygos